Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The behavioural gap between entrepreneurial SME’s and high growth: evidence from Canada

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Entrepreneurial orientation (EO) describes a firm’s attitude towards entrepreneurial activity; however, it does not measure the specific behaviors likely to contribute to high growth. This research applies the resource-based and dynamic capabilities views to propose a mediation model between EO and high growth. The theoretical framework is drawn from the strategic management and entrepreneurship literature. Competing models are tested against a sample of Canadian SMEs to validate the proposed explanation for the presence of high-growth firms among the population. The study finds that the relationship between EO and high growth is perfectly mediated by innovation performance, a behavioral measure of innovation. This research contributes to firm growth theory while providing further insight into the drivers of high growth useful to policy makers endeavoring to stimulate, and overcome barriers to, entrepreneurship and innovation. Determining the factors associated with firm growth can have implications for management as well as policy. If a firm’s goal is to grow it must be able to focus its limited resources using a strategy appropriate for growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 521–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aljanabi, A. R. A., & Mohd Noor, N. A. (2015). The mediating role of market orientation on entrepreneurial orientation, absorptive capacity and technological innovation capabilities. Asian Social Science, 11(5), 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1985). Conceptual underpinnings of systematic strategic management. European Journal of Operational Research, 19(1), 2–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., Ramaswami, S. N., Herrmann, P., & Walker, D. (2018). Innovation pathway to profitability: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(4), 744–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Robust chi square difference testing with mean and variance adjusted test statistics. Matrix, 1(5), 1–6.

  • Atuahene-Gima, K., Slater, S. F., & Olson, E. M. (2005). The contingent value of responsive and proactive market orientations for new product program performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(6), 464–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (2002). The dynamic role of small firms: Evidence from the US. Small Business Economics, 18(1–3), 13–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 421–458.

  • Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2009). The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barringer, B. R., Jones, F. F., & Neubaum, D. O. (2005). A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 663–687.

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boso, N., Cadogan, J. W., & Story, V. M. (2012). Complementary effect of entrepreneurial and market orientations on export new product success under differing levels of competitive intensity and financial capital. International Business Review, 21(4), 667–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boso, N., Cadogan, J. W., & Story, V. M. (2013). Entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation as drivers of product innovation performance: A study of exporters from a developing economy. International Small Business Journal, 31(1), 57–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D., & Medoff, J. (1994). Gazelles. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 605–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cainelli, G., Evangelista, R., & Savona, M. (2006). Innovation and economic performance in services: A firm-level analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(3), 435–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calantone, R. J., Schmidt, J. B., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (1997). New product activities and performance: The moderating role of environmental hostility. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(3), 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassia, L., & Minola, T. (2012). Hyper-growth of SMEs: Toward a reconciliation of entrepreneurial orientation and strategic resources. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 18(2), 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coad, A. (2022). Lumps, Bumps and Jumps in the Firm Growth Process. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 18(4), 212–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coad, A., Daunfeldt, S. O., Hölzl, W., Johansson, D., & Nightingale, P. (2014). High-growth firms: Introduction to the special section. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2008). Innovation and Firm Growth in High-Tech Sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research Policy, 37(4), 633–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5), 477–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. P., & Heeley, M. B. (2000). Pioneers and Followers: Competitive Tactics, Environment, and Firm Growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 175–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. P., & Heeley, M. B. (2001). Strategic decision making in an intuitive vs. technocratic mode: Structural and environmental considerations. Journal of Business Research, 52(1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G., Ireland, R., Zahra, S., Janney, J., & Floyd, S. (2003). Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 351–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensley, M. D., Pearce, C. L., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2006). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between entrepreneur leadership behavior and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evermann, J., & Tate, M. (2010). Testing models or fitting models? Identifying Model Misspecification in PLS. ICIS 2010.

  • Ferreira, J., Coelho, A., & Moutinho, L. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation, 92, 102061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466.

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaikwad, P. (2022). Catching Up with Gazelles: A systematic literature review of high growth antecedents. The Promises and Properties of Rapidly Growing Companies: Gazelles, 7–38.

  • Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural equation modelling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 1–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 479–491.

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, S., Saarenketo, S., & Kyläheiko, K. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities, and international performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 222–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocak, A., Carsrud, A., & Oflazoglu, S. (2017). Market, entrepreneurial, and technology orientations: impact on innovation and firm performance. Management Decision.

  • Kollmann, T., & Stöckmann, C. (2014). Filling the entrepreneurial orientation–performance gap: The mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, S., & Rumelt, R. (1982). Uncertain Imiitability - an analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition. Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 418–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G., & Dess, G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manu, F. A., & Sriram, V. (1996). Innovation, marketing strategy, environment, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 35(1), 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J. (1994). Firm growth during infancy. Small Business Economics, 6(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, 770–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minola, T., Cogliati, G. M., Cassia, L., & Paleari, S. (2017). Are hyper-growth firms inherently different? Preliminary evidence from a sample of fast-growing European SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 9(2), 122–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, G. F. A. (2019). High-growth firms and scale-ups: A review and research agenda. RAUSP Management Journal, 54, 96–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus User’s Guide Seventh Edition, Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA.

  • Neneh, B. N., & Van, Z. J. (2017). Entrepreneurial orientation and its impact on firm growth amongst SMEs in South Africa. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(3), 166–178.

  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2007). High-growth SMEs, Innovation, Intellectual Assets and Value Creation: Literature Review. OECD, Paris.

  • OECD. (2008). Measuring Entrepreneurship: A digest of indicators. OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.

  • Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, in. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, M. B., Echambadi, R. A. J., & Harrison, J. S. (2001). Alliance entrepreneurship and firm market performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 701–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514.

  • Schreyer, P. (2000). High-Growth Firms and Employment. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. OECD Publishing.

  • Shepherd, D., & Wiklund, J. (2008). Are we comparing apples with apples or apples with oranges? Appropriateness of knowledge accumulation across growth studies. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33(1), 105–123.

  • Sheppard, M. (2020). The relationship between discretionary slack and growth in small firms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(1), 195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siguaw, J. A., Simpson, P. M., & Enz, C. A. (2006). Conceptualizing innovation orientation: A framework for study and integration of innovation research. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(6), 556–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (1992). Firm Size, Firm Growth, and Persistence of Chance - Testing Gibrats Law with Establishment Data from Lower Saxony, 1978–1989. Small Business Economics, 4(2), 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, A., Auer, M., & Ritter, T. (2006). The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 541–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. L. (2008). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Learning Orientation, and Firm Performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 635–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: A Review and Comprehensive CFA Marker Technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 477–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1999). Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1087–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 259–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual Influences on the Corporate Entrepreneurship Performance Relationship – a Longitudinal Analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. A., O’Kane, C., & Chen, G. (2020). Business ties, political ties, and innovation performance in Chinese industrial firms: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Research, 121, 254–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2010). How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 224–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. F. C. Manning School of Business, Acadia University, NS, Wolfville, Canada, B4P 2R6

    Michael Sheppard

Authors
  1. Michael Sheppard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Sheppard.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheppard, M. The behavioural gap between entrepreneurial SME’s and high growth: evidence from Canada. Int Entrep Manag J 19, 427–449 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00832-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00832-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation