Simulation-based design for resource efficiency of metal production and recycling systems: Cases - copper production and recycling, e-waste (LED lamps) and nickel pig iron
- 1.1k Downloads
This paper illustrates how a product-centric approach to recycling, building on the extensive expertise, knowhow and tools of the mineral-centric classical minerals and metallurgical processing, should be core to Design for Resource Efficiency (DfRE).
Process simulation (HSC Sim 1974-2014, Outotec's design tool) and environmental software (GaBi 2014) are applied to quantify resource efficiency (RE) in a rigorous manner. These digitalisation tools are linked and will be used to show how the environmental performance of copper primary production, the processing of residues and the recycling of e-waste, e.g. light emitting diode (LED) lamps as well as the production of nickel pig iron can be evaluated. The paper also shows how technologies can be compared relative to a precise thermodynamic and techno-economic baseline.
The results include simulation-based environmental indicators, exergy, recycling and recovery rates, as well as the qualities and quantities of the recyclates, losses and emissions of materials during production recycling. The complete mass and energy balance simulation provides the mineralogical detail of all streams (both mineral and recyclate as well as offgas and dust) to define and improve environmental assessment, while at the same time revealing the aspects of LCA databases and their results that require improvement. Furthermore, this paper presents an approach for industry to implement life-cycle methods in practice. It shows that the DfRE is all about predicting stream grades and thus is equivalent to Design for Recyclate grade and quality (as this determines whether a recyclate or product stream has economic value and can be treated or processed further). DfRE also reveals especially the grade, composition, minerals etc. of the leakage streams, i.e. diffuse emissions, thus permitting a more precise evaluation of environmental impact.
The prediction of recyclate and stream compositions and grade makes the environmental analysis of systems more precise and will help to expand the detail that defines these flows on environmental databases. This is especially valuable for DfR, where the methodological rigour suggested in this paper is a very necessary addition and requirement for estimating the true environmental impact of product redesigns and the resource efficiency of processing technology and complete recycling systems. The methodology produces mass- and energy-consistent, economically viable best available technique (BAT) process blocks, the inclusion of which on environmental databases will be invaluable in benchmarking technology and systems in terms of estimating the achievable resource efficiency baseline.
KeywordsCopper production and scrap recycling Design for Resource Efficiency E-waste and WEEE Greenprinting LED lamp recycling Nickel pig iron (NPI) production Process metallurgy Product-centric Design for Recycling (DfR) System design Ecodesign LCA
- Ayres RU, Ayres LW (2002) Handbook of Industrial Ecology. Edward Elgar Northampton MA, USA, 680pGoogle Scholar
- Biemer, J, Dixon W, Blackburn N (2013) Our environmental handprint the good we do. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. Presented at the 2013 I.E. Conference on Technologies for Sustainability 8 pGoogle Scholar
- Brunner PH, Rechberger H (2004) Practical handbook of material flow analysis. Lewis Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Cartman R (2012) Nickel pig iron—a long term solution? 3rd Euronickel Conference. Hatch Associates Limited, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
- EC (2012) Organisation Environmental Footprint (OEF) guide deliverable 3 and 4B to the administrative arrangement between DG Environment and Joint Research Centre No. N 070307/2009/552517, including Amendment No.1 from December 2010. Ref. Ares (2012)873788-17/07/2012Google Scholar
- EC (2013) European Commission Decision C 8631 of 10 December 2013. Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2014–2015. Climate action, environment, resource efficiency and raw materialsGoogle Scholar
- FACT Sage 6.4: ©CRCT 2006-2013 (www.factsage.com)
- GaBi 6, Software and System Databases for Life Cycle Engineering, Stuttgart-Echterdingen, www.pe-international.com (1992–2013)
- HSC and HSC Sim 7.1&8, Thermochemical and process simulation, Outotec Research Center, www.outotec.com (1974–2014)
- Krinke S, van Schaik A, Reuter MA, Stichling J (2009) Recycling and DfR of multi-material vehicles (as part of ‘Life cycle assessment and recycling of innovative multi-material applications’ by). In: Proceedings of the International Conference ‘Innovative Developments for Lightweight Vehicle Structures’, May, 26–27th 2009, Wolfsburg, Germany (Volkswagen Head Office), 196–208Google Scholar
- Pagan R (2009) Environmental life cycle costing: a code of practice. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(5):389–391Google Scholar
- Reuter MA, van Schaik A (2015) Product-centric simulation based design for recycling: Case of LED lamp recycling. J Sustain Metall 1(1):4–28Google Scholar
- Swarr TE, Hunkeler D, Klöpffer W, Pesonen H-L, Ciroth A, Brent AC, Pagan R (2011) Environmental life cycle costing: a code of practice. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), PensacolaGoogle Scholar
- UNEP Reuter MA et al (2013) Metal Recycling: Opportunities, Limits, Infrastructure”, United Nations Environmental Programme UNEP 316 p. http://www.unep.org/resourcepanel/Publications/MetalRecycling/tabid/106143/Default.aspx
- Van Schaik A, Reuter MA (2014) Material-Centric (Aluminium and Copper) and Product-Centric (Cars, WEEE, TV, Lamps, Batteries, Catalysts) Recycling and DfR Rules. In: Worrel E, Reuter MA (eds) Handbook of Recycling (doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-396459-5.00022-2), pp. 307–378
- Von Krüger P, Silva CA, Vieira C, Aruajo FGS, Seshadri (2012) Relevant aspects relating to production of iron nickel alloys (pig iron containing nickel) in mini blast furnaces. In: Proceedings of The Twelfth International Ferroalloys Congress Sustainable Future, June 6–9, 2010, Helsinki, Finland, pp 671–680Google Scholar
- Worrel E, Reuter MA (2014) Handbook of Recycling. Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, 595pGoogle Scholar
- Xianyun C (2008) Methods on producing nickel bearing pig iron. Ferro-Alloys 4:1–7 (in Chinese)Google Scholar