Abstract
In this article, I reconstruct the view of the Yuktidīpikā, the most detailed and profound commentary of classical Sāṃkhya, on the origin of the Vedas. A close reading of the text reveals that its unknown author wavered between at least two different views on this issue. The first view is that the authorless but noneternal Vedas evolve from prakṛti (primordial matter) at the beginning of a new cycle of existence of the world (kalpa) and merge into prakṛti during a cosmic dissolution (pralaya). The Yuktidīpikā is the first text in classical Sāṃkhya to state directly that the Vedas have no author. The second and opposite view is that Kapila is the author of the highest teaching of the Vedas. This view is expressed only indirectly. Besides reconstructing the above-mentioned views, I attempt to answer the question of whether by quoting Nirukta 1.20 the Yuktidīpikā communicates something about the origin of the Vedas. Illustrating Sāṃkhya thought by quoting this passage of the Nirukta, as well as proclaiming the idea that the Vedas are authorless, which became the “official” standpoint of the Sāṃkhya darśana, can be interpreted as elements of the Yuktidīpikā’s pioneering project to show that Sāṃkhya is not in conflict with the Vedas.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Sāṃkhya Sanskrit Texts
Gauḍapādabhāṣya. See Sāṃkhyakārikābhāṣya.
Jayamaṅgalā. 1970 [1922]. Sāṃkhyakārikā of Śrīmad Īśvarakṛṣṇa with the Māṭharavṛtti of Māṭharācārya and the Jayamaṅgalā of Śrī Śaṅkara (eds. Viṣṇuprasāda Śarman [Māṭharavṛtti] and Satkāriśarman Vaṅgīya [Jayamaṅgalā]). Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.
Māṭharavṛtti. See Jayamaṅgalā.
Paramārtha (the commentary that survived in the Chinese translation of Paramārtha). 1904. “La Sāṃkhyakārikā étudiée à la lumière de sa version chinoise (II) par M. J. Takakusu. Traité sur les « Septante d’or » (Suvarṇasaptati) ou Traité sur la philosophie Sāṃkhya (Sāṃkhyaçāstra) traduit par Paramārtha.” Bulletin de l’Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient 4: 978–1064.
Paramārtha (the commentary that survived in the Chinese translation of Paramārtha). 1944. Suvarṇasaptati Śāstra: Sāṅkhya-Kārikā-Saptati of Īśvara-Kṛṣṇa with a Commentary. Reconstructed into Sanskrit from the Chinese Translation of Paramārtha and Edited with English Notes, Introduction and Appendices by N. Aiyaswami Sastri. Tirupati: Tirumalai-Tirupati Devasthanams Press.
Sāṃkhyakārikā. 1998. Īśvarakṛṣṇa: Sāṃkhyakārikā (ed. Ferenc Ruzsa). Available at: http://gretil.sub.uni-goettingen.de/gretil/1_sanskr/6_sastra/3_phil/samkhya/isvskaru.htm (accessed December 5, 2011).
Sāṃkhyakārikābhāṣya. 1883. The Sāṅkhya Kārikā with an Exposition Called Candrikā by Nārāyaṇa Tīrtha, and Gauḍapādācārya’s Commentary (ed. Becanarama Tripathi). Benares: Messrs. Braj B. Das and Co.
Sāṃkhyasaptativṛtti. 1973. Sāṃkhya-Saptati-Vṛtti (V1) (ed. Esther A. Solomon). Ahmedabad: Gujarat University.
Sāṃkhyasūtras and Sāṃkhyasūtravṛtti. 1888. Aniruddha’s Commentary and the Original Parts of the Vedāntin Mahādeva’s Commentary to the Sāṃkhya Sūtras (ed. Richard Garbe). Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal.
Sāṃkhyatattvakaumudī. 1871. Sankhyatatwa Koumudi by Bachaspati Misra (ed. Taranatha Tarkavachaspati). Calcutta: Sucharu Press.
Sāṃkhyavṛtti. 1973. Sāṃkhya-Vṛtti (V2) (ed. Esther A. Solomon). Ahmedabad: Gujarat University.
