Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy, which is predominantly a disease of older adults (the median age at diagnosis is 70 years). The slow progression from asymptomatic stages and the late-onset of MM suggest fundamental differences compared to many other hematopoietic system-related malignancies. The concept discussed in this review is that age-related changes at the level of terminally differentiated plasma cells act as the main risk factors for the development of MM. Epigenetic and genetic changes that characterize both MM development and normal aging are highlighted. The relationships between cellular aging processes, genetic mosaicism in plasma cells, and risk for MM and the stochastic processes contributing to clonal selection and expansion of mutated plasma cells are investigated. In line with the DNA damage accumulation theory of aging, in this review, the evolution of monoclonal gammopathy to symptomatic MM is considered. Therapeutic consequences of age-dependent comorbidities that lead to frailty and have fundamental influence on treatment outcome are described. The importance of considering geriatric states when planning the life-long treatment course of an elderly MM patient in order to achieve maximal therapeutic benefit is emphasized.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Multiple myeloma (MM) accounts for about 1% of all cancers and approximately 10% of all hematologic malignancies. Aging is considered one of the most significant risk factors for various malignant diseases. MM excels in this regard, as it affects predominantly older people. It is diagnosed on average at the age of 70, and only a tiny proportion (less than 2%) of patients with MM are less than 40 years old [1]. Males have a 20% higher chance of a MM diagnosis than females [2]. Excess body fat is known to increase the lifetime risk of developing MM [3].
MM is considered a rare disease, but its global incidence increased by 126% from 1990 to 2016 [4], probably due to the worldwide aging population. In fact, it is the most common malignancy that originates in the bone marrow. In MM, the origin of the cells that serve as the starting point for the malignancy is not the bone marrow stem or progenitor cells, like in most other hematopoietic malignancies, but terminally differentiated, mature B cells in the germinal centers of secondary lymphoid tissues [5]. Symptomatic MM is characterized by the clonal expansion of terminally differentiated, antibody-producing plasma cells, progenies of a malignantly transformed B cell. Plasma cells in MM produce non-functional monoclonal antibodies (M proteins) that result in elevated serum levels in most patients, termed a monoclonal gammopathy. Malignant clones later tend to colonize the bone marrow but also may cause damage to soft tissues in the form of plasmacytomas. The diagnosis of MM is primarily based on an elevated clonal plasma cell count (or plasmacytoma) and nowadays less importantly of the M protein and disease defining CRAB criteria (hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, and osteolytic bone destruction). In most cases, gammopathies very slowly develop from the asymptomatic forms [6] towards the manifest MM [7]. More recently, the SLiM diagnostic criteria were also established for defining myeloma: smoldering myeloma with more than 60% plasma cells, with more than 100 for free light chain ratios, and/or more than one focal lesion on MRI scans is also termed as MM that requires therapy.
In this review, the stochastic genetic, epigenetic, and cellular processes involved in clonal selection and expansion of mutated plasma cells are presented from a geroscience perspective, highlighting the role of basic mechanisms of aging in the pathogenesis of MM. The goal of therapy—especially in the elderly—should be to slow down disease progression, achieve symptomatic relief, possibly a remission, and provide the best possible quality of life, considering patients’ older age and comorbidities.
The biological and clinical heterogeneity observed in MM results in variable responses to treatment and outcome. Therefore, while tailoring the treatment, predictive and prognostic biological markers, as well as geriatric/frailty assessments, are to be considered according to the recommendation of the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) [8]. Here, an overview of the clinical practice and experiences as well as recommendations for elderly, unfit, and frail patients are provided.
Diverse mechanisms underlying the long-lasting pathogenesis of symptomatic MM
Epigenetic changes and genetic mutations with structural and numerical chromosome aberrations that characterize MM may develop asymptomatically for decades. Prolonged disease progression and branching evolution lead to clonal heterogeneity of malignant cells in different patients [8]. Additionally, the disorder has different cytogenetic backgrounds despite similar clinical diagnostic criteria [9]. There are no two MM patients alike, though certain biologic subclasses of the disease are clearly distinguishable. Due to its complexity and heterogeneity, our understanding has been developing at least as slowly and gradually as the MM itself. The IMWG has differentiated asymptomatic plasma cell disorders from asymptomatic MM in their 2009 recommendations for differential diagnosis [10]. According to more recent updates by Rajkumar [11], subcategories of these asymptomatic stages are non-IgM as well as IgM monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance (MGUS and IgM MGUS), light-chain MGUS, and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). These phenotypes lack myeloma-defining events (MDE), such as end-organ damage or amyloidosis. However, patients affected have an abnormally higher rate of monoclonal B cells in their bone marrow (MGUS, SMM) or elevated serum and urinary monoclonal protein that is a class of IgA or IgG (in MGUS), IgM (in IgM MGUS), or light chain (in light-chain MGUS). The asymptomatic MGUS and SMM disorders tend to develop into MM at different rates and speeds, depending on their genetic background. Interestingly, the MGUS is known to be present in approximately more than 3% in the population above the age of 50 [12]. MGUS progresses to multiple myeloma or related malignancies at a steady rate of 1% per year [13], meaning that MGUS diagnosis may precede the development of MM by more than 10 years [14]. SMM is considered a more advanced stage of the developing malignancy, and it tends to develop into symptomatic MM at a rate ten times higher than seen in MGUS, especially in the first 2 to 5 years after its diagnosis. SMM may also have early active forms depending on genetic changes and require closer follow-up [15].
Multiple myeloma was initially termed “multiple” to distinguish it from plasmacytoma, a solitary tumor of a bone or an organ/tissue. Solitary plasmacytoma (SP) may develop further into a solitary plasmacytoma with minimal marrow involvement (SPMMI). Both SP and SPMMI are characterized by monoclonal plasma cell contribution confirmed by biopsy evidence [16]. By contrast, MM typically has multiple foci of the clonal proliferation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow, and these form multiple osteolytic lesions in the involved bones, most commonly in the vertebrae, skull, ribs, pelvis, and the proximal long bones [10]. SP has a much better prognosis than MM. However, symptomatic MM is developing in almost 50% of patients with SP of bone. This unfavorable progression may take as long as 15 years [17].
MM in companion animals
Veterinary medicine offers a unique insight into the biology of age-associated diseases, including malignancies. In the field of geroscience, dogs are considered highly interesting models to understand biological and environmental factors that influence aging, age-related pathologies, and longevity. Unlike laboratory rodents, companion dogs and humans are exposed to similar environmental conditions. There is strong evidence that many chronic conditions that are manifested in older humans (e.g., obesity, chronic inflammatory diseases, diabetes mellitus), and which are associated with comorbidities, are also present in companion dogs and are associated with similarly high levels of comorbidities [18, 19]. In both dogs and humans, malignancies are leading causes of death, and age trajectories of deaths from malignant diseases are almost identical between the two species [18]. Multiple myeloma also develops in older dogs, and it represents approximately 1% of all canine tumors [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. An analysis of myeloma in 156 cases in companion dogs reported diagnosis at the median age of 10.7 years [20] (37% of maximum lifespan potential in Canis familiaris [30] and dogs are generally considered old after 10 years of age). Thus, multiple myeloma is an age-related malignancy in dogs, similarly to humans (the median age of humans with multiple myeloma at time of diagnosis is ~70 year, which is 57% of the maximum lifespan potential of the species). Dogs are also considered powerful models of genetic determinants of successful aging [31, 32], as the aging profiles of different dog breeds vary according to their adult size: smaller dogs often live for over 15–16 years, medium and large size dogs have a lifespan typically of 10 to 13 years, and some giant dog breeds such as mastiffs often live only for 7 to 8 years. It is interesting to consider that certain relatively shorter-lived dog breeds seem to be more susceptible to developing plasma cell tumors, including German shepherds (median lifespan: ~10.3 years) [33].
Cats also develop myeloma at old ages [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. A detailed analysis of myeloma cases in sixteen cats reported a median age of 14.0 years (47% of maximum lifespan potential in Felis catus domesticus [30] at time of diagnosis [46]. In contrast to other hematological malignancies (e.g., lymphoma) in cats, there is no evidence that would suggest that infection with oncogenic viruses (e.g., feline immunodeficiency virus, feline leukemia virus) is causally linked to the pathogenesis of feline cases of multiple myeloma [47]. The available evidence suggests that in contrast to the model of primary intramedullary neoplastic transformation explaining the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma in humans, in felines primary extramedullary neoplastic transformation (plasmacytoma) is more common [48].
Many characteristics of myeloma are similar in humans and companion animals. Multiple myeloma in companion animals appears to exhibit an immunoglobulin isotype distribution that is similar to human cases: IgG and IgA gammopathies are the most common in both people and companion animals (dogs and cats). Both dogs and cats exhibit evidence of skeletal lesions, similarly to humans.
Taken together, veterinary medicine may offer valuable insight into the gero-oncological aspects of the pathogenesis of MM. Future studies are also warranted to investigate the similarities of risk factors for myeloma in humans and companion animals, including the role of obesity and exposure to environmental toxicants (e.g., the presence of benzene in food consumed by companion animals; see below).
Potential roles of fundamental cellular and molecular mechanisms of aging in the pathogenesis of MM
Geroscience research in the past 2 decades has demonstrated that the rate of organismal aging is controlled by evolutionarily conserved genetic pathways and biochemical processes [49]. By definition, the pathogenesis of all age-related diseases, including that of MM, must involve these processes and pathways. In the following section, the potential roles of fundamental cellular and molecular mechanisms of aging in the pathogenesis of MM are discussed.
Reactive oxygen species, DNA damage, and mutation accumulation
Aging is characterized by increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and increased susceptibility to ROS-mediated DNA damage. Importantly, DNA damage mediated by ROS (either produced by cellular sources or generated by exogenous factors, e.g., UV radiation, tobacco smoke constituents, and other environmental toxicants) plays a central role in the accumulation of different mutations in B cells, ranging from a single nucleotide divergence to the broken chromosomes and ploidy changes [50], promoting the pathogenesis of MM.
There is strong evidence that in addition to increased production of ROS, aging impairs pathways underlying cellular resilience to oxidative stressors. In young cells, evolutionarily conserved antioxidative stress resilience pathways maintain cellular reduction-oxidation homeostasis through transcriptional regulation of key cytoprotective genes encoding antioxidant enzymes, pro-survival factors, anti-inflammatory, and macromolecular damage repair pathways. A critical mechanism by which aging may exacerbate the induction of DNA damage in plasma cells and thereby the pathogenesis of MM involves an age-related impairment of oxidative stress resilience pathways [51,52,53,54,55] and, consequentially, increased propensity for ROS-mediated alterations to the DNA.
