Abstract
Purpose
Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) studies have been undertaken to evaluate the social impacts of various products across different geographies, but there is a need for a study which can help in evaluating impacts for peculiar social conditions of country like India. This paper presents a pilot-level case study for identifying hotspots against social impact for an Indian steel company using a S-LCA approach.
Methods
An aggregation approach has been developed at pilot scale for identification of social hotspots in value chain which is aligned with social context and regional perspective. Categories, subcategories and metrics were determined in the form of social impact indicators using United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) methodological sheets while incorporating feedback from stakeholders and management group. Impact indicators were selected against these subcategories on the basis of their importance to steel industry as well as geographical context. Stakeholder surveys were conducted for key suppliers, employees, customers and community members. Databases of social indicators published by the government were also used for capturing information. Management perspective was captured by interviewing identified senior management. Aggregation and analysis of inventory data was performed and supply chain evaluated.
Results and discussion
Social impact assessment of life cycle stages was carried out, and aggregated scores were evaluated on the scale of 0 to 1 for each life cycle stage. Total aggregated score was 3.13 against the maximum value of 5 across the entire value chain. For life cycle stages of raw material, transportation, manufacturing, customer and end-of-life scores were found to be above cut-off, indicating an average response of neutral or positive impact as perceived by respondents. Evaluation of the perspectives of stakeholders against management revealed that economic prosperity, training and skill development, healthcare facilities, access to clean water, infrastructure, access to education and workplace safety for workers are key hotspots which are requiring attention and needing improvement.
Conclusions
Attempt has been made to develop an aggregation approach for S-LCA in Indian context. Steel sector-specific indicators and perspective of diverse stakeholders across the supply chain were captured. Outcomes of this study reflect the quantitative results of pressing social issues aimed for identification and implementation of social projects targeted at the needs of stakeholders. Some limitations include use of equal weights for indicators, lack of site-specific data, lack of awareness of few stakeholders, hybrid aggregation approach and lacking sensitivity analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews E, Lesage P, Benoît C, Parent J, Norris G, Revéret JP (2009) Life cycle attribute assessment. J Ind Ecol 13(4):565–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00142.x
Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013) Application of a methodology for the social life cycle assessment of recycling systems in low income countries: three Peruvian case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1116–1128
Benoît C, Mazijn B (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Sustainable Product and Consumption Branch, Paris
Benoît C, Norris G, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S, Ugaya C, Beck T (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):156–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0147-8
Ciroth A, Franze J (2011) LCA of an ecolabelled notebook. Consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle. ISBN 978-1-4466-0087-0
District Level Health Survey 4 (2012–2013) Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, Web http://wwwrchiipsorg/DLHS-4html. Accessed 23 June 2015
Dong YH, Ng ST (2015) A social life cycle assessment model for building construction in Hong Kong. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(8):1166–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0908-5
Dreyer L, Hauschild M (2006) Scoping must be done in accordance with the goal definition, also in social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):87. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.02.004
Dreyer L, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2005.08.223
Dreyer L, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2010) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(3):247–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0148-7
Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0442-7
Foolmaun R, Ramjeeawon T (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0447-2
Franze J, Ciroth A (2011a) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):366–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0266-x
Franze J, Ciroth A (2011b) Social and environmental LCA of an ecolabeled notebook. Presentation, LCM 2011, 28–31 August, Berlin, Germany
Guinée JB (2001) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer Academic, The Netherlands
Hosseinijou S, Mansour S, Shirazi M (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(3):620–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0658-1
Hsu CW, Wang SW, Hu A (2013) Development of a new methodology for impact assessment of SLCA. In: Nee AYC, Song B, Ong S-K (eds) Re-engineering manufacturing for sustainability. Springer, Singapore, pp 469–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-48-2_76
Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(6):371–382. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.08.261
ISO (2006a) Environmental management:—lifecycle assessment—principles and framework. International Standards Organization, ISO 14040: 2006, Geneva
ISO (2006b) Environmental management:—lifecycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Standards Organization, ISO 14040: 2006, Geneva
ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild MZ(2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–103. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.11.367
Jørgensen A (2012) Social LCA—a way ahead? Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:296–299
Kallidaikurichi S, Rao B (2009) Index of drinking water adequacy for the Asian economies, National University of Singapore https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1478311
Kruse SA, Flysjö A, Kasperczyk N, Scholz AJ (2009) Socioeconomic indicators as a complement to life cycle assessment—an application to salmon production systems. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(1):8–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0040-x
Lagarde V, Macombe C (2013) Designing the social life cycle of products from the systematic competitive model. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):172–184
Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Schebek L (2013) Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(8):1581–1592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0594-0
Macombe C, Leskinen P, Feschet P, Antikainen R (2013) Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: a literature review and development needs. J Clean Prod 52:205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.026
Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A (2013) Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(7):1386–1392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0581-5
Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, Antón A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, Finkbeiner M (2014) Application challenges for the social LCA of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.044
Mathe S (2014) Integrating participatory approaches into social life cycle assessment: the SLCA participatory approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(8):1506–1514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0758-6
Norris G (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles—towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(S1):97–104. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.04.017
Norris CB (2014) Data for social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(2):261–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0644-7
Norris CB, Niederman VG, Valdivia S, Franze J, Traverso M, Ciroth A, Mazijn B (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(7):682–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0301-y
Planning Commission (2011) Indian human development report, 2011—towards social inclusion, Institute of Applied Manpower Research, Government of India
Prakash S (2012) Application of S-LCA: From artisanal mining to Complex Products. Presentation,Workshop on Practical Aspects of Social LCA, 25th May, Berlin
Reitinger C, Dumke M, Barosevcic M, Hillerbrand R (2011) A conceptual framework for impact assessment within SLCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):380–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0265-y
Russo A, Perrini F (2010) Investigating stakeholder theory and social capital: CSR in large firms and SMEs. J Business Ethics 91:207–221
Schmidt I, Meurer M, Saling P, Kicherer A, Reuter W, Gensch CO (2005) SEEbalance®:Managing Sustainability of Products and Processes with the Socio-Eco-Efficiency Analysis by BASF. Greener Manag Int 45:79–94
SHDB (2014) Social hotspots database. https://www.socialhotspotorg/. Accessed 12 Aug 2015
Swarr T (2009) Societal life cycle assessment—could you repeat the question? Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(4):285–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0088-2
The Companies Act (2013) Web http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/CompaniesAct2013.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2015
Ugaya CML, Brones F, Correa S (2011) S-LCA: Preliminary results of Natura's cocoa soap bar. In: Life Cycle Management Conference LCM 2011, Berlin. Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Management Proceedings
UNDP (2000) Millennium development goals, Web http://wwwunmillenniumprojectorg/goals/. Accessed 12 Aug 2015
UNEP (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. ISBN: 978-92-807-3021-0
World Steel Association (2011) Life cycle assessment methodology report
Wu R, Yang D, Chen J (2014) Social life cycle assessment revisited. Sustainability 6(7):4200–4226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6074200
Zamagni A (2012) Life cycle sustainability assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(4):373–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0389-8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Catherine Macombe
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, R.K., Gupta, U. Social life cycle assessment in Indian steel sector: a case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23, 921–939 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1427-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1427-3