Skip to main content
Log in

Direct and indirect transmission of avian influenza: results from a calibrated agent-based model

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops an agent-based model of the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza in a regional poultry sector. Spatially located flocks and flock owners interact with each other within a realistic regional geography. A specific regional poultry industry in Thailand shapes the model details: production practices that affect bio-containment, key transportation routes and methods, commercial and social networks, and an unusually detailed tabulation of flock types, flock owners, and human behaviors. Model simulations follow disease spread from an initial infection through both direct and indirect transmission pathways. This demonstrates how to realistically calibrate a model of disease spread to a regional poultry industry, while attending to the relative importance of different pathways. Despite its region-specific calibration, the model design facilitates easy adaptation to similar settings. This supports public policy by providing a modeling framework that may be used to simulate interventions to reduce or prevent the regional transmission of avian influenza.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Known H5 strains do not transmit efficiently between humans. The 2017 outbreaks in the Philippines among ducks and chickens are not currently known to have caused any human infections. Still, in 2022 the World Health Organization reported 862 human cases of H5N1 since 2003, with 455 deaths.

  2. Reported cases of H7N1 in Thai quail farms do not appear to highly pathogenic (Wongphatcharachai et al. 2014).

  3. Livestock officers at the district level estimated that there may be up to 29% more flocks in the district than are registered. In addition, our model includes nine flocks of free-grazing ducks (FGDs), because Beaudoin (2012) was able to find and interview nine flock owners. See the online appendix for additional details.

  4. The baseline simulation has no egg cooperative, since DKY did not have one. However, since they are common in similar settings, the model allows for the existence of an egg cooperative for free-grazing duck eggs.

  5. It is uncommon for backyard chicken owners to sell chicken eggs, so these agents are not included in the egg-trading component of the model.

  6. The rai is a measure of area, included in the International System of Units and commonly used in Thailand. It is about a third of an acre.

  7. For example, for each grazing site, a single patch serves an access point. This paper loosely refers to a grazing site for a free-grazing duck flock as a field; however, this is a slight misnomer. Individually owned fields in Central Thailand average only 3 hectares, or approximately 20 rai, but a single grazing site may comprise many such fields.

  8. Using GIS land-cover data (obtained from the Royal Thai Survey Department (RTSD) in Bangkok, Thailand), we determined the proportion to be 73%. Similar proportions apply across the Muang District, which is characterized by intensive rice production.

  9. This close match depends on idiosyncratic modeling choices, such as the number of patches to associate with a model feature. It is by no means necessary for model adequacy; we would have been happy with anything from 65% to 85%.

  10. The maximum field size of 610 rai can roughly feed one 2,000-duck flock for two months. Interviews by Beaudoin (2012) found that interviewees report staying in one place for 4–60 days. While a few interviewees reported staying longer periods, their flocks tended to graze just around their homes, allowing the ducks to wander year-round.

  11. The road types were defined in our land-cover data as hard surface two lane with median (road type A), hard surface two lane (road type B), loose surface one lane (road type C), and nonspecific road (road type D).

  12. Since DKY did not have an egg cooperative, none is not included in the baseline simulation. However, the model optionally includes one.

  13. No non-field patches are placed along highways (type A roads). Although a highway can nevertheless become contaminated, this cannot lead to contamination of other patches.

  14. In the tables, some numbers are rounded for presentational convenience. Exact values are in the online appendix.

  15. In the simulation literature, discrete and PERT distributions are often used to incorporate estimates provided through expert opinion (Van Hauwermeiren et al. 2012). The PERT distribution is a version of the Beta distribution: It can take any value within the range defined by the minimum and maximum values, weighted by the location of the most likely value.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan G. Isaac.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Authors are in alphabetical order; authorship is equal. This paper draws on work and data described in Beaudoin’s dissertation. We thank David Castellan, David Halvorson, and David Swayne—three experts in the field of avian influenza, who provided expert opinions used to calibrate the baseline PERT distributions. We also thank Orapin Laosee of the ASEAN Institute for Health Development, Mahidol University, Thailand, whose in-depth interviews produced data used to calibrate our baseline model. This work could not have been conducted without the considerable assistance provided by the Thai Department of Livestock Development, including livestock officers and colleagues.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (pdf 257 KB)

Appendix: Software and source code

Appendix: Software and source code

The agent-based computational model introduced in this paper is implemented in NetLogo 6 (Wilensky 1999), which provides substantial facilities for modeling spatially situated agents. Model source code is available upon request. In the model, the spatial environment represents the DKY subdistrict that is the focus of our investigation. We utilized the intersect tool in Arc Toolbox to identify DKY road intersections, from which we developed a stylized regional transportation network. (See figure 1 of the online appendix.) Data analysis was primarily in Python, along with the NumPy and Matplotlib libraries (van der Walt et al. 2011; Hunter 2007).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beaudoin, A., Isaac, A.G. Direct and indirect transmission of avian influenza: results from a calibrated agent-based model. J Econ Interact Coord 18, 191–212 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-022-00353-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-022-00353-w

Keywords

Navigation