Skip to main content
Log in

Physicochemical and ecotoxicological evaluation of estuarine water quality during a dredging operation

  • INTERCOMPARTMENT • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Most of the information concerning the effects of contaminated sediments on estuarine organisms deals with the impacts of bed forming sediments. The ecotoxicological potential at the time of a dredging operation is more difficult to assess, and few studies have dealt specifically with resuspended contaminated sediments. The aim of this study was to determine whether release of contaminants through sediment resuspension during a dredging operation in the Itajaí-açu estuary (Brazil) changed the water quality classification and had an ecotoxicological impact on the near-field water column during the critical moment of this operation.

Materials and methods

Waters from two sites (control and dredged sites) were analyzed for physicochemical parameters before, during, and after a dredging operation. In parallel, a short-term, sensitive battery of biotests (bacteria, algae, and daphnids) was performed with water samples before and during this operation according to the ISO bioassay protocols.

Results and discussion

No short-term toxicity was observed with waters collected before or during the dredging operation. The results showed that desorption of contaminants from suspended particles of sediments with a low level of contamination during a dredging operation lowered the water quality in the near-field water column but that this did not promote significant acute toxicity effects on the organisms tested.

Conclusions

More detailed studies are needed (e.g., the question of the reliability of biotests under turbulent, particle-rich conditions) to fully understand this complex issue regarding water column ecotoxicity during the whole dredging operation and to support decisions on the management of dredging activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlf W, Hollert H, Neumann-Hensel H, Ricking M (2002) A guidance for the assessment and evaluation of sediment quality—a German approach based on ecotoxicological and chemical measurements. J Soils Sediments 3:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APHA, AWWA, WPCF (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn, Section 8220, American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation Washington, DC

  • Bonnet C, Babut M, Férard J-F, Martel L, Garric J (2000) Assessing the potential toxicity of resuspended sediment. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1290–1296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calace N, Petronio BM, Pietroletti M (2006) Metal bioavailability: how does its significance change in the time? Ann Chim 96:131–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman PM, Wang F, Janssen C, Persoone G, Allen H (1998) Ecotoxicology of metals in aquatic sediments: binding and release, bioavailability, risk assessment, and remediation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:2221–2243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins MA (1995) Dredging-induced near-field resuspended sediment concentrations and source strengths, miscellaneous paper D-95-2, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station

  • CONAMA (2004) Resolution 344 of 25 March 2004. Guidelines for dreding sediments in the National waters. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, Brazil (in Portuguese)

  • CONAMA (2005) Resolution 357 of 17 March 2005. Classification of waters in the National territory. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, Brazil (in Portuguese)

  • Constantino R, Gaspar MB, Tata-Regala J, Carvalho S, Cúrdia J, Drago T, Taborda R, Monteiro CC (2009) Clam dredging effects and subsequent recovery of benthic communities at different depth ranges. Mar Environ Res 67:89–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cotou E, Gremare A, Charles F, Hatzianestis I, Sklivagou E (2005) Potential toxicity of resuspended particulate matter and sediments: environmental samples from the Bay of Banyuls-sur-Mer and Thermaikos Gulf. Cont Shelf Res 25:2521–2532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darbra RM, Pittam N, Royston KA, Darbra JP, Journee H (2009) Survey on environmental monitoring requirements of European ports. J Environ Man 90:1396–1403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleton J, Thomas KV (2004) A review of factors affecting the release and bioavailability of contaminants during sediment disturbance events. Environ Int 30:973–980

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EVS (1997) Release of contaminants from resuspended particulate matter, White Paper, Environment Consultants, North Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • Fairbridge RW (1980) The estuary: its definition and geodynamic cycle. In: Olausson E, Cato I (eds) Chemistry and biogeochemistry of estuaries. Wiley, New York, pp 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Förstner U (1987) Changes in metal mobilities in aquatic and terrestrial cycles. In: Patterson JW, Pasino R (eds) Metals speciation, separation and recovery. Lewis, Chelsea, pp 3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Förstner U (2004) Sediment dynamics and pollutant mobility in rivers: an interdisciplinary approach. Lakes Res: Res Manag 9:25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förstner U, Salomons W (2008) Trends and challenges in sediment research 2008: the role of sediments in river basin management. J Soils Sediments 8:281–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förstner U, Wittmann GTW (1981) Metal pollution in the aquatic environment. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredette TJ, French GT (2004) Understanding the physical and environmental consequences of dredged material disposal: history in New England and current perspectives. Mar Pollut Bull 49:93–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavson KE, Burton GA, Francingues NR Jr, Reible DD, Vorhees DJ, Wolfe JR (2008) Evaluating the effectiveness of contaminated sediment dredging. Environ Sci Technol 42:5042–5047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes DF, Engler RM (1986) Environmental effects of dredging. Technical notes. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieha C-Y, Tsai M-H, Ryan DK, Pancorbo OC (2004) Toxicity of the 13 priority pollutant metals to Vibrio fisheri in the microtox-chronic toxicity test. Sci Total Environ 320:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1989a) Water quality: freshwater algal growth inhibition test with Scenedesmus subspicatus and Selenastrum capricornutum. ISO 8692. International Standard Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1989b) Water quality: determination of the inhibition of the mobility of Daphnia magna Straus (Cladocera, Crustacea). ISO 6341. International Standard Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1996) Water quality: determination of the inhibitory effect of water samples on the light emission of Vibrio fischeri (Luminescent bacteria test). Part 3: method using freeze-dried bacteria. ISO/DIS 11348–3. International Standard Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Khangarot BS, Ray PK (1989) Investigation of correlation between physiochemical properties of metals and their toxicity to the water flea Daphnia magna Straus. Ecotox Environ Saf 18:109–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klavins M, Briede A, Rodinov V, Kokorite I, Parele E, Klavina I (2000) Heavy metals in rivers of Latvia. Sci Total Environ 262:175–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long ER (2002) Degraded sediment quality in US estuaries: a review of magnitude and ecological implications. Ecol Appl 10:338–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu JY, Chakrabarti CL, Back MH, Sekaly ALR, Gregoire DC, Schroeder WH (1996) Speciation of some metals in river surface water, rain and snow, and the interactions of these metals with selected soil matrices. J Anal Atom Spectrom 11:1189–1201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwing DD, Sherrard JH (1988) An evaluation of the standard elutriate test as an estimator of contaminant release at the point of dredging, contract report HL-88-1, prepared for U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Improvement of Operations and Maintenance Techniques Research Program, Washington, DC: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army