One of the most abundant spontaneous hydrolytic reactions also points to the close interaction between mutations and epigenetic impairment (see below). Cytosine with an epigenetic mark, i.e., 5-methylcytosine, tends to easily lose an amino group and therefore easily be converted to thymine. As this spontaneous mutation primarily occurs at methylated CpG islands [56], we can speculate that quiescent (e.g., memory B cells) or senescent cells are particularly vulnerable to mutations at the loci of cell cycle regulation and, therefore, can be the source of a malignant clone with time. Every tissue accumulates mutations at a roughly constant mutation rate throughout life; the estimated rate is 13–44 mutations per genome per year [57]. Therefore, with age, genetic mosaicism seems to be inevitable, and it is only a question of time when the fitness of a clone leads to clonal expansion to the detriment of others [57]. Stochastic processes may produce malignant, benign, or natural/functional clones or senescent cells.
Role of DNA damage induced by environmental toxicants in the pathogenesis of MM
Several toxic chemicals to which humans are exposed have been causally linked to the pathogenesis of MM through their ability to induce oxidative stress and/or DNA damage. An important example is benzene which is a natural constituent of crude oil and is one of the most widely used chemicals in developed countries. Benzene is highly toxic and is used to manufacture resins, adhesives, nylon fibers, plastics, rubbers, lubricants, dyes, detergents, drugs, explosives, and pesticides. There are many studies linking exposure to benzene to myeloma [58,59,60,61,62,63]. Benzene is present in petrol, and inhalation of benzene with petrol fumes (e.g., taxicab drivers [64], workers in gasoline stations [65], and refineries) results in a significantly increased risk for malignancies. Exposure to the herbicide glyphosate (Roundup®) has also been linked to the genesis of myeloma and other malignancies [66, 67], and on the basis on findings of epidemiological studies and preclinical investigations, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified it as “probably carcinogenic in humans” (category 2A). Although some controversies exist regarding the methodologies of epidemiological studies [68, 69], exposure of laboratory rodents under controlled conditions results in induction of myeloma. Age-related decline in cellular stress resilience likely renders aged B cells more susceptible to environmental toxicants.
Possible mechanisms contributing to the increased susceptibility of B cells to DNA damage and malignant transformation
During normal B cell maturation and development to plasma cells in germinal centers, the several developmental steps—reviewed in detail elsewhere [70]—make these cells a particularly good target for mutations, increasing the risk of potential malignant transformation. Firstly, genetically inherent steps of somatic hypermutations are needed for the most effective B cell receptor and antibody-producing clones. Somatic hypermutations involve a step when cytosine deamination occurs with enzymatic help (activation-induced cytidine deaminase, AID) at genomic regions coding variable regions of immunoglobulins. This way, germinal centers are the places of “officially” promoted mutations. Enormous cellular and intracellular networks [70] are responsible for the mutations and the proper clone selection via epigenetic changes; the more steps needed, the more mistakes may occur. Secondly, multiple cell divisions are needed that lead to proliferation and survival vs. extinction of suitable vs. not suitable clones for effective humoral immune response vs. autoimmune responses. For clonal selection, clones are needed. The single-stranded DNA during replication is more vulnerable to mutations. Thirdly, to preserve a long-term humoral memory, quiescent B cells are preserved with an arrested cell cycle for a long time, necessarily with hypermethylated regions of their genome at cell cycle regulation. We speculate that, similarly to senescent cells, memory B cells, due to the vulnerability of the hypermethylated regions, may become malignant, depending on other mutations accumulated. Due to the aforementioned factors, B cells are susceptible to DNA damage, which may lead to further structural and numerical chromosomal mutations. B cells divide in germinal centers, but healthy plasma cells do not. Due to cascading mutational events that start in B cells, a plasma cell clone may proliferate and gain further mutations. The monoclonal source of a dysfunctional antibody is detectable in gammopathies [5].
Cellular senescence
Cellular senescence, an evolutionarily conserved, DNA damage-associated cellular stress response, is a critical biological process underlying aging [71]. Several molecular stressors associated with aging, including oxidative and nitrative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammatory cytokines, and replicative exhaustion/telomere attrition, may trigger cellular senescence [72,73,74]. Cellular senescence results in stable growth arrest whereby cells stop proliferating in spite of the presence of growth signals. In order to escape apoptosis in replicative arrest, senescent cells inactivate p53 and other proteins with apoptosis-induction roles in case of DNA damage [74]. This may act to facilitate malignant transformation in senescent and pre-senescent cells [75]. Other mechanisms by which senescent cells may indirectly promote the pathogenesis of MM involve changes in the cellular microenvironment. Senescent cells have intense metabolism and exhibit a pro-inflammatory senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Chemokines, pro-inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and matrix proteases secreted by senescent cells likely contribute to the genesis of a wide range of age-related diseases and may play a critical role in the development of a growth promoting tumor microenvironment that influences the growth, invasion, and metastasis of transformed cells [71, 76]. Senescent cells survive for a prolonged time, occupying up to more than 10 percent of aging tissues [77] that may become gradually dysfunctional.
Epigenetic dysregulation: changes in DNA methylation
Epigenetic alterations are important hallmarks of aging [49] and play an important role in the pathogenesis of MM [78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99]. In the field of geroscience, there is an important distinction between biological age (determined based on alterations in the epigenome and consequential phenotypic and functional changes) and chronological age [100,101,102]. Biological age acceleration (which indicates unsuccessful/unhealthy aging due to lifestyle factors, among other) was shown to associate with DNA methylation-based cancer risk factors [103,104,105,106]. Future studies should determine how age acceleration, via altering the epigenome, promotes the pathogenesis of MM.
As shown in the differentiation studies, DNA hypermethylation at CpG islands in a gene’s promoter region can switch off its transcription, and hypomethylation of these areas switches them on, depending on the cell’s fate during development. There is a global DNA hypomethylation in malignant cells, including MM cells [107]. Overall hypomethylation leads to genomic instability, e.g., release of the transposable elements, which lead to mutations and disease progression [107], [108]. Hypermethylation of distinct genes also occurs in malignant cells as well as aged cells. In myeloma cells, genes typically affected are tumor suppressor genes [109], [110], leading to the loss of cell cycle control, and genes involved in stress resilience, including DNA repair genes [92, 111]. Epigenetic aberrations have also been causally linked to chemoresistance in MM [112]. In senescent cells, global hypomethylation is accompanied by hypermethylation of the senescent-associated heterochromatin foci (SAHFs). The SAHFs are at the loci of proliferative genes such as E2F target genes, responsible for initiating the G1 phase of the cell cycle. This way, senescent cells may live with replicative arrest for a long time. Epigenetic changes that affect cell cycle regulation may lead directly (via silencing of tumor suppressor genes) or indirectly (via regulation of cellular senescence) to malignancy. In this regard, see also possible prevention strategies later. Due to MM’s late-onset, we have no reason to doubt that myeloma development lacks the effect of senescent cells or that the origin of the malignant clone is not a long-lived memory B cell with senescence-like properties.
Epigenetic dysregulation: histone modifications
In addition to DNA methylation, posttranslational histone modifications also have an important role in regulation of chromatin structure and thereby in the transcriptional regulation of pathways that modulate aging [113,114,115]. Histone proteins form a complex with DNA to compile the nucleosomes consisting of 2 subunits of each core histone (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4). Changes in the abundance of core histones and the ratio of different histone variants may also affect genomic stability both in aging cells and malignant clones in MM. Reduced histone protein synthesis with aging results in a loss of histones and changed nucleosome positioning on particular DNA sequences. This age-related decrease in nucleosome abundance may contribute to dysregulation of gene expression and increased genomic instability, including increased DNA breaks, translocations, and increases in retrotransposons and the insertion of mitochondrial DNA into nuclear DNA [116], all of which may promote the pathogenesis of MM. During aging in mammals, the abundance of non-canonical histone protein variants increases [117], which may also affect the histone methylation patterns. Histone variants may be replaced at any stage of the cell cycle [118]; thus, dynamic epigenetic changes may occur even in non-dividing cells, potentially contributing to cancer formation. It can be hypothesized that similar processes may occur during aging of memory B cells with an arrested cell cycle, which may lead to multiple cytogenetic changes. Previous studies identified genes encoding histones and diverse histone modifiers as targets of somatic mutation in MM [119]. Pawlyn et al. found mutations of the HIST1H1B-E gene family encoding H1 histone in 6% of 463 MM patients and, with lower frequency, mutations in genes encoding core histone proteins [120].
The N-terminal domains of the core histone proteins (histone tails) are the sites of posttranslational modifications, including methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and sumoylation. These histone marks present an additional layer of epigenetic information that affects the chromatin structure and, consequently, gene transcription, DNA replication, and repair [121]. There are distinct changes in histone marks in aging cells. A global increase in active histone marks such as H3K4me3 and H4K16ac and a decrease in repressive marks such as H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 associate with aging. These changes further increase the instability and vulnerability of the genome. Not surprisingly, aberrant histone posttranslational modification profiles are also linked to tumorigenesis [122]. The case with histone code is complex with many site-, cell-, and tumor-type-specific changes in aging and MM [79, 119]. Dysregulation of histone modifiers (e.g., histone methyltransferases, acetyltransferases, demethylases, deacetylases) and their associated histone mark profiles in MM pathogenesis were recently reviewed [107].
The interaction between epigenetic alterations associated with aging and the pathogenesis of cancer is subject to intensive research. Sirtuins (Sirt 1-7) are evolutionarily conserved histone modifiers, which function as NAD+-dependent histone deacetylases. Sirt proteins regulate essential metabolic pathways and are involved in cell survival, senescence, proliferation, apoptosis, DNA repair, cell metabolism, and caloric restriction[123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138]. In particular, Sirt 6 seems to play a role in MM as its high expression is related to poor prognosis [139]. In contrast, SIRT2 and SIRT3 expression is reduced in MM patients as compared to healthy controls [140]. Sirtuins are considered potential targets for treating neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and aging [133,134,135,136,137,138, 141]. The role of SIRT1 activators and that of other histone modifiers in the pathogenesis and treatment of MM is a focus of intensive investigations [120, 142,143,144].
Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression
Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression represents an additional layer of epigenetic regulation. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are RNA transcripts more than 200 nucleotides long that are not translated into protein, which are involved in both in transcriptional regulation and post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. There is growing evidence that lncRNA-mediated regulation of gene expression plays a role in modulation of cellular aging processes [145,146,147,148,149]. Importantly, lncRNAs are useful biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of MM [150]. lncRNAs have been causally linked to dysregulation of cell proliferation, tumor growth, and drug resistance in MM [151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small single-stranded non-coding RNAs (containing about 22 nucleotides), whose functions include RNA silencing and post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression [161,162,163,164]. Dysregulation of miRNA expression was shown to contribute to the genesis of aging phenotypes in various organs [165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173] including cells of the immune system [174, 175]. miRNAs play important roles in the generation and differentiation of B cells [176,177,178]. Importantly, dysregulation of miRNA expression has been demonstrated in MM, which likely plays a multifaceted role in the pathogenesis of the disease [179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186].
Dysregulation of proteostasis
Normal proteostasis, the homeostatic regulation of the functional proteome, is essential for the maintenance of youthful organ function. Age-related changes of the proteostasis network underlie the altered biogenesis, folding, trafficking, and degradation of proteins in aging cells and tissues and contribute to the pathogenesis of a wide array of age-related diseases [187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198].
Survival and proliferation of myeloma cells, which unusually produce large amounts of abnormal immunoglobulins, critically depend on a normal proteostasis. Factors that overwhelm the proteasome (e.g., proteasome inhibitors, such as bortezomib or heat shock [199] result in increased cellular stress and promote apoptosis in myeloma cells.
Nutrient sensing pathways
Nutrient-sensing pathways, including GH/IGF-1 pathway, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), sirtuins, and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling, regulate organismal and cellular metabolism and modulate cellular processes of aging [49, 200, 201]. These pathways also play critical roles in the regulation of metabolism and survival of malignant cells, including MM cells. IGF-1 signaling promotes myeloma cell survival and progression [202,203,204,205,206,207], whereas inhibition of IGF-1 signaling promotes the pro-apoptotic effects of chemotherapeutic drugs in MM. mTOR regulates cellular protein synthesis, autophagy, cell growth, and proliferation as well as cell survival and thereby modulates aging processes and lifespan regulation. In myeloma cells, mTOR signaling plays an important pro-survival role, and pharmacological inhibition of its activity was shown to exert significant, therapeutically relevant cytotoxic effects [208,209,210,211,212,213,214]. AMPK plays a central role in regulation of cellular energy homeostasis, by activating glucose and fatty acid uptake and metabolism. Activation of AMPK was shown to delay aging and extend lifespan in models of aging. Metformin is a pharmacological activator of AMPK, which was shown to extend lifespan in rodent models, and its anti-aging activity is to be tested in clinical studies as well [215,216,217]. Importantly, metformin was shown to exert significant anti-myeloma effects in preclinical studies and is also being considered for myeloma treatment in human patients [218,219,220,221,222,223,224].
Age-related sterile inflammation and immunosenescence
Aging per se results in chronic low-grade sterile inflammation (termed “inflammaging”) in multiple tissues due to age-related phenotypic changes in a number of cell types, including cells of the cardiovascular system, adipocytes, fibroblasts, and immune cells [225]. The highly proinflammatory SASP of senescent cells is an important contributing factor [226,227,228,229]. Inflammaging results in increased levels of pro-inflammatory mediators in the circulation and tissues and is a strong risk factor for multiple age-associated diseases. Various lifestyle factors, including obesity associated with consumption of an unhealthy diet, exacerbate age-related inflammation. Obesity in older adults is associated with a heightened state of inflammation in the white adipose tissue and with a consequential increase in circulating levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines [230,231,232]. Increased systemic inflammation in obese older subjects is known to promote the pathogenesis of MM [233,234,235]. Other obesity-associated cancers may also be present in obese older MM patients.
Advanced aging associates with immunosenescence, which is characterized by immune dysfunction increasing susceptibility to infectious pathogens, compromising vaccine responses and promoting the development of autoimmune diseases and malignant tumors in older adults. Immunosenescence mainly affects the adaptive immune responses by decreasing lymphopoiesis, while myelopoiesis is maintained. Immunosenescence has also been causally linked to the pathogenesis of frailty and age-related cardiovascular diseases and degenerative diseases [236]. The heightened state of inflammation in older adults combined with an age-related decline in tumor immune surveillance favors the genesis of MM[236].
Clonal hematopoiesis
Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is a newly recognized phenomenon in older adults. There is growing evidence that somatic mutations are manifested in blood cells and/or cells of the bone marrow in 10% of adults aged 70 to 80 [237,238,239,240]. In CHIP, hematopoietic stem cells with somatic mutations modulate hematopoietic lineage potential by a mechanism of clonal expansion. CHIP is associated with an increased risk for hematologic malignancies and cardiovascular diseases [237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248]. It also associates with adverse outcomes in patients with other advanced malignancies [249]. In MM the presence of CHIP in bone marrow is also associated with poor prognosis and development of second hematopoietic malignancies [250].
Importance of cytogenetic heterogeneity for the progression of MM
There are no two MM patients alike. The genetic background of the same disease phenotype in MM varies greatly, which also influences the progression of the disease. According to Rajkumar’s update [11], the clonal plasma cell population of MGUS or SMM cells are primarily gaining multiple odd-numbered chromosomes or immunoglobulin heavy chain translocations. Trisomies are present in the plasma cells obtained from the bone marrow in approx. 40% of the MM cases, termed trisomic (or hyperdiploid) MM. Almost all the rest of the myeloma patients have a translocation involving the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) locus at chromosome 14q32; their condition is commonly termed as IgH-translocated MM. Both numerical and structural chromosomal changes, i.e., trisomies and IgH translocations, can be present in rare cases up to 15%. Further cytogenetic abnormalities may arise later in the progression of the MGUS/SMM condition or MM [11]. These typically include gains or losses of short or long arms of certain chromosomes e.g., gain(1q), del(1p), del(17p), del(13); RAS mutations, and secondary translocations [251].
IgH locus at 14q32 is transcriptionally active in B cells; therefore, patients with IgH translocation may have oncogenes translocated to the 14q32 region, which may lead to their enhanced expression. There are several known reciprocal translocations of 14q32 with other chromosomes, including t(4;14) and t(11;14) translocations (30% of patients with MM) and the less common t(14;16), t(6;14), t(8;14), and t(14;20) translocations. For example, the t(4;14) translocation can be associated with upregulation of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) and the myeloma SET domain protein (MMSET). Affected patients show an overall poor prognosis and therapeutic resistance. The reciprocal translocations of the IgH allele at 14q32 with other oncogenes such as D types of cyclins, Maf family members, or c-MYC also affect the disease course [252]. In addition, patients with t(4;14) translocation, del(17p), and gain(1q) are at a higher risk of progression from MGUS or SMM to MM [253].
The effect of any cytogenetic abnormality varies depending on the stage of the disease. Complexity, variability, and randomness all suggest that there is essentially an aging process in B-cells resulting in a vulnerable epi/genomic state and, finally, the propagation of a malignant clone at work in MM.
Treatment aspects of MM in older adults
Therapy of MM has been revolutionized in the last 2 decades with the registration and availability of multiple highly effective novel agents, such as immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and more recently, CAR-T cells and bispecific antibodies. Despite these advances, effective treatment of MM in unfit and frail older adults is still a challenge.
Frailty is a functional term representing the multisystem decrease in physiological functions that leads to increased vulnerability, which, in return, results in increased morbidity and mortality during cancer therapy. Since MM is a disease that affects predominantly older adults, frailty may influence the therapy of up to two-thirds of MM patients. These patients are frequently designated as “not eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation,” which is a highly effective standard procedure for younger patients. Yet, this classification may be entirely misleading: multiple different cohorts of older MM patients exist. Therefore, it is paramount to properly address frailty and adjust anti-myeloma therapy accordingly to obtain a maximal therapeutic benefit. As elderly and frail patients are less likely to participate in clinical trials, the evidence of their proper therapy is of lower grade, mainly based on results of fit elderly patients that did participate and on the expert opinions of recommended dose adjustments.
In order to properly identify myeloma patients who are at increased risk of therapy-related toxicity, clinical frailty scores were established. These scores aim to help predict survival, likely adverse event rate, and treatment tolerability. In the field of myeloma, the most accepted frailty scoring system is the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty score [254]. It uses age, the Katz Activity of Daily Living (ADL), the Lawton Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL), and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), as shown in Table 1 (and a convenient web-based tool is available at http://www.myelomafrailtyscorecalculator.net/Geriatric.aspx). Score systems such as this and others used clinically as complex geriatric assessments are time-consuming and not readily available, though may be more reliable in the long run [255]. It has been shown multiple times that during therapy of elderly myeloma patients, proper determination of frailty is as important for progression-free and overall survival as molecular and genetic markers of the underlining disease [256]. Notably, all risk scoring systems have determined age as one of the most relevant risk factors for therapy failure, though it is a matter of debate what age may exactly be the best for cutoff (70, 75, or 80 years of age). An additional aspect with definite future potential is the inclusion of easily measurable predictive biomarkers in the frailty scoring system. A pioneer of this approach has been the Mayo Clinic. Their score includes the Performance Score (WHO PS), the age, and the NT-proBNP value (Table 2) [257]. Four clearly separable subgroups could be identified with widely disparate OS differences (18 to 54 months from diagnosis).
The most important value of frailty measurement for everyday clinical practice is in the available recommendations for relevant drug dosing in the treatment of MM in older adults. Accordingly, in multiple clinical trials, evidence has been presented that elderly patients abandon therapy early and do not get its total possible value unless the anticancer drug dosing intensity has been adapted to their fitness level. Consequently, a well-designed, personalized therapy may achieve its full benefit for the patient (Table 3) [255, 258].
An additional essential aspect of clinical care of elderly myeloma patients is vaccination. As infections are the leading cause of death in myeloma and the “alertness” of the aged immune system is impaired, prophylaxis of infections may be lifesaving. Regular seasonal Influenza vaccinations, Pneumococcus vaccination, and SARS-CoV vaccination should be done as the standard of care. Acyclovir prophylaxis is inexpensive and effective for herpes simplex and zoster and should be pursued for most patients who receive anticancer therapy.
Antibacterial prophylaxis is controversial, though the evidence is reasonably strong for initial therapy in frail patients (levofloxacin or sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim could be used). The latter is also appropriate as Pneumocystis prophylaxis, especially in late-line heavily pretreated patients.
Conclusion
MM is different from many other hematopoietic malignancies with respect to the origin of cells. It develops from terminally differentiated B cells over very long periods, possibly decades. The gradually increasing and interconnected instability of the epigenome and genome and the accumulation of mutations have common roots and are similar in many aspects during the development of aging and MM. It is easy to hypothesize that the development of MM as cancer is unusually long because it is aging associated with stochastic clone development and selection that causes it.
The memory B cells in germinal centers may at least potentially give rise to many plasma cells, making the cell source similar when the aged bone marrow HSCs population is already depleted, and hematopoiesis relies increasingly on progenitors. After multiple divisions, with more cellular memories of differentiation and environmental effects, a somatic cell carries much more epigenetic and genetic divergencies than a stem cell [259], [260], [261]. Aging is also characterized by mutations that lead to mosaicism, forming divergent clonal cell lines in tissues [262]. The older the body is, the fewer cells carry the original genomic blueprint of the zygote and preserve multipotency. Above a certain age, it is a matter of luck when and which clone becomes dysfunctional or malignant. In Fig. 1, we summarized aging processes and B cell maturation that act in concert in the development of MM. Aging alone is a malignancy risk, but memory B cells are especially endangered by this transformation.
Schematic illustration of the role of fundamental cellular and molecular mechanisms of aging in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. The scheme highlights stages of B cell differentiation and myelomagenesis, showing how myeloma progresses from a normal plasma cell to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) to full blown multiple myeloma. Aging promotes the genesis of DNA damage and mutations, facilitates the selection of premalignant and malignant clones, impairs the mechanisms involved immunosurveillance and elimination of malignantly transformed cells, and exacerbates cellular and molecular mechanisms contributing to tumor cell survival, proliferation, extramedullary tumor formation, and tumor angiogenesis. Abbreviations used: SASP, senescence-associated secretory phenotype; MGUS, monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance; SMM, smoldering multiple myeloma
Additionally, B cell development involves steps (like SHM and clonal selection) that make its genome particularly vulnerable, potentially causing an accelerated aging process in this cell type compared with others. It is stochastic which clone, a possibly transformed B cell, is activated and whether this leads to the proliferation of a truly malignant plasma cell clone. Chronic inflammation in the aging body and the general aging of the immune system as well as clonal hematopoiesis favor the development of MM by providing a nurturing environment.
In summary, the claim that aging is the most significant risk factor for cancer development is particularly striking in the case of MM. If we consider aging a multifaceted disease process, then gammopathy is one of the possible faces, and MM is the final outcome.
Treatment of the aged and polymorbid myeloma patients is incredibly challenging and puts a strain on the patient, the caregiver, and the healthcare system. When tailoring the therapy, we must consider that all organs of these elderly patients are aged and have a lower tolerance. On the other hand, myeloma in elderly patients is generally not more resistant to anticancer therapy, just one needs to apply the most adequate drug dosing and therapy intensity.
References
Kyle RA, Gertz MA, Witzig TE, Lust JA, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, et al. Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78(1):21–33.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7–33.
Avgerinos KI, Spyrou N, Mantzoros CS, Dalamaga M. Obesity and cancer risk: emerging biological mechanisms and perspectives. Metabolism. 2019;92:121–35.
Cowan AJ, Allen C, Barac A, Basaleem H, Bensenor I, Curado MP, et al. Global burden of multiple myeloma: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(9):1221–7.
Barwick BG, Gupta VA, Vertino PM, Boise LH. Cell of origin and genetic alterations in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1121.
Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: every year a new standard? Hematol Oncol. 2019;37(Suppl 1):62–5.
Rajkumar SV. Updated diagnostic criteria and staging system for multiple myeloma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:e418–23.
Chng WJ, Dispenzieri A, Chim CS, Fonseca R, Goldschmidt H, Lentzsch S, et al. IMWG consensus on risk stratification in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2014;28(2):269–77.
Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, Blade J, Merlini G, Mateos MV, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):e538-48.
Dimopoulos M, Terpos E, Comenzo RL, Tosi P, Beksac M, Sezer O, et al. International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma. Leukemia. 2009;23(9):1545–56.
Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2020;95(5):548–67.
Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, Larson DR, Plevak MF, Offord JR, et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(13):1362–9.
Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, Offord JR, Larson DR, Plevak MF, et al. A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(8):564–9.
Therneau TM, Kyle RA, Melton LJ 3rd, Larson DR, Benson JT, Colby CL, et al. Incidence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and estimation of duration before first clinical recognition. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(11):1071–9.
Kyle RA, Remstein ED, Therneau TM, Dispenzieri A, Kurtin PJ, Hodnefield JM, et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(25):2582–90.
Pham A, Mahindra A. Solitary plasmacytoma: a review of diagnosis and management. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2019;14(2):63–9.
International Myeloma Working G. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol. 2003;121(5):749–57.
Hoffman JM, Creevy KE, Franks A, O’Neill DG, Promislow DEL. The companion dog as a model for human aging and mortality. Aging Cell. 2018;17(3):e12737.
Urfer SR, Darvas M, Czeibert K, Sandor S, Promislow DEL, Creevy KE, et al. Canine Cognitive Dysfunction (CCD) scores correlate with amyloid beta 42 levels in dog brain tissue. Geroscience. 2021;43(5):2379–86.
Caldin M, Campigli M, Zoia A, Zanella A, Bertolini G, Furlanello T, et al. Bleeding diathesis in canine multiple myeloma and prognostic implications: a cohort study in 156 dogs. Res Vet Sci. 2019;125:305–8.
Cowgill ES, Neel JA, Ruslander D. Light-chain myeloma in a dog. J Vet Intern Med. 2004;18(1):119–21.
Doppa T, Simpson K. What is your diagnosis? Multiple myeloma. J Small Anim Pract. 1997;38(8):327–57.
Kato H, Momoi Y, Omori K, Youn HY, Yamada T, Goto N, et al. Gammopathy with two M- components in a dog with IgA-type multiple myeloma. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1995;49(1–2):161–8.
Lautzenhiser SJ, Walker MC, Goring RL. Unusual IgM-secreting multiple myeloma in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003;223(5):645–8, 36.
Mayer MN, Kerr ME, Grier CK, Macdonald VS. Immunoglobulin A multiple myeloma with cutaneous involvement in a dog. Can Vet J. 2008;49(7):694–702.
Ramaiah SK, Seguin MA, Carwile HF, Raskin RE. Biclonal gammopathy associated with immunoglobulin A in a dog with multiple myeloma. Vet Clin Pathol. 2002;31(2):83–9.
Ricci M, De Feo G, Konar M, Lubas G. Multiple myeloma and primary erythrocytosis in a dog. Can Vet J. 2021;62(8):849–53.
Villiers E, Dobson J. Multiple myeloma with associated polyneuropathy in a German shepherd dog. J Small Anim Pract. 1998;39(5):249–51.
Wyatt S, De Risio L, Driver C, Jose-Lopez R, Pivetta M, Beltran E. Neurological signs and MRI findings in 12 dogs with multiple myeloma. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2019;60(4):409–15.
Tacutu R, Thornton D, Johnson E, Budovsky A, Barardo D, Craig T, et al. Human Ageing Genomic Resources: new and updated databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D1083–90.
Kaeberlein M, Creevy KE, Promislow DE. The dog aging project: translational geroscience in companion animals. Mamm Genome. 2016;27(7–8):279–88.
Urfer SR, Kaeberlein M, Promislow DEL, Creevy KE. Lifespan of companion dogs seen in three independent primary care veterinary clinics in the United States. Canine Med Genet. 2020;7:7.
Pinard C. Plasma Cell Tumors and Multiple Myeloma. https://vcahospitals.com/know-your-pet/plasma-cell-tumors-and-multiple-myeloma. Accessed 19 Aug 2022.
Appel SL, Moens NM, Abrams-Ogg AC, Woods JP, Nykamp S, Bienzle D. Multiple myeloma with central nervous system involvement in a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008;233(5):743–7.
Bagwell JM, Herd HR, Breshears MA, Hodges S, Rizzi TE. Concurrent multiple myeloma and mast cell neoplasia in a 13-year-old castrated male Maine Coon cat. Vet Clin Pathol. 2017;46(1):151–7.
Bienzle D, Silverstein DC, Chaffin K. Multiple myeloma in cats: variable presentation with different immunoglobulin isotypes in two cats. Vet Pathol. 2000;37(4):364–9.
Dunbar MD, Lyles S. Hemophagocytic syndrome in a cat with multiple myeloma. Vet Clin Pathol. 2013;42(1):55–60.
Forrester SD, Greco DS, Relford RL. Serum hyperviscosity syndrome associated with multiple myeloma in two cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1992;200(1):79–82.
Harris RA, Miller M, Donaghy D, Ashton L, Langston C, Shockey T, et al. Light chain myeloma and detection of free light chains in serum and urine of dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med. 2021;35(2):1031–40.
Hribernik TN, Barta O, Gaunt SD, Boudreaux MK. Serum hyperviscosity syndrome associated with IgG myeloma in a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1982;181(2):169–70.
McDonald WJ, Burton SA, Fuentealba IC. Plasma cell myeloma producing an immunoglobulin A paraprotein in a cat. Can Vet J. 1994;35(3):157.
Sheafor SE, Gamblin RM, Couto CG. Hypercalcemia in two cats with multiple myeloma. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1996;32(6):503–8.
Webb J, Chary P, Northrup N, Almy F. Erythrophagocytic multiple myeloma in a cat. Vet Clin Pathol. 2008;37(3):302–7.
Weber NA, Tebeau CS. An unusual presentation of multiple myeloma in two cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1998;34(6):477–83.
Yamada O, Tamura K, Yagihara H, Isotani M, Azakami M, Sawada S, et al. Light-chain multiple myeloma in a cat. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007;19(4):443–7.
Patel RT, Caceres A, French AF, McManus PM. Multiple myeloma in 16 cats: a retrospective study. Vet Clin Pathol. 2005;34(4):341–52.
Mellor PJ, Haugland S, Murphy S, Smith KC, Holloway A, Archer J, et al. Myeloma-related disorders in cats commonly present as extramedullary neoplasms in contrast to myeloma in human patients: 24 cases with clinical follow-up. J Vet Intern Med. 2006;20(6):1376–83.
Mellor PJ, Haugland S, Smith KC, Powell RM, Archer J, Scase TJ, et al. Histopathologic, immunohistochemical, and cytologic analysis of feline myeloma-related disorders: further evidence for primary extramedullary development in the cat. Vet Pathol. 2008;45(2):159–73.
Lopez-Otin C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153(6):1194–217.
Stead ER, Bjedov I. Balancing DNA repair to prevent ageing and cancer. Exp Cell Res. 2021;405(2):112679.
Ungvari Z, Tarantini S, Nyul-Toth A, Kiss T, Yabluchanskiy A, Csipo T, et al. Nrf2 dysfunction and impaired cellular resilience to oxidative stressors in the aged vasculature: from increased cellular senescence to the pathogenesis of age-related vascular diseases. Gerosci. 2019;41(6):727–38.
Ungvari Z, Bailey-Downs L, Sosnowska D, Gautam T, Koncz P, Losonczy G, et al. Vascular oxidative stress in aging: a homeostatic failure due to dysregulation of Nrf2-mediated antioxidant response. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;H301(2):363–72.
Ungvari Z, Bailey-Downs L, Gautam T, Sosnowska D, Wang M, Monticone RE, et al. Age- associated vascular oxidative stress, Nrf2 dysfunction and NF-kB activation in the non-human primate Macaca mulatta. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66(8):866–75.
Pearson KJ, Lewis KN, Price NL, Chang JW, Perez E, Cascajo MV, et al. Nrf2 mediates cancer protection but not prolongevity induced by caloric restriction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(7):2325–30.
Csiszar A, Balasubramanian P, Tarantini S, Yabluchanskiy A, Zhang XA, Springo Z, et al. Chemically induced carcinogenesis in rodent models of aging: assessing organismal resilience to genotoxic stressors in geroscience research. Gerosci. 2019;41(2):209–27.
Duncan BK, Miller JH. Mutagenic deamination of cytosine residues in DNA. Nature. 1980;287(5782):560–1.
Kakiuchi N, Ogawa S. Clonal expansion in non-cancer tissues. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21(4):239–56.
Costantini AS, Benvenuti A, Vineis P, Kriebel D, Tumino R, Ramazzotti V, et al. Risk of leukemia and multiple myeloma associated with exposure to benzene and other organic solvents: evidence from the Italian Multicenter Case-control study. Am J Ind Med. 2008;51(11):803–11.
Infante PF. Benzene exposure and multiple myeloma: a detailed meta-analysis of benzene cohort studies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1076:90–109.
Lincz LF, Scorgie FE, Robertson R, Enno A. Genetic variations in benzene metabolism and susceptibility to multiple myeloma. Leuk Res. 2007;31(6):759–63.
Savitz DA, Andrews KW. Risk of myelogenous leukaemia and multiple myeloma in workers exposed to benzene. Occup Environ Med. 1996;53(5):357–8.
Sonoda T, Nagata Y, Mori M, Ishida T, Imai K. Meta-analysis of multiple myeloma and benzene exposure. J Epidemiol. 2001;11(6):249–54.
Teitelbaum DT, Brautbar N. Benzene and multiple myeloma: appraisal of the scientific evidence. Blood. 2000;95(9):2995–7.
Chen X, Feng L, Luo H, Cheng H. Health risk equations and risk assessment of airborne benzene homologues exposure to drivers and passengers in taxi cabins. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016;23(5):4797–811.
Chaiklieng S, Suggaravetsiri P, Autrup H. Risk Assessment on benzene exposure among gasoline station workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(14):2545. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142545.
De Roos AJ, Blair A, Rusiecki JA, Hoppin JA, Svec M, Dosemeci M, et al. Cancer incidence among glyphosate-exposed pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(1):49–54.
Weisenburger DD. A Review and update with perspective of evidence that the herbicide glyphosate (Roundup) is a cause of non-hodgkin lymphoma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021;21(9):621–30.
Acquavella J, Garabrant D, Marsh G, Sorahan T, Weed DL. Glyphosate epidemiology expert panel review: a weight of evidence systematic review of the relationship between glyphosate exposure and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or multiple myeloma. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2016;46(sup1):28–43.
Sorahan T. Multiple myeloma and glyphosate use: a re-analysis of US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(2):1548–59.
Sheppard EC, Morrish RB, Dillon MJ, Leyland R, Chahwan R. Epigenomic modifications mediating antibody maturation. Front Immunol. 2018;9:355.
Campisi J. Aging, cellular senescence, and cancer. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:685–705.
Wiley CD, Velarde MC, Lecot P, Liu S, Sarnoski EA, Freund A, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction induces senescence with a distinct secretory phenotype. Cell Metab. 2016;23(2):303–14.
Childs BG, Durik M, Baker DJ, van Deursen JM. Cellular senescence in aging and age-related disease: from mechanisms to therapy. Nat Med. 2015;21(12):1424–35.
Sturmlechner I, Sine CC, Jeganathan KB, Zhang C, Fierro Velasco RO, Baker DJ, et al. Senescent cells limit p53 activity via multiple mechanisms to remain viable. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):3722.
Funayama R, Ishikawa F. Cellular senescence and chromatin structure. Chromosoma. 2007;116(5):431–40.
Abdul-Aziz AM, Sun Y, Hellmich C, Marlein CR, Mistry J, Forde E, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia induces protumoral p16INK4a-driven senescence in the bone marrow microenvironment. Blood. 2019;133(5):446–56.
Farr JN, Fraser DG, Wang H, Jaehn K, Ogrodnik MB, Weivoda MM, et al. Identification of senescent cells in the bone microenvironment. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(11):1920–9.
Muylaert C, Van Hemelrijck LA, Maes A, De Veirman K, Menu E, Vanderkerken K, et al. Aberrant DNA methylation in multiple myeloma: a major obstacle or an opportunity? Front Oncol. 2022;12:979569.
Amodio N, D’Aquila P, Passarino G, Tassone P, Bellizzi D. Epigenetic modifications in multiple myeloma: recent advances on the role of DNA and histone methylation. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2017;21(1):91–101.
Benetatos L, Dasoula A, Hatzimichael E, Georgiou I, Syrrou M, Bourantas KL. Promoter hypermethylation of the MEG3 (DLK1/MEG3) imprinted gene in multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2008;8(3):171–5.
Chesi M, Bergsagel PL. Epigenetics and microRNAs combine to modulate the MDM2/p53 axis in myeloma. Cancer Cell. 2010;18(4):299–300.
Chim CS, Liang R, Fung TK, Choi CL, Kwong YL. Epigenetic dysregulation of the death- associated protein kinase/p14/HDM2/p53/Apaf-1 apoptosis pathway in multiple myeloma. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60(6):664–9.
Chim CS, Liang R, Fung TK, Kwong YL. Infrequent epigenetic dysregulation of CIP/KIP family of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2005;19(12):2352–5.
Chim CS, Pang R, Fung TK, Choi CL, Liang R. Epigenetic dysregulation of Wnt signaling pathway in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2007;21(12):2527–36.
De Bruyne E, Bos TJ, Asosingh K, Vande Broek I, Menu E, Van Valckenborgh E, et al. Epigenetic silencing of the tetraspanin CD9 during disease progression in multiple myeloma cells and correlation with survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(10):2918–26.
Dimopoulos K, Gimsing P, Gronbaek K. The role of epigenetics in the biology of multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2014;4:e207.
Drucker L, Tohami T, Tartakover-Matalon S, Zismanov V, Shapiro H, Radnay J, et al. Promoter hypermethylation of tetraspanin members contributes to their silencing in myeloma cell lines. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27(2):197–204.
Hodge DR, Peng B, Pompeia C, Thomas S, Cho E, Clausen PA, et al. Epigenetic silencing of manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD-2) in KAS 6/1 human multiple myeloma cells increases cell proliferation. Cancer Biol Ther. 2005;4(5):585–92.
Jost E, Gezer D, Wilop S, Suzuki H, Herman JG, Osieka R, et al. Epigenetic dysregulation of secreted Frizzled-related proteins in multiple myeloma. Cancer Lett. 2009;281(1):24–31.
Li J, Hu WX, Luo SQ, Xiong DH, Sun S, Wang YP, et al. Promoter methylation induced epigenetic silencing of DAZAP2, a downstream effector of p38/MAPK pathway, in multiple myeloma cells. Cell Signal. 2019;60:136–45.
Pawlyn C, Kaiser MF, Davies FE, Morgan GJ. Current and potential epigenetic targets in multiple myeloma. Epigenomics. 2014;6(2):215–28.
Peng B, Hodge DR, Thomas SB, Cherry JM, Munroe DJ, Pompeia C, et al. Epigenetic silencing of the human nucleotide excision repair gene, hHR23B, in interleukin-6-responsive multiple myeloma KAS-6/1 cells. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(6):4182–7.
San-Miguel J, Garcia-Sanz R, Lopez-Perez R. Analysis of methylation pattern in multiple myeloma. Acta Haematol. 2005;114(Suppl 1):23–6.
Sawyer JR, Tian E, Heuck CJ, Johann DJ, Epstein J, Swanson CM, et al. Evidence of an epigenetic origin for high-risk 1q21 copy number aberrations in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2015;125(24):3756–9.
Sharma A, Heuck CJ, Fazzari MJ, Mehta J, Singhal S, Greally JM, et al. DNA methylation alterations in multiple myeloma as a model for epigenetic changes in cancer. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2010;2(6):654–69.
Troppan K, Hofer S, Wenzl K, Lassnig M, Pursche B, Steinbauer E, et al. Frequent down regulation of the tumor suppressor gene a20 in multiple myeloma. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0123922.
Tshuikina M, Jernberg-Wiklund H, Nilsson K, Oberg F. Epigenetic silencing of the interferon regulatory factor ICSBP/IRF8 in human multiple myeloma. Exp Hematol. 2008;36(12):1673–81.
Wilop S, van Gemmeren TB, Lentjes MH, van Engeland M, Herman JG, Brummendorf TH, et al. Methylation-associated dysregulation of the suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 gene in multiple myeloma. Epigenetics. 2011;6(8):1047–52.
Wong KY, Huang X, Chim CS. DNA methylation of microRNA genes in multiple myeloma. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33(9):1629–38.
Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):R115.
Jones MJ, Goodman SJ, Kobor MS. DNA methylation and healthy human aging. Aging Cell. 2015;14(6):924–32.
Kwon D, Belsky DW. A toolkit for quantification of biological age from blood chemistry and organ function test data: BioAge. Geroscience. 2021;43(6):2795–808.
Chen M, Wong EM, Nguyen TL, Dite GS, Stone J, Dugue PA, et al. DNA methylation-based biological age, genome-wide average DNA methylation, and conventional breast cancer risk factors. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15055.
Dugue PA, Bassett JK, Joo JE, Baglietto L, Jung CH, Wong EM, et al. Association of DNA methylation-based biological age with health risk factors and overall and cause-specific mortality. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(3):529–38.
Kresovich JK, Xu Z, O’Brien KM, Weinberg CR, Sandler DP, Taylor JA. Methylation-based biological age and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(10):1051–8.
Saez-Freire MDM, Blanco-Gomez A, Castillo-Lluva S, Gomez-Vecino A, Galvis-Jimenez JM, Martin-Seisdedos C, et al. The biological age linked to oxidative stress modifies breast cancer aggressiveness. Free Radic Biol Med. 2018;120:133–46.
Alzrigat M, Parraga AA, Jernberg-Wiklund H. Epigenetics in multiple myeloma: from mechanisms to therapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2018;51:101–15.
Jang HS, Shah NM, Du AY, Dailey ZZ, Pehrsson EC, Godoy PM, et al. Transposable elements drive widespread expression of oncogenes in human cancers. Nat Genet. 2019;51(4):611–7.
Robertson KD. DNA methylation and human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6(8):597–610.
Liang G, Weisenberger DJ. DNA methylation aberrancies as a guide for surveillance and treatment of human cancers. Epigenetics. 2017;12(6):416–32.
Peng B, Hurt EM, Hodge DR, Thomas SB, Farrar WL. DNA hypermethylation and partial gene silencing of human thymine- DNA glycosylase in multiple myeloma cell lines. Epigenetics. 2006;1(3):138–45.
Wang J, Zhu X, Dang L, Jiang H, Xie Y, Li X, Guo J, Wang Y, Peng Z, Wang M, Wang J, Wang S, Li Q, Wang Y, Wang Q, Ye L, Zhang L, Liu Z. Epigenomic reprogramming via HRP2-MINA dictates response to proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma with t(4;14) translocation. J Clin Invest. 2022;132(4):e149526. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI149526.
Michalak EM, Burr ML, Bannister AJ, Dawson MA. The roles of DNA, RNA and histone methylation in ageing and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(10):573–89.
Das C, Tyler JK. Histone exchange and histone modifications during transcription and aging. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1819(3–4):332–42.
Molina-Serrano D, Kyriakou D, Kirmizis A. Histone Modifications as an intersection between diet and longevity. Front Genet. 2019;10:192.
Hu Z, Chen K, Xia Z, Chavez M, Pal S, Seol JH, et al. Nucleosome loss leads to global transcriptional up-regulation and genomic instability during yeast aging. Genes Dev. 2014;28(4):396–408.
Duarte LF, Young AR, Wang Z, Wu HA, Panda T, Kou Y, et al. Histone H3.3 and its proteolytically processed form drive a cellular senescence programme. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5210.
Tvardovskiy A, Schwammle V, Kempf SJ, Rogowska-Wrzesinska A, Jensen ON. Accumulation of histone variant H3.3 with age is associated with profound changes in the histone methylation landscape. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(16):9272–89.
Cross NC. Histone modification defects in developmental disorders and cancer. Oncotarget. 2012;3(1):3–4.
Pawlyn C, Kaiser MF, Heuck C, Melchor L, Wardell CP, Murison A, et al. The spectrum and clinical impact of epigenetic modifier mutations in myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(23):5783–94.
Lennartsson A, Ekwall K. Histone modification patterns and epigenetic codes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1790(9):863–8.
Fullgrabe J, Kavanagh E, Joseph B. Histone onco-modifications. Oncogene. 2011;30(31):3391–403.
Bonkowski MS, Sinclair DA. Slowing ageing by design: the rise of NAD+ and sirtuin-activating compounds. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(11):679–90.
North BJ, Rosenberg MA, Jeganathan KB, Hafner AV, Michan S, Dai J, et al. SIRT2 induces the checkpoint kinase BubR1 to increase lifespan. EMBO J. 2014;33(13):1438–53.
Mitchell SJ, Martin-Montalvo A, Mercken EM, Palacios HH, Ward TM, Abulwerdi G, et al. The SIRT1 activator SRT1720 extends lifespan and improves health of mice fed a standard diet. Cell Rep. 2014;6(5):836–43.
Price NL, Gomes AP, Ling AJ, Duarte FV, Martin-Montalvo A, North BJ, et al. SIRT1 is required for AMPK activation and the beneficial effects of resveratrol on mitochondrial function. Cell Metab. 2012;15(5):675–90.
Firestein R, Blander G, Michan S, Oberdoerffer P, Ogino S, Campbell J, et al. The SIRT1 deacetylase suppresses intestinal tumorigenesis and colon cancer growth. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(4):e2020.
Kim D, Nguyen MD, Dobbin MM, Fischer A, Sananbenesi F, Rodgers JT, et al. SIRT1 deacetylase protects against neurodegeneration in models for Alzheimer’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. EMBO J. 2007;26(13):3169–79.
Cohen HY, Miller C, Bitterman KJ, Wall NR, Hekking B, Kessler B, et al. Calorie restriction promotes mammalian cell survival by inducing the SIRT1 deacetylase. Science. 2004;305(5682):390–2.
Brunet A, Sweeney LB, Sturgill JF, Chua KF, Greer PL, Lin Y, et al. Stress-dependent regulation of FOXO transcription factors by the SIRT1 deacetylase. Science. 2004;303(5666):2011–5.
Anderson RM, Bitterman KJ, Wood JG, Medvedik O, Sinclair DA. Nicotinamide and PNC1 govern lifespan extension by calorie restriction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 2003;423(6936):181–5.
Bitterman KJ, Anderson RM, Cohen HY, Latorre-Esteves M, Sinclair DA. Inhibition of silencing and accelerated aging by nicotinamide, a putative negative regulator of yeast sir2 and human SIRT1. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(47):45099–107.
Kiss T, Nyul-Toth A, Balasubramanian P, Tarantini S, Ahire C, Yabluchanskiy A, Csipo T, Farkas E, Wren JD, Garman L, Csiszar A, Ungvari Z. Nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) supplementation promotes neurovascular rejuvenation in aged mice: transcriptional footprint of SIRT1 activation, mitochondrial protection, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic effects. Geroscience. 2020;42(2):527–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-020-00165-5.
Kiss T, Balasubramanian P, Valcarcel-Ares MN, Tarantini S, Yabluchanskiy A, Csipo T, et al. Nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) treatment attenuates oxidative stress and rescues angiogenic capacity in aged cerebromicrovascular endothelial cells: a potential mechanism for the prevention of vascular cognitive impairment. Geroscience. 2019;41(5):619–30.
Baur JA, Ungvari Z, Minor RK, Le Couteur DG, de Cabo R. Are sirtuins viable targets for improving healthspan and lifespan? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11(6):443–61.
Ungvari Z, Labinskyy N, Mukhopadhyay P, Pinto JT, Bagi Z, Ballabh P, et al. Resveratrol attenuates mitochondrial oxidative stress in coronary arterial endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;297(5):H1876–81.
Csiszar A, Labinskyy N, Pinto JT, Ballabh P, Zhang H, Losonczy G, et al. Resveratrol induces mitochondrial biogenesis in endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;297(1):H13-20.
Csiszar A, Labinskyy N, Jimenez R, Pinto JT, Ballabh P, Losonczy G, Pearson, KJ, de Cabo R, Ungvari Z. Anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory vasoprotective effects of caloric restriction in aging: role of circulating factors and SIRT1. Mech Ageing Dev. 2009;130(8):518–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2009.06.004.
Cea M, Cagnetta A, Adamia S, Acharya C, Tai YT, Fulciniti M, et al. Evidence for a role of the histone deacetylase SIRT6 in DNA damage response of multiple myeloma cells. Blood. 2016;127(9):1138–50.
Allegra A, Innao V, Polito F, Oteri R, Alibrandi A, Allegra AG, et al. SIRT2 and SIRT3 expression correlates with redox imbalance and advanced clinical stage in patients with multiple myeloma. Clin Biochem. 2021;93:42–9.
Carafa V, Rotili D, Forgione M, Cuomo F, Serretiello E, Hailu GS, et al. Sirtuin functions and modulation: from chemistry to the clinic. Clin Epigenetics. 2016;8:61.
Chauhan D, Bandi M, Singh AV, Ray A, Raje N, Richardson P, et al. Preclinical evaluation of a novel SIRT1 modulator SRT1720 in multiple myeloma cells. Br J Haematol. 2011;155(5):588–98.
Lu B, Zhang D, Wang X, Lin D, Chen Y, Xu X. Targeting SIRT1 to inhibit the proliferation of multiple myeloma cells. Oncol Lett. 2021;21(4):306.
Zeng R, He J, Peng J, Chen Y, Yi S, Zhao F, et al. The time-dependent autophagy protects against apoptosis with possible involvement of Sirt1 protein in multiple myeloma under nutrient depletion. Ann Hematol. 2012;91(3):407–17.
Bink DI, Lozano-Vidal N, Boon RA. Long non-coding RNA in vascular disease and aging. Non-coding RNA. 2019;5(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ncrna5010026.
Pereira Fernandes D, Bitar M, Jacobs FMJ, Barry G. Long non-coding RNAs in neuronal aging. Non-coding RNA. 2018;4(2):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ncrna4020012.
Xing W, Gao W, Mao G, Zhang J, Lv X, Wang G, et al. Long non-coding RNAs in aging organs and tissues. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2017;44(Suppl 1):30–7.
Yo K, Runger TM. The long non-coding RNA FLJ46906 binds to the transcription factors NF- kappaB and AP-1 and regulates expression of aging-associated genes. Aging (Albany NY). 2018;10(8):2037–50.
Zheng Y, Liu T, Li Q, Li J. Integrated analysis of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and mRNA expression profiles identifies lncRNA PRKG1-AS1 playing important roles in skeletal muscle aging. Aging (Albany NY). 2021;13(11):15044–60.
Mardani M, Rashedi S, Keykhaei M, Farrokhpour H, Azadnajafabad S, Tavolinejad H, et al. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) as prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers in multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pathol Res Pract. 2022;229:153726.
Corrado C, Costa V, Giavaresi G, Calabrese A, Conigliaro A, Alessandro R. Long non coding RNA H19: a new player in hypoxia-induced multiple myeloma cell dissemination. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(4):801. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20040801.
Cui YS, Song YP, Fang BJ. The role of long non-coding RNAs in multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol. 2019;103(1):3–9.
David A, Zocchi S, Talbot A, Choisy C, Ohnona A, Lion J, et al. The long non-coding RNA CRNDE regulates growth of multiple myeloma cells via an effect on IL6 signalling. Leukemia. 2021;35(6):1710–21.
Ding T, Deng R, Huang T. Long non-coding RNA T cell factor 7 is associated with increased disease risk and poor prognosis, and promotes cell proliferation, attenuates cell apoptosis and miR-200c expression in multiple myeloma. Oncol Lett. 2021;21(2):129.
Hu AX, Huang ZY, Zhang L, Shen J. Potential prognostic long non-coding RNA identification and their validation in predicting survival of patients with multiple myeloma. Tumour Biol. 2017;39(4):1010428317694563.
Li QY, Chen L, Hu N, Zhao H. Long non-coding RNA FEZF1-AS1 promotes cell growth in multiple myeloma via miR-610/Akt3 axis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;103:1727–32.
Nian F, Zhu J, Chang H. Long non-coding RNA ANGPTL1-3 promotes multiple myeloma bortezomib resistance by sponging miR-30a-3p to activate c-Maf expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;514(4):1140–6.