Yuktidīpikā. 1998. Yuktidīpikā: The Most Significant Commentary on the Sāṃkhyakārikā (eds. Albrecht Wezler and Shujun Motegi). Volume 1. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Other Sanskrit Texts
Mahābhāṣya. 1962 [1880]. The Vyākaraṇa-Mahābhāṣya of Patañjali (ed. Franz Kielhorn; third edition revised by Kashinath Vasudev Abhyankar). Volume 1. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
Nirukta. 1998 [1920–27]. The Nighaṇṭu and the Nirukta: The Oldest Indian Treatise on Etymology, Philology, and Semantics (ed. and trans. Lakshman Sarup). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Nyāyasūtras, Nyāyabhāṣya, Nyāyavārttika, and Nyāyavārttikatātparyaṭīkā. 1936–1944. Nyāyadarśanam: With Vātsyāyana’s Bhāṣya, Uddyotakara’s Vārttika, Vācaspati Miśra’s Tātparyaṭīkā and Viśvanātha’s Vṛtti (eds. Taranatha Nyaya-Tarkatirtha [chapter I, section I] and Amarendramohan Tarkatirtha and Hemantakumar Tarkatirtha [chapters I-ii–V]). 2 volumes. Calcutta: Metropolitan.
Ślokavārttika. 1978. Ślokavārttika of Śrī Kumārila Bhaṭṭa with the Commentary Nyāyaratnākara of Śrī Pārthasārathi Miśra (ed. Dwarikadas Shastri). Varanasi: Tara Publications.
Tarkasaṃgraha and Tarkadīpikā. 1930 [1897]. Tarka-Saṃgraha of Annambhaṭṭa with the Author’s Own Dīpikā, and Govardhana’s Nyāya-Bodhinī (ed. Yashwant Vasudev Athalye; trans. [of the Tarka-Saṃgraha] Mahadev Rajaram Bodas). Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
Upaskāra. See Vaiśeṣikasūtras2.
Vaiśeṣikasūtras1 (the recension of the Vaiśeṣikasūtras found in the commentary Vaiśeṣikasūtravṛtti by Candrānanda). 1961. Vaiśeṣikasūtra of Kaṇāda, with the Commentary of Candrānanda (ed. Muni Jambuvijaya). Baroda: Oriental Institute.
Vaiśeṣikasūtras2 (the recension of the Vaiśeṣikasūtras found in the commentary Upaskāra by Śaṅkara Miśra). 1861. The Vaiśeṣika Darśana, with the Commentaries of Śaṅkara Miśra and Jayanārāyaṇa Tarka Pañcānana (ed. Jayanarayana Tarka Panchanana). Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal.
Vaiśeṣikasūtravṛtti. SeeVaiśeṣikasūtras1.
Vākyapadīya (and the Vṛtti on it). 1966. Vākyapadīya of Bhartṛhari with the Commentaries Vṛtti and Paddhati of Vṛṣabhadeva: Kāṇḍa I (ed. K. A. Subramania Iyer). Poona: Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute.
Secondary Literature
Acharya, Diwakar. 2006. Vācaspatimiśra’s Tattvasamīkṣā: The Earliest Commentary on Maṇḍanamiśra’s Brahmasiddhi. Critically Edited with an Introduction and Critical Notes. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Aklujkar, Ashok. 2009. “Veda Revelation According to Bhartṛ-hari.” In Mithilesh Chaturvedi, ed., Bhartṛhari: Language, Thought and Reality (Proceedings of the International Seminar, Delhi, December 12–14, 2003), 1–97. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Bronkhorst, Johannes. 2011 [1999]. Language and Reality: On an Episode in Indian Thought (trans. Michael S. Allen and Rajam Raghunathan). Leiden: Brill.
Coward, Harold G. and K. Kunjunni Raja, eds. 2001 [1990]. Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies. Volume 5: The Philosophy of the Grammarians. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Deshpande, Madhav M. 2009. “Revisiting the Notion of Śiṣṭa in Bhartṛhari.” In Mithilesh Chaturvedi, ed., Bhartṛhari: Language, Thought and Reality (Proceedings of the International Seminar, Delhi, December 12–14, 2003), 163–75. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Halbfass, Wilhelm. 1991. Tradition and Reflection: Explorations in Indian Thought. Albany: SUNY Press.
Ham, Hyoung Seok. 2016. “Buddhist Critiques of the Veda and Vedic Sacrifice: A Study of Bhāviveka’s Mīmāṃsā Chapter of the Madhyamakahṛdayakārikā and Tarkajvālā.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Harzer, Edeltraud. 2006. The Yuktidīpikā: A Reconstruction of Sāṅkhya Methods of Knowing. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
Kimball, James. 2011. “The Soteriological Role of the Ṛṣi Kapila in the Yuktidīpikā: The Production and Transmission of Liberating Knowledge in Classical Sāmkhya.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
Kimball, James. 2016. “The Relationship Between the Bhāvas and the Pratyayasarga in Classical Sāṃkhya.” Journal of Indian Philosophy 44, 3: 537–55.
Kondō, Hayato. 2012–13. “Reinterpretation of Tradition and Transmission: Āptavacana in the Yuktidīpikā.” Journal of Indological Studies 24–25: 137–68.
Larson, Gerald James. 1987. “The History and Literature of Sāṃkhya.” In Gerald James Larson and Ram Shankar Bhattacharya, eds., Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies. Volume 4: Sāṃkhya: A Dualist Tradition in Indian Philosophy, 3–41. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Łucyszyna, Ołena. 2010. “Poznanie prawdziwe a poznanie wyzwalające w sāṁkhyi (na podstawie analizy klasycznych komentarzy do Sāṁkhya-kāriki 23).” Ruch Filozoficzny 67, 2: 319–34.
Łucyszyna, Ołena [Lutsyshyna, Olena]. 2012. “Classical Sāṁkhya on the Authorship of the Vedas.” Journal of Indian Philosophy 40, 4: 453–67.
Łucyszyna, Ołena. 2016. “Classical Sāṁkhya on the Relationship Between a Word and Its Meaning.” Journal of Indian Philosophy 44, 2: 303–23.
Mejor, Marek. 2004. “Some Observations on the Date of the Yukti-dīpikā (Apropos of the New Edition).” In Piotr Balcerowicz and Marek Mejor, eds., Essays in Indian Philosophy, Religion and Literature, 399–433. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Motegi, Shujun. 2006. “Śabda in the Yuktidīpikā.” Acta Asiatica 90: 39–54.
Nakada, Naomichi. 1970–71. “Word and Inference in the Yuktidīpikā: Part II.” Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 19, 2: 1000–994.
Pind, Ole Holten. 1991. “Dignāga on Śabdasāmānya and Śabdaviśeṣa.” In Ernst Steinkellner, ed., Studies in the Buddhist Epistemological Tradition: Proceedings of the Second International Dharmakīrti Conference, Vienna, June 11–16, 1989, 269–80. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Potter, Karl H. and Sibajiban Bhattacharya. 1977. “Nyāyakusumāñjali.” In Karl H. Potter, ed., The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies. Volume 2: Indian Metaphysics and Epistemology: The Tradition of Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika up to Gaṅgeśa, 557–88. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Ruegg, D. Seyfort. 1994. “Pramāṇabhūta, *Pramāṇa(bhūta)-puruṣa, Pratyakṣadharman and Sākṣātkṛtadharman as Epithets of the Ṛṣi, Ācārya and Tathāgata in Grammatical, Epistemological and Madhyamaka Texts.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 57, 2: 303–20.
Varadachari, V. 1977a. “Vyomavatī or Ṭīkā on Praśastapāda’s Padārthadharmasaṃgraha.” In Karl H. Potter, ed., The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies. Volume 2: Indian Metaphysics and Epistemology: The Tradition of Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika up to Gaṅgeśa, 425–53. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Varadachari, V. 1977b. “Ātmatattvaviveka.” In Karl H. Potter, ed., The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies. Volume 2: Indian Metaphysics and Epistemology: The Tradition of Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika up to Gaṅgeśa, 526–57. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Wezler, Albrecht. 2001. “Some Remarks on Nirukta 1.20 sākṣātkṛtadharmāṇa ṛṣayo, etc.” In Axel Michaels, ed., The Pandit: Traditional Scholarship in India, 215–48. Delhi: Manohar Publishers.
Acknowledgements
I am deeply grateful to Sushil Mittal, the editor of this Journal, for his immense support and encouragement during the whole process of preparing this article for publication. His guidance and brilliant and painstaking editing helped to avoid essential inaccuracies and enhance the quality of this paper. His contribution to its betterment is difficult to overestimate. I thank Hyoung Seok Ham, Edeltraud Harzer, and Noémie Verdon for their helpful comments and encouragement to continue working on the Yuktidīpikā. I am much obliged to the reviewers for their thorough analysis of my paper and insightful, precise, and valuable suggestions on how to improve the text. My sincere thanks to Catherine Davis for carefully editing the manuscript and significantly improving its style. This study was generously supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, project # 2017/01/X/HS1/01469.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access
About this article
Cite this article
Łucyszyna, O. The Yuktidīpikā on the Origin of the Vedas. Hindu Studies 24, 239–256 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11407-020-09278-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11407-020-09278-0