Challenges and ways forward in pesticide emission and toxicity characterization modeling for tropical conditions

  • Céline GentilEmail author
  • Peter Fantke
  • Charles Mottes
  • Claudine Basset-Mens



In tropical cropping systems, pesticides are extensively used to fight pests and ensure high crop yields. However, pesticide use also leads to environmental and health impacts. While pesticide emissions and impacts are influenced by farm management practices and environmental conditions, available Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) emission models and Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) toxicity characterization models are generally designed based on temperate conditions. There is, hence, a need for adapting LCI and LCIA models for evaluating pesticides under tropical conditions. To address this need, we aim to identify the characteristics that determine pesticide emissions and related impacts under tropical conditions, and to assess to what extent LCI and LCIA models need to be adapted to better account for these conditions.


We investigated the state-of-knowledge with respect to characteristics that drive pesticide emission patterns, environmental fate, human and ecological exposures, and toxicological effects under tropical conditions. We then discuss the applicability of existing LCI and LCIA models to tropical regions as input for deriving specific recommendations for future modeling refinements.

Results and discussion

Our results indicate that many pesticide-related environmental processes, such as degradation and volatilization, show higher kinetic rates under tropical conditions mainly due to higher temperatures, sunlight radiation, and microbial activity. Heavy and frequent rainfalls enhance leaching and runoff. Specific soil characteristics (e.g., low pH), crops, and cropping systems (e.g., mulching) are important drivers of distinct pesticide emission patterns under tropical conditions. Adapting LCI models to tropical conditions implies incorporating specific features of tropical cropping systems (e.g., intercropping, ground cover management), specific drift curves for tropical pesticide application techniques, and better addressing leaching processes. The validity domain of the discussed LCI and LCIA models could be systematically extended to tropical regions by considering tropical soil types, climate conditions, and crops, and adding active substances applied specifically under tropical conditions, including the consideration of late applications of pesticides before harvest and their effect on crop residues and subsequent human intake.


Current LCI and LCIA models are not fully suitable for evaluating pesticide emissions and impacts for crops cultivated in tropical regions. Models should be adapted and parameterized to better account for various characteristics influencing emission and impact patterns under tropical conditions using best available data and knowledge. Further research is urgently required to improve our knowledge and data with respect to understanding and evaluating pesticide emission and impact processes under tropical conditions.


Life cycle assessment Pesticides Emission models Toxicity characterization models Tropical regions 


Funding information

The present study was supported by ADEME (French Environment and Energy Management Agency) of Martinique (InnovACV project no. 17MAC0038), by CIRAD and the European Regional Development Fund of Martinique through the Rivage project (MQ0003772-CIRAD), and by the OLCA-Pest project financially supported by ADEME (grant agreement no. 17-03-C0025).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Abbasi MA, Jamal T (1999) Soil loss and runoff measurement from banana-pineapple intercropping system. Pak J Bio Sci 2:689–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aktar MW, Sengupta D, Chowdhury A (2009) Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards. Interdiscip Toxicol 2:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alves GS, da Cunha JPAR (2014) Field data and prediction models of pesticide spray drift on coffee crop. Pesq Agrop Brasileira 49:622–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alves PRL, Cardoso EJBN, Martines AM, Sousa JP, Pasini A (2013) Earthworm ecotoxicological assessments of pesticides used to treat seeds under tropical conditions. Chemosphere 90:2674–2682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antón A, Castells F, Montero JI, Huijbregts M (2004) Comparison of toxicological impacts of integrated and chemical pest management in Mediterranean greenhouses. Chemosphere 54:1225–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Antón A, Torrellas M, Núñez M, Sevigné E, Amores MJ, Muñoz P, Montero JI (2014) Improvement of agricultural life cycle assessment studies through spatial differentiation and new impact categories: case study on greenhouse tomato production. Environ Sci Technol 48:9454–9462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arias-Andrés M, Rämö R, Torres FM et al (2018) Lower tier toxicity risk assessment of agriculture pesticides detected on the Río Madre de Dios watershed, Costa Rica. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:13312–13321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arias-Estévez M, López-Periago E, Martínez-Carballo E, Simal-Gándara J, Mejuto JC, García-Río L (2008) The mobility and degradation of pesticides in soils and the pollution of groundwater resources. Agri Ecosyst Environ 123:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arvidsson T, Bergström L, Kreuger J (2011) Spray drift as influenced by meteorological and technical factors. Pest Manag Sci 67:586–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Awadhwal NK, Cabrido EF, Quick GR (1991) Minimizing drift and exposure from knapsack sprayers. J Environ Sci Health B 26:589–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bajwa U, Sandhu KS (2014) Effect of handling and processing on pesticide residues in food- a review. J Food Sci Technol 51:201–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Basset-Mens C, Edewa A, Gentil C (2019) An LCA of French beans from Kenya for decision-makers. Indones J Life Cycle Assess Sust 3:11Google Scholar