Nobili L, Ronchetti D, Agnelli L, Taiana E, Vinci C, Neri A. Long non-coding RNAs in multiple myeloma. Genes. 2018;9(2):69. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9020069.
Sedlarikova L, Gromesova B, Kubaczkova V, Radova L, Filipova J, Jarkovsky J, et al. Deregulated expression of long non-coding RNA UCA1 in multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol. 2017;99(3):223–33.
Xu H, Yin Q, Shen X, Ju S. Long non-coding RNA CCAT2 as a potential serum biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2020;99(9):2159–71.
Csiszar A, Gautam T, Sosnowska D, Tarantini S, Banki E, Tucsek Z, et al. Caloric restriction confers persistent anti-oxidative, pro-angiogenic, and anti-inflammatory effects and promotes anti- aging miRNA expression profile in cerebromicrovascular endothelial cells of aged rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2014;307(3):H292-306.
Kiss T, Giles CB, Tarantini S, Yabluchanskiy A, Balasubramanian P, Gautam T, et al. Nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) supplementation promotes anti-aging miRNA expression profile in the aorta of aged mice, predicting epigenetic rejuvenation and anti-atherogenic effects. Geroscience. 2019;41:419–39.
Smith-Vikos T, Liu Z, Parsons C, Gorospe M, Ferrucci L, Gill TM, et al. A serum miRNA profile of human longevity: findings from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA). Aging (Albany NY). 2016;8(11):2971–87.
Tarantini S, Giles CB, Wren JD, Ashpole NM, Valcarcel-Ares MN, Wei JY, et al. IGF-1 deficiency in a critical period early in life influences the vascular aging phenotype in mice by altering miRNA- mediated post-transcriptional gene regulation: implications for the developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis. Age (Dordr). 2016;38(4):239–58.
Bates DJ, Li N, Liang R, Sarojini H, An J, Masternak MM, et al. MicroRNA regulation in Ames dwarf mouse liver may contribute to delayed aging. Aging Cell. 2010;9(1):1–18.
Cheng X, Ku CH, Siow RC. Regulation of the Nrf2 antioxidant pathway by microRNAs: new players in micromanaging redox homeostasis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;64:4–11.
de Lucia C, Komici K, Borghetti G, Femminella GD, Bencivenga L, Cannavo A, et al. microRNA in cardiovascular aging and age-related cardiovascular diseases. Front Med (Lausanne). 2017;4:74.
Inukai S, de Lencastre A, Turner M, Slack F. Novel microRNAs differentially expressed during aging in the mouse brain. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):e40028.
Inukai S, Slack F. MicroRNAs and the genetic network in aging. J Mol Biol. 2013;425(19):3601–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2013.01.023.
Maes OC, An J, Sarojini H, Wang E. Murine microRNAs implicated in liver functions and aging process. Mech Ageing Dev. 2008;129(9):534–41.
Menghini R, Stohr R, Federici M. MicroRNAs in vascular aging and atherosclerosis. Ageing Res Rev. 2014;17:68–78.
O’Rourke JR, Olson EN. Modulating the MicroRNArchitecture of an aging aorta. Circ Res. 2011;109(10):1098–9.
Ungvari Z, Tucsek Z, Sosnowska D, Toth P, Gautam T, Podlutsky A, et al. Aging-induced dysregulation of Dicer1-dependent microRNA expression impairs Angiogenic capacity of rat cerebromicrovascular endothelial cells. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68(8):877–91.
Gustafson CE, Cavanagh MM, Jin J, Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. Functional pathways regulated by microRNA networks in CD8 T-cell aging. Aging Cell. 2019;18(1):e12879.
Ye Y, Li D, Ouyang D, Deng L, Zhang Y, Ma Y, et al. MicroRNA expression in the aging mouse thymus. Gene. 2014;547(2):218–25.
Salunkhe S, Vaidya T. CD40-miRNA axis controls prospective cell fate determinants during B cell differentiation. Mol Immunol. 2020;126:46–55.
Tan LP, Wang M, Robertus JL, Schakel RN, Gibcus JH, Diepstra A, et al. miRNA profiling of B- cell subsets: specific miRNA profile for germinal center B cells with variation between centroblasts and centrocytes. Lab Invest. 2009;89(6):708–16.
Pan J, Hu S, Ren X, Hu H, Deng X, Yu B, et al. Whole-transcriptome profiling and circRNA- miRNA-mRNA regulatory networks in B-cell development. Front Immunol. 2022;13:812924.
Aass KR, Nedal TMV, Tryggestad SS, Haukas E, Slordahl TS, Waage A, et al. Paired miRNA- and messenger RNA-sequencing identifies novel miRNA-mRNA interactions in multiple myeloma. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):12147.
Calura E, Bisognin A, Manzoni M, Todoerti K, Taiana E, Sales G, et al. Disentangling the microRNA regulatory milieu in multiple myeloma: integrative genomics analysis outlines mixed miRNA-TF circuits and pathway-derived networks modulated in t(4;14) patients. Oncotarget. 2016;7(3):2367–78.
Chen D, Yang X, Liu M, Zhang Z, Xing E. Roles of miRNA dysregulation in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. Cancer Gene Ther. 2021;28(12):1256–68.
Gao SS, Wang YJ, Zhang GX, Zhang WT. Potential diagnostic value of circulating miRNA for multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. J Bone Oncol. 2020;25: 100327.
Katiyar A, Kaur G, Rani L, Jena L, Singh H, Kumar L, et al. Genome-wide identification of potential biomarkers in multiple myeloma using meta-analysis of mRNA and miRNA expression data. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):10957.
Lionetti M, Agnelli L, Mosca L, Fabris S, Andronache A, Todoerti K, et al. Integrative high- resolution microarray analysis of human myeloma cell lines reveals deregulated miRNA expression associated with allelic imbalances and gene expression profiles. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2009;48(6):521–31.
Rocci A, Hofmeister CC, Geyer S, Stiff A, Gambella M, Cascione L, et al. Circulating miRNA markers show promise as new prognosticators for multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2014;28(9):1922–6.
Zhao G, Jing X, Li Z, Wu X, Gao Z, Ma R. The diagnostic and prognostic values of circulating miRNA-1246 in multiple myeloma. Hematology. 2022;27(1):778–84.
Kaushik S, Cuervo AM. Proteostasis and aging. Nat Med. 2015;21(12):1406–15.
Ferreira JV, da Rosa SA, Pereira P. Cell non-autonomous proteostasis regulation in aging and disease. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:878296.
Korovila I, Hugo M, Castro JP, Weber D, Hohn A, Grune T, et al. Proteostasis, oxidative stress and aging. Redox Biol. 2017;13:550–67.
Labbadia J, Morimoto RI. The biology of proteostasis in aging and disease. Annu Rev Biochem. 2015;84:435–64.
Moehle EA, Shen K, Dillin A. Mitochondrial proteostasis in the context of cellular and organismal health and aging. J Biol Chem. 2019;294(14):5396–407.
Morimoto RI. Cell-nonautonomous regulation of proteostasis in aging and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2020;12(4);a034074. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a034074.
Morimoto RI, Cuervo AM. Proteostasis and the aging proteome in health and disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(Suppl 1):S33–8.
Santra M, Dill KA, de Graff AMR. Proteostasis collapse is a driver of cell aging and death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(44):22173–8.
Steffen KK, Dillin A. A ribosomal perspective on proteostasis and aging. Cell Metab. 2016;23(6):1004–12.
Taylor RC, Hetz C. Mastering organismal aging through the endoplasmic reticulum proteostasis network. Aging Cell. 2020;19(11):e13265.
Ubaida-Mohien C, Lyashkov A, Gonzalez-Freire M, Tharakan R, Shardell M, Moaddel R, Semba RD, Chia CW, Gorospe M, Sen R, Ferrucci L. Discovery proteomics in aging human skeletal muscle finds change in spliceosome, immunity, proteostasis and mitochondria. eLife. 2019;8:e49874. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49874.
Zimmermann A, Madreiter-Sokolowski C, Stryeck S, Abdellatif M. Targeting the mitochondria-proteostasis axis to delay aging. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:656201.
Sha Z, Goldberg AL. Multiple myeloma cells are exceptionally sensitive to heat shock, which overwhelms their proteostasis network and induces apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(35):21588–97.
Fernandes SA, Demetriades C. The multifaceted role of nutrient sensing and mTORC1 signaling in physiology and aging. Front Aging. 2021;2:707372.
Lopez-Otin C, Galluzzi L, Freije JMP, Madeo F, Kroemer G. Metabolic control of longevity. Cell. 2016;166(4):802–21.
De Bruyne E, Bos TJ, Schuit F, Van Valckenborgh E, Menu E, Thorrez L, et al. IGF-1 suppresses Bim expression in multiple myeloma via epigenetic and posttranslational mechanisms. Blood. 2010;115(12):2430–40.
Menoret E, Maiga S, Descamps G, Pellat-Deceunynck C, Fraslon C, Cappellano M, et al. IL-21 stimulates human myeloma cell growth through an autocrine IGF-1 loop. J Immunol. 2008;181(10):6837–42.
Peng Y, Li F, Zhang P, Wang X, Shen Y, Feng Y, et al. IGF-1 promotes multiple myeloma progression through PI3K/Akt-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Life Sci. 2020;249:117503.
Ro TB, Holien T, Fagerli UM, Hov H, Misund K, Waage A, et al. HGF and IGF-1 synergize with SDF-1alpha in promoting migration of myeloma cells by cooperative activation of p21-activated kinase. Exp Hematol. 2013;41(7):646–55.
Sprynski AC, Hose D, Caillot L, Reme T, Shaughnessy JD Jr, Barlogie B, et al. The role of IGF-1 as a major growth factor for myeloma cell lines and the prognostic relevance of the expression of its receptor. Blood. 2009;113(19):4614–26.
Tagoug I, De Sauty Chalon A, Dumontet C. Inhibition of IGF-1 signalling enhances the apoptotic effect of AS602868, an IKK2 inhibitor, in multiple myeloma cell lines. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22641.
Baumann P, Schneider L, Mandl-Weber S, Oduncu F, Schmidmaier R. Simultaneous targeting of PI3K and mTOR with NVP-BGT226 is highly effective in multiple myeloma. Anticancer Drugs. 2012;23(1):131–8.
Frost P, Moatamed F, Hoang B, Shi Y, Gera J, Yan H, et al. In vivo antitumor effects of the mTOR inhibitor CCI-779 against human multiple myeloma cells in a xenograft model. Blood. 2004;104(13):4181–7.
