Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Green supply chain, green leadership, consumer preferences, sustainability attitudes, and sustainable business advantage: a case of Vietnamese textile industry

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surging environmental issues confiscate stakeholders’ attention due to growing competition. Sustainable performance in this regard is viewed as a suitable tool because it not only gauges firm’s financial performance but also covers social and environmental areas. However, sustainable performance cannot be achieved without creating sustainable business advantage. Green supply chain practices are known to be implemented in terms of sustainability as they are cross-looped as well as cross-organizational. The practices help in the reduction of environmental impact of business activities without compromising on quality, performance, cost, and energy usage efficiency. The reason encourages the authors to explore the role of selected green supply chain factors, customer preference, and leadership factors in shaping sustainable business advantage. The study has examined the association by adopting the quantitative research method. The researcher has gathered data from 530 employees in the purchasing department, logistics, import/export officers, and packing staff. The data was analyzed statistically by employing SPSS for preliminary analysis and AMOS for testing the structural model and the hypotheses of the study. Using confirmatory factors analysis and structural equational modeling, the researcher has analyzed the study’s measurement model and the hypotheses of the study. The findings of the research have depicted that there is a significant positive impact of lean management and green product design with sustainable business advantage. Moreover, there exists a mediation of customer preferences and leadership factors between green product design and sustainable business advantage. The study has a few limitations as well and uses a quantitative method; therefore, the study has recommended that future researchers utilize qualitative or mixed methods. The study has several theoretical and practical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure. 1
Figure. 2
Figure. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data are not publicly available due to restrictions.

References

  • Ab Hamid MR, Sami W, Sidek MHM (2017) Discriminant validity assessment: use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. In: Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed AK, Senthilkumar CB, Nallusamy S (2018) Study on environmental impact through analysis of big data for sustainable and green supply chain management. Int J Mechan Product Eng Res Develop 8(1):1245–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed R, Anantatmula VS (2017) Empirical study of project managers leadership competence and project performance. Eng Manag J 29(3):189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alarcón, David, Sánchez, José A, & De Olavide, U. (2015). Assessing convergent and discriminant validity in the ADHD-R IV rating scale: user-written commands for Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Composite Reliability (CR), and Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT). Paper presented at the Spanish STATA meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-khawaldah R, Al-zoubi W, Alshaer S, Almarshad M, ALShalabi F, Altahrawi M, Al-Hawary S (2022) Green supply chain management and competitive advantage: the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag 10(3):961–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoako GK, Bonsu GA, Caesar LD, Osei-Tete F (2021) Finding the nexus between green supply chain practices and sustainable business advantage: an emerging market perspective. Manag Environ Qual: An Int J 32(6):1133–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awan FH, Dunnan L, Jamil K, Mustafa S, Atif M, Gul RF, Guangyu Q (2022) Mediating role of green supply chain management between lean manufacturing practices and sustainable performance. Front Psychol 12:810504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai X, Wang KT, Tran TK, Sadiq M, Trung LM, Khudoykulov K (2022) Measuring China’s green economic recovery and energy environment sustainability: econometric analysis of sustainable development goals. Econ Anal Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.07.005

  • Bajad M (2022) Simplified and practical lean approach towards sustainable infrastructure. Inn Infrastruct Solutions 7(3):193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauducel A, Wittmann WW (2005) Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Struct Equ Model 12(1):41–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begum S, Ashfaq M, Xia E, Awan U (2022a) Does green transformational leadership lead to green innovation? The role of green thinking and creative process engagement. Bus Strateg Environ 31(1):580–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begum S, Xia E, Ali F, Awan U, Ashfaq M (2022b) Achieving green product and process innovation through green leadership and creative engagement in manufacturing. J Manuf Technol Manag 33(4):656–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belas J, Škare M, Gavurova B, Dvorsky J, Kotaskova A (2022) The impact of ethical and CSR factors on engineers’ attitudes towards SMEs sustainability. J Bus Res 149:589–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzatu A-I, Costache C, Iordache A (2019) Lean management for sustainable business development. Calitatea 20(S2):139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang T-W, Chen F-F, Luan H-D, Chen Y-S (2019) Effect of green organizational identity, green shared vision, and organizational citizenship behavior for the environment on green product development performance. Sustain 11(3):617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau KY, Lin CH, Tufail B, Tran TK, Van L, Nguyen TTH (2022a) Impact of eco-innovation and sustainable tourism growth on the environmental degradation: the case of China. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2150258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau KY, Moslehpour M, Tu YT, Tai NT, Tien NH, Huy PQ (2022b) Exploring the impact of green energy and consumption on the sustainability of natural resources: Empirical evidence from G7 countries. Renew Energy 196:1241–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen AP, Huang YF, Do MH (2022) Exploring the challenges to adopt green initiatives to supply chain management for manufacturing industries. Sustain 14(20):13516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C (2001) Design for the environment: a quality-based model for green product development. Manag Sci 47(2):250–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Liu L (2020) Customer participation, and green product innovation in SMEs: the mediating role of opportunity recognition and exploitation. J Bus Res 119:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y-S, Chang C-H (2013) The determinants of green product development performance: green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. J Bus Ethics 116:107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien F, Hsu CC, Moslehpour M, Sadiq M, Tufail B, Ngo TQ (2023) A step toward sustainable development: the nexus of environmental sustainability, technological advancement and green finance: evidence from Indonesia. Environ Develop Sustain:1–22

