1 Introduction

The biogeochemical cycling of mineral elements, including nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), and their equilibrium and interactions in terrestrial ecosystems, are crucial for the preservation of ecosystem services (Zechmeister-Boltenstern et al. 2015; Sardans et al. 2021). Because soil is typically a “black box” with high spatial heterogeneity and structural complexity, it is difficult to analyze and predict the availability of these nutrients in soils (Bünemann et al. 2018). The majority of earlier investigations discovered well-constrained relationships among soil C, N, and P, suggesting that alterations in the stoichiometry of these nutrients may better reflect variations in their availability in soils under environmental changes (Cleveland and Liptzin 2007; Elser et al. 2010; Yue et al. 2017). Apart from C, N, and P in soils, the element S is also a fundamental component of proteins and critical to the growth of organisms (Blum et al. 2013; Li et al. 2019). It is crucial to recognize changes in S availability and its stoichiometric relationships with C, N, and P in order to comprehend how these elements interact in the dynamics of ecosystem services and to evaluate the degree of nutrient restriction in ecosystems (Chen et al. 2016). However, compared to the elements C, N, and P, soil S cycling is poorly understood due to the paucity of research that has measured soil S content and investigated the interactions of soil C, N, P, and S at the same time (Kirkby et al. 2011; Khan et al. 2016; Tipping et al. 2016). In addition, more than 55% of the C and nutrients reside in deep soils below 20 cm, but few studies have directly compared the responses of these elements and their stoichiometry to environmental changes between topsoil versus subsoil, particularly in field experiments (Doetterl et al. 2018; Spohn 2020; Xu et al. 2021).

Around 20% of the Earth’s land area is covered by grasslands, which serve crucial ecosystem services but are currently severely threatened by anthropogenic activities such as increasing N deposition (Bengtsson et al. 2019). The mean annual N deposition in temperate grasslands worldwide has already exceeded 1 g N m−2 and is expected to rise 5–15-fold by 2050 if no mitigation measures are taken (Heyburn et al. 2017; Lü and Tian 2007; Wen et al. 2020).

Experimental findings show that N addition altered the soil stoichiometry in grassland ecosystems by boosting soil C and N contents while decreasing soil P and S levels (Li et al. 2019; Ning et al. 2021; Xu et al. 2021). However, related findings are not entirely consistent among different experiments because the effects of N addition would vary with several factors like the rate of N addition, the depth of soil, and the availability of water (Chen et al. 2016; Gao et al. 2018; Coonan et al. 2019). It is worth noting that soil C:N:P:S ratios are largely stable, and their equilibrium can be recovered even when soils have been severely disturbed (Cleveland and Liptzin 2007; Kirkby et al. 2011; Tian et al. 2010; Yang et al. 2019). For instance, in N-limited grasslands, short-term N addition was deemed to reduce the C:N ratio by alleviating microbial N starvation; however, when N addition treatment is sustained, C:N ratio may not change any further after declining to a supposedly saturated point (Manzoni et al. 2010; Schleuss et al. 2019; Zhu et al. 2021).

Most temperate grasslands are found in semi-arid regions, where both abiotic and biotic processes are highly constrained by the availability of water (Cregger et al. 2014; Nielsen and Ball 2015; Bengtsson et al. 2019). In the future, severe precipitation events are anticipated to occur more frequently in Northern China, resulting in increased annual precipitation (Wu et al. 2011; Ren et al. 2017; Pendergrass and Knutti 2018). Previous studies have indicated that N addition and altered precipitation could have either an independent or a combined effect on the cycling of N and other nutrients in semi-arid and arid ecosystems (Wu et al. 2011; Ochoa-Hueso et al. 2014; Nielsen and Ball 2015). Additionally, higher precipitation not only stimulated the above- and belowground biomass, but also enhanced the flux of C and nutrients (such as N, P, and S) by influencing soil microbial activities (Nielsen and Ball 2015; Greaver et al. 2016; Engelhardt et al. 2019). Furthermore, increased precipitation, particularly during heavy precipitation events, may alter the distribution of nutrients along the soil profile by accelerating leaching and weathering processes (Wu et al. 2011; Doetterl et al. 2018). Overall, it is unclear how increased precipitation regulates the impacts of N addition on soil C, N, P, and S contents along the soil profile in semi-arid ecosystems.

