Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nitrification and acidification from urea application in red soil (Ferralic Cambisol) after different long-term fertilization treatments

  • SOILS, SEC 1 • SOIL ORGANIC MATTER DYNAMICS AND NUTRIENT CYCLING • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Long-term manure applications can prevent or reverse soil acidification by chemical nitrogen (N) fertilizer. However, the resistance to re-acidification from further chemical fertilization is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of urea application on nitrification and acidification processes in an acid red soil (Ferralic Cambisol) after long-term different field fertilization treatments.

Materials and methods

Soils were collected from six treatments of a 19-year field trial: (1) non-fertilization control, (2) chemical phosphorus and potassium (PK), (3) chemical N only (N), (4) chemical N, P, and K (NPK), (5) pig manure only (M), and (6) NPK plus M (NPKM; 70 % N from M). In a 35-day laboratory incubation experiment, the soils were incubated and examined for changes in pH, NH4 +, and NO3 , and their correlations from urea application at 80 mg N kg−1(−80) compared to 0 rate (−0).

Results and discussion

From urea addition, manure-treated soils exhibited the highest acidification and nitrification rates due to high soil pH (5.75–6.38) and the lowest in the chemical N treated soils due to low soil pH (3.83–3.90) with no N-treated soils (pH 4.98–5.12) fell between. By day 35, soil pH decreased to 5.21 and 5.81 (0.54 and 0.57 unit decrease) in the NPKM-80 and M-80 treatments, respectively, and to 4.69 and 4.53 (0.43 and 0.45 unit decrease) in the control-80 and PK-80 treatments, respectively, with no changes in the N-80 and NPK-80 treatments. The soil pH decrease was highly correlated with nitrification potential, and the estimated net proton released. The maximum nitrification rates (K max) of NPKM and M soils (14.7 and 21.6 mg N kg−1 day−1, respectively) were significantly higher than other treatments (2.86–3.48 mg N kg−1 day−1). The priming effect on mineralization of organic N was high in manure treated soils.

Conclusions

Field data have shown clearly that manure amendment can prevent or reverse the acidification of the red soil. When a chemical fertilizer such as urea is applied to the soil again, however, soil acidification will occur at possibly high rates. Thus, the strategy in soil N management is continuous incorporation of manure to prevent acidification to maintain soil productivity. Further studies under field conditions are needed to provide more accurate assessments on acidification rate from chemical N fertilizer applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken RL, Moody PW (1994) The effect of valence and ionic strength on the measurement of pH buffer capacity. Aust J Soil Res 32:975–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao JD, Shi M, Zhang MT, Liang DL, Wu XP (2011) Nitrification of main soils in china and its relationship with soil properties. Sci Agric Sin 44:1384–1393

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak P, Jobe BO, Krueger AR, Petersen LA, Laird DA (1997) Effects of long-term soil acidification due to nitrogen fertilizer inputs in Wisconsin. Plant Soil 197:61–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolan NS, Hedley MJ (2003) Role of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycles in soil acidification. In: Rengel Z (ed) Handbook of soil acidity. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 29–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner JM (1996) Nitrogen-total. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods, SSSA Book Series 5. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 1085–1122

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton SAQ, Prosser JI (2001) Autotrophic ammonia oxidation at low pH through urea hydrolysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2952–2957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butterly CR, Baldock JA, Tang CX (2013) The contribution of crop residues to changes in soil pH under field conditions. Plant Soil 366:185–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cai ZJ, Xu MG, Wang BR, Zhang HM, Zhang L, Gao SD (2014 submitted) Acidification rate from chemical N fertilization and alleviation by manure in an 18–year field experiment in a Ferralic Cambisol, South China. Submitted to Plos One (Under review)

  • Chien SH, Gearhart MM, Collamer DJ (2008) The effect of different ammonical nitrogen sources on soil acidification. Soil Sci 173:544–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dancer WS, Peterson LA, Chesters G (1973) Ammonification and nitrification of N as influenced by soil pH and previous N treatments. Soil Sci Soc Am J 37:67–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries W, Breeuwsma A (1987) The relation between soil acidification and element cycling. Water Air Soil Pollut 35:293–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan YH, Xu MG, Wang BR, Yang XY, Huang SM, Gao SD (2011) Long-term evaluation of manure application on maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency in China. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:1562–1573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan XH, Sun YH, Lin DX, Meng AM, Qin SW (2005) The characteristics of mineralization and nitrification in red soil and calcareous soil from long term fertilization experiments. Chin J Soil Sci 36(375–376):476

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu YF, Zhang XP, Tu SH, Sun XF, Kristina L (2008) Effect of long-term fertilization on nitrification and nitrobacteria community in a purple paddy soil under rice-wheat rotations. Acta Ecol Sin 28:2123–2130