  • da Costa L, Gonçalves F, Espíndola JC, Kumar V, Garza-Reyes JA (2020) Benchmarking of sustainability to assess practices and performances of the management of the end of life cycle of electronic products: a study of Brazilian manufacturing companies. Clean Techn Environ Policy:1–17

  • Dangelico RM, Pujari D (2010) Mainstreaming green product innovation: why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. J Bus Ethics 95:471–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshmukh SG, Upadhye N, Garg S (2010) Lean manufacturing for sustainable development. Glob Bus Manag Res Int J 2(1):125

    Google Scholar 

  • Do A, Nguyen Q, Nguyen D, Le Q, Trinh D (2020) Green supply chain management practices and destination image: evidence from Vietnam tourism industry. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag 8(2):371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulewicz V, Higgs M (2005) Assessing leadership styles and organisational context. J Manag Psychol 20(2):105–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foo P-Y, Lee V-H, Ooi K-B, Tan GW-H, Sohal A (2021) Unfolding the impact of leadership and management on sustainability performance: Green and lean practices and Guanxi as the dual mediators. Bus Strateg Environ 30(8):4136–4153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenreich B, Lüdeke-Freund F, Schaltegger S (2020) A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: value creation for sustainability. J Bus Ethics 166:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung Y-N, Chan H-L, Choi T-M, Liu R (2021) Sustainable product development processes in fashion: supply chains structures and classifications. Int J Prod Econ 231:107911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Salirrosas EE, Rondon-Eusebio RF (2022) Green marketing practices related to key variables of consumer purchasing behavior. Sustain 14(14):8499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gericke N, Pauw B-d, Jelle BT, Olsson D (2019) The Sustainability Consciousness Questionnaire: The theoretical development and empirical validation of an evaluation instrument for stakeholders working with sustainable development. Sustain Dev 27(1):35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleim MR, McCullough H, Sreen N, Pant LG (2023) Is doing right all that matters in sustainability marketing? The role of fit in sustainable marketing strategies. J Retail Consum Serv 70:103124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Benito J, González-Benito Ó (2006) A review of determinant factors of environmental proactivity. Bus Strateg Environ 15(2):87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graedel TE, Comrie PR, Sekutowski JC (1995) Green product design. AT&T Tech J 74(6):17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerci M, Longoni A, Luzzini D (2016) Translating stakeholder pressures into environmental performance–the mediating role of green HRM practices. Int J Hum Resour Manag 27(2):262–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gündoğdu, H. G., & Aytekin, A. (2022). Effects of sustainable governance to sustainable development.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hadi NU, Abdullah N, Sentosa I (2016) An easy approach to exploratory factor analysis: marketing perspective. J Educ Soc Res 6(1):215

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, Joseph F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.

