Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multiculturalism and Controversial Minority and Majority Practices

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Raphael Cohen-Almagor’s Just, Reasonable Multiculturalism offers a different way of approaching multiculturalism from the systematic theoretical treatments that anchor the literature. While strongly committed to liberal democratic values, it presents not so much a theory or moral argument justifying minority or majority cultural rights as a set of values and principles for adjudicating controversial cases and oft-heard arguments against multicultural accommodation. After noting distinctive features of the approach, I discuss three areas of tension in the analysis. First, between its appeals to Rawlsian justice and state neutrality and its support of state multiculturalism. Second, between its stated theoretical principles and its adjudication of some cases. Third, regarding how we think about a state’s entanglement with culture and, specifically, whether that should be in terms of an incomplete liberal neutrality, liberal perfectionism, or liberal nationalism. I suggest that as helpful as Cohen-Almagor’s liberal-democratic guidelines are, there remain some contextual factors which are no less important in justly responding to the pointy end of multiculturalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Kymlicka (2001, 2019) argues that Parekh’s position is not that far removed from his own, at least on where it ends up on issues.

  2. Parekh interviewed Cohen-Almagor about Just, Reasonable Multiculturalism in September 2021: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sA5mtaM9xyU [accessed 5 November 2021].

  3. Smooha (2002b, p. 426) classifies republican liberal democracy, à la the French model, as a case of majoritarian preference rather than state neutrality.

  4. In this, I do not entirely agree with Chaim Gans’s (2011) objection to Cohen-Almagor’s (2011) analysis of Israel as a case of liberal perfectionism. I think Cohen-Almagor (2011, 2021) is right to say that Israel has embraced some perfectionist policies which exceed liberal democratic bounds (such as the Law of Return, privileging Jewish immigrants). However, I share Gans’s view that liberal nationalism (he calls it nationalist liberalism) is the appropriate benchmark for assessing Israel. In my view, Cohen-Almagor wrongly supposes that the only alternative to a perfectionist liberal regime is liberal neutrality.

References

  • Balint, P. (2017). Respecting toleration. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • BBC News (2012). Angela Merkel backs circumcision right after German ruling. 13 July: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18833145 [Accessed 8 February 2022]

  • Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture: equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton University Press

  • Bouchard, G. (2011). What is interculturalism? McGill Law Journal, 56(2), 435–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, G., & Taylor, C. (2008). Building the future: A time for reconciliation. Report Commission de consultation sur les practiques d’accommodement reliees aux differences culturelles. Gouvernement du Québec

  • Carens, J. H. (2000). Culture, citizenship, and community: A contextual exploration of justice as evenhandedness. Oxford University Press

  • Cohen-Almagor, R. (1994). Between neutrality and perfectionism. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 7(2), 217–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Almagor, R. (2011). Review essay: Zionism –. A Just Revolution. Ethical Perspectives, 18(4), 646–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Almagor, R. (2021). Just, reasonable multiculturalism: Liberalism, culture and coercion. Cambridge University Press

  • Crowder, G. (2013). Theories of multiculturalism: An introduction. Polity Press

  • Day, M. (2012). Germany introduces new circumcision law. The Telegraph [London], 5 October: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/9589905/Germany-introduces-new-circumcision-law.html [Accessed 8 February 2022]

  • Galston, W. (2005). The practice of liberal pluralism. Cambridge University Press

  • Gans, C. (2011). Is egalitarian Zionism possible? Ethical Perspectives, 18(4), 667–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A. (2003). Identity in democracy. Princeton University Press

  • Kukathas, C. (2003). The liberal archipelago: A theory of diversity and freedom. Oxford University Press

  • Kymlicka, W. (1989). Liberalism, community, and culture. Oxford University Press

  • Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford University Press

  • Kymlicka, W. (2001). Liberalism, dialogue and multiculturalism. Ethnicities, 1(1), 128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2019). Deschooling multiculturalism. Ethnicities, 19(6), 971–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landesgericht, K. (2012). Urteile des Amtsgerichts und des Landgerichts Köln zur Strafbarkeit von Beschneidungen nicht einwilligungsfähiger Jungen aus rein religiösen Gründe [Judgments of the Local District Court and of the Cologne Regional Court on the Criminalization of Circumcision of Non-Consensual Boys for Purely Religious Reasons], Press Release, 26 June, Justiz-Online, Decision of May 7, 2012 [in German], Docket No. Az. 151 Ns 169/11

  • Levey, G. B. (2012). Multiculturalism and Australian national identity. In G. B. Levey (Ed.), Political theory and Australian multiculturalism (pp. 254–276). Berghahn Books

  • Levey, G. B. (2013). Thinking about infant male circumcision after the Cologne court decision. Global Discourse, 3(2), 326–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. T. (2000). The multiculturalism of fear. Oxford University Press

  • Modood, T. (2007). Multiculturalism: A civic idea. Polity Press

  • Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. Macmillan

  • Parekh, B. (2019). Ethnocentric political theory: The pursuit of flawed universals. Palgrave Macmillan

  • Patten, A. (2014). Equal recognition: The moral foundations of minority rights. Princeton University Press

  • Phillips, A. (2007). Multiculturalism without culture. Princeton University Press

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press

  • Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. Columbia University Press

  • Rosenblum, N. L. (1998). Members and morals: The personal uses of pluralism in America. Princeton University Press

  • Smooha, S. (2002a). The model of ethnic democracy: Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. Nations and Nationalism, 8(4), 475–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smooha, S. (2002b). Types of democracy and modes of conflict management in ethnically divided societies. Nations and Nationalism, 8(4), 423–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1992). The politics of recognition. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism and ‘The politics of recognition’: An essay (pp. 25–73). Princeton University Press

  • Walzer, M. (1989). What kind of state is a Jewish state?. Shalom Hartman Institute

  • Walzer, M. (1992). Comment. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism and ‘The politics of recognition’: An essay (pp. 99–103). Princeton University Press

  • Weil, P. (2018). Laïcité is a most liberal legal frame: Reflections on the work of the Stasi Commission. In K. Alidadi, & M. C. Foblets (Eds.), Public commissions on cultural and religious diversity: National narratives, multiple identities and minorities (pp. 113–120). Routledge

  • Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972). 406 U.S. 205

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey Brahm Levey.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levey, G.B. Multiculturalism and Controversial Minority and Majority Practices. Philosophia 50, 2333–2346 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-022-00518-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-022-00518-8

Navigation