Abstract
The terms of a mathematical problem become precise and concise if they are expressed in an appropriate notation, therefore notations are useful to mathematics. But are notations only useful, or also essential? According to prevailing view, they are not essential. Contrary to this view, this paper argues that notations are essential to mathematics, because they may play a crucial role in mathematical discovery. Specifically, since notations may consist of symbolic notations, diagrammatic notations, or a mix of symbolic and diagrammatic notations, notations may play a crucial role in mathematical discovery in different ways. Some examples are given to illustrate these ways.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aczel, A. D. (2015). Finding zero. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Barrow, J. D. (2001). The book of nothing. New York: Vintage Books.
Biletch, B. D., Yu, H., & Kay, K. R. (2015). An analysis of mathematical notation: For better or for worse. Worchester: Worchester Polytechnic Institute.
Brown, J. R. (2008). Philosophy of mathematics: A contemporary introduction to the world of proofs and pictures. Abingdon: Routledge.
Cajori, F. (1913). History of the exponential and logarithmic concepts I. The American Mathematical Monthly, 20, 5–14.
Cajori, F. (1923). The history of notations of the calculus. Annals of Mathematics, 25(1), 1–46.
Cajori, F. (1993). A history of mathematical notation. Mineola: Dover.
Cellucci, C. (2009). The universal generalization problem. Logique & Analyse, 205, 3–20.
Cellucci, C. (2013). Philosophy of mathematics: Making a fresh start. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44(1), 32–42.
Cellucci, C. (2017). Is Mathematics Problem Solving or Theorem Proving?. Foundations of Science, 22(1), 183–199.
Cellucci, C. (2018). Definition in mathematics. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 8(3), 605–629.
Cellucci, C. (2019). Diagrams in Mathematics. Foundations of Science, 24(3), 583–604.
Châtelet, G. (2000). Figuring space: Philosophy, mathematics and physics. Cham: Springer.
Châtelet, G. (2006). Interlacing the singularity, the diagram and the metaphor. In S. B. Duffy (Ed.), Virtual mathematics: The logic of difference (pp. 31–45). Manchester: Clinamen.
Chrisomalis, S. (2010). Numerical notation: A comparative history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Colyvan, M. (2012). An introduction to the philosophy of mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Conway, J. H., & Shipman, J. (2013). Extreme proofs I: The irrationality of \( \sqrt{2} \). The Mathematical Intelligencer, 35(3), 2–7.
De Cruz, H., & de Smedt, J. (2013). Mathematical symbols as epistemic actions. Synthese, 190, 3–19.
de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Descartes, R. (1996). Œuvres. Paris: Vrin.
Devlin, K. (2013). The music of math games. American Scientist, 101, 87–91.
Diophantus. (1893–1895). Opera omnia. Leipzig: Teubner.
Dutilh Novaes, C. (2012). Formal languages in logic: A philosophical and cognitive analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dutilh Novaes, C. (2013). Mathematical reasoning and external symbolic systems. Logique et Analyse, 221, 45–65.
Enderton, H. B. (1977). Elements of set theory. New York: Academic Press.
Glaser, A. (1971). History of binary and other nondecimal numeration. Los Angeles: Tomash Publishers.
Grabiner, J. (1974). Is mathematical truth time-dependent? The American Mathematical Monthly, 81, 354–365.
Herbrand, J. (1971). Logical writings. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ifrah, G. (2000). The universal history of numbers: From prehistory to the invention of the computer. New York: Wiley.
Kaplan, R. (2000). The nothing that is: A natural history of zero. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kleiner, I. (2007). A history of abstract algebra. Cham: Birkhäuser.
Leibniz, G. W. (1923–) Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Berlin: Academie Verlag.
Leibniz, G. W. (1971). Mathematische Schriften. Hildesheim: Olms.
Lengnink, K., & Schlimm, D. (2010). Learning and understanding numeral system: Semantic aspects of number representations from an educational perspective. In B. Löwe & T. Müller (Eds.), PhiMSAMP. Philosophy of mathematics: Sociological aspects and mathematical practice (pp. 235–264). London: College Publications.
Macbeth, D. (2013). Writing reason. Logique et Analyse, 221, 25–44.
Mazur, J. (2014). Enlightening symbols: A short history of mathematical notation and its hidden powers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Menninger, K. (1992). Number words and number symbols: A cultural history of numbers. Mineola: Dover.
Meskens, A. (2010). Travelling mathematics – The fate of Diophantos’ arithmetic. Cham: Springer.
Montelle, C. (2011). A ‘symbolic’ history of the derivative. In D. Jardine & A. Shell-Gellasch (Eds.), Mathematical time capsules (pp. 151–158). Washington: The Mathematical Association of America.
Netz, R. (1999). The shaping of deduction in Greek mathematics: A study in cognitive history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Newton, I. (1967–1981). The mathematical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pender, W., Saddler, D., Shea, J., & Ward, D. (2012). Cambridge 3 unit mathematics year 11 enhanced version. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pisano, L. (2002). Liber abaci. Cham: Springer.
Pólya, G. (2004). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sartorius von Waltershausen, W. (1856). Gauss zum Gedächtniss. Leipzig: Hirzel.
Schlimm, D. (2018a). On Frege’s Begriffsschrift notation for propositional logic: Design principles and trade-offs. History and Philosophy of Logic, 39(1), 53–79.
Schlimm, D. (2018b). Numbers through numerals: The constitutive role of eternal representations. In S. Bangu (Ed.), Naturalizing logico-mathematical knowledge: Approaches from philosophy, psychology and cognitive science (pp. 195–217). New York: Routledge.
Seife, C. (2000). Zero: The biography of a dangerous idea. New York: Viking.
Sen, S. K., & Agarwal, R. P. (2016). A landmark discovery, the dreadful void, and the ultimate mind. London: Academic Press.
Serfati, M. (2005). La révolution symbolique: La constitution de l’écriture symbolique mathématique. Paris: Petra.
van der Waerden, B. L. (1976). Defence of a ‘shocking’ point of view. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 15, 199–210.
Velleman, D. J. (2017). Calculus: A rigorous first course. Mineola: Dover.
Viète, F. (1646). Opera mathematica. Leiden: Ex Officina Bonaventurae & Abrahami Elzeviriorum.
Whitehead, A. N. (2017). An introduction to mathematics. Mineola: Dover.
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Otávio Bueno, Catarina Dutilh Novaes, Danielle Macbeth, Dirk Schlimm, Nathalie Sinclair, Fabio Sterpetti, and Robert Thomas, for critical comments and helpful suggestions concerning earlier drafts of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cellucci, C. The Role of Notations in Mathematics. Philosophia 48, 1397–1412 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00162-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00162-9