Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Choices for Chinese Political Science: Methodological Positivism or Methodological Pluralism?

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Chinese Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Like its American counterpart, Chinese political science is experiencing a similar concern regarding its societal relevance as it attempts to assess and focus on China’s unique political and social concerns. Should Chinese political science tread the same path? Should it pursue a purely methodological positivist approach or should it engage in a more holistic and methodologically pluralistic approach such as that found in public administration? A mixed-methods approach, which includes both problem-driven research and theory-driven research, might be a better way to serve both the discipline and China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Creswell and Plano Clark [9]; Topper [33].

References

  1. Adcock, Robert. 2009. Making making social science matter matter to us. Journal of Theoretical Politics 21: 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Almond, Gabriel A. 1988. Separate tables: Schools and sects in political science. PS: Political Science and Politics 21(4): 828–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barilleaux, Ryan J. 2003. The restoration of political science. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of Society of Catholic Social Scientists.

  4. Barrow, Clyde. 2008. Political science. International encyclopedia of the social sciences, 2nd Edn. 310–315.

  5. Bellman, Jonathan, and Phil Ford. 2008. “Trendy.” Dial “M” for Musicology Blog: http://musicology.typepad.com/dialm/2008/07/hey-everyone-im.html.

  6. Brugger, Bill. 1986. The revival of political science in China: A review of the journal Zhengzhixue Yanjiu. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 15: 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ceaser, James W. 1990. Liberal democracy and political science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cox, Robert. 1993. Why it is difficult to teach comparative politics to American students? PS: Political Science and Politics 26(1): 68–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Creswell, John W. and Vicki L. Plano Clark. 2006. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dryzek, John S. 2005. A pox on perestroika, a hex on hegemony: Toward a critical political science. In Perestroika! the raucous rebellion in political science, ed. Kristen Renwick Monroe, 509–525. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Easton, David. 1969. The new revolution in political science. American Political Science Review 63(4): 1051–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Easton, David. 1985. Political science in the United States: Past and present. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique, The Future of the State 6(1): 133–152.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gettell, Raymond G. 1922. Introduction to political science. Boston: Ginn and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Golembiewski, Robert T. 1977. Public administration as a developing discipline. Part I: Perspectives on past and present. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gunnell, John. 2003. Telling the story of political science paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 27, 2003.

  17. Gunnell, John. 2006. The founding of the American Political Science Association: Discipline, profession, political theory, and politics. American Political Science Review 100(4): 479–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hume, David. 1742. That politics may be reduced to a science, essays moral, political and literary:13.

  19. King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khodr, Hiba. 2005. Public administration and political science: An historical analysis of the relation between the two academic disciplines. Doctoral Dissertation, The Askew School of Public Administration and Policy, Florida State University.

  21. Laitin, David D. 1995. Disciplining political science. American Political Science Review 89(2): 454–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Little, Daniel. 1998. Microfoundations, method and causation: On the philosophy of the social sciences. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Loewenberg, Gerhard. 1984. The division of political science into American and non-American politics: The case of legislatures. PS: Political Science 17(3): 561–563.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lowi, Ted. 1992. The state in political science: How we become what we study. American Political Science Review 86: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mao Zedong. 1957. On the correct handling of the contradictions among the people. Speech at the eleventh session (Enlarged) of the Supreme State Conference: People’s Daily, February 27, 1957.

  26. Monroe, Kristen Renwick (ed). 2005. Perestroika! the raucous rebellion in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pierson, Paul. 2004. Why Americanists should be buyers in the markeplace of ideas. Newsletter of the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association 15(1): 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schram, Sanford. 2006. Making political science matter: Debating knowledge, research, and method. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Smith, Rogers M. 1997. “Still Blowing in the Wind: The American Quest for a Democratic, Scientific Political Science,” Daedalus, Winter 1997, pp. 253–287 (rep. as “La quete americaine d’une science politique democratique et scientificque” in Politix--Revue des Sciences Sociales du Politique 40:58–87 (1997) (transl. Loc Blondiaux); and in American Academic Culture in Transformation: Fifty Years, Four Disciplines, ed. C. Schorske and T. Bender (Princeton University Press, 1998), pp. 271–305.

  30. Smith, Rogers M. 2002. Should we make political science more of a science or more about politics? PS: Political Science and Politics 35(2): 199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Snyder, R.Claire. 2001. Should political science have a civic mission? An overview of the historical evidence. PS: Political Science and Politics 34(2): 301–305.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Somit, Albert and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1967. The development of American political science. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Topper, Keith. 2005. The disorder of political inquiry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yanow, Davora. 2003. Practicing discipline. PS: Political Science and Politics 36(3): 397–399.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, University of St. Thomas, Houston, TX, 77006-4626, USA

    Jon R. Taylor

Authors
  1. Jon R. Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon R. Taylor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, J.R. Choices for Chinese Political Science: Methodological Positivism or Methodological Pluralism?. J OF CHIN POLIT SCI 14, 357–367 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-009-9070-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-009-9070-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation