Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An evolutionary model of industry dynamics and firms’ institutional behavior with job search, bargaining and matching

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By combining features from distinct theoretical approaches, namely the evolutionary and the job search, matching and bargaining literatures, we propose a model that captures the main dynamics of a world where heterogeneous firms and workers interact and co-evolve. Within a micro-meso framework, the model focuses on the influence of firms’ labour choices (“institutional settings”) on industry dynamics, taking into account the existence of employment adjustment costs. The consideration of endogenous matching and bargaining processes in the labour market results in significant frictions, such as the simultaneous coexistence of unfilled job vacancies and unemployment. In a setting where technological progress is not biased a stylized fact of industrialized world economies in the last few decades emerges, the increasing wage inequality. Additionally, turbulence in the industry increases after a negative demand shock. As expected, the negative demand shock causes a decrease in the number of vacancies and, consequently, unemployment rates increase considerably. Interestingly, and mimicking the recent experiences of countries such as US, Spain, Greece and Portugal, the rise in unemployment is matched by a rise in contractual wages. This outcome is explained by the lower ability of the firms to fill their posted vacancies, which results from friction in the interactions among agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abowd J, Kramarz F (2003) The costs of hiring and separations. Working Paper 9543, CREST, INSEE

  • Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Violante GL (2001) Deunionization, technical change and inequality. Discussion paper, CEPR

  • Adler PS (1988) Managing flexible automation. Calif Manag Rev 30: 34–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen ES (1994) Evolutionary economics: post-schumpeterian contributions. Pinter Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen ES (1999) Multisectoral growth and national innovation systems. Nordic J Polit Econ 25: 33–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonioli D, Manzalini R, Pini P (2011) Innovation, workers skills and industrial relations: Empirical evidence from firm-level Italian data. J Soc Econ 40(3): 312–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor DH, Levy F, Murnane RJ (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. Q J Econ 118(4): 1279–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baccini A, Cioni M (2010) Is technological change really skill-biased? Evidence from the introduction of ICT on the Italian textile industry (1980–2000). New Technol Work Employ 25(1): 80–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron J, Burton M, Hannan M (1996) The road taken: origins and evolution of employment systems in emerging companies. Ind Corpor Change 5(2): 239–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelsman E, Doms M (2000) Lessons from longitudinal microdata. J Econ Lit 38: 569–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach R, Muhlemann AP, Price DHR, Paterson A, Sharp JA (2000) A review of manufacturing flexibility. Eur J Oper Res 122(1): 41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas GJ, Ramey VA (1994) Time series evidence on the sources of trends in wage inequality. Am Econ Rev (Papers and Proceedings) 84(2): 10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabral LMB, Mata J (2003) On the evolution of the firm size distribution: facts and theory. Am Econ Rev 93(4): 1075–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo J, Gromb D (2007) Cultural inertia and uniformity in organizations. J Law Econ Organ 23(3):743–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen C, Rosenbloom R (1995) Explaining the attacker advantage. Res Policy 23(2): 237–257

    Google Scholar 

  • David P (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Am Econ Rev 75(2): 332–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis SJ, Haltiwanger J, Schuh S (1996) Job creation and destruction. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • De Toni A, Tonchia S (1998) Manufacturing flexibility: a literature review. Int J Prod Res 36(6): 1587–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G (1988) The nature of the innovative process. In: Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G, Soete L (eds) Technical change and economic theory. Pinter Publishers, London, pp 221–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G, Malerba F, Marsili O, Orsenigo L (1997) Industrial structures and dynamics: evidence, interpretations and puzzles. Ind Corpor Change 6(1): 3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne T, Roberts MJ, Samuelson L (1989) Plant turnover and gross employment flows in the U.S. manufacturing sector. J Labour Econ 7: 48–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger H, Grossmann V (2005) Non-routine tasks, restructuring of firms, and wage inequality within and between skill-groups. J Econ 86(3): 197–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein J, Axtell R (1996) Growing artificial societies: social science from the bottom-up. MIT Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagiolo G, Dosi G, Gabriele R (2004) Matching, bargaining and wage setting in an evolutionary model of labour market and output dynamics. Adv Complex Syst 7: 157–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finegold D, Soskice D (1988) The failure of training in Britain: analysis and prescription. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 4(3): 21–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RB (1995) Are your wages set in Bejing?. J Econ Persp 9: 15–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski PA (1995) What do we know about entry?. Int J Ind Organ 13(4): 421–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerwin D (1993) Manufacturing flexibility—a strategic perspective. Manag Sci 39(4): 395–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk P (1997) Inequality, income growth and mobility: the basic facts. J Econ Persp 11: 21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg P, Wadsworth J (1995) A short history of labour turnover, job tenure and job security. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 11: 73–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh D (1993) Labour demand. Princenton University Press, Princenton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh D, Pfann G (1996) Adjustment costs in factor demand. J Econ Lit 34: 1264–1292

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigton JE (1998) The social selection of flexible and rigid agents. Am Econ Rev 88(1):62–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman H (1995) The demographic methabolism of organizations: industry dynamics, turnover, and tenure. Admin Sci Q 40(4): 586–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell DR, Wolff EN (1991) Trends in the growth and distribution of skills in the US workplace 1960–1985. Ind Labour Relat Rev 44: 485–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen BJ, Troske K (1997) Increasing wage dispersion in U.S. manufacturing: plant-level evidence on the role of trade and technology. In: Fishlow A, Parker K (eds) Growing apart: the causes and consequences of global inequality. Council of Foreign Relations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson G (1997) Changing in earnings inequality: the role of demand shifts. J Econ Persp 11(2): 41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolivet G, Postel-Vinay F, Robin J (2006) The empirical content of the job search model: labor mobility and wage distributions in Europe and the US. Eur Econ Rev 50: 877–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz I, Autor D (1999) Changes in the wage structure and earnings inequality. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labour economics, vol 3A. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1463–1559