  • Maddock JEL, Carvalho MF, Santelli RE, Machado W (2007) Contaminant metal behaviour during re-suspension of sulphidic estuarine sediments. Water Air Soil Pollut 181:193–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rörig LR (2005) Usos múltiplos e qualidade das águas da bacia do baixo Itajaí-Açu – SC: Elementos para um gerenciamento integrado. Doctorate Thesis (in Portuguese), UFSCar, São Carlos, SP, Brazil

  • Rosa EVC, Simionatto EL, Souza-Sierra MM, Bertoli SL, Radetski CM (2001) Toxicity-based criteria for the evaluation of textile wastewater treatment efficiency. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:839–845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schettini CAF (2002) Caracterização física do estuário do Rio Itajaí-açu. RBRH 7:123–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Schettini CAF, Carvalho JLB (1998) Suspended sediment balance in the estuary of Itajaí-Açu river during a low discharge period. An Acad Bras Ciênc 70:325–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Schettini CAF, Resgalla C Jr, Pereira Filho J, Silva MAC, Truccolo EC, Rörig LR (2005) Variabilidade temporal das características oceanográficas e ecológicas da região de influência fluvial do rio Itajaí-Açu. Braz J Aquat Sci Technol 9:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessier A, Campbell PGC, Bisson M (1979) Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal Chem 51:844–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomson MB, Kan AT, Chen W, Hunter MA (2003) Desorption of nonpolar organic pollutants from historically contaminated sediments and dredged materials. Hazardous Substance Research Center, South/Southwest. Georgia Tech Research Corporation

  • USEPA (1996) Test methods for evaluating solid waste, SW-846. USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1998) Evaluation of dredged material proposedfor discharge inwaters of the U.S.—testing manual. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1999) The ecological condition of estuaries in the Gulf of Mexico. EPA 620-R-98–004. Office of Research and Development, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2000) Liquid assets 2000: America´s water resources at a turning point. EPA 840-B-00-001. Office of Water, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2001) Methods for collection, storage and manipulation of sediments for chemical and toxicological analyses: technical manual. EPA 823-B-01-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2007) Framework for metals risk assessment. EPA document 120/R-07/001, Washington, DC

  • Van Oostrum RW, Vroege P (1994) Turbidity and contaminant release during dredging of contaminated sediments, Proc. of the Second International Conference on Dredging and Dredge Material Placement. November 13–16, 1994, Lake Buena Vista, FL, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York

  • Viers J, Dupréa B, Gaillardet J (2009) Chemical composition of suspended sediments in World Rivers: new insights from a new database. Sci Total Environ 407:853–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voie OA, Johnsen A, Rossland HK (2002) Why biota still accumulate high levels of PCB after removal of PCB contaminated sediments in a Norwegian fjord. Chemosphere 46:1367–1372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh GE, McLaughlin LL, Yoder MJ, Moody PH, Lores EM, Forester J, Wessinger-Duvall PB (1988) Minutocellus polymorphus: a new marine diatom for use in algal toxicity tests. Environ Toxicol Chem 7:925–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weston DP, Jarman WM, Cabana G, Bacon CE, Jacobson LA (2002) An evaluation of the success of dredging as remediation at a DDT-contaminated site in San Francisco Bay, California, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:2216–2224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilber DH, Clarke DG (2001) Biological effects of suspended sediments: a review of suspended sediment impacts on fish and shellfish with relation to dredging activities in estuaries. N Am J Fish Manage 21:855–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilber DH, Clarke DG, Rees SI (2007) Responses of benthic macroinvertebrates to thin-layer disposal of dredged material in Mississippi Sound, USA. Mar Pollut Bull 54:42–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wölz J, Cofalla C, Hudjetz S, Roger S, Brinkmann M, Schmidt B, Schäffer A, Kammann U, Lennartz G, Hecker M, Schüttrumpf H, Hollert H (2009) In search for the ecological and toxicological relevance of sediment re-mobilisation and transport during flood events. J Soils Sediments 9:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly acknowledge the fellowship support of CNPq—Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (grants 300898/2007-0 for CM Radetski and 306217/2007-4 for CAF Schettini).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudemir M. Radetski.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Susanne Heise.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Urban, S.R., Corrêa, A.X.R., Schettini, C.A.F. et al. Physicochemical and ecotoxicological evaluation of estuarine water quality during a dredging operation. J Soils Sediments 10, 65–76 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-009-0156-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-009-0156-z

Keywords

Navigation