Skip to main content
Log in

Entrepreneurial Orientation, Dynamic Capabilities and International Performance

  • Published:
Journal of International Entrepreneurship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to be able to seize the opportunities that a dynamic operating environment opens up, entrepreneurial firms have to reconfigure their existing asset base and processes. This study explores the effect of an entrepreneurial orientation and a firm's reconfiguring capabilities on international performance by using survey data from 217 manufacturing and service organizations. Our findings indicate that a firm's entrepreneurial orientation and reconfiguring capabilities have an effect on its international performance and provide empirical support for the dynamic capability view of the firm. Entrepreneurial behavior combined with organizational reconfiguring capabilities constitutes a potential source of competitive advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, J.S. and T.S. Overton, (1977), ‘Estimating Non-Response Bias in Mail Surveys’, Journal of Marketing Research 14 (3), 396–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, Erkko, Harry J. Sapienza, and James G. Almeida, (2000), ‘Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth’, Academy of Management Journal 43 (5), 909–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomstermo, Anders, Kent Eriksson, and D. Deo Sharma, (2004), ‘Domestic Activity and Knowledge Development in the Internationalization Process of Firms’, Journal of International Entrepreneurship 2, 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S. Tamer and Shaoming Zou, (1994), ‘Marketing Strategy-Performance Relationship: An Investigation of the Empirical Link in Export Market Ventures’, Journal of Marketing 58 (1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Young Rok and Dean Shepherd, (2004), ‘Entrepreneurs’ Decisions to Exploit Opportunities’, Journal of Management 30 (3), 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, Nicole E. and Marian V. Jones, (2004), ‘Methodological Issues in International Entrepreneurship Research’, Journal of Business Venturing 19, 485–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J.G. and D.P. Slevin, (1988), ‘The Influence of Organization Structure on the Utility of an Entrepreneurial Top Management Style’, Journal of Management Studies 25 (3), 217–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin, Jeffrey G. and Dennis P. Slevin, (1989), ‘Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments’, Strategic Management Journal 10 (1), 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin, Jeffrey G. and Dennis P. Slevin, (1991), ‘A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 16 (1), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denrell, Jerker, Christina Fang, and Sidney G. Winter, (2003), ‘The Economics of Strategic Opportunity’, Strategic Management Journal 24 (10), 977–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, Gregory G., R. Duane Ireland, Shaker A. Zahra, Steven W. Floyd, Jay J. Janney, and Peter J. Lane, (2003), Emerging Issues in Corporate Entrepreneurship, Journal of Management 29 (3), 351–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, Ingemar and Karel Cool, (1989), ‘Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage’, Management Science 35 (12), 1504–1511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitratos, Pavlos and Marian V. Jones, (2005), ‘Future Directions for International Entrepreneurship Research’, International Business Review 14, 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitratos, Pavlos, Spyros Lioukas, and Sara Carter, (2004), ‘The Relationship Between Entrepreneurship and International Performance: The Importance of Domestic Environment’, International Business Review 13 (1), 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, Amy C., Richard M. Bohmer, and Gary P. Pisano, (2001), ‘Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals’, Administrative Science Quarterly 46 (4), 685–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M and Jeffrey A. Martin, (2000), ‘Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?’, Strategic Management Journal 21 (10/11), 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etemad, Hamid, (2004), ‘International Entrepreneurship as a Dynamic Adaptive System: Towards a Grounded Theory’, Journal of International Entrepreneurship 2, 5–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fey, Carl F. and Ingmar Björkman, (2001), ‘The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices on MNC Subsidiary Performance in Russia’, Journal of International Business Studies 32 (1), 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg, Vinay K., Bruce A. Walters, and Richard L. Priem, (2003), ‘Chief Executive Scanning Emphases, Environmental Dynamism, and Manufacturing Firm Performance’, Strategic Management Journal 24 (8), 725–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimeno, Javier, Timothy B. Folta, Arnold C. Cooper, and Carolyn Y. Woo, (1997), Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms’, Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (4), 750–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. von, (1945), ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’, The American Economic Review 35 (4), 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, Michael A., R. Duane Ireland, S. Michael Camp, and Donald L. Sexton, (2001), Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue Strategic Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation’, Strategic Management Journal 22 (6/7), 479–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, Randall G., (2003), ‘The Origins of Entrepreneurial Opportunities’, The review of Austrian Economics, 16 (1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Heh Jason and John B. Cullen, (2001), ‘Labour Flexibility and Related HRM Practices: A Study of Large Taiwanese Manufacturers’, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 18 (1), 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, George P. and Daniel J. Power, (1985), ‘Retrospective Reports of Strategic-Level Managers: Guidelines for Increasing Their Accuracy’, Strategic Management Journal 6 (2), 171–180.

  • Ichniowski, Casey, Kathryn Shaw, and Giovanna Prennushi, (1997), ‘The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines’, American Economic Review 87, 291–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. Duane, Michael A. Hitt, and David G. Sirmon, (2003), ‘A Model of Strategic Entrepreneurship: The Construct and its Dimensions’, Journal of Management 29 (6), 963–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli, (1993), ‘Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences’, Journal of Marketing 57 (3), 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, Jan and Jan-Erik Vahlne, (1977), ‘The Internationalisation Process of the Firm—a Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments’, Journal of International Business Studies 8 (1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, Jan and Jan-Erik Vahlne, (1990), ‘The Mechanism of Internationalisation’, International Marketing Review 7 (4), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, Jan and Finn Wiedersheim-Paul, (1975), ‘The Internationalization of the Firm: Four Swedish Cases’, Journal of Management Studies 12 (3), 305–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsikeas, Constantine S., Leonidas C. Leonidou, and Neil A. Morgan, (2000), ‘Firm-Level Export Performance Assessment: Review, Evaluation, and Development’, Academy of Marketing Science 28 (4), 493–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, Israel M., (1997), ‘Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach’, Journal of Economic Literature 35 (1), 60–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Frank H., (1921), Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Gary A., (2001), ‘Entrepreneurship and Strategy in the International SME’, Journal of International Management 7, 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Gary A. and S. Tamer Cavusgil, (2004), ‘Innovation, Organizational Capabilities, and the Born-Global Firm’, Journal of International Business Studies 35 (2), 124–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, Keld, (2002), ‘The Importance of Sectoral Differences in the Application of Complementary HRM Practices for Innovation Performance’, International Journal of the Economics of Business 9 (1), 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Choonwoo, Kyungmook Lee, and Johannes M. Pennings, (2001), ‘Internal Capabilities, External Networks, and Performance: A Study on Technology-Based Ventures’, Strategic Management Journal 22 (6/7), 615–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou, Leonidas, C., Constantine S. Katsikeas, and Saeed Samiee, (2002), ‘Marketing Strategy Determinants of Export Performance: A Meta-Analysis’, Journal of Business Research 55 (1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Jane W. and Paul W. Beamish, (2001), ‘The Internationalization and Performance of SMEs’, Strategic Management Journal 22 (6/7), 565–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G.T. and Gregory G. Dess, (1996), ‘Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance’, Academy of Management Review 21 (1), 135–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G.T. and Gregory G. Dess, (2001), ‘Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle’, Journal of Business Venturing 16 (5), 429–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manolova, Tatiana, S. and Ivan M. Manev, (2004), ‘Internationalization and the Performance of the Small Firm: A Review of the Empirical Literature Between 1996 and 2001. in Jones, Marian, V. and Dimitratos, Pavlos (eds.), Emerging Paradigms in International Entrepreneurship, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK., pp. 37–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, Rita Gunther and Ian MacMillan, (2000), The Entrepreneurial Mindset, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. and C. Droge, (1986), ‘Psychological and Traditional Determinants of Structure’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31 (4), 539–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. and P.H. Friesen, (1982), ‘Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum’, Strategic Management Journal 3 (1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Peter and Sumantra Ghoshal, (1999), ‘Markets, Firms, and the Processes of Economic Development’, Academy of Management Review 24 (3), 390–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naman, J.L. and D.P. Slevin, (1993), ‘Entrepreneurship and the Concept of Fit: A Model and Empirical Tests’, Strategic Management Journal 14 (2), 137–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nummela, Niina, Sami Saarenketo, and Kaisu Puumalainen, (2004), ‘A global mindset—a prerequisite for successful internationalization?’, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 21 (1), 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J.C., (1978), ‘Psychometric Theory’, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, Edith T., (1959), ‘The Theory of the Growth of the Firm’, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Christopher and Chetty, Sylvie K., (2000), ‘A Contingency-Based Approach to Understanding Export Performance’, International Business Review 9 (2), 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, Richard P., (1984), ‘Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm’, in Lamb, Robert B. (ed.), Competitive Strategic Management Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 557–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, Harry J., Dirk De Clerq and William R. Sandberg, (2005), ‘Antecedents of International and Domestic Learning Effort’, Journal of Business Venturing 20 (4) 437–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Josef A., (1934), ‘The Theory of Economic Development’, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, Scott and S. Venkataraman, (2000), ‘The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research’, Academy of Management Review 25 (1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, Scott and S. Venkataraman, (2001), ‘Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research: A Response to Zahra and Dess, Singh, and Erikson’, Academy of Management Review 26 (1), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppeck, Michael A. and Jack Militello, (2000), ‘Strategic HR Configurations and Organizational Performance’, Human Resource Management 39 (1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Stanley F. and John C. Narver, (2000), ‘The Positive Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability: A Balanced Replication’, Journal of Business Research 48, 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Michael, Cornelia Droge, Sangphet Hanvanich, and Roger Calantone, (2005), ‘Marketing and Technology Resource Complementarity: An Analysis of Their Interaction Effect in Two Environmental Contexts’, Strategic Management Journal 26, 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J-C. and Robert M. Grant, (1996), ‘Knowledge and the Firm: Overview’, Strategic Management Journal 17, 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Finland, (2004), Statistical Yearbook of Finland.