  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis, Global edn. NJ:Pearson Higher Education Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajmohammad S, Vachon S, Klassen RD, Gavronski I (2013) Lean management and supply management: their role in green practices and performance. J Clean Prod 39:312–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallam CRA, Valerdi R, Contreras C (2018) Strategic lean actions for sustainable competitive advantage. Int J Qual & Reliab Manag

  • Haseeb M, Hussain HI, Kot S, Androniceanu A, Jermsittiparsert K (2019) Role of social and technological challenges in achieving a sustainable competitive advantage and sustainable business performance. Sustain 11(14):3811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hejazi MT, Al Batati B, Bahurmuz A (2023) The influence of green supply chain management practices on corporate sustainability performance. Sustain 15(6):5459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler J, Dijkstra TK, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Diamantopoulos A, Straub DW, Calantone RJ (2014) Common beliefs and reality about PLS: comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organ Res Methods 17(2):182–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong Z, Wang H, Gong Y (2019) Green product design considering functional-product reference. Int J Prod Econ 210:155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood CJ, Schwaba T, Milfont TL, Sibley CG, Bleidorn W (2022) Personality change and sustainability attitudes and behaviors. Eur J Personal 36(5):750–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hörisch J, Schaltegger S, Freeman RE (2020) Integrating stakeholder theory and sustainability accounting: a conceptual synthesis. J Clean Prod 275:124097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hur E, Cassidy T (2019) Perceptions and attitudes towards sustainable fashion design: challenges and opportunities for implementing sustainability in fashion. Int J Fashion Design, Technol Educ

  • Hussain HI, Kamarudin F, Anwar NAM, Ali M, Turner JJ, Somasundram SA (2023) Does income inequality influence the role of a sharing economy in promoting sustainable economic growth? Fresh evidence from emerging markets. J Innov Knowl 8(2):100348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain HI, Kamarudin F, Turner JJ, Thas Thaker HM, Mohamad Anwar NA (2022) Environmental reporting policy and debt maturity: prespectives from a developing country. Transform Business Econ 21(1)

  • Jabbour CJ, Chiappetta J, Daniel DSJ, Lopes AB, Gunasekaran A, Latan H (2015) Green product development and performance of Brazilian firms: measuring the role of human and technical aspects. J Clean Prod 87:442–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahi A, Al-Gamrh B, Gharleghi B (2020) Sustainable development in Iran post-sanction: embracing green innovation by small and medium-sized enterprises. Sustain Dev 28(4):781–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamalanon P, Chen J-S, Le T-T-Y (2022) “Why do we buy green products?” An extended theory of the planned behavior model for green product purchase behavior. Sustain 14(2):689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattak MA, Ali M, Azmi W, Rizvi SAR (2023) Digital transformation, diversification and stability: what do we know about banks? Econ Anal Policy 78:122–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein LL, Alves AC, Abreu MF, Feltrin TS (2022) Lean management and sustainable practices in higher education institutions of Brazil and Portugal: a cross country perspective. J Clean Prod 342:130868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurniawan K, Supriatna J, Sapoheluwakan J, Soesilo TEB, Mariati S, Gunarso G (2022) The analysis of forest and land fire and carbon and greenhouse gas emissions on the climate change in Indonesia. AgBioForum 24(2):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • La Torre D, Eva M, Perez-Encinas A, Gomez-Mediavilla G (2022) Fostering sustainability through mobility knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Sustain 14(3):1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan J, Khan SU, Sadiq M, Chien F, Baloch ZA (2022) Evaluating energy poverty and its effects using multi-dimensional based DEA-like mathematical composite indicator approach: Findings from Asia. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112933

  • Leiserowitz AA, Kates RW, Parris TM (2006) Sustainability values, attitudes, and behaviors: a review of multinational and global trends. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:413–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CY, Chau KY, Moslehpour M, Linh HV, Duong KD, Ngo TQ (2022) Factors influencing the sustainable energy technologies adaptation in ASEAN countries. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 53:102668