  13. Beck HE, Zimmermann NE, McVicar TR et al (2018) Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Scientific Data 5:180214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berthoud A, Maupu P, Huet C, Poupart A (2011) Assessing freshwater ecotoxicity of agricultural products in life cycle assessment (LCA): a case study of wheat using French agricultural practices databases and USEtox model. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:841–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bessou C, Basset-Mens C, Tran T, Benoist A (2013) LCA applied to perennial cropping systems: a review focused on the farm stage. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:340–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Biénabe E, Rival A, Loeillet D (2016) Développement durable et filières tropicales, Quae. Versailles, FranceGoogle Scholar
  17. Birkved M, Hauschild MZ (2006) PestLCI—A model for estimating field emissions of pesticides in agricultural LCA. Ecol Model 198:433–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bocquené G, Franco A (2005) Pesticide contamination of the coastline of Martinique. Mar Pollut Bull 51:612–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bojacá CR, Gil R, Casilimas H et al (2012) Modelling the environmental impact of pesticides sprayed on greenhouse tomatoes: a regional case study in Colombia. Acta Hortic 61–68.
  20. Brock TC, Alix A, Brown C et al (2009) Linking aquatic exposure and effects: risk assessment of pesticides. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Brown JH (2014) Why are there so many species in the tropics? J Biogeogr 41:8–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bueno MR, da Cunha JPAR, de Santana DG (2017) Assessment of spray drift from pesticide applications in soybean crops. Biosyst Eng 154:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Capri E, Miao Z (2002) Modelling pesticide fate in rice paddy. Agronomie 22:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Castillo LE, de la Cruz E, Ruepert C (1996) Ecotoxicology and pesticides in tropical aquatic ecosystems of Central America. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Charlier JB, Cattan P, Voltz M, Moussa R (2009) Transport of a nematicide in surface and groundwaters in a tropical volcanic catchment. J Environ Qual 38:1031–1041Google Scholar
  26. da Cunha JPAR, Teixeira MM, Coury JR, Ferreira LR (2003) Evaluation of strategies to reduce pesticide spray drift. Planta Daninha 21:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Daam MA, Rico A (2018) Freshwater shrimps as sensitive test species for the risk assessment of pesticides in the tropics. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:13235–13243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Daam MA, van den Brink PJ (2010) Implications of differences between temperate and tropical freshwater ecosystems for the ecological risk assessment of pesticides. Ecotoxicology 19:24–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Danielopol DL, Pospisil P, Rouch R (2000) Biodiversity in groundwater: a large-scale view. Trends Ecol Evol 15:223–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. de Bon H, Huat J, Parrot L, Sinzogan A, Martin T, Malézieux E, Vayssières JF (2014) Pesticide risks from fruit and vegetable pest management by small farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:723–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dickinson NM, Lepp NW (1984) Pollution of tropical plantation crops by copper fungicides: a copper budget for Kenyan coffee plantation. Stud Environ Sci:341–346Google Scholar
  32. Dijkman TJ (2013) Modelling of pesticide emissions for Life Cycle Inventory analysis: model development, applications and implications. Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  33. Dijkman TJ, Basset-Mens C, Antón A, Núñez M (2018) LCA of food and agriculture. In: Hauschild MZ (ed) Life Cycle Assessment - theory and practice. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp 723–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dijkman TJ, Birkved M, Hauschild MZ (2012) PestLCI 2.0: a second generation model for estimating emissions of pesticides from arable land in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:973–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dijkman TJ, Birkved M, Saxe H, Wenzel H, Hauschild MZ (2017) Environmental impacts of barley cultivation under current and future climatic conditions. J Clean Prod 140:644–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Elibariki R, Maguta MM (2017) Status of pesticides pollution in Tanzania – a review. Chemos 178:154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fantin V, Buscaroli A, Dijkman T, Zamagni A, Garavini G, Bonoli A, Righi S (2019) PestLCI 2.0 sensitivity to soil variations for the evaluation of pesticide distribution in life cycle assessment studies. Sci Total Environ 656:1021–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fantke P (2019) Modeling the environmental impacts of pesticides in agriculture. In: Weidema, B.P. (Ed) Assessing the environmental impact of agriculture, Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing. Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp 177–228.
  39. Fantke P, Antón A, Grant T, Hayashi K (2017a) Pesticide emission quantification for life cycle assessment: a global consensus building process. J Life Cycle Assess 13:245–251Google Scholar
  40. Fantke P, Arnot JA, Doucette WJ (2016) Improving plant bioaccumulation science through consistent reporting of experimental data. J Environ Manag 181:374–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fantke P, Aurisano N, Bare J, Backhaus T, Bulle C, Chapman PM, de Zwart D, Dwyer R, Ernstoff A, Golsteijn L, Holmquist H, Jolliet O, McKone TE, Owsianiak M, Peijnenburg W, Posthuma L, Roos S, Saouter E, Schowanek D, van Straalen NM, Vijver MG, Hauschild M (2018) Toward harmonizing ecotoxicity characterization in life cycle impact assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 37:2955–2971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fantke P, Bijster M, Guignard C et al (2017b) USEtox® 2.0 documentation (Version1)Google Scholar
  43. Fantke P, Charles R, de Alencastro LF et al (2011a) Plant uptake of pesticides and human health: dynamic modeling of residues in wheat and ingestion intake. Chemosphere 85:1639–1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fantke P, Friedrich R, Jolliet O (2012a) Health impact and damage cost assessment of pesticides in Europe. Enviro Int 49:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fantke P, Gillespie BW, Juraske R, Jolliet O (2014) Estimating half-lives for pesticide dissipation from plants. Environ Sci Technol 48:8588–8602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Fantke P, Jolliet O (2016) Life cycle human health impacts of 875 pesticides. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:722–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Fantke P, Juraske R (2013) Variability of pesticide dissipation half-lives in plants. Environ Sci Technol 47:3548–3562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fantke P, Juraske R, Antón A, Friedrich R, Jolliet O (2011b) Dynamic multicrop model to characterize impacts of pesticides in food. Environ Sci Technol 45:8842–8849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fantke P, Wieland P, Juraske R, Shaddick G, Itoiz ES, Friedrich R, Jolliet O (2012b) Parameterization models for pesticide exposure via crop consumption. Environ Sci Technol 46:12864–12872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Fantke P, Wieland P, Wannaz C, Friedrich R, Jolliet O (2013) Dynamics of pesticide uptake into plants: from system functioning to parsimonious modeling. Environ Model Softw 40:316–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. FAOSTAT (2019) FAOSTAT. In: FAOSTAT. Accessed 15 Jan 2019
  52. Feng X, Wang K, Pan L, Xu T, Zhang H, Fantke P (2018) Measured and modeled residue dynamics of famoxadone and oxathiapiprolin in tomato fields. J Agric Food Chem 66:8489–8495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Franke AC, Kempenaar C, Holterman HJ, van de Zande JC (2010) Spray drift from knapsack sprayers, a study conducted within the framework of the Sino-Dutch pesticide environmental risk assessment project PERAP. Wageningen, Plant Research International B.VGoogle Scholar
  54. Ganzelmeier H, Rautmann D, Spangenberg R et al (1995) Studies on the spray drift of plant protection products. Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  55. García-Santos G, Feola G, Nuyttens D, Diaz J (2016) Drift from the use of hand-held knapsack pesticide sprayers in Boyacá (Colombian Andes). J Agric Food Chem 64:3990–3998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Gouda AI, Mehoba MHL, Toko II et al (2018) Comparison of drift of two types of sprayers used in cotton production in Benin. Biotechnol Agron Soc 22:94–105Google Scholar
  57. Hauschild MZ (2000) Estimating pesticide emissions for LCA of agricultural products. In: Weidema BP (ed) Agricultural data for life cycle assessments. Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI), The Hague, pp 64–79Google Scholar
  58. Hauschild MZ, Goedkoop M, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, Jolliet O, Margni M, de Schryver A, Humbert S, Laurent A, Sala S, Pant R (2013) Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:683–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Henderson AD, Hauschild MZ, van de Meent D, Huijbregts MAJ, Larsen HF, Margni M, McKone TE, Payet J, Rosenbaum RK, Jolliet O (2011) USEtox fate and ecotoxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key chemical properties. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:701–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Holterman HJ, van de Zande JC (2003) IMAG Drift Calculator v1.1: user manual. Accessed 28 Dec 2018
  61. Hossain MS, Fakhruddin ANM, Chowdhury MAZ et al (2015) Health risk assessment of selected pesticide residues in locally produced vegetables of Bangladesh. Int Food Res J 22:110–115Google Scholar
  62. Houbraken M, Habimana V, Senaeve D, López-Dávila E, Spanoghe P (2017) Multi-residue determination and ecological risk assessment of pesticides in the lakes of Rwanda. Sci Total Environ 576:888–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hunt ND, Hill JD, Liebman M (2017) Reducing freshwater toxicity while maintaining weed control, profits, and productivity: effects of increased crop rotation diversity and reduced herbicide usage. Environ Sci Technol 51:1707–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Inao K, Iwafune T, Horio T (2018) An improved PADDY model including uptake by rice roots to predict pesticide behavior in paddy fields under nursery-box and submerged applications. J Pestic Sci 43:142–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ingwersen WW (2012) Life cycle assessment of fresh pineapple from Costa Rica. J Clean Prod 35:152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Itoiz ES, Fantke P, Juraske R, Kounina A, Vallejo AA (2012) Deposition and residues of azoxystrobin and imidacloprid on greenhouse lettuce with implications for human consumption. Chemosphere 89:1034–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Jacobsen RE, Fantke P, Trapp S (2015) Analysing half-lives for pesticide dissipation in plants. SAR QSAR Environ Res 26:325–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Juraske R, Fantke P, Ramírez ACR, González A (2012) Pesticide residue dynamics in passion fruits: comparing field trial and modelling results. Chemosphere 89:850–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Juraske R, Mutel CL, Stoessel F, Hellweg S (2009) Life cycle human toxicity assessment of pesticides: comparing fruit and vegetable diets in Switzerland and the United States. Chemosphere 77:939–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Juraske R, Vivas CSM, Velásquez AE et al (2011) Pesticide uptake in potatoes: model and field experiments. Environ Sci Technol 45:651–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kariathi V, Kassim N, Kimanya M (2016) Pesticide exposure from fresh tomatoes and its relationship with pesticide application practices in Meru district. Cogent Food & Agriculture 2:1196808. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kookana RS (2010) The role of biochar in modifying the environmental fate, bioavailability, and efficacy of pesticides in soils: a review. Soil Res 48:627–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F (2006) World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z 15:259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kwok KW, Leung KM, Lui GS et al (2007) Comparison of tropical and temperate freshwater animal species’ acute sensitivities to chemicals: implications for deriving safe extrapolation factors. Integr Environ Asses 3:49–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Laplace D (2018) L’usage des phytosanitaires dans le bassin amazonien : entre problèmes spécifiques à l’agriculture en zone tropicale et fragilité de l’écosystème. Innovations Agronomiques:1–10
  76. Leboulanger C, Schwartz C, Somville P, Diallo AO, Pagano M (2011) Sensitivity of two mesocyclops (Crustacea, Copepoda, Cyclopidae), from tropical and temperate origins, to the herbicides, Diuron and Paraquat, and the insecticides, Temephos and Fenitrothion. B Environ Contam Tox 87:487–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lewis SE, Silburn DM, Kookana RS, Shaw M (2016) Pesticide behavior, fate, and effects in the tropics: an overview of the current state of knowledge. J Agric Food Chem 64:3917–3924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Linders J, Mensink H, Stephenson G et al (2000) Foliar interception and retention values after pesticide application: a proposal for standardised values for environmental risk assessment. Pest Manag Sci 58:315–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Matthews G, Wiles T, Baleguel P (2003) A survey of pesticide application in Cameroon. Crop Prot 22:707–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Meier MS, Stoessel F, Jungbluth N, Juraske R, Schader C, Stolze M (2015) Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products – are the differences captured by life cycle assessment? J Environ Manag 149:193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Mendes KF, Hall KE, Takeshita V, Rossi ML, Tornisielo VL (2018) Animal bonechar increases sorption and decreases leaching potential of aminocyclopyrachlor and mesotrione in a tropical soil. Geoderma 316:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Mitoko GJAO (1997) Occupational pesticide exposure among Kenyan agricultural workers : an epidemiological and public health perspective. Ohayo-MitokoGoogle Scholar
  83. Montes AM, González-Farias FA, Botello AV (2012) Pollution by organochlorine pesticides in Navachiste-Macapule, Sinaloa, Mexico. Environ Monit Assess 184:1359–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Mottes C, Lesueur-Jannoyer M, Le Bail M, Guéné M, Carles C,  Malézieux E  (2017) Relationships between past and present pesticide applications and pollution at a watershed outlet: the case of a horticultural catchment in Martinique, French West Indies. Chemosphere 184:762–773Google Scholar
  85. Mottes C, Lesueur-Jannoyer M, Le Bail M, Malézieux E (2014) Pesticide transfer models in crop and watershed systems: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:229–250Google Scholar
  86. Mutua GK, Ngigi AN, Getenga ZM (2016) Degradation characteristics of metribuzin in soils within the Nzoia River Drainage Basin, Kenya. Toxicol Environ Chem 98:800–813Google Scholar
  87. Nemecek T, Schnetzer J (2011) Methods of assessment of direct field emissions for LCIs of agricultural production systems. Data v3.0. Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories, Duebendord, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  88. Nordborg M, Cederberg C, Berndes G (2014) Modeling potential freshwater ecotoxicity impacts due to pesticide use in biofuel feedstock production: the cases of maize, rapeseed, Salix, soybean, sugar cane, and wheat. Environ Sci Technol 48:11379–11388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Nordborg M, Davis J, Cederberg C, Woodhouse A (2017) Freshwater ecotoxicity impacts from pesticide use in animal and vegetable foods produced in Sweden. Sci Total Environ 581–582:448–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Notarnicola B, Sala S, Antón A et al (2017) The role of life cycle assessment in supporting sustainable agri-food systems: a review of the challenges. J Clean Prod 140:399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Oturan N, Trajkovska S, Oturan MA, Couderchet M, Aaron JJ (2008) Study of the toxicity of diuron and its metabolites formed in aqueous medium during application of the electrochemical advanced oxidation process “electro-Fenton.” Chemosphere 73:1550–1556Google Scholar
  92. Peña N, Antón A, Kamilaris A, Fantke P (2018) Modeling ecotoxicity impacts in vineyard production: addressing spatial differentiation for copper fungicides. Sci Total Environ 616–617:796–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Peña N, Knudsen MT, Fantke P, Antón A, Hermansen JE (2019) Freshwater ecotoxicity assessment of pesticide use in crop production: testing the influence of modeling choices. J Clean Prod 209:1332–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Pennington DW, Margni M, Ammann C, Jolliet O (2005) Multimedia fate and human intake modeling: spatial versus nonspatial insights for chemical emissions in Western Europe. Environ Sci Technol 39:1119–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Pereira-Junior EV, Giori FG, Nascimento AL, Tornisielo VL, Regitano JB (2015) Effects of soil attributes and straw accumulation on the sorption of hexazinone and tebuthiuron in tropical soils cultivated with sugarcane. J Environ Sci Health B 50:238–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Peters EC, Gassman NJ, Firman JC, Richmond RH, Power EA (1997) Ecotoxicology of tropical marine ecosystems. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:12–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Pillai MKK (1986) Pesticide pollution of soil, water and air in Delhi area, India. Sci Total Environ 55:321–327. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Pouokam GB, Lemnyuy Album W, Ndikontar AS, Sidatt MEH (2017) A pilot study in Cameroon to understand safe uses of pesticides in agriculture, risk factors for farmers’ exposure and management of accidental cases. Toxics 5(4):E30. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Racke KD, Skidmore MW, Hamilton DJ, Unsworth JB, Miyamoto J, Cohen SZ (1997) Pesticides report .38. Pesticide fate in tropical soils - (Technical report). Pure Appl Chem 69:1349–1371Google Scholar
  100. Raksanam B, Taneepanichskul S, Siriwong W, Robson MG (2012) Factors associated with pesticide risk behaviors among rice farmers in rural community, Thailand. J Environ Earth Sci 2:32–39Google Scholar
  101. Renaud-Gentié C, Dijkman TJ, Bjørn A, Birkved M (2015) Pesticide emission modelling and freshwater ecotoxicity assessment for grapevine LCA: adaptation of PestLCI 2.0 to viticulture. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1528–1543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Rosenbaum RK, Antón A, Bengoa X et al (2015) The Glasgow consensus on the delineation between pesticide emission inventory and impact assessment for LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:765–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Rosenbaum RK, Bachmann TM, Gold LS, Huijbregts MAJ, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen HF, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone TE, Payet J, Schuhmacher M, van de Meent D, Hauschild MZ (2008) USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:532–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Rosenbaum RK, Huijbregts MAJ, Henderson AD, Margni M, McKone TE, van de Meent D, Hauschild MZ, Shaked S, Li DS, Gold LS, Jolliet O (2011) USEtox human exposure and toxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key chemical properties. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:710–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Ryberg MW, Rosenbaum RK, Mosqueron L, Fantke P (2018) Addressing bystander exposure to agricultural pesticides in life cycle impact assessment. Chemosphere 197:541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Salomone R, Ioppolo G (2012) Environmental impacts of olive oil production: a Life Cycle Assessment case study in the province of Messina (Sicily). J Clean Prod 28:88–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Sanchez-Bayo F, Hyne RV (2011) Comparison of environmental risks of pesticides between tropical and nontropical regions. Integr Environ Assess Manag 7:577–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Sansoulet J, Cabidoche YM, Cattan P (2007) Adsorption and transport of nitrate and potassium in an Andosol under banana (Guadeloupe, French West Indies). Eur J Soil Biol 58:478–489Google Scholar
  109. Settle W, Soumare M, Sarr M et al (2014) Reducing pesticide risks to farming communities: cotton farmer field schools in Mali. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 369:20120277. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Snelder DJ, Masipiqueña MD, de Snoo GR (2008) Risk assessment of pesticide usage by smallholder farmers in the Cagayan Valley (Philippines). Crop Prot 27:747–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Sorensen JPR, Lapworth DJ, Nkhuwa DCW, Stuart ME, Gooddy DC, Bell RA, Chirwa M, Kabika J, Liemisa M, Chibesa M, Pedley S (2015) Emerging contaminants in urban groundwater sources in Africa. Water Res 72:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Thorbek P, Forbes EV, Heimbach F et al (2009) Ecological models for regulatory risk assessments of pesticides: developing a strategy for the future. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  113. van Zelm R, Larrey-Lassalle P, Roux P (2014) Bridging the gap between life cycle inventory and impact assessment for toxicological assessments of pesticides used in crop production. Chemosphere 100:175–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Vázquez-Rowe I, Torres-García JR, Cáceres AL et al (2017) Assessing the magnitude of potential environmental impacts related to water and toxicity in the Peruvian hyper-arid coast: a case study for the cultivation of grapes for pisco production. Sci Total Environ 601–602:532–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Vázquez-Rowe I, Villanueva-Rey P, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2012) Environmental analysis of Ribeiro wine from a timeline perspective: harvest year matters when reporting environmental impacts. J Environ Manag 98:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wannaz C, Fantke P, Lane J, Jolliet O (2018) Source-to-exposure assessment with the Pangea multi-scale framework – case study in Australia. Environ Sci: Processes Impacts 20:133–144Google Scholar
  117. Weinberger K, Lumpkin TA (2007) Diversification into horticulture and poverty reduction: a research agenda. World Dev 35:1464–1480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Westh TB, Hauschild MZ, Birkved M, Jørgensen MS, Rosenbaum RK, Fantke P (2015) The USEtox story: a survey of model developer visions and user requirements. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Williamson S, Ball A, Pretty J (2008) Trends in pesticide use and drivers for safer pest management in four African countries. Crop Prot 27:1327–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Xue X, Hawkins TR, Ingwersen WW, Smith RL (2015) Demonstrating an approach for including pesticide use in life-cycle assessment: estimating human and ecosystem toxicity of pesticide use in Midwest corn farming. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1117–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HortSys, Univ Montpellier, CIRADMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.CIRAD, UPR HortSys, ELSALe LamentinFrance
  3. 3.Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of DenmarkKgs. LyngbyDenmark
  4. 4.CIRAD, UPR HortSysLe LamentinFrance

Personalised recommendations