Currently, knowledge of how N addition affects the stoichiometric relationships among these elements in the soil is still lacking, for at least three reasons. (1) The dynamics of the topsoil C:N:P:S ratio following N addition may not be applicable to the entire profile (i.e., deep soils). In contrast to topsoil, the dynamics of soil nutrients in deep soil layers are closely tied to the rates of soil nutrient diffusion and infiltration (Tian et al. 2010). Furthermore, P and S supplies are mainly derived from the parent materials, and their contents would decline with soil depth more slowly than C and N (Gao et al. 2018; Spohn 2020). (2) The treatment duration of most previous studies was relatively short (≤ 6 years), and their results might not accurately reflect the long-term responses of soil nutrients. For example, in a global meta-analysis, Xu et al. (2021) observed that long-term N addition had a stronger impact on soil C content than short-term N addition. (3) The majority of past investigations did not differentiate between the effects of low-N addition and high-N addition rates. Empirical evidence demonstrated that the positive effects of N deposition would disappear or even turn negative when the rate of N addition was high, or the duration of the treatment was prolonged (Bai et al. 2010; Stevens et al. 2015).

Northern China is a relatively populous region with a range of farming-pastoral ecotones. The temperate grassland of this region is an essential component of the Eurasian steppe and is susceptible to changes in N and water availability (Ren et al. 2008, 2017). We conducted a controlled field experiment in this temperate steppe to investigate how long-term N and water addition affect soil contents of the four key elements C, N, P, and S, as well as their stoichiometric ratios. Our objectives were to (i) distinguish the effects of low- and high-N additions on the total amounts of C, N, P, and S in soil and their stoichiometric ratios; (ii) understand how water addition regulates the effects of N addition on these elemental ratios; and (iii) illustrate the stratified properties of elemental ratios in different soil depths under N and water addition. We also attempted to explore the relationship between these ratios and soil physicochemical properties in various soil layers.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Experimental sites and treatments

This study was conducted at the Inner Mongolia Duolun Ecosystem Research Station (IMDERS; 116° 170″ E, 42° 02″ N; elevation 1324 m). The long-term mean annual temperature is 2.2 ℃, with monthly mean temperatures ranging from − 17.5 °C (January) to 18.9 °C (July), and the mean annual precipitation (MAP) is 382 mm, with 85% of the precipitation from May to September (IMDERS data, 1953–2016). The soil type is chestnut (Chinese classification) or Haplic Calcisols (FAO classification), with 5.2% clay and 44.2% silt in the top 0–10 cm layer (Niu et al. 2021a). Vegetation in the study area is dominated by Stipa krylovii, Agropyron cristatum, and Artemisia frigida, and three species together account for 65% of the community’s total aboveground biomass (Ren et al. 2017).

In 2005, seven (107 m × 8 m) blocks of naturally assembled vegetation communities were set up in a flat field using a split-plot experimental design. Identical treatments were placed into all blocks, and each block was split into two main plots that randomly received water addition and ambient precipitation, respectively. Each main plot was further split into six (8 m × 8 m) subplots, which randomly received either nutrient addition or ambient nutrient deposition. In this study, we only selected a few levels of N addition treatments in both plots with and without the addition of water, including control and two levels of N addition (5 and 15 g N m−2 year−1) treatments. These rates, while still higher than the combined rate of atmospheric N deposition and N fertilization (2 ~ 5 g N m−2 year−1) in our study area, are useful for evaluating the accumulative impacts of N addition on soil nutrients. 1-m walkways separated all subplots. Compared to plots that received ambient precipitation, the water addition plots received an additional 180 mm of precipitation (approximately 50% of the long-term MAP in the study area), with 15 mm of water sprinkled weekly during the primary growing seasons (June to August). Even though the 50% increase in precipitation is greater than the projected precipitation increases in the near future, it is comparable to the variation in annual precipitation between wet and dry years over the past 30 years, given that increases in precipitation during the growing season are more frequent in our study region (IPCC 2021; Xu et al. 2015; Ren et al. 2017). In our experiment, N was applied in the form of urea, with each application of N accounting for 50% of the annual amount (May and July). The study site had only been used for grazing until it was fenced in 2000, and no fertilizer had been administered to any of the plots prior to our study.

2.2 Field sampling and laboratory analysis

Soil samples were collected from the surface layer to 80 cm in depth, with intervals of 10 cm or 20 cm (0–10, 10–20, 20–30, 30–40, 40–60, and 60–80 cm) in September 2017 (i.e., after 13 consecutive years of treatment). Three randomly chosen cores were gathered and combined from each plot to create a composite sample. In this study, there were five replicates for each treatment, resulting in 180 composite samples. Each fresh soil sample was sieved, air-dried, and further ground to determine the contents of total C, N, P, and S in the soil, as well as other physicochemical parameters.

The water content of the soil was quantified using the gravimetric method, and the pH was measured using a pH meter in soil supernatant at a soil-to-water ratio (w:v) of 1:2.5. Soil available nitrogen (AVN) was estimated using alkali hydrolysis and Conway’s diffusion technique. The soil’s total C, N, and S contents were determined using the combustion method in an N/C/S analyzer (CHNOS Elemental Analyzer, Germany). The total P content of the soil was measured using an inductive coupled plasma emission spectrometer (ICP-ES) after acid extraction. In a nutshell, 6 mL of HNO3, 2 mL of HClO3, and 2 mL of HF were added to 1 g of the ground soil sample and extracted in a microwave oven at 180 °C for 4 h. The extracted solutions were diluted to 25 mL volume, filtered, and quantified by ICP-ES. To ensure the accuracy of the obtained data acquired, we used standard certified soils for C, N, P, and S during the measurement process, which were purchased from the Institute of Geographical and Geochemical Prospecting of China.

2.3 Data analysis

All data analyses were performed in R 4.1.3 (https://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-4/). Before data analysis, we verified that the data set meets the requirements of normality and homogeneity using the “Q-Q plot” and “bartlett. test” functions in the “Car” package, respectively. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the effects of N and water addition on the contents of the four elements and their stoichiometric ratios. Next, one-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD test was used to examine the effects of N addition rates on these parameters in plots with or without water addition. One-way ANOVA was also used to assess the effects of soil depth on these soil variables. Additionally, a t-test was used to evaluate the effects of adding water at the same rate of N addition on these soil variables. To better illustrate changes in C:N:P:S stoichiometry in each soil layer, we also calculated the response ratio (RR) of various elemental stoichiometric compositions (i.e., C:N, C:P, C:S, N:P, N:S, and P:S ratios) using the following formula:

$$RR=\left({R}_{T}-{R}_{C}\right)/{R}_{C}$$
(1)

where RT is the mean value of soil nutrient ratio (e.g., the C:N ratio) from treatment plots and RC is the control mean value from control plots. If the nutrient ratio increased under long-term treatments compared to the control, then RR > 0 and vice versa. The closer the RR value approximates to zero, the weaker the treatment effects are. Additionally, the shifts in soil total C, N, P, and S contents and their ratios among different treatments are demonstrated using principal component analysis (PCA) and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) in “FactoMineR,” “Factoextra,” and “Vegan” packages. Pearson correlation analysis further highlighted the relationships between soil C, N, P, and S parameters and principal component axes. Pearson correlation was also used to indicate the relationships of soil stoichiometric ratios with soil C, N, P, and S contents and soil properties.

3 Results

3.1 Changes in soil total C, N, P, and S contents

The total C, N, P, and S contents all decreased significantly with soil depth regardless of the addition of N and water (Figs. 1 and 2). The overall effects of N addition on total C and N contents were positive, whereas the impacts on total P and S contents were negative; these effects depend on water addition and soil depth (Figs. 1 and 2, Table S1). Specifically, when compared to the corresponding layers in control plots, low-N addition significantly increased the total C content in 0–10, 20–30, and 40–60 cm soils, while high-N addition increased the contents of total C, N, and P in 10–20 cm soil (Figs. 1 and 2). The values of total S content in the 0–10, 30–40, 40–60, and 60–80 cm soil layers were lower under both N addition rates, and the negative effects were pronounced under high-N addition (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Content of total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) across the 0–80 cm soil profile following 13 years of N and water additions in a semi-arid steppe. Notes: colored bars and error bars indicate the mean values and standard errors (n = 5). Vertical comparisons (i.e., between the six layers of soil) of mean changes in soil elements are denoted by different capital letters (p ≤ 0.05). For each soil layer, significant differences among different treatments are indicated by different lowercase letters (p ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, the effects of water addition at the same N additions were detected using a t-test; the symbols + and – indicate increased and decreased effects, respectively

Fig. 2
figure 2

Content of total phosphorus (TP) and total sulfur (TS) across the 0–80 cm soil profile following 13 years of N and water addition in a semi-arid steppe. For notes, see Fig. 1

