Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Creating a “family tree” on fertilizer inventory use in life cycle assessment of oil palm: visualization of earlier studies and its implications

  • LCA FOR AGRICULTURE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 27 May 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

This review develops and applies a visualization method for understanding how chemical fertilizer inventory data, including greenhouse gas (GHG) emission factors and fossil fuel energy requirements, have been used in previous life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of oil palm and discusses how inconsistencies detected in previous studies can be decreased.

Methods

As a visualization method for previous publications, a “family tree” was constructed using a directed graph (digraph) representation. Each node in the graph indicates an article, and an arrow from the source to a destination illustrates that the former article was cited in the latter article as a source of the background inventories. Bibliographical data extracted from the Web of Science were used for constructing the genealogy of fertilizer inventory use.

Results and discussion

Several groups (“families”) were identified through creation of the family tree. The most noticeable group was formed around the LCA database ecoinvent, which has the maximum number of out-flows (arrows from the node), suggesting a considerable influence of ecoinvent in the LCA of oil palm. In addition, temporal and spatial inconsistencies (outdated technological assumptions and substitutional use of European data) were detected in the visualization; therefore, the severity of the inconsistencies was discussed through an analysis of scenario uncertainty in nitrogen fertilizer production. The importance of devoting attention to fertilizer production technologies rather than simply to regional differences was clarified.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the usefulness of applying visualization methods in understanding the overall configuration of earlier studies. It is expected that the visualization and its implications constitute a way forward to good practices in inventory analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 27 May 2019

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake.

References

  • Achten W, Vandenbempt P, Almeida J, Mathijs E, Muys B (2010) Life cycle assessment of a palm oil system with simultaneous production of biodiesel and cooking oil in Cameroon. Environ Sci Technol 44:4809–4815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ackermann F, Eden C (2011) Making strategy: mapping out strategic success, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Arpornpong N, Sabatini D, Khaodhiar S, Charoensaeng A (2015) Life cycle assessment of palm oil microemulsion-based biofuel. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:913–926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson R, Persson S, Fröling M, Svanström M (2011) Life cycle assessment of hydrotreated vegetable oil from rape, oil palm and Jatropha. J Clean Prod 19:129–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Audsley E, Alber S, Clift R, Cowell S, Crettaz P, Gaillard G, Hausheer J, Jolliett O, Kleijn R, Mortensen B, Pearce D, Roger E, Teulon H, Weidema B, van Zeijts H (1997) Harmonisation of environmental life cycle assessment for agriculture, concerted action AIR3-CT94-2028. Silsoe Research Institute, Silsoe

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessou C, Chase LDC, Henson IE, Abdul-Manan AFN, Mila i Canals L, Agus F, Sharma M, Chin M (2014) Pilot application of PalmGHG, the roundtable on sustainable palm oil greenhouse gas calculator for oil palm products. J Clean Prod 73:136–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bessou C, Basset-Mens C, Latunussa C, Velu A, Heitz H, Vanniere H, Caliman JP (2016) Partial modelling of the perennial crop cycle misleads LCA results in two contrasted case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:297–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat MG, English BC, Turhollow AF, Nyangito HO (1994) Energy in synthetic fertilizers and pesticides: revisited. ORNL/Sub/90-99732/2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borras S Jr, Franco J, Isakson R, Levidow L, Vervest P (2016) The rise of flex crops and commodities: implications for research. J Peasant Stud 43:93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brentrup F, Palliere, C (2008) GHG emissions and energy efficiency in European nitrogen fertilizers production and use. Proceedings No. 639, International Fertilizer Society, York, UK

  • Brentrup F, Hoxha A, Christensen B (2016) Carbon footprint analysis of mineral fertilizer production in Europe and other world regions. 10th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment of Food, Book of Abstracts. pp A482–A490

  • Bunchai A, Suttinun O, H-Kittikun A, Musikavong C (2017) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of palm oil production by wet and dry extraction processes in Thailand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:1802–1814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castanheira E, Freire F (2017) Environmental life cycle assessment of biodiesel produced with palm oil from Colombia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:587–600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castanheira E, Acevedo H, Freire F (2014) Greenhouse gas intensity of palm oil produced in Colombia addressing alternative land use change and fertilization scenarios. Appl Energy 114:958–967

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choo Y, Muhamad H, Hashim Z, Subramaniam V, Puah CW, Tan YA (2011) Determination of GHG contributions by subsystems in the oil palm supply chain using the LCA approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:669–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corley RHV, Tinker PB (2016) The oil palm, 5th edn. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J, Haglund C (1999) Life cycle inventory (LCI) of fertiliser production: fertiliser products used in Sweden and Western Europe. SIK-Report No. 654, The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden

  • Delivand M, Gnansounou E (2013) Life cycle environmental impacts of a prospective palm-based biorefinery in Pará State-Brazil. Bioresour Technol 150:438–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fertilizers Europe (2018) Fertilizers Europe “Carbon Footprint Calculator for fertilizer products” v2.0. http://www.fertilizerseurope.com/get-to-know-us/fertilizers-europe-carbon-footprint-calculator-for-fertilizer-products-v20/. Accessed 25 September 2018

  • Garcia-Nunez J, Rodriguez D, Fontanilla C, Ramirez N, Lora E, Frear C, Stockle C, Amonette J, Garcia-Perez M (2016) Evaluation of alternatives for the evolution of palm oil mills into biorefineries. Biomass Bioenergy 95:310–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert N (2012) Palm-oil boom raises conservation concerns. Nature 487:14–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GIZ (2011) Greenhouse gas calculation guideline for Thai palm oil industry under the project of sustainable palm oil production for bioenergy. Office of Agricultural Economics, Ministry of Agricultural and Cooperatives and GIZ Office Bangkok, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunarso P, Hartoyo ME, Agus F, Killeen TJ (2013) Oil palm and land use change in Indonesia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea. In: Killeen TJ, Goon J (eds) Reports from the Technical Panels of the 2nd Greenhouse Gas Working Group of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). pp 29-63

  • Hansen S, Padfield R, Syayuti K, Evers S, Zakariah Z, Mastura S (2015) Trends in global palm oil sustainability research. J Clean Prod 100:140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsono S, Prochnow A, Grundmann P, Hansen A, Hallmann C (2012) Energy balances and greenhouse gas emissions of palm oil biodiesel in Indonesia. GCB Bioenergy 4:213–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasler K, Bröring S, Omta SWF, Olfs H-W (2015) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of different fertilizer product types. Eur J Agronomy 69:41–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan M, Jaramillo P, Griffin M (2011) Life cycle GHG emissions from Malaysian oil palm bioenergy development: the impact on transportation sector’s energy security. Energ Policy 39:2615–2625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Intarapong P, Papong S, Malakul P (2016) Comparative life cycle assessment of diesel production from crude palm oil and waste cooking oil via pyrolysis. Int J Energ Res 40:702–713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenssen TK, Kongshaug G (2003) Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in fertilizer production. Proceedings No. 509, International Fertiliser Society, York, UK

  • Kaewmai R, H-Kittikun A, Musikavong C (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions of palm oil mills in Thailand. Int J Greenh Gas Con 11:141–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaewmai R, H-Kittikun A, Suksaroj C, Musikavong C (2013) Alternative technologies for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from palm oil mills in Thailand. Environ Sci Technol 47:12417–12425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kongshoug G (1998) Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in fertilizer production. IFA Technical Conference, Marrakech, Morocco

  • Lam M, Lee K, Mohamed A (2009) Life cycle assessment for the production of biodiesel: a case study in Malaysia for palm oil versus jatropha oil. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 3:601–612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goucher L, Bruce R, Cameron DD, Koh SCL, Horton P (2017) The environmental impact of fertilizer embodied in a wheat-to-bread supply chain. Nature Plants 3(3)

  • Lim S, Lee K (2011) Parallel production of biodiesel and bioethanol in palm-oil-based biorefineries: life cycle assessment on the energy and greenhouse gases emissions. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 5:132–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maharjan S, Wang W-C, Teah H (2017) Life cycle assessment of palm-derived biodiesel in Taiwan. Clean Technol Environ 19:959–969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek T, Kaegi T (2007) Life cycle inventories of Swiss and European agricultural production systems. Final report ecoinvent V2.0 No. 15a. Agroscope-Taenikon Research Station ART, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Zurich and Duebendorf, Switzerland

  • Noël J, Allred P, White M (2015) Life cycle assessment of two biologically produced phase change materials and their related products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak JD (1998) Leaning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Papong S, Chom-In T, Noksa-nga S, Malakul P (2010) Life cycle energy efficiency and potentials of biodiesel production from palm oil in Thailand. Energy Policy 38:226–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patyk A, Reinhardt GA (1997) Duengemittel – Energie- und Stoffstrombilanzen. Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pleanjai S, Gheewala S (2009) Full chain energy analysis of biodiesel production from palm oil in Thailand. Appl Energy 86:S209–S214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prapaspongsa T, Musikavong C, Gheewala S (2017) Life cycle assessment of palm biodiesel production in Thailand: impacts from modelling choices, co-product utilisation, improvement technologies, and land use change. J Clean Prod 153:435–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz AG, França L, Ponte MX (2012) The life cycle assessment of biodiesel from palm oil (“dendê”) in the Amazon. Biomass Bioenergy 36:50–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rasid N, Syed-Hassan S, Kadir S, Asadullah M (2013) Life cycle assessment to evaluate the greenhouse gas emission from oil palm bio-oil based power plant. Korean J Chem Eng 30:1277–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reijnders L, Huijbregts M (2008) Palm oil and the emission of carbon-based greenhouse gases. J Clean Prod 16:477–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues T, Caldeira-Pires A, Luz S, Frate C (2014) GHG balance of crude palm oil for biodiesel production in the northern region of Brazil. Renew Energy 62:516–521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • RSPO (2018) PalmGHG calculator. Round Table of Sustainable Palm Oil. https://rspo.org/certification/palm-ghg-calculator. Accessed 5 April 2018

  • Saswattecha K, Kroeze C, Jawjit W, Hein L (2015) Assessing the environmental impact of palm oil produced in Thailand. J Clean Prod 100:150–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saswattecha K, Kroeze C, Jawjit W, Hein L (2016) Options to reduce environmental impacts of palm oil production in Thailand. J Clean Prod 137:370–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt J (2007) Life assessment of rapeseed oil and palm oil. Ph.D. thesis, Part 3: Life cycle inventory of rapeseed oil and palm oil. Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University

  • Schmidt J (2010) Comparative life cycle assessment of rapeseed oil and palm oil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:183–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt J (2015) Life cycle assessment of five vegetable oils. J Clean Prod 87:130–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silalertruksa T, Gheewala S (2012) Environmental sustainability assessment of palm biodiesel production in Thailand. Energy 43:306–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silalertruksa T, Gheewala S, Pongpat P, Kaenchan P, Permpool N, Lecksiwilai N, Mungkung R (2017) Environmental sustainability of oil palm cultivation in different regions of Thailand: greenhouse gases and water use impact. J Clean Prod 167:1009–1019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stichnothe H, Schuchardt F (2010) Comparison of different treatment options for palm oil production waste on a life cycle basis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:907–915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stichnothe H, Schuchardt F (2011) Life cycle assessment of two palm oil production systems. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3976–3984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • TGO (2011) Guidelines for assessment of the carbon footprint of products. Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (TGO), Bangkok, Thailand. http://www.tgo.or.th/download/publication/CFP_Guideline_TH_Edition3.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2018

  • Uusitalo V, Väisänen S, Havukainen J, Havukainen M, Soukka R, Luoranen M (2014) Carbon footprint of renewable diesel from palm oil, jatropha oil and rapeseed oil. Renew Energy 69:103–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (2007) Defining a decision analytic structure. In: Edwards W, Miles RF Jr, von Winterfeldt D (eds) Advances in decision analysis: from foundations to applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 81–103

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • West T, Marland G (2002) A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States. Agric Ecosyst Environ 91:217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeldon J, Ahlberg MK (2012) Visualizing social science research: maps, methods, and meaning. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wicke B, Dornburg V, Junginger M, Faaij A (2008) Different palm oil production systems for energy purposes and their greenhouse gas implications. Biomass Bioenergy 32:1322–1337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Corley (1993) The energy balance of oil palm cultivation. Proceedings of 1991 PORIM International Palm Oil Conference, Agriculture, 130–143. Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • Wood S, Cowie A (2007) A review of greenhouse gas emission factors for fertilizer production. IEA Bioenergy Task 38. http://task38.org/publications/GHG_Emission_Fertilizer_Production_July2004.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2018

  • Yan W (2017) A makeover for the world’s most hated crop. Nature 543:306–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yanez Angarita EE, Silva Lora EE, da Costa RE, Torres EA (2009) The energy balance in the palm oil-derived methyl ester (PME) life cycle for the cases in Brazil and Colombia. Renew Energy 34:2905–2913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yee K, Tan K, Abdullah A, Lee K (2009) Life cycle assessment of palm biodiesel: revealing facts and benefits for sustainability. Appl Energy 86:S189–S196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yusoff S, Hansen SB (2007) Feasibility study of performing an life cycle assessment on crude palm oil production in Malaysia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(1):50–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zolkarnain M, Yusoff S, Subramaniam V, Maurad ZA, Bakar ZA, Ghazali R, Hassan HA (2015) Evaluation of environmental impacts and GHG of palm polyol production using life cycle assessment approach. J Oil Palm Res 27:144–155

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zulkifli H, Halimah M, Chan KW, Choo YM, Mohd Basri W (2010) Life cycle assessment for oil palm fresh fruit bunch production from continued land use for oil palm planted on mineral soil (part 2). J Oil Palm Res 22:887–894

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was in part supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) Grant Number 263103316 and 18K11745.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 3-1-3 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8604, Japan

    Kiyotada Hayashi

Authors
  1. Kiyotada Hayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiyotada Hayashi.

Ethics declarations

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Niels Jungbluth

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(XLSX 16 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hayashi, K. Creating a “family tree” on fertilizer inventory use in life cycle assessment of oil palm: visualization of earlier studies and its implications. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24, 1805–1815 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01607-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01607-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation