Skip to main content
Log in

Vedantam vs. Venus: Drag, Impersonation, and the Limitations of Gender Trouble

  • ARTICLE: SPECIAL ISSUE ON REFIGURING BODIES THAT MATTER: SEX, GENDER, AND ALTERNATIVE BODILY IDENTITIES IN HINDU TRADITIONS
  • Published:
International Journal of Hindu Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing on the seminal work of feminist and queer theorist Judith Butler, this article compares the practice of gender impersonation in the South Indian dance form of Kuchipudi with American drag performance. While impersonation in Kuchipudi and American drag performance arise from radically distinct gendered, cultural, and religious contexts, the juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate spheres generates a useful framework for comparison that illuminates new ways of interpreting gender and caste in contemporary South India. Focusing on the Kuchipudi dancer Vedantam Satyanarayana Sarma and the drag ball performer Venus Xtravaganza, this article analyzes the gender and caste norms of Kuchipudi dance in Telugu-speaking South India while outlining the limitations of Butler’s theory of gender performativity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Butler elaborates on this connection to Derrida in the Preface (1999) of the 2008 edition of Gender Trouble (2008: xv).

  2. While Butler does not cite Austin’s work in Gender Trouble, she explores the relationship between speech acts in the work of Austin and Derrida in her book Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative (1997). See also Mahmood 2005: 19, 162.

  3. Scholars who have critiqued Gender Trouble include Nussbaum (1999), Mahmood (2005), Reddy (2005), Prosser (2006), and Drouin (2008).

  4. In this section Butler engages with hooks’s (1992) critique of Paris Is Burning.

  5. The concept of “reading” is a practice of the drag ball itself and is referred to as “the art of insult” by senior drag ball performer Dorian Corey in Livingston’s film (1991).

  6. The dominant-caste males from the Kuchipudi village self-identify as Vaidikī, a sect of Telugu-speaking Smārta brahmins whose occupational practices traditionally focus on Vedic rituals and study.

  7. While it is difficult to ascertain the exact circumstances of early performance practices of Kuchipudi prior to the nineteenth century due to a dearth of sources, it is evident that as a result of female exclusion Kuchipudi brahmin males have been donning a woman’s guise, or strī-vēṣam, in order to portray characters such as Satyabhāmā in Bhāmākalāpam and Uṣā in the yakṣagāna Uṣā-pariṇayam from the late nineteenth century onwards. In comparison with the brahmin males from the village of Kuchipudi, their female brahmin counterparts (wives, daughters, mothers) often occupy domestic roles and rarely participate as performers in the arts, aside from a few notable exceptions. See Kamath (2019a: Chapter 5) for a detailed discussion of Kuchipudi brahmin women.

  8. See the introduction to Kamath and Lothspeich (2022) for a robust discussion of impersonation across South Asia. See also Flueckiger’s (2013) discussion of vēṣam.

  9. See Halberstam 1998: 232.

  10. Due to the separation of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana in 2014, I utilize the broader term “Telugu South India” rather than indicating a specific state location. The Kuchipudi village is currently located in the state of Andhra Pradesh, in an area that is identified as “coastal Andhra.”

  11. Telugu poet-scholar Arudra questions the historicity of Tana Shah’s land grant in the title of his 1994 essay, “Lingering Questions and Some Fashionable Fallacies.” In an earlier essay published in 1989, “Background and Evolution of Kuchipudi Dance,” Arudra casts doubt on the location of the Kuchipudi village by positing three possible locations for the village. His research reveals the contentious history of Kuchipudi and counters contemporary practitioner accounts.

  12. As Arudra indicates, the list of these “hereditary” Kuchipudi families seems to have been codified in this 1763 property document (1994: 31), although it is Tana Shah’s earlier land grant of 1678 that remains of primary importance in the living memory of the inhabitants of the Kuchipudi village.

  13. See Arudra (1994), Jonnalagadda (1996), Putcha (2015), and Kamath (2019a, 2019b) for a discussion of the controversies regarding the historicity of Siddhendra.