In comparison to the control plots, water addition alone increased total C content in the 0–10 cm soil and increased total S content in the 10–20 cm soil and decreased total S content in the 30–40, 40–60, and 60–80 cm soil layers (p ≤ 0.05, Figs. 1 and 2). Nitrogen plus water addition resulted in overall higher contents of soil total C, N, and P compared with plots with water addition alone, while low-N plus water addition significantly increased total S content in the 10–20, 20–30, 30–40, and 60–80 cm soil layers (Figs. 1 and 2). When comparing C, N, P, and S contents at the same N addition rates, N plus water additions generally increased soil total C and P contents in most soil layers. It also increased total S content in top 0–30 cm soils but decreased that in 30–80 cm soils except for 40–60 cm soil, where high-N addition increased soil total S content (Figs. 1 and 2).

3.2 Shifts in soil total C: N: P: S stoichiometry

Regardless of N and water addition, C:N and C:P rations decreased, and N:P, N:S, and P:S increased with increasing soil depth (p ≤ 0.05, Fig. S1). Compared to control plots, low-N addition considerably raised C:N ratios across the entire soil profile except for the 10–20 cm soil (p ≤ 0.05), whereas high-N addition significantly lowered this ratio except for the 60–80 cm soil (Fig. 3a). In most soil layers, both N addition rates generally increased ratios of C:P, C:S, N:P, and N:S (p ≤ 0.1; Figs. 3 and 4). Low-N addition increased total P:S in 30–40 and 40–60 cm soil layers, whereas high-N addition marginally increased this ratio in 0–10,10–20, 40–60, and 60–80 cm soils (p ≤ 0.1, Fig. 4c).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Changes in the TC: TN, TC: TP, and TC: TS ratios across the 0–80 cm soil profile following 13 years of N and water addition in a semi-arid steppe. Notes: points and error bars indicate the mean values and standard errors (n = 5). The effects were quantified as changes in the ratios of total C (TC): total N (TN), TC: total P (TP), and TC: total S (TS) under N and water addition compared to the control plots. The values below zero indicate decreased effects and those above zero indicate increased effects. Unless otherwise stated, if the error bars have not crossed the zero line, there are significant differences between the N addition treatments and control. Furthermore, the effects of water addition at the same N additions were detected using a t-test; the symbols + and – indicate increased and decreased effects, respectively

Fig. 4
figure 4

Changes in the ratios of TN:TP, TN:TS, and TP: TS across the 0–80 cm soil profile following 13 years N and water addition in a semi-arid steppe. For notes, see notes in Fig. 3

Water addition alone typically increased C:P and N:P ratios in 0–60 cm soil layers but decreased the ratios in 60–80 cm soil (p ≤ 0.1, Figs. 3e and 4d). Further, water addition alone enhanced the C:N, C:S, and N:S ratios in soil with depths of 0–10 and 40–60 cm, as well as the C:S and N:S ratios in soils with a depth of 30–40 cm (p ≤ 0.05, Figs. 3 and 4). In plots receiving water addition, both N addition rates generally increased the C:N ratio across the entire soil profile, while low-N plus water addition typically decreased the N:P ratio except for 10–20 cm soil (Figs. 3 and 4). Likewise, when comparing the values of these ratios at the same N addition rates, we only observed consistent positive effects of water addition on the C:N ratio throughout the entire soil profile (Fig. 4d).

3.3 Covariations and correlation of soil C:N:P:S stoichiometry with their contents

Ten variables, including soil C, N, P, and S contents and six related ratios, were subjected to PCA, which revealed two main mixed axes that, together, accounted for 77.0%, 72.6%, 74.1%, 73.2%, 73.7%, and 66.2% of total variances in the soil layers 0–10, 10–20, 20–30, 30–40, 40–60, and 60–80 cm, respectively (Fig. 5). The N and water additions impacted covariations of soil C:N:P:S stoichiometry in distinct ways by altering different characteristics, and these impacts varied with soil depth (Fig. 5). For instance, in the 0–10 cm soil layer, the PC1 axis explained 52.3% of the total variance and was associated with the majority of soil parameters, with the exception of C:N and P:S ratios (Fig. 5a, Table S3); however, in the 60–80 cm soil layer, the PC1 axis explained 41.1% of the variations and was represented by contents of total C, N, and P, as well as six ratios, signaling that water addition alone had the greatest impact on these ten variables (Fig. 5f, Table S3). When all soil samples were considered, changes in soil C:N:P:S stoichiometry were, in fact, more often connected to their contents than soil properties (Table S3). In particular, the ratios of C:P, C:S, N:P, N:S, and P:S were negatively correlated to soil pH and positively correlated with C and N contents in the 0–10 cm soil, whereas C:N ratio was significantly positively correlated to total C content across all soil depths (p ≤ 0.05, Table S4). All soil nutrient ratios were typically positively correlated with total C and N contents and negatively correlated with total P and S contents, albeit these associations were only significant in specific soil layers (Table S4).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of N and water addition on variations in soil total C (TC), total N (TN), total P (TP), and total S (TS) contents and their six stoichiometric ratios in a semi-arid steppe. The ten parameters were used to assess the effects among different treatments, and each treatment was summarized as a single point by PCA (n = 50). The results of the PERMANOVA test are attached to the corner of the figure

