Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Life-Cycle based methods for sustainable product development

  • Editorial
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainability-a term originating from silviculture, which was adopted by UNEP as the main political goal for the future development of humankind-is also the ultimate aim of product development. It comprises three components: environment, economy and social aspects which have to be properly assessed and balanced if a new product is to be designed or an existing one is to be improved. The responsibility of the researchers involved in the assessment is to provide appropriate and reliable instruments. For the environmental part there is already an internationally standardized tool: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Life Cycle Costing (LCC) is the logical counterpart of LCA for the economic assessment. LCC surpasses the purely economic cost calculation by taking into account hidden costs and potentially external costs over the life cycle of the product. It is a very important point that different life-cycle based methods (including Social Life Cycle Assessment) for sustainablity assessment use the same system boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Carlowitz HC (1713/2000): Sylvicultura Oeconomica-Natur-mäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum-Zucht. Leipzig 1713 (Reprint [ISBN 3-86012-115-4]: TU, Bergakademie Freiberg, Akademische Buchhandlung Freiberg 2000)

  2. WCED-World Commission on Environment and Development (1987): Our Common Future. Oxford

  3. Töpfer K (2002): The Launch of the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative (Prague, 28 April 2002). Editorial. Int J LCA 7 (4) 191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunt R, Franklin WE (1996): LCA-How it Came About. Personal Reflections on the Origin and the Development of LCA in the USA. Int J LCA 1 (1) 4–7

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oberbacher B, Nikodem H, Klopffer W (1996): LCA-How it Came About. An Early Systems Analysis of Packaging for Liquids which Would be Called an LCA Today. Int J LCA 1 (2) 62–65

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boustead I (1996): LCA-How it came About. The Beginning in UK. Int J LCA 1 (3) 147–150

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meadows Donella H, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens III WW (1972): The Limits to Growth. A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. [ISBN 0-87663-165-0]. Universe Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fava JA et al. (Eds) (1991): SETAC Workshop Report: A Technical Framework for Life Cycle Assessments. August 18-23 1990, Smugglers Notch, Vermont (USA)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) (1993): Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: A ‘Code of Practice’. Based on a Workshop at Sesimbra, Portugal, March 31–April 3 1993., Brussels and Pensacola, Florida (USA)

  10. Klüppel H-J (2002): The ISO Standardization Process: Quo Vadis? Int J LCA 7 (1) 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barnthouse L. et al. (Eds) (1998): Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: The State-of-the-Art. Report of the SETAC Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) Impact Assessment Workgroup. 2nd edition. Pensacola, Florida (USA)

  12. Klöpffer W, Grießhammer R, Sundström G (1995): Overview of the Scientific Peer Review of the European Life Cycle Inventory for Surfactant Production. Tenside Surfactants Detergents 32, 378–383

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hunt RG, Boguski TK, Weitz K, Sharma A (1998): Case Studies Examining Streamlining Techniques. Int J LCA 3 (1) 36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. White AL, Savage D, Shapiro K (1996): Life-Cycle Costing: Concepts and Application. Chapter 7. In: Curran, Mary Ann (Ed): Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment. [ISBN 0-07-015063-X] McGraw-Hill, New York, p 7.1–7.19

    Google Scholar 

  15. Norris GA (2001): Integrating Life Cycle Cost Analysis and LCA. Int J LCA 6 (2) 118–120

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hunkeler D, Rebitzer G (2002): Life Cycle Costing-Paving the Road to Sustainable Development? Editorial in: Gate to EHS: Life Cycle Management, March 25th, 2002. ecomed publishers (DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/ehs2002.03.028)

  17. Shapiro KG (2001): Incorporating Costs in LCA. Int J LCA 6 (2) 121–123

    Google Scholar 

  18. O’Brian M, Doig A, Clift R (1996): Social and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (SELCA). Int J LCA 1 (4) 231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Projektgruppe Ökologische Wirtschaft (1987): Produktlini-enanalyse (PLA). [ISBN 3-923243-27-8] Kölner Volksblatt Verlag

  20. Rebitzer G (2002): Integrating Life Cycle Costing and Life Cycle Assessment for Managing Costs and Environmental Impacts in Supply Chains. In: Seuring S, Goldbach M (Eds): Cost Management in Supply Chains. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, p 128–146

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. C.A.U. GmbH, Daimlerstr. 23, D-63303, Dreieich, Germany

    Walter Klöpffer

Authors
  1. Walter Klöpffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Klöpffer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klöpffer, W. Life-Cycle based methods for sustainable product development. Int J LCA 8, 157–159 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978462

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978462

Keywords

Search

Navigation