Skip to main content
Log in

The influence on biosorption potentials of metal-resistant bacteria Enterobacter sp. EG16 and Bacillus subtilis DBM by typical red soil minerals

  • Soils, Sec 5 • Soil and Landscape Ecology • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Due to the inevitable interaction between bacteria and soil minerals, whether bacteria could exert the excepted functions in the soil is yet to be confirmed and how minerals affect biosorption potential is needed to be investigated. The purposes of this study were to explore the adsorption behavior and mechanism of metal-resistant bacteria attaching to typical red soil minerals under different conditions and to discuss whether biosorption potential would be altered after the addition of functional bacteria to soil.

Materials and methods

Here, we tested equilibrium adsorption along with zeta potential analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR), and desorption to investigate the adsorption of two metal-resistant bacteria (Gram-negative Enterobacter sp. EG16 and Gram-positive Bacillus subtilis DBM) onto typical red soil minerals including goethite, kaolinite, and gibbsite under different environmental factors.

Results and discussion

We found that the minerals adsorbed more EG16 cells than DBM, and the adsorption capacities followed the sequence of goethite > kaolinite > gibbsite. Both the surfaces of bacteria and mineral were pH-dependent in our tested pH range (4.0–7.0), and the maximum adsorption was at pH 4.0. Increasing ionic strength resulted in less adsorption of bacteria onto goethite, whereas bacterial adsorption onto kaolinite was the opposite. These observations elucidated that electrostatic interaction was the dominant contributor. The adsorption conformed to the Langmuir and pseudo-second-order kinetic model implying chemical adsorption, and the result of FTIR also supported that. Desorption experiment has suggested the significant contribution of electrostatic force and the minor dominator of functional groups for bacteria–mineral combination.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicated that electrostatic interaction was the dominant contributor to bacteria–mineral combination and functional groups coordination contributed less than 10%. This finding suggested most adhered bacteria could still provide active sites for heavy metal biosorption. Thus, although 50–90% of added functional bacteria has adhered to minerals, the bacteria–mineral combination had a limited impact on biosorption.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the reviewers who help us improve the paper by many pertinent comments and suggestions.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2018YFD0800700), the Youth Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (41807031), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030310127), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (2018M643309).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaying Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Yuan Ge

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 435 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, W., Li, Y., Lin, Z. et al. The influence on biosorption potentials of metal-resistant bacteria Enterobacter sp. EG16 and Bacillus subtilis DBM by typical red soil minerals. J Soils Sediments 20, 3217–3229 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02650-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02650-y

Keywords

Navigation