Abstract
Purpose
The aim of the present study is to assess the influence of two different attributional life cycle assessment (LCA) approaches, namely static LCA (sLCA) and dynamic LCA (dLCA), through their application to the calculation of the carbon footprint (CF) of the entire cork sector in Portugal. The effect of including biogenic carbon sequestration and emissions is considered as well.
Methods
sLCA is often described as a static tool since all the emissions are accounted for as if occurring at the same time which may not be the case in reality for greenhouse gases. In contrast, dLCA aims to evaluate the impact of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions on radiative forcing considering the specific moment when these emissions occur.
Results and discussion
The results show that the total CF of the cork sector differs depending on the approach and time horizon chosen. However, the greater it is the time horizon chosen, the smaller the difference between the CF results of the two approaches. Additionally, the inclusion of biogenic carbon sequestration and emissions also influences significantly the CF result. The cork sector is considered a net carbon source when biogenic carbon is excluded from the calculations and a net carbon sink when biogenic carbon is included in the calculations since more carbon is sequestered than emitted along the sector.
Conclusions
dLCA allows an overview of greenhouse gas emissions along the time. This is an advantage as it allows to identify and plan different management approaches for the cork sector. Even though dLCA is a more realistic approach, it is a more time-consuming and complex approach for long life cycles. The choice of time horizon was found to be another important aspect for CF assessment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
APCOR (2014) Anuário da Cortiça 2014. Anual report. 78 pp. Portuguese Cork Association. Santa Maria de Lamas: Portugal; http://www.apcor.pt/userfiles/File/Publicacoes/AnuarioAPCOR2014.pdf. Access on Jan 2016
Brandão M, Levasseur A (2010) Assessing temporary carbon storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting, outcomes of an expert workshop. Joint Research Center, Ispra http://www.avnir.org/documentation/e_book/Workshop-Report-final.pdf
Brandão M, Levasseur A, Kirschbaum M, Weidema B, Cowie A, Jørgensen S et al (2012) Key issues and options in accounting for carbon sequestration and temporary storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:230–240
Bribrián I, Capilla A, Usón A (2010) Life cycle assessment of building materials: comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Build Environ 46:1133–1140
CIRAIG 2016 New generation carbon footprinting - dynamic carbon footprinter software. International Reference Centre for the Life Cycle of Products, Processes and Services (CIRAIG). http://www.ciraig.org/en/dynco2.php. Access on Feb 2016
Demertzi M, Dias A, Matos A, Arroja L (2015a) Evaluation of different end-of-life management alternatives for used natural cork stoppers through life cycle assessment. Waste Manag 46:668–680
Demertzi M, Garrido A, Dias A, Arroja L (2015b) Environmental performance of a cork floating floor. Mat Des 82:317–325
Demertzi M, Paulo Amaral J, Arroja L, Dias A (2016a) A carbon footprint simulation model for the cork oak sector. Sci Total Environ 566–567:499–511
Demertzi M, Silva R, Neto B, Dias A, Arroja L (2016b) Cork stoppers supply chain: potential scenarios for environmental impact reduction. J Clean Prod 112:1985–1994
Demertzi M, Sierra-Pérez J, Paulo Amaral J, Arroja L, Dias A (2017) Environmental performance of an expanded cork slab and granules through life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 145:294–302
Dias A, Arroja L (2014) A model for estimating carbon accumulation in cork products. Forest Syst 23:236–246
Dias A, Boschmonart-Rives J, González-García S, Demertzi M, Gabarrel X, Arroja L (2014) Analysis of raw cork production in Portugal and Catalonia using life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1985–2000
EPA (2011) Accounting framework for biogenic CO2 emissions from stationary sources. Office of Atmospheric Programs. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. USA. http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/Biogenic-CO2-Accounting-Framework-Report-Sept-2011.pdf. Access on Jan 2016
Eurostat (2013) Waste management in EU27 (Portugal). European Commission. Luxembourg city, Luxembourg. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/6757479/8-26032015-AP-EN.pdf/a2982b86-9d56-401c-8443-ec5b08e543cc. Access on Jan 2016
Faias S, Palma J, Barreiro S, Paulo J, Tomé M (2012) Resource communication. sIMfLOR—platform for the Portuguese forest simulators. Forest Syst 21:543–548
Fouquet M, Levasseur A, Margni M, Leberta A, Lasvaux S, Souyri B, Buhé C, Woloszyn M (2015) Methodological challenges and developments in LCA of low energy buildings: application to biogenic carbon and global warming assessment. Build Environ 90:51–59
Garcia R, Freire F (2014) Carbon footprint of particleboard: a comparison between ISO/TS 14067, GHG protocol, PAS 2050 and climate declaration. J Clean Prod 66:199–209
González-García S, Dias A, Arroja L (2013) Life-cycle assessment of typical Portuguese cork oak woodlands. Sci Total Environ 452-453:355–364
Green Cork (2013) Relatório 2013. Report 2013. Gaia, Portugal. http://www.greencork.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Green-Cork-Relat%C3%B3rio-2013.pdf (in Portuguese). Access on Jan 2016
Helin T, Sokka L, Soimakallio S, Pingoud K, Pajula T (2013) Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment—a review. Glob Change Biol 5:475–486
ICNF (2013) IFN6 — Áreas dos usos do solo e das espécies florestais de Portugal continental. Resultados preliminares. Lisboa: Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas. Areas of land use and forest species in mainland Portugal. Preliminary results. Lisbon: Institute for Conservation of Nature and Forestry, p 34
IPCC (2013) In: Stocker T, Qin G, Plattner K, Tignor M, Allen S, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley P (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Levasseur A, Lesage P, Margni M, Deschenes M, Samson R (2010a) Considering time in LCA: dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. Environ Sci Technol 44:3169–3174
Levasseur A, Lesage P, Margni M, Deschenes M, Samson R (2010b) New generation carbon footprinting, instruction manual. Interuniversity Research Centre for the Life Cycle of Products, Processes and Services. CIRAIG, Montréal
Levasseur A, Brandão M, Lesage P, Margni M, Pennington D, Clift R (2012) Valuing temporary carbon storage. Nat Clim Chang 1:6–8
Levasseur A, Lesage P, Margni M, Samson R (2013) Biogenic carbon and temporary storage addressed with dynamic life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 17:117–128
Micales J, Skog K (1997) The decomposition of forest products in landfills. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(97)83389-6
Müller-Wenk R, Brandão M (2010) Climatic impact of land use in LCA—carbon transfers between vegetation/soil and air. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:172–182
Palma J, Crous-Duran J, Graves A, Garcia de Jalon S, Upson M, Oliveira T, Paulo J, Ferreiro-Domínguez N, Moreno G, Burgess P (2017) Integrating belowground carbon dynamics into Yield-SAFE, a parameter sparse agroforestry model. Agrofor Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0123-4
Pargana N, Pinheiro M, Silvestre J, Brito J (2014) Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of thermal insulation materials of buildings. Energ Build 82:466–481
Paulo J (2011) Development of a growth and yield model for the sustainable management of cork oak stands, Desenvolvimento de um sistema para apoio à gestão sustentável de montados de sobro. Ph.D. Thesis. 188 pp. (Cap3). Technical University of Lisbon. Instituto Superior de Agronomia. Lisbon, Portugal. (in Portuguese). http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/3850. Access on Jan 2016
Paulo J, Tomé M (2006) Equações para estimação do volume e biomassa de duas espécies de carvalhos: Quercus suber e Quercus ilex. Publicações GIMREF. RC1/2006. Technical university of Lisbon. Instituto Superior Agronomia. Centro de Estudos Florestais. Lisbon. 21 pp http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/1730
Paulo J, Tomé M (2010) Predicting mature cork biomass with t years of growth from one measurement taken at any other age. For Ecol Manag 259:1993–2005
Paulo J, Tomé J, Tomé M (2002) Ajustamento simultâneo de equações de biomassa de azinheira. Actas do X Congresso da Sociedade Portuguesa de Estatística. 25th to 28th September 2002, Porto, Portugal
Paulo JA, Faias S, Gomes AA, Palma J, Tomé J, Tomé M (2015) Predicting site index from climate and soil variables for cork oak (Quercus suber L.) stands in Portugal. New Forest 46:293–307
Pereira H (2007) Cork: biology, production and uses. Lisbon: Elsevier, p 336
Pereira J, Bugalho M (2009) From the cork oak to cork. Portuguese Cork Association, Santa Maria de Lamas 336 pp
Pullar R, Novais R (2017) Ecoceramics—cork-based biomimetic ceramic 3-DOM foams. Mat Today 20:45–46
PwC/Ecobilan (2008) Evaluation of the environmental impacts of cork stoppers versus aluminium and plastic closures. Corticeira Amorim, Santa Maria de Lamas http://www.amorimcork.com/media/cms_page_media/228/Amorim_LCA_Final_Report.pdf
Rives J, Fernandez-Rodriguez I, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X (2011) Environmental analysis of the production of natural cork stoppers in southern Europe (Catalonia, Spain). J Clean Prod 19:259–271
Rives J, Fernandez-Rodriguez I, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X (2012a) Environmental analysis of raw cork extraction in cork oak forests in southern Europe (Catalonia, Spain). J Environ Manag 110:236–245
Rives J, Fernandez-Rodriguez I, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X (2012b) Environmental analysis of the production of champagne cork stoppers. J Clean Prod 25:1–13
Rives J, Fernandez-Rodriguez I, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X (2012c) Environmental analysis of cork granulate production in Catalonia—northern Spain. Resour Conserv Recy 58:132–142
Rives J, Fernandez-Rodriguez I, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X (2013) Integrated environmental analysis of the main cork products in southern Europe (Catalonia e Spain). J Clean Prod 51:289–298
Sierra-Pérez J, Boschmonart-Rives J, Gabarrell Durany X (2016) Environmental assessment of façade-building systems and thermal insulation materials for different climatic conditions. J Clean Prod 113:102–113
Tomé M, Barreiro S, Paulo J, Tomé J (2006) Modelling tree and stand growth with growth functions formulated as age independent difference equations. Can J For Res 36:1621–1630
Weidema B, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Reinhard J, Vadenbo C (2013) Data quality guideline for the Ecoinvent v.3 (Dübendorf, Switzerland)
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Corticeira Amorim, APCOR (Portuguese Cork Association) and C.E. Liège (European Cork Federation) for the collaboration. This study was supported by the project “Cork carbon footprint: from trees to products” (PTDC/AGR-FOR/4360/2012) funded by FEDER (European Regional Development Fund) through COMPETE (Operational Program Thematic Factors of Competitiveness) (FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER027982) and by FCT (Science and Technology Foundation—Portugal). Thanks are due, for the financial support, to CESAM (UID/AMB/50017), to FCT/MEC through national funds, and the co-funding by the FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement and Compete 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Responsible editor: Alessandra Zamagni
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Demertzi, M., Paulo, J.A., Faias, S.P. et al. Evaluating the carbon footprint of the cork sector with a dynamic approach including biogenic carbon flows. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23, 1448–1459 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1406-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1406-8