    Google Scholar 

  • Klette TJ, Kortum S (2004) Innovating firms and aggregate innovation. J Polit Econ 112: 986–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesourne J (1992) The economics of order and disorder. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy F, Temin P (2007) Inequality and institutions in 20th century America. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 13106

  • Loasby B (1999) Knowledge, institutions and evolution in economics. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz E, Valeyre A (2004) Organisational change in Europe: national models or the diffusion of a new ’one best way’? Working Paper 04-04, DRUID

  • Malerba F, Orsenigo L (1995) Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Camb J Econ 19(1): 47–65

    Google Scholar 

  • March J, Simon H (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen D (1970) Job search, the duration of employment, and the Phillips curve. Amn Econ Rev 60: 505–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen D (1982) The matching process as a noncooperative bargaining game. In: MacCall JJ (eds) The economics of information and uncertainty. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen D (1986) Job search and labor market analysis. In: Ashenfelter O, Layard R (eds) Handbook of labor economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 849–919

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen D (1999) Equilibrium unemployment dynamics. Int Econ Rev 40(4): 889–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen D, Pissarides C (1994) Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment. Rev Econ Studies 61: 397–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen D, Pissarides C (1999) New developments in models of search in the labor market. In: Ashenfelter O, Layard R (eds) Handbook of labor economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R (1995) Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. J Econ Lit 33: 48–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Winter S (2002) Evolutionary theorizing in economics. J Econ Persp 16(2): 23–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neugart M (2008) Labor market policy evaluation with ACE. J Econ Behav Organ 67(2): 418–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickell S (1986) Dynamic models of labour demand. In: Ashenfelter O, Layard R (eds) Handbook of labour conomics. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard R (1984) Coevolutionary development potential. Land Econ 60:160–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Oesch D, Menés JR (2011) Upgrading or polarization? Occupational change in Britain, Germany, Spain and Switzerland, 1990–2008. Soc Econ Rev 9(3): 503–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2000) Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J Econ Persp 14(3): 137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res Policy 13(6): 343–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingle M, Tesfatsion L (2003) Evolution of worker-employer networks and behaviors under alternative non-employment benefits: an agent-based computational study. In: Nagurney A (eds) Innovations in financial and economic networks, new dimensions in networks book series. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 256–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson D (1995) Income inequality and trade: how to think, what to conclude. J Econ Persp 9(3): 33–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richiardi M (2006) Toward a non-equilibrium unemployment theory. Comput Econ 27: 135–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal RW (1993) Rules of thumb in games. J Econ Behav Organ 22: 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford M (1994) Institutions in economics. The old and the new institutionalism. Cambridge University Press, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent RG (1999) Validation and verification of simulation models. Paper, proceedings of the 1999 winter simulation conference

  • Simon H (1955) A behavioural model of rational choice. Q J Econ 69: 99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol Rev 63: 129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe A (1965) Social structure and organizations. In: March J (eds) The handbook of organizations Chap. 4. Rand McNally, Chicago, pp 142–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton J (1997) Gibralt’s legacy. J Econ Lit 35(1): 40–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18:509–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira AAC (2004) Strategic complementarities between innovation and human capital. The neglected role of human capital demand. Revista Brasileira de Inovaç 3: 169–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesfatsion L (1997) How economists can get alife. In: Arthur W, Durlauf S, Lane D (eds) The economy as an evolving complex system II. Addison-Wesley, Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow L (1975) Generating inequality. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente M (1998) Laboratory for simulation development. Working Paper 98-5, DRUID

  • Valente M, Andersen ES (2002) A hands-on-approach to evolutionary simulation: Nelson-Winter models in the Laboratory for Simulation Developments. Electron J Evol Model Econ Dyn 1003, http://www.e-jemed.org/1003/index.php

  • Van den Bergh JCM, Stagl S (2003) Coevolution of economic behaviour and institutions: towards a theory of institutional change. J Evol Econ 13: 289–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1982) Management of organizational change among loosely coupled elements. In: Goodman PS (eds) Change in organizations. New perspectives on theory, research and practice. Jossey Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss M, Garloff A (2011) Skill-biased technological change and endogenous benefits: the dynamics of unemployment and wage inequality. Appl Econ 43(7): 811–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt U (2003) The evolving economy: essays on the evolutionary approach to economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt U (2008) What is specific about evolutionary economics?. J Evol Econ 18: 547–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood A (1998) Globalization and the rise in labour market inequalities. Econ J 108: 1463–1482

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CEF.UP, Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Sandra Tavares Silva

  2. LIAAD—INESC Porto LA, Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Jorge M. S. Valente

  3. CEF.UP, Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto, INESC Porto, OBEGEF, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, 4200-464, Porto, Portugal

    Aurora A. C. Teixeira

Authors
  1. Sandra Tavares Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jorge M. S. Valente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aurora A. C. Teixeira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurora A. C. Teixeira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silva, S.T., Valente, J.M.S. & Teixeira, A.A.C. An evolutionary model of industry dynamics and firms’ institutional behavior with job search, bargaining and matching. J Econ Interact Coord 7, 23–61 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-011-0085-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-011-0085-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation