Abstract
Anthropogenic groundwater arsenic (As) pollution is common in many aquifers in Southwest China. It is concerned that long-term random disposal of As smelting slag could induce the transport of high-As groundwater into previously uncontaminated aquifers. Here, we used HELP-MODFLOW-MT3DMS model simulations to integrate the percolation, groundwater flow, and solute transport processes at an aquifer at site scale, constrained by weather, hydrogeology, and monitoring data. Our simulations provide a new method framework of the simulated percolation by HELP model and have induced As spatiotemporal distribution in the aquifer. According to the HELP model simulation results, percolation volume accounts for 24% of rainfall over 18 years. This work determined that the As discharge trend was fitted by double-constants kinetics based on the leaching experiment. And this work calculates total mass distribution of As in the aquifer over 18 years. We have found that the sustained As pollution relies on the rainfall that acts as the primary contributor of elevated As concentrations. Model simulation results suggest that 51.70% of the total As mass (1.96 × 104 kg) was fixed in low permeability solid media. The total As mass discharged into groundwater reached 9.3 × 103 kg, accounting for 24.68%. The accumulative outflow mass of arsenic was 8.0 × 103 kg, accounting for 21.62%.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Weihua Cui, upon reasonable request.
References
Abo RK, Merkel BJ (2015) Comparative estimation of the potential groundwater recharge in Al Zerba catchment of Aleppo basin. Syria Arab J Geosci 8(3):1339–1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1222-9
Ahmad A, Ahmad G (2021) Estimation of arsenic leaching from Zn–Pb mine tailings under environmental conditions. J Clean Prod 295:126477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126477
Alslaibi TM, Abustan I, Mogheir YK, Afifi S (2013) Quantification of leachate discharged to groundwater using the water balance method and the Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) model. Waste Manag Res 31(1):50–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X12465462
Berger K, Melchor S, Miehlich G (1996) Suitability of Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) model of the US Environmental Protection Agency for the simulation of the water balance of landfill cover systems. Environ Geol 28(4):181–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002540050092
Borah R, Taki K, Gogoi A, Das P, Kumar M (2018) Contemporary distribution and impending mobility of arsenic, copper and zinc in a tropical (Brahmaputra) river bed sediments, Assam. India Ecotox Environ Safe 161:769–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.06.038
Chabuk A, Al-Ansari N, Ezz-Aldeen M, Laue J, Pusch R, Hussain H, Knutsson S (2018) Two scenarios for landfills design in special conditions using the HELP model: a case study in babylon governorate. Iraq Sustainability-Basel 10(2):125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010125
Duan Y, Gan Y, Wang Y, Liu C, Yu K, Deng Y, Zhao K, Dong C (2017) Arsenic speciation in aquifer sediment under varying groundwater regime and redox conditions at Jianghan Plain of Central China. Sci Total Environ 607–608:992–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.011
Esfahani SG, Valocchi AJ, Werth CJ (2021) Using MODFLOW and RT3D to simulate diffusion and reaction without discretizing low permeability zones. J Contam Hydrol 239:103777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2021.103777
World Health Organization (2022) Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating the first and second addenda. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO
Haluska AA, Schaefer CE, Cho J, Lavorgna GM, Annable MD (2019) Long-term mass flux assessment of a DNAPL source area treated using bioremediation. J Contam Hydrol 227:103516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2019.103516
Harbaugh AW (2005) MODFLOW-2005. The U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model—the Ground-Water Flow Process: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6- A16. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, USA
Hu M, Zhou P, Chen C (2022) Spatial and temporal distribution and affecting factors of iron and manganese in the groundwater in the middle area of the Yangtze River Basin. China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(40):61204–61221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20253-7
Huang B, Liu ZR, Wang Y, Zhou LM, Wang CF, Ye TZ (2022) Release behavior and mechanism of uranium and thorium from Ta-Nb tailings under simulated rainfall in Jiangxi Province. China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(38):57466–57478
Hussein EE, Fouad M, Gad MI (2019) Prediction of the pollutants movements from the polluted industrial zone in 10th of Ramadan city to the Quaternary aquifer. Appl Water Sci 9(1):897–899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-0897-9
Kang X, Kokkinaki A, Kitanidis PK, Shi X, Lee J, Mo S, Wu J (2021) Hydrogeophysical characterization of nonstationary DNAPL source zones by integrating a convolutional variational autoencoder and ensemble smoother. Water Resour Res 57(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028538
Karlović I, Posavec K, Larva O, Marković T (2022) Numerical groundwater flow and nitrate transport assessment in alluvial aquifer of Varaždin region. NW Croatia. J Hydrol-Reg Stud 41:101084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101084