  • Sullivan, D., (1994), ‘Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of a Firm’, Journal of International Business Studies 25 (2), 323–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J., (2000), ‘Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions’, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J., (2003), ‘Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: Asset Selection, Coordination, and Entrepreneurship in Strategic Management Theory’, University of California, Berkeley Business and Public Policy Working Paper BPP-98.

  • Teece, David J., Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen, (1997), ‘Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management’, Strategic Management Journal 18 (7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, Peter, G.P. and Samiee, Saeed, (1990), ‘A Model for Assessing Performance in Small U.S. Exporting Firms’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 15 (2), 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, Lawrence S. and Reijo Luostarinen, (1988), ‘Internationalization: Evolution of a Concept’, Journal of General Management 14 (2), 34–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Steven, D., Griffith, David, A., and Ryans, John, K. Jr, (1998), ‘Measuring Export Performance in Service Industries’, International Marketing Review 15 (3), 188–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, Johan, (1998), ‘Small Firm Growth and Performance: Entrepreneurship and Beyond’ Doctoral dissertation, Jönköping, Jönköping International Business School.

  • Wiklund, Johan, (1999), ‘The Sustainability of the Entrepreneurial Orientation—Performance Relationship’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 24 (1), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, Johan and Dean Shepherd, (2003), ‘Knowledge-Based Resources, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and the Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Businesses’, Strategic Management Journal 24 (13), 1307–1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, Johan and Dean Shepherd, (2005), ‘Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configurational Approach’, Journal of Business Venturing 20 (1), 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Sidney G., (2003), ‘Understanding Dynamic Capabilities’, Strategic Management Journal 24 (10), 991–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yli-Renko, H., E. Autio, and V. Tontti, (2002), ‘Social Capital, Knowledge, and the International Growth of Technology-Based New Firms’, International Business Review 11, 279–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Shaker A. and William C. Bogner, (2000), ‘Technology Strategy and Software New Ventures’ Performance: Exploring the Moderating Effect of the Competitive Environment’, Journal of Business Venturing, 15 (2), 135–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Shaker A. and Jeffrey G. Covin, (1995), ‘Contextual Influences on the Corporate Entrepreneurship—Performance Relationship: A Longitudinal Analysis’, Journal of Business Venturing 10 (1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Shaker A. and Gregory G. Dess, (2001), ‘Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research: Encouraging Dialogue and Debate’, Academy of Management Review 26 (1), 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Shaker A. and Dennis M. Garvis, (2000), ‘International Corporate Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effect of International Environmental Hostility’, Journal of Business Venturing 15 (5/6), 469–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Shaker A. and Gerard George, (2002), ‘International Entrepreneurship: The Current Status of the Field and Future Research Agenda’, in Hitt, M.A., R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, and D. L. Sexton (eds.), Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset 255–288. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Shaker A., Brett P. Matherne, and Julie M. Carleton, (2003), ‘Technological Resource Leveraging and the Internationalisation of New Ventures’, Journal of International Entrepreneurship 1 (2), 163–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, Shaoming and Simona Stan, (1998), ‘The Determinants of Export Performance: A Review of the Empirical Literature Between 1987 and 1997’, International Marketing Review 15 (5), 333–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ari Jantunen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S. et al. Entrepreneurial Orientation, Dynamic Capabilities and International Performance. J Int Entrepr 3, 223–243 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-005-1133-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-005-1133-2

Keywords

Navigation