Skip to main content
Log in

Arsenic mobilization and speciation during iron plaque decomposition in a paddy soil

  • SOILS, SEC 3 • REMEDIATION AND MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED OR DEGRADED LANDS • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Little information is available concerning the mobilization and speciation of arsenic (As) in paddy soils during iron plaque decomposition. It is important to investigate these processes since they affect As bioavailability and contaminate surface and ground water systems.

Materials and methods

A microcosm experiment was conducted to investigate the reductive dissolution of iron plaque and subsequent As mobilization under NaN3 sterilized (abiotic treatments) and non-sterilized (biotic treatments) paddy soil conditions.

Results and discussion

In the biotic treatment, As and iron (Fe) were quickly released into the soil solution, with more than 76.1% of total arsenic (T As) on the roots lost in 27 days. In the abiotic treatment, both iron plaque decomposition and As release were significantly slower, with only 39.4% of T As on the roots lost in 85 days. A part of arsenate reduction reaction occurred before and may also occur after release from roots in both abiotic and biotic treatments. Bacterial abundance, quantified by real-time PCR, varied significantly between treatments. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism combined with principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that microbial community structures were also different between treatments.

Conclusions

The changes in microbial factors (bacterial abundance and microbial diversity and activities) significantly affected iron plaque decomposition, As mobilization, and speciation processes. Iron plaque reductive dissolution was likely the major factor leading to As release. Most As released was trapped in the solid phase during the incubation period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arao T, Kawasaki A, Baba K, Mori S, Matsumoto S (2009) Effects of water management on cadmium and arsenic accumulation and dimethylarsinic acid concentrations in Japanese rice. Environ Sci Technol 43(24):9361–9367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berg M, Winkel L, Amini M, Hug SJ, Johnson CA (2008) Predicting groundwater arsenic contamination in Southeast Asia from surface parameters. Nat Geosci 1(8):536–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton ED, Johnston SG, Watling K, Bush RT, Keene AF, Sullivan LA (2010) Arsenic effects and behavior in association with the Fe(II)-catalyzed transformation of schwertmannite. Environ Sci Technol 44(6):2016–2021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CC, Dixon JB, Turner FT (1980) Iron coatings on rice roots—morphology and models of development. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44(5):1113–1119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Zhu YG, Liu WJ, Meharg AA (2005) Direct evidence showing the effect of root surface iron plaque on arsenite and arsenate uptake into rice (Oryza sativa) roots. New Phytol 165(1):91–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chon CM, Kim JG, Lee GH, Kim TH (2008) Influence of extractable soil manganese on oxidation capacity of different soils in Korea. Environ Geol 55(4):763–773