  14. The invocation of the Nāṭyaśāstra is part of a postcolonial grounding of Kuchipudi within the boundaries of “classical Indian dance.” For a discussion of the classicization of Kuchipudi dance, see Putcha 2013 and Kamath 2023. See Soneji (2012), Putcha (2015, 2022), and Thakore (2022) for a discussion of the intersections of Kuchipudi and Kalavantulu (courtesan) dance. Allen (1997) and Soneji (2010) provide a broader context for the revival of Indian dance—in particular, the style of Bharatanatyam in South India.

  15. This hagiography draws on Rao (1992) and Acharya and Sarabhai (1992), as well as the dissertation by Indian dance critic Kothari (1977). The full version of the hagiography is found in Kamath 2019a: 38–39.

  16. This section draws on a detailed discussion of Vedantam Satyanarayana Sarma in Kamath 2019a, chapters 1–2.

  17. Jayant Kastuar’s remarks are found in Nritya Nidhi Utsav, “Treasures of Indian Dance” (2005).

  18. Modali Nagabhushana Sarma, interview by author, Hyderabad, October 29, 2009.

  19. Satyanarayana Sarma also repeated these stories in the documentary film I Am Satyabhama (2012).

  20. Lecture demonstration by Vedantam Satyanarayana Sarma, Kuchipudi Nrityotsava (1995).

  21. See Pose, Season 2, Episode 4, which first aired on July 9, 2019.

References

  • Acharya, C. R. and Mallika Sarabhai. 1992. Understanding Kuchipudi. New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts in association with Darpana Academy of Performing Arts, Ahmedabad.

  • Allen, Matthew Harp. 1997. “Rewriting the Script for South Indian Dance.” TDR 41, 3: 63–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arudra. 1989. “Background and Evolution of Kuchipudi Dance.” Sruti 54: 17–19.

  • Arudra. 1994. “Lingering Questions and Some Fashionable Fallacies.” Sruti 115: 29–31.

  • Austin, J. L. 1975 [1962]. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2008 [1990]. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

  • Butler, Judith. 1993a. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge.

  • Butler, Judith. 1993b. “Imitation and Gender Insubordination.” In Henry Abelove, Michèle Aina Barale, and David M. Halperin, eds., The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader, 307–20. New York: Routledge.

  • Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43, 6: 1241–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drouin, Jennifer. 2008. “Cross-Dressing, Drag, and Passing: Slippages in Shakespearean Comedy.” In James C. Bulman, ed., Shakespeare Redressed: Cross-Gender Casting in Contemporary Performance, 23–56. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flueckiger, Joyce Burkhalter. 2013. When the World Becomes Female: The Guises of a South Indian Goddess. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, Jack. 1998. Female Masculinity. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, John Stratton. 2000. “Krishna and the Gender of Longing.” In Joseph Runzo and Nancy M. Martin, eds., Love, Sex, and Gender in the World Religions, 239–56. Oxford: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, bell. 1992. “Is Paris Burning?” In bell hooks, Black Looks: Race and Representation, 145–56. Boston: South End Press.

  • I Am Satyabhama. 2012. Directed by Dulam Satyanarayana. Hyderabad: DSN Films.

  • Jackson, William J. 1991. Tyāgarāja: Life and Lyrics. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. Patrick. 2016. “Introduction.” In E. Patrick Johnson, ed., No Tea, No Shade: New Writings in Black Queer Studies, 1–26. Durham: Duke University Press.

  • Jonnalagadda, Anuradha. 1993. Kuchipudi Dance: Who Is Who. Bombay: Kuchipudi Mahotsav.

  • Jonnalagadda, Anuradha. 1996. “Tradition and Innovations in Kuchipudi Dance.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hyderabad, Telangana.

  • Kamath, Harshita Mruthinti. 2019a. Impersonations: The Artifice of Brahmin Masculinity in South Indian Dance. Oakland: University of California Press.

  • Kamath, Harshita Mruthinti. 2019b. “Two Bhaktas, One District: Revisioning Hagiography and Imagery in Telugu South India.” Journal of Hindu Studies 12, 2: 168–91.