Hoang B, Frost P, Shi Y, Belanger E, Benavides A, Pezeshkpour G, et al. Targeting TORC2 in multiple myeloma with a new mTOR kinase inhibitor. Blood. 2010;116(22):4560–8.
Ma R, Yu D, Peng Y, Yi H, Wang Y, Cheng T, et al. Resveratrol induces AMPK and mTOR signaling inhibition-mediated autophagy and apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2021;53(6):775–83.
Osada N, Kikuchi J, Koyama D, Kuroda Y, Yasui H, Leverson JD, et al. mTOR inhibitors sensitize multiple myeloma cells to venetoclax via IKZF3- and Blimp-1-mediated BCL-2 upregulation. Haematologica. 2021;106(11):3008–13.
Peterson TR, Laplante M, Thoreen CC, Sancak Y, Kang SA, Kuehl WM, et al. DEPTOR is an mTOR inhibitor frequently overexpressed in multiple myeloma cells and required for their survival. Cell. 2009;137(5):873–86.
Raje N, Kumar S, Hideshima T, Ishitsuka K, Chauhan D, Mitsiades C, et al. Combination of the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin and CC-5013 has synergistic activity in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2004;104(13):4188–93.
De Haes W, Frooninckx L, Van Assche R, Smolders A, Depuydt G, Billen J, et al. Metformin promotes lifespan through mitohormesis via the peroxiredoxin PRDX-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(24):E2501–9.
Martin-Montalvo A, Mercken EM, Mitchell SJ, Palacios HH, Mote PL, Scheibye-Knudsen M, et al. Metformin improves healthspan and lifespan in mice. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2192.
Slack C, Foley A, Partridge L. Activation of AMPK by the putative dietary restriction mimetic metformin is insufficient to extend lifespan in Drosophila. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(10):e47699.
Boursi B, Mamtani R, Yang YX, Weiss BM. Impact of metformin on the progression of MGUS to multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017;58(5):1265–7.
Dalva-Aydemir S, Bajpai R, Martinez M, Adekola KU, Kandela I, Wei C, et al. Targeting the metabolic plasticity of multiple myeloma with FDA-approved ritonavir and metformin. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(5):1161–71.
Jagannathan S, Abdel-Malek MA, Malek E, Vad N, Latif T, Anderson KC, et al. Pharmacologic screens reveal metformin that suppresses GRP78-dependent autophagy to enhance the anti- myeloma effect of bortezomib. Leukemia. 2015;29(11):2184–91.
Kocemba-Pilarczyk KA, Trojan S, Ostrowska B, Lasota M, Dudzik P, Kusior D, et al. Influence of metformin on HIF-1 pathway in multiple myeloma. Pharmacol Rep. 2020;72(5):1407–17.
Wu Z, Wu L, Zou L, Wang M, Liu X. Metformin induces myeloma cells necrosis and apoptosis and it is considered for therapeutic use. J Chemother (Florence, Italy). 2022;1–11. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1120009X.2022.2062895.
Zhao Y, Zhang E, Lv N, Ma L, Yao S, Yan M, et al. Metformin and FTY720 Synergistically Induce Apoptosis in Multiple Myeloma Cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;48(2):785–800.
Zi FM, He JS, Li Y, Wu C, Yang L, Yang Y, et al. Metformin displays anti-myeloma activity and synergistic effect with dexamethasone in in vitro and in vivo xenograft models. Cancer Lett. 2015;356(2):443–53.
Franceschi C, Campisi J. Chronic inflammation (inflammaging) and its potential contribution to age-associated diseases. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(Suppl 1):S4-9.
Anerillas C, Abdelmohsen K, Gorospe M. Regulation of senescence traits by MAPKs. Geroscience. 2020;42(2):397–408.
Budamagunta V, Foster TC, Zhou D. Cellular senescence in lymphoid organs and immunosenescence. Aging (Albany NY). 2021;13(15):19920–41.
Chinta SJ, Woods G, Rane A, Demaria M, Campisi J, Andersen JK. Cellular senescence and the aging brain. Exp Gerontol. 2015;(68):3–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2014.09.018.
Coppe JP, Desprez PY, Krtolica A, Campisi J. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu Rev Pathol. 2010;5:99–118.
Bailey-Downs LC, Tucsek Z, Toth P, Sosnowska D, Gautam T, Sonntag WE, et al. Aging exacerbates obesity-induced oxidative stress and inflammation in perivascular adipose tissue in mice: a paracrine mechanism contributing to vascular redox dysregulation and inflammation. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68(7):780–92.
Ghosh AK, O’Brien M, Mau T, Qi N, Yung R. Adipose tissue senescence and inflammation in aging is reversed by the young milieu. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74(11):1709–15.
Wu D, Ren Z, Pae M, Guo W, Cui X, Merrill AH, et al. Aging up-regulates expression of inflammatory mediators in mouse adipose tissue. J Immunol. 2007;179(7):4829–39.
da Cunha Junior AD, Zanette DL, Pericole FV, Olalla Saad ST, Barreto Campello Carvalheira J. Obesity as a possible risk factor for progression from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance progression into multiple myeloma: could myeloma be prevented with metformin treatment? Adv Hematol. 2021;2021:6615684.
Li Z, Liu H, He J, Wang Z, Yin Z, You G, et al. Acetyl-CoA synthetase 2: a critical linkage in obesity-induced tumorigenesis in myeloma. Cell Metab. 2021;33(1):78–93.
Lwin ST, Olechnowicz SW, Fowler JA, Edwards CM. Diet-induced obesity promotes a myeloma-like condition in vivo. Leukemia. 2015;29(2):507–10.
Bleve A, Motta F, Durante B, Pandolfo C, Selmi C, Sica A. Immunosenescence, inflammaging, and frailty: role of myeloid cells in age-related diseases. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2022;1–22. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-021-08909-7.
Libby P, Ebert BL. CHIP (clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential): potent and newly recognized contributor to cardiovascular risk. Circulation. 2018;138(7):666–8.
Fuster JJ, Walsh K. Somatic mutations and clonal hematopoiesis: unexpected potential new drivers of age-related cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2018;122(3):523–32.
Jaiswal S, Natarajan P, Silver AJ, Gibson CJ, Bick AG, Shvartz E, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(2):111–21.
Khetarpal SA, Qamar A, Bick AG, Fuster JJ, Kathiresan S, Jaiswal S, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential reshapes age-related CVD: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(4):578–86.
Bhattacharya R, Zekavat SM, Haessler J, Fornage M, Raffield L, Uddin MM, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis is associated with higher risk of stroke. Stroke. 2022;53(3):788–97.
Calvillo-Arguelles O, Jaiswal S, Shlush LI, Moslehi JJ, Schimmer A, Barac A, et al. Connections between clonal hematopoiesis, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: a review. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(4):380–7.
Genovese G, Jaiswal S, Ebert BL, McCarroll SA. Clonal hematopoiesis and blood-cancer risk. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1071–2.
Jaiswal S. Clonal hematopoiesis and nonhematologic disorders. Blood. 2020;136(14):1606–14.
Jaiswal S, Ebert BL. Clonal hematopoiesis in human aging and disease. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2019;366(6465):eaan4673. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan4673.
Luis TC, Wilkinson AC, Beerman I, Jaiswal S, Shlush LI. Biological implications of clonal hematopoiesis. Exp Hematol. 2019;77:1–5.
Mitchell SR, Gopakumar J, Jaiswal S. Insights into clonal hematopoiesis and its relation to cancer risk. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2021;66:63–9.
Uddin MDM, Nguyen NQH, Yu B, Brody JA, Pampana A, Nakao T, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, DNA methylation, and risk for coronary artery disease. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):5350.
Jaiswal S, Fontanillas P, Flannick J, Manning A, Grauman PV, Mar BG, et al. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(26):2488–98.
Maclachlan K, Diamond B, Maura F, Hillengass J, Turesson I, Landgren CO, et al. Second malignancies in multiple myeloma; emerging patterns and future directions. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2020;33(1):101144.
Rajan AM, Rajkumar SV. Interpretation of cytogenetic results in multiple myeloma for clinical practice. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5:e365.
Kalff A, Spencer A. The t(4;14) translocation and FGFR3 overexpression in multiple myeloma: prognostic implications and current clinical strategies. Blood Cancer J. 2012;2:e89.
Neben K, Jauch A, Hielscher T, Hillengass J, Lehners N, Seckinger A, et al. Progression in smoldering myeloma is independently determined by the chromosomal abnormalities del(17p), t(4;14), gain 1q, hyperdiploidy, and tumor load. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(34):4325–32.
Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Mateos MV, Larocca A, Facon T, Kumar SK, et al. Geriatric assessment predicts survival and toxicities in elderly myeloma patients: an International Myeloma Working Group report. Blood. 2015;125(13):2068–74.
Moller MD, Gengenbach L, Graziani G, Greil C, Wasch R, Engelhardt M. Geriatric assessments and frailty scores in multiple myeloma patients: a needed tool for individualized treatment? Curr Opin Oncol. 2021;33(6):648–57.
Cook G, Larocca A, Facon T, Zweegman S, Engelhardt M. Defining the vulnerable patient with myeloma-a frailty position paper of the European Myeloma Network. Leukemia. 2020;34(9):2285–94.
Milani P, Vincent Rajkumar S, Merlini G, Kumar S, Gertz MA, Palladini G, et al. N-terminal fragment of the type-B natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) contributes to a simple new frailty score in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol. 2016;91(11):1129–34.
Engelhardt M, Ihorst G, Duque-Afonso J, Wedding U, Spat-Schwalbe E, Goede V, et al. Structured assessment of frailty in multiple myeloma as a paradigm of individualized treatment algorithms in cancer patients at advanced age. Haematologica. 2020;105(5):1183–8.
He S, Nakada D, Morrison SJ. Mechanisms of stem cell self-renewal. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2009;25:377–406.
Crane GM, Jeffery E, Morrison SJ. Adult haematopoietic stem cell niches. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(9):573–90.
Brazhnik K, Sun S, Alani O, Kinkhabwala M, Wolkoff AW, Maslov AY, et al. Single-cell analysis reveals different age-related somatic mutation profiles between stem and differentiated cells in human liver. Sci Adv. 2020;6(5):eaax2659.
Vijg J, Dong X. Pathogenic mechanisms of somatic mutation and genome mosaicism in aging. Cell. 2020;182(1):12–23.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Semmelweis University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Urban, V.S., Cegledi, A. & Mikala, G. Multiple myeloma, a quintessential malignant disease of aging: a geroscience perspective on pathogenesis and treatment. GeroScience 45, 727–746 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-022-00698-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-022-00698-x