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings DE, Caccavo F, Fendorf S, Rosenzweig RF (1999) Arsenic mobilization by the dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducing bacterium Shewanella alga BrY. Environ Sci Technol 33(5):723–729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • deLemos JL, Bostick BC, Renshaw CE, Sturup S, Feng XH (2006) Landfill-stimulated iron reduction and arsenic release at the Coakley Superfund Site (NH). Environ Sci Technol 40(1):67–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit S, Hering JG (2003) Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility. Environ Sci Technol 37(18):4182–4189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herbel M, Fendorf S (2006) Biogeochemical processes controlling the speciation and transport of arsenic within iron coated sands. Chem Geol 228(1–3):16–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain MF (2006) Arsenic contamination in Bangladesh—an overview. Agr Ecosyst Environ 113(1–4):1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Islam FS, Gault AG, Boothman C, Polya DA, Charnock JM, Chatterjee D, Lloyd JR (2004) Role of metal-reducing bacteria in arsenic release from Bengal delta sediments. Nature 430(6995):68–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kocar BD, Herbel MJ, Tufano KJ, Fendorf S (2006) Contrasting effects of dissimilatory iron(III) and arsenic(V) reduction on arsenic retention and transport. Environ Sci Technol 40(21):6715–6721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu WJ, Zhu YG, Hu Y, Williams PN, Gault AG, Meharg AA, Charnock JM, Smith FA (2006) Arsenic sequestration in iron plaque, its accumulation and speciation in mature rice plants (Oryza sativa L.). Environ Sci Technol 40(18):5730–5736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lovley DR (2000) Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction. In: Lovley DR (ed) Environmental microbe–metal interactions. ASM, Washington, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin M, Ferdousi R, Hossain K, Barberis E (2010) Arsenic from groundwater to paddy fields in Bangladesh: solid–liquid partition, sorption and mobility. Water Air Soil Pollut 212(1):27–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelssohn IA, Kleiss BA, Wakeley JS (1995) Factors controlling the formation of oxidized root channels—a review. Wetlands 15(1):37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickson RT, McArthur JM, Ravenscroft P, Burgess WG, Ahmed KM (2000) Mechanism of arsenic release to groundwater, Bangladesh and West Bengal. Appl Geochem 15(4):403–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen HD, Postma D, Jakobsen R (2006) Release of arsenic associated with the reduction and transformation of iron oxides. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70(16):4116–4129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1966) The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J Theor Biol 13:131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Naidu R, Bhattacharya P (2009) Arsenic contamination in groundwater in the Southeast Asia region. Environ Geochem Health 31:9–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon C, Weaver W (1963) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki MT, Taylor LT, DeLong EF (2000) Quantitative analysis of small-subunit rRNA genes in mixed microbial populations via 5′-nuclease assays. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(11):4605–4614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi Y, Minamikawa R, Hattori KH, Kurishima K, Kihou N, Yuita K (2004) Arsenic behavior in paddy fields during the cycle of flooded and non-flooded periods. Environ Sci Technol 38(4):1038–1044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor GJ, Crowder AA (1983) Use of DCB technique for extraction of hydrous iron oxides from roots of wetland plants. Am J Bot 70:1254–1257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tufano KJ, Reyes C, Saltikov CW, Fendorf S (2008) Reductive processes controlling arsenic retention: revealing the relative importance of iron and arsenic reduction. Environ Sci Technol 42(22):8283–8289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XJ, Chen XP, Yang J, Wang ZS, Sun GX (2009) Effect of microbial mediated iron plaque reduction on arsenic mobility in paddy soil. J Environ Sci 21(11):1562–1568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss JV, Emerson D, Backer SM, Megonigal JP (2003) Enumeration of Fe(II)-oxidizing and Fe(III)-reducing bacteria in the root zone of wetland plants: implications for a rhizosphere iron cycle. Biogeochemistry 64(1):77–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss JV, Emerson D, Megonigal JP (2004) Geochemical control of microbial Fe(III) reduction potential in wetlands: comparison of the rhizosphere to non-rhizosphere soil. Fems Microbiol Ecol 48(1):89–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss JV, Emerson D, Megonigal JP (2005) Rhizosphere iron(III) deposition and reduction in a Juncus effusus L.-dominated wetland. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69(6):1861–1870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi N, Nakamura T, Dong D, Takahashi Y, Amachi S, Makino T (2011) Arsenic release from flooded paddy soils is influenced by speciation, Eh, pH, and iron dissolution. Chemosphere 83(7):925–932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Hu Y, Wang XJ, Chen XP, Huang YZ, Zhu YG (2009) Differences of iron plaque formation and As accumulation between two rice cultivars with different aerenchyma Tissue. Asian J Ecotoxicol 4(5):711–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong SQ, Shi JC, Xu JM (2010) Influence of iron plaque on accumulation of lead by yellow flag (Iris pseudacorus L.) grown in artificial Pb-contaminated soil. J Soils Sediments 10(5):964–970

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu YG, Sun GX, Lei M, Teng M, Liu YX, Chen NC, Wang LH, Carey AM, Deacon C, Raab A, Meharg AA, Williams PN (2008) High percentage inorganic arsenic content of mining impacted and nonimpacted Chinese rice. Environ Sci Technol 42(13):5008–5013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zobrist J, Dowdle PR, Davis JA, Oremland RS (2000) Mobilization of arsenite by dissimilatory reduction of adsorbed arsenate. Environ Sci Technol 34(22):4747–4753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 40973058).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoxin Sun.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Bernd Markert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, H., Zhu, Y., Chen, Z. et al. Arsenic mobilization and speciation during iron plaque decomposition in a paddy soil. J Soils Sediments 12, 402–410 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0461-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0461-1

Keywords

Navigation