4 Discussion

4.1 Effect of N addition on topsoil C:N:P:S stoichiometry depends on N addition rates and water availability

The status of the nutrient limitation in grasslands at the regional scale can be evaluated effectively using elemental ratios, and the majority of research shows that variations in the N:P ratio can be regarded as an indicator of both N saturation and limitation (Schade et al. 2005; Tipping et al. 2016; Sardans et al. 2021). In the present study, we used different elemental ratios related to soil C, N, P, and S in an effort to deepen our understanding of the ecological stoichiometry theory. Despite the fact that both rates of N addition tended to increase soil total C and N contents and decrease soil total P and S contents, we found no consistent responses between the low and high rates of N addition. Moreover, the mean response ratios of C:S (0.18), N:S (0.21), and P:S (0.19) were higher than those of C:N (0.02), C:P (0.07), and N:P (0.08), suggesting that changes in these nutrients were asynchronous and that C, N, P, and S had distinct sensitivity to N addition (Khan et al. 2016). Furthermore, water addition alone did not appear to have any apparent effects on the contents of soil total C, N, P, and S in most soil layers. Still, there were notable changes in elemental ratios in water addition plots, implying that increased precipitation altered interactions among these elements in soils. Additionally, we observed that the sensitivities of total amounts of the four elements to water addition gradually decreased from C, N, and P to S in the 0–10 cm soil, which may be related to the elements’ different affinities for water (Kramer and Chadwick 2018).

The effects of N addition on elemental ratios in water addition plots were also incongruent with those in plots with ambient precipitation. In contrast to ambient precipitation plots, low N addition significantly decreased soil N:P ratios in the water addition plots, indicating that water addition regulated, or perhaps altered the effects of N addition on soil elemental ratios.

The effects of N and water addition on these four soil elements and their stoichiometry varied with N addition rates in the semi-arid steppe, which may be explained by a number of distinct mechanisms. First, in semi-arid grassland ecosystems, water is the key limiting resource for the growth of plants and microorganisms, while N is a close second. Adding water alone has a major impact on the soil microbial communities and biogeochemical processes, particularly during dry years (Cregger et al. 2014; Nielsen and Ball 2015). Plant and microbial populations can interact to uptake additional N only under wet soil conditions; otherwise, most N could be lost by leaching into the underground or as gas to air (Nielsen and ball 2015; Niu et al. 2021b). As a result, we observed significant interaction effects of N and water addition in most soil layers (Table S2). Second, soil N availability for plants and microbial communities would be altered with increasing intensity and duration of N addition (Elser et al. 2010; Niu et al. 2022a). In the long run, plant growth processes and plant residue inputs into the soil varied significantly under low- and high-N addition rates (Bai et al. 2010), which may further affect soil C and nutrient cycling. High-N addition typically inhibits plant growth and the subsequent return of plant residues to soil due to low soil pH and the toxic effects of ammonium on plants rather than having a favorable impact on these processes (Tian and Niu 2015; Li et al. 2019; Niu et al. 2022b). Third, alterations in plant and microbial traits, especially their competition for soil nutrients, may result in an unsynchronized response of these soil elements (Moreau et al. 2015; Craig and Fraterrigo 2017). The nutritional needs of different plants and microbial species vary, and long-term N addition may further accentuate these nutritional differences concurrently while also causing changes in the structure of the plant and microbe community (Zhang et al. 2014; Ma et al. 2016; Niu et al. 2021b).