  • Kamath, Harshita Mruthinti. 2023. “Wonder as Affect on the Kuchipudi Stage.” In Tulasi Srinivas, ed., Wonder in South Asia: Histories, Aesthetics, Ethics, 123–44. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kamath, Harshita Mruthinti and Pamela Lothspeich, eds. 2022. Mimetic Desires: Impersonation and Guising across South Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, Sunil. 1977. “The Dance-Drama Tradition of Kuchipudi, Bhagavata Mela Nataka and Kuravanji with Special Reference to Rasa Theory as Expounded in Bharata’s Natyasastra.” Ph.D. dissertation, M. S. University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat.

  • Kuchipudi Nrityotsava. 1995. New Delhi: Sangeet Natak Akademi Archives, V3138. VHS.

  • Marcus, Sharon. 2005. “Queer Theory for Everyone: A Review Essay.” Signs 31, 1: 191–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlotten, Shaka. 2016. “Black Data.” In E. Patrick Johnson, ed., No Tea, No Shade: New Writings in Black Queer Studies, 262–86. Durham: Duke University Press.

  • Nagabhushana Sarma, Modali. 2005. “The Man who Beguiles Women: Vedantam Satyanarayana Sarma and the Art of Female Impersonation.” Nartanam: A Quarterly Journal of Indian Dance 5, 4: 5–20.

  • Newton, Esther. 1979 [1972]. Mother Camp: Female Impersonators in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Nritya Nidhi Utsav. 2005. “Treasures of Indian Dance.” New Delhi: Sangeet Natak Akademi Archives, V7448. VHS.

  • Nussbaum, Martha C. 1999. “The Professor of Parody: The Hip Defeatism of Judith Butler.” The New Republic 22, 8: 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris Is Burning. 1991. Directed by Jennie Livingston. Burbank: Miramax Films. DVD.

  • Pose. 2019. “Never Knew Love Like This Before.” Directed by Ryan Murphy. Written by Ryan Murphy and Janet Mock. FX. Aired on July 9, 2019.

  • Prosser, Jay. 2006. “Judith Butler: Queer Feminism, Transgender, and the Transubstantiation of Sex.” In Susan Stryker and Stephen Whittle, eds., The Transgender Studies Reader, 257–80. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putcha, Rumya S. 2013. “Between History and Historiography: The Origins of Classical Kuchipudi Dance.” Dance Research Journal 45, 3: 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putcha, Rumya S. 2015. “Dancing in Place: Mythopoetics and the Production of History in Kuchipudi Dance.” Yearbook for Traditional Music 47: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putcha, Rumya Sree. 2022. The Dancer’s Voice: Performance and Womanhood in Transnational India. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rama Rao, Uma. 1992. Kuchipudi Bharatam or Kuchipudi Dance: A South Indian Classical Dance Tradition. New Delhi: South Asia Books.

  • Reddy, Gayatri. 2005. With Respect to Sex: Negotiating Hijra Identity in South India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Satyanarayana Sarma, Vedantam. 1996. “Bhrukunsuvus of Kuchipudi.” Kuchipudi Mahotsav ’96 Souvenir, 86–87. Mumbai: Kuchipudi Kalakendra.

  • Soneji, Davesh, ed. 2010. Bharatanatyam: A Reader. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soneji, Davesh. 2012. Unfinished Gestures: Devadāsīs, Memory, and Modernity in South India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakore, Yashoda. 2022. “Dancing Caste, Rethinking Heredity: A Kuchipudi Artist Reflects on Her Multiple Lineages.” Scroll.in, April 10. Available at: https://scroll.in/article/1021494/dancing-caste-rethinking-heredity-a-kuchipudi-artist-reflects-on-her-multiple-lineages (accessed September 1, 2022).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harshita Mruthinti Kamath.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamath, H.M. Vedantam vs. Venus: Drag, Impersonation, and the Limitations of Gender Trouble. Hindu Studies (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11407-024-09363-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11407-024-09363-8

Keywords

Navigation