Skip to main content
Log in

Sorption of pesticides by microplastics, charcoal, ash, and river sediments

  • Sediments, Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In addition to sediments, pesticides can be sorbed to other constituents present in rivers including ash, charcoal, and microplastics. Pesticide sorption by microplastics has been studied for hydrophobic compounds such as the legacy insecticide DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) but not for current-use herbicides. The purpose of this study was to investigate to what extent 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) (weak acid), atrazine (weak base), and glyphosate (zwitterion) are sorbed by microplastics (i.e., fiber, polyethylene beads, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and tire fragments) and other river constituents (i.e., ash, charcoal, suspended and bottom sediments). DDT was included in the study to provide reference data that could be compared to known literature values.

Methods

Batch equilibrium experiments were conducted following Guidelines 106 of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Experiments utilized either a 1:100 solid/solution ratio with 0.1 g of a river constituent as the sorbent or a 1:5 solid/solution ratio with the sorbents consisted of 1.9 g bottom sediments mixed with 0.1 g of a river constituent. Background solutions included 0.01 M CaCl 2 or 0.01 M KCl, deionized water, and river water.

Result

Individual microplastics always sorbed >50% of DDT. Current-use herbicides had a weak affinity for microplastics (< 6%) except that a substantial amount of glyphosate was sorbed by PVC (32–36%) in 0.01M KCl and DI water. When river water was used as a background solution, rather than 0.01M KCl or deionized water, there was much less glyphosate sorption by PVC, ash, charcoal, and both sediments. This suggested that ions present in river water competed for sorption sites with glyphosate molecules. Across background solutions, sorption by sediments decreased in the order of DDT (91–95%) > glyphosate (36–88%) >atrazine (5–13%) >2,4-D (2–5%). Sorption of 2,4-D, atrazine, and DDT by ash and charcoal was always > 90% but < 35% for glyphosate. Relative to bottom sediments alone, the presence of ash or charcoal (5% by weight) with sediments significantly increased the sorption of 2,4-D, atrazine, and DDT. Microplastic additions (5% by weight) had no impact on all four pesticides’ sorption by sediments.

Conclusion

Microplastics are not a strong sorbent for current-use herbicides, although there are exceptions such as glyphosate by PVC. Ions present in river water competed with glyphosate for sorption sites of river constituents. Hence, the types and concentrations of ions present in rivers might have some influence on the partitioning of glyphosate between the water column and solid phase, including glyphosate fate processes in rivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Rob Ellis and Mauli Gamhewage for their technical assistance in the field and laboratory work.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through its Collaborative Research and Training Experience Program (CREATE grant# 432009-2013) and Discovery Grant Program (Grant#RGPIN-2018-06030), including providing a student stipend to Ms. Marufa Fatema.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marufa Fatema.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Jan Schwarzbauer

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 12 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fatema, M., Farenhorst, A. Sorption of pesticides by microplastics, charcoal, ash, and river sediments. J Soils Sediments 22, 1876–1884 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03218-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03218-8

Keywords

Navigation