Li J, Li F, Li H, Guo C, Dong W (2019) Analysis of rainfall infiltration and its influence on groundwater in rain gardens. Environ Sci Pollut R 26(22):22641–22655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05622-z
Li F, Yu T, Huang Z, Jiang T, Wang L, Hou Q, Tang Q, Liu J, Yang Z (2022) Leaching experiments and risk assessment to explore the migration and risk of potentially toxic elements in soil from black shale. Sci Total Environ 844:156922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156922
Liu ZB, Wang XY (2013) Study on migration law in soil of arsenic in coal gangue. Adv Mat Res 864–867:983–989. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.864-867.983
Lyra A, Loukas A, Sidiropoulos P, Voudouris K, Mylopoulos N (2022) Integrated modeling of agronomic and water resources management scenarios in a degraded coastal watershed (Almyros Basin, Magnesia, Greece). Water-Sui 14(7):1086. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071086
Michael HA (2013) An arsenic forecast for China. Sci 341:852. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1242212
Min J, Kim M, Kim JY, Park I, Park J (2010) Leachate modeling for a municipal solid waste landfill for upper expansion. KSCE J Civ Eng 14(4):473–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-0473-1
Mo XY, Peng H, Xin J, Wang S (2022) Analysis of urea nitrogen leaching under high-intensity rainfall using HYDRUS-1D. J Environ Manage 312:114900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114900
Molina-Navarro E, Bailey RT, Andersen HE, Thodsen H, Nielsen A, Park S, Jensen JS, Jensen JB, Trolle D (2019) Comparison of abstraction scenarios simulated by SWAT and SWAT-MODFLOW. Hydrolog Sci J 64(4):434–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1590583
Morris MD (1991) Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33(2):161–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804
Nazari AM, Radzinski R, Ghahreman A (2017) Review of arsenic metallurgy: treatment of arsenical minerals and the immobilization of arsenic. Hydrometallurgy 174:258–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.10.011
Oostrom M, Truex MJ, Carroll KC, Chronister GB (2013) Perched-water analysis related to deep vadose zone contaminant transport and impact to groundwater. J Hydrol 505:228–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.001
Pişkin FY, Demirer GN (2007) Evaluation of the hazardous waste landfill cap system design and clay layer thickness criteria of the Turkish Regulation on the Control of Hazardous Waste (RCHW) using the Hydrological Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) model. Int J Environ Pollut 31(1):178–192
Punia A (2021) Role of temperature, wind, and precipitation in heavy metal contamination at copper mines: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(4):4056–4072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11580-8
Qi X, Li Y, Wei L, Hao F, Zhu X, Wei Y, Li K, Wang H (2019) Disposal of high-arsenic waste acid by the stepwise formation of gypsum and scorodite. RSC Adv 1(1):29–42. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra06568g
Qiao D, Yao J, Song L, Yang J (2021) Migration of leather tannins and chromium in soils under the effect of simulated rain. Chemosphere 284:131413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131413
Rafiei V, Nejadhashemi AP, Mushtaq S, Bailey RT, An-Vo D (2022) Groundwater-surface water interactions at wetland interface: advancement in catchment system modeling. Environ Modell Softw 152:105407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105407
Rivard C, Paniconi C, Vigneault H, Chaumont D (2014) A watershed-scale study of climate change impacts on groundwater recharge (Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia, Canada). Hydrol Sci J 59(8):1437–1456. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.887203
Robinson, HES (1963) Dispersion in ground water flowing through heterogeneous materials. Geolgical Survey Professional Paper 368-B. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp386B
Rodrı́guez R, Ramos JA, Armienta A (2004) Groundwater arsenic variations: the role of local geology and rainfall. Appl Geochem 19(2):245–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2003.09.010
Rodriguez-Lado L, Sun G, Berg M, Zhang Q, Xue H, Zheng Q, Johnson CA (2013) Groundwater arsenic contamination throughout China. Science 341(6148):866–868. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237484
Sathe SS, Mahanta C (2019) Groundwater flow and arsenic contamination transport modeling for a multi aquifer terrain: assessment and mitigation strategies. J Environ Manage 231:166–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.057
Schouwenaars R, Montoya-Bautista CV, Isaacs-Páez ED, Solís-López M, Ramírez-Zamora RM (2017) Removal of arsenic III and V from laboratory solutions and contaminated groundwater by metallurgical slag through anion-induced precipitation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(32):25034–25046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0120-1
Schroeder PR, Gibson AC, Smolen MD (1984) The hydrologic evaluation of landfill performacne (HELP) model (Volume II): Documentation for Version 1. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A, U.S
Schroeder PR, Dozier TS, Zappi PA, Mcenroe BM, Sjostrom JW, Peyton RL (1994) The hydrologic evaluation of landfill performance (HELP) model: Engineering documentation for Version 3. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A, U.S
Shahzad H, Farid HU, Khan ZM, Anjum MN, Ahmad I, Chen X, Sakindar P, Mubeen M, Ahmad M, Gulakhmadov A (2020) An integrated use of GIS, geostatistical and map overlay techniques for spatio-temporal variability analysis of groundwater quality and level in the Punjab Province of Pakistan. South Asia Water-Sui 12(12):3555. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123555
Smedley PL, Kinniburgh DG (2002) A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl Geochem 17(5):517–568
Sun R, Gao Y, Yang Y (2022) Leaching of heavy metals from lead-zinc mine tailings and the subsequent migration and transformation characteristics in paddy soil. Chemosphere 291:132792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132792
Tran THH, Kim SH, Jo HY, Chung J, Lee S (2022) Transient behavior of arsenic in vadose zone under alternating wet and dry conditions: a comparative soil column study. J Hazard Mater 422:126957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126957
Wang P, Sun Z, Hu Y, Cheng H (2019) Leaching of heavy metals from abandoned mine tailings brought by precipitation and the associated environmental impact. Sci Total Environ 695:133893
Wang L, He Z, Li J (2020) Assessing the land use type and environment factors affecting groundwater nitrogen in an arid oasis in northwestern China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(32):40061–40074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09745-6
Xiao Z, Xie X, Pi K, Yan Y, Li J, Chi Z, Qian K, Wang Y (2018) Effects of irrigation-induced water table fluctuation on arsenic mobilization in the unsaturated zone of the Datong Basin, northern China. J Hydrol 564:256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.018
Xu D, Fu R (2022) Mechanistic insight into the release behavior of arsenic (as) based on its geochemical fractions in the contaminated soils around lead/zinc (Pb/Zn) smelters. J Clean Prod 363:132348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132348
Xue S, Korna R, Fan J, Ke W, Lou W, Wang J, Zhu F (2023) Spatial distribution, environmental risks, and sources of potentially toxic elements in soils from a typical abandoned antimony smelting site. J Environ Sci-China 127:780–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.07.009
Zeng J, Li C, Wang J, Tang L, Wu C, Xue S (2022) Pollution simulation and remediation strategy of a zinc smelting site based on multi-source information. J Hazard Mater 433:128774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128774
Zhang W, Zhang G, Chen Y (2013) Analyses on a high leachate mound in a landfill of municipal solid waste in China. Environ Earth Sci 70(4):1747–1752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2262-x
Zhang H, Yang R, Guo S, Li Q (2020) Modeling fertilization impacts on nitrate leaching and groundwater contamination with HYDRUS-1D and MT3DMS. Paddy Water Environ 18(3):481–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-020-00796-6
Zheng C, Wang PP (1999) MT3DMS: A modular three-dimensional multispecies transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion, and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems; Documentation and user’s guide. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, U.S.A, U. S
Zhou S, Li N, Ren B, Zhang P (2017) Release law of Sb, As, and Hg in antimony smelting slag under simulated acid rain. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 26(2):925–933. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/65470
Zhou C, Liu C, Liang J, Wang S (2018) Numerical simulation of pollutant transport in soils surrounding subway infrastructure. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(7):6859–6869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0968-0
Funding
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program, China (2019YFC18003500).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by ZH, FL, WC, GC, and JY. ZH: conceptualization, methodology, software, investigation, formal analysis, writing—review and editing, writing original—draft.
FL: methodology, experiment, formal analysis, visualization.
WC: conceptualization, writing—review and editing, project administration, supervision, funding acquisition.
GC: conceptualization, software, methodology, writing—review and editing, supervision.
JY: supervision, resources. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ZH and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate.
Not applicable. This research did not involve any human beings or animals as research subject.
Consent for publication
The Author confirms.
-
That the work described has not been published before;
-
That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere;
-
That its publication has been approved by all co-authors;
-
That its publication has been approved (tacitly or explicitly) by the responsible authorities at the institution where the work is carried out.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Marcus Schulz
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, Z., Li, F., Cui, W. et al. Simulating arsenic discharge flux at a relic smelting site in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 12094–12111 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31695-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31695-y