Abstract
In “Models of God,” Ted Peters discusses a methodology for formulating and evaluating models of God, surveys nine models, and proposes one that he entitles “Eschatological Panentheism.” This paper provides critical comments on Peters’ methodological claims, taxonomy of models of God, and specific proposal. This paper has been delivered during APA Pacific 2007 Mini-Conference on Models of God.Both Peters’ “Models of God” and these comments were presented at the “Models of God” mini-conference at the Pacific Division Meetings of the American Philosophical Association in April of 2007.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, J.E. Response to Ted Peters’ “Models of God”. Philosophia 35, 289–292 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-007-9064-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-007-9064-x