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo JH, Liu XJ, Zhang Y, Shen JL, Han WX, Zhang WF, Christie P, Goulding KWT, Vitousek PM, Zhang FS (2010) Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Sci 327:1008–1010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hart PBS, Rayner JH, Jenkinson DS (1986) Influence of pool substitution on the interpretation of fertilizer experiments with 15N. J Soil Sci 37:389–403

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jia JX, Li ZP, Che YP (2011) Effects of soil fertility and urea application rate on nitrification in black soils. Chin J Soil Sci 42(2):412–416

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang RF (1999) Methods of soil nitrogen and sulfur. In: Bao SD (ed) Analysis of soil agrochemistry, 3rd edn. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, pp 39–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzyakov Y, Friedel JK, Stahr K (2000) Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1485–1498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masud MM, Guo D, Li JY, Xu RK (2014) Hydroxyl release by maize (Zea mays L.) roots under acidic conditions due to nitrate absorption and its potential to ameliorate an acidic Ultisol. J Soils Sediments 14(5):845–853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvaney RL (1996) Nitrogen-inorganic forms. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods, SSSA Book Series 5. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 1123–1184

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods, SSSA Book Series 5. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 961–1011

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton JM (2000) Nitrification. In: Sumner ME et al (eds) Handbook of soil science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 160–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul KI, Black AS, Conyers MK (2001) Influence of fallow, wheat and subterranean clover on pH within an initially mixed surface soil in the field. Biol Fertil Soils 33:41–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie GSP (1989) The chemical behavior of aluminum, hydrogen and manganese in acid soils. In: Robson AD (ed) Soil acidity and plant growth. Academic, Sydney, pp 1–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Rukshana F, Butterly CR, Xu JM, Baldock JA, Tang CX (2014) Organic anion-to-acid ratio influences pH change of soils differing in initial pH. J Soils Sediments 14:407–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schroder JL, Zhang HL, Girma W, Raun WR, Penn CJ (2011) Soil acidification from long-term use of nitrogen fertilizers on winter wheat. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:957–964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Bartha R (1996) The priming effect of substrate addition in soil-based biodegradation tests. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:1428–1430

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stark JM, Firestone MK (1996) Kinetic characteristics of ammonium-oxidizer communities in a California oak woodland-annual grassland. Soil Biol Biochem 28:1307–1317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner ME, Miller WP (1996) Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods, SSSA Book Series 5. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 1201–11230

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong DL, Xu RK (2012) Effects of urea and (NH4)2SO4 on nitrification and acidification of Ultisols from Southern China. J Environ Sci 24:682–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich B (1986) Natural and anthropogenic component of soil acidification. Z Pflanzenernähr Bodenk 149:702–717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Du S, Wang JQ, Gao XZ, Zhang WF, Ma WQ (2006) Consumption situation of nitrogenous fertilizers in china and prospects for development. Chem Fert Ind 33:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZG, Zhao YC, Liao QL, Huang B, Sun WX, Qi YB, Shi XZ, Yu DS (2008) Spatio-temporal variation and associated affecting factors of soil pH in the past 20 years of Jiangsu Province, China. Acta Ecol Sin 28:720–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YF, Tang CX, Wu JJ, Liu XM, Xu JM (2013) Impact of organic matter addition on pH change of paddy soils. J Soils Sediments 13:12–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu FC, Wang XY, Zou J, Peng SL (2001) A study on acidic buffering ability of soils in Hunan Province. Res Agr Mod 1:58–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao KC, Xu JM, Tang CX, Zhang JB, Brookes PC (2013) Differences in carbon and nitrogen mineralization in soils of differing initial pH induced by electrokinesis and receiving crop residue amendments. Soil Biol Biochem 67:70–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresource Technol 102:3488–3497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Xing GX (2009) Variation in the relationship between nitrification and acidification of subtropical soils as affected by the addition of urea or ammonium sulfate. Soil Biol Biochem 41:2584–2587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao W, Cai ZC, Xu ZH (2007) Does ammonium-based N addition influence nitrification and acidification in humid subtropical soils of China? Plant Soil 297:213–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Fang X, Liu XM, He Y, Xu JM, Brookes PC (2014) Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the acidification of two typical acid soils in South China. J Soils Sediments 14:415–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41301309), the National Basic Research Program (2014CB441001) and National Nonprofit Institute Research Grant of CAAS (IARRP-2014-10). Mention of trademark, propriety product, or vendor in this article does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the CAAS and the USDA-ARS nor does it imply approval to the exclusion of other products or vendors that may be suitable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minggang Xu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hong Jie Di

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, Z., Wang, B., Xu, M. et al. Nitrification and acidification from urea application in red soil (Ferralic Cambisol) after different long-term fertilization treatments. J Soils Sediments 14, 1526–1536 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0906-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0906-4

Keywords

Navigation