4.2 Effect of N and water addition on soil C: N: P: S stoichiometry varied with soil depth

An increasing number of research demonstrated that soil total C, N, P, and S contents declined as soil depth increased, but fewer studies have examined changes in their ratios along the soil profile (Manzoni et al. 2010; Khan et al. 2016; Chen et al. 2016; Niu et al. 2022a). Based on the decreasing trends of soil C:N and C:P ratios with soil depth and the increasing trends of soil N:P, N:S, and P:S ratios regardless of N and water addition, it may be inferred that C and N are the key factors limiting the microbial activity in deep soil. In our investigated grassland, soil total C and N contents in the 0–10 cm soil were elevated after 13 years of N addition, but total P and S contents were reduced (Figs. 1 and 2). The findings in the 0–10 cm soil layer were in accordance with those of earlier research on grassland ecosystems, probably because short-term N input promotes plant growth, which in turn increases C and N input to the soil as plant residuals (Stevens et al. 2015; Yue et al. 2017; Tang et al. 2018; Niu et al. 2022b). It may also be caused by the gradual depletion of other nutrients (such as P, S, and K) as a result of further N addition, which raises the readily available amount of N. This could alleviate the N limitation experienced by plants and microorganisms (Fujita et al. 2010; Hill and Jones 2019; Dong et al. 2021). Furthermore, we confirmed that the responses of soil nutrient contents and stoichiometric ratios in 0–10 cm soil were distinct from those in 10–80 cm subsoil (Figs. 1, 2, 3, and 4, S1). These findings are consistent with earlier research, such as that by Han et al. (2019), who found that N addition increased available N only in 0–10 cm soil and had no significant effects on the total P content of top- and sub-soil in three different grassland types.

The singular or combined effect of water and N addition varied with soil depth. For instance, the soil C:S ratio increased with low-N addition in the 0–10, 30–40, and 40–60 cm soil layers and decreased in other soil layers (Fig. 3e). The varied responses at different soil depths may be closely related to a leaching process (Cameron et al. 2013; Kramer and Chadwick 2018). Deep soils (10–80 cm), as opposed to topsoil (0–10 cm), primarily receive leaching materials from the topsoil, which may have a differential impact on soil C and nutrient cycling in various soil layers (Cameron et al. 2013; Mnich and Houlton 2016). However, the amount and composition of these leaching materials present in each layer of soil remain unknown, thus warranting further studies. In our study, no significant correlations between soil properties and these six elemental ratios were found across the soil profile when all soil samples were taken into account, with the exception of soil pH in the 0–10 cm soil layer. Importantly, we found significant positive correlations between these six elemental ratios and the total C and N contents, but negative correlations with the total P and S contents, which may be strongly related to the processes of formation and leaching (Mnich and Houlton 2016; Doetterl et al. 2018).

4.3 Implications for ecosystem management

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive analysis of the responses of six soil elemental ratios to long-term N and water addition across the entire 0–80 cm soil profile of a semi-arid grassland ecosystem. Our findings highlight the effects of N addition rates and enhanced water availability on soil C and nutrient balance in semi-arid ecosystems, which are crucial for maintaining productivity and conserving grassland biodiversity. Our results further confirmed that soil responses of elemental ratios rather than elemental contents were sensitive to long-term N addition, partly contrary to prior studies that suggested that plants rather than soils were sensitive to N deposition (Bowman et al. 2008; Bai et al. 2010). Nevertheless, the interpretation of our findings is subject to several restrictions. First, there were only two N addition rates (5 versus 15 g m−2 year−1), which may not adequately represent the distinction between low- and high-N addition rates in affecting soil C and nutrient dynamics. Second, although potential explanations for variations in the contents of these soil nutrients and their ratios were proposed, the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. For instance, our current understanding of the interplay between weathering and N addition and their effects on soil nutrients is limited. Therefore, further research is required to understand the broad trends and mechanisms underlying the dynamic changes in soil nutrient ratios caused by the addition of N and alternative precipitation conditions.

5 Conclusions

After 13 years of N and water addition, we found that soil total C, N, P, and S contents and their elemental ratios significantly changed, although there were no consistent patterns when specific N addition rate and soil depth were taken into account. N addition generally had positive effects on total C and N contents only in 0–10 cm of soil, but had negative effects on total P and S, while water addition raised the contents of these four elements. The elemental ratios responded differently to low- and high-N addition rates across the soil profile, and water addition further regulated N addition effects on these elemental ratios. Our findings demonstrated that N addition rates and soil depths in semi-arid steppe influence the impact of N and water addition on soil C, N, P, and S contents and their stoichiometric ratios. Our research offers valuable insights for assessing the cycling of essential soil elements, particularly in semi-arid grasslands where nutrient inputs and changes in precipitation are co-occurring.