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CY, Rahaman M, Moslehpour M, Chattopadhyay S, Arya V (2023) Web semantic-based MOOP Algorithm for facilitating allocation problems in the supply chain domain. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst (IJSWIS) 19(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Jurado PJ, Moyano-Fuentes J (2014) Lean management, supply chain management and sustainability: a literature review. J Clean Prod 85:134–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohaghegh M, Blasi S, Groessler A (2021) Dynamic capabilities linking lean practices and sustainable business performance. J Clean Prod 322:129073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moslehpour M, Aldeehani TM, Sibghatullah A, Tai TD, Phan TTH, Ngo TQ (2023a) Dynamic association between technological advancement, green finance, energy efficiency and sustainable development: evidence from Vietnam. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 36(3):2190796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moslehpour M, Faez SE, Gupta BB, Arya V (2023b) A Fuzzy-Based Analysis of the Mediating Factors Affecting Sustainable Purchase Intentions of Smartphones: The Case of Two Brands in Two Asian Countries. Sustainability 15(12):9396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moslehpour M, Firman A, Lin CH, Bilgiçli İ, Tran TK, Nguyen TTH (2023c) The moderating impact of government support on the relationship between tourism development and growth, natural resources depletion, sociocultural degradation, economic environment, and pollution reduction: case of Indonesian economy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(19):56863–56878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TD, Ngo QT (2022) The impact of corporate social responsibility, energy consumption, energy import and usages and carbon emission on sustainable economic development: Evidence from ASEAN countries. Contemporary econ 16(2)

  • Nguyen, Xuan Hung, Duong, Tuan Anh, Nguyen, Viet Anh, Nguyen, Khanh Linh, Dinh, Nguyen Thuong, & Mai, Duc Hieu. (2022). The impact of corporate social responsibility, green supply chain management on the performance of small and medium enterprises in Vietnam: a Systematic literature review and directions for future research.

  • Notteboom T, van der Lugt L, van Saase N, Sel S, Neyens K (2020) The role of seaports in green supply chain management: initiatives, attitudes, and perspectives in Rotterdam, Antwerp, North Sea Port, and Zeebrugge. Sustain 12(4):1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham TM (2017) The factors affecting green supply chains: empirical study of agricultural chains in Vietnam. J Mgmt Sustain 7:135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham VK, Wong WK, Moslehpour M, Musyoki D (2018) Simultaneous adaptation of AHP and Fuzzy AHP to evaluate outsourcing service in the East and Southeast Asia. Available at SSRN 3208130

  • Pinto L (2020) Green supply chain practices and company performance in Portuguese manufacturing sector. Bus Strateg Environ 29(5):1832–1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu L, Jie X, Wang Y, Zhao M (2020) Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 27(1):146–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupa RA, Saif AN, Mohammad. (2022) Impact of green supply chain management (GSCM) on business performance and environmental sustainability: case of a developing country. Bus Perspect Res 10(1):140–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rymaszewska D, Anna. (2014) The challenges of lean manufacturing implementation in SMEs. BIJ 21(6):987–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq M, Moslehpour M, Qiu R, Hieu VM, Duong KD, Ngo TQ (2023) Sharing economy benefits and sustainable development goals: empirical evidence from the transportation industry of Vietnam. J Innov Knowl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100290

  • Shahid MN, Azmi W, Ali M, Islam MU, Rizvi SAR (2023) Uncovering risk transmission between socially responsible investments, alternative energy investments and the implied volatility of major commodities. Energy Econ 106634

  • Shao J, Li W, Aneye C, Fang W (2022) Facilitating mechanism of green products purchasing with a premium price—moderating by sustainability-related information. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 29(3):686–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriyakul T, Chienwattanasook K, Chankoson T (2022) Does industrialization and renewable energy consumption determine economic growth? Empirical evidence from ASEAN countries. Int J Econ Finance Stud 14(03):264–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey J (2004) Leadership in organizations: current issues and key trends. Psychology Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian N, Suresh M (2023) Green organizational culture in manufacturing SMEs: an analysis of causal relationships. Int J Manpow (ahead-of-print)

  • Sveen, Arnt, Gresaker, Ole Kristian, Hæhre, Reidar, Madsen, Dag Øivind, & Stenheim, Tonny. (2020). Attitudes and actions towards sustainability: a survey of Norwegian SMEs

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB (2013) Using multivariate statistics, vol 6, Pearson Boston MA

  • Taghikhah F, Voinov A, Shukla N (2019) Extending the supply chain to address sustainability. J Clean Prod 229:652–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taherdoost HAMED, Sahibuddin S, Jalaliyoon NEDA (2022) Exploratory factor analysis; concepts and theory. Adv appl pure math 27:375–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Vietnam Textile and Apparel Association. (2017). Vietnam textile industry: added value in the global chain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thitinan TS, Chankoson Khunanan S (2022) Modelling the impact of e-government on corruption for the COVID-19 crisis. Int J eBusiness eGovernment Stud 14(3):26–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevlopoulos NS, Tsalis TA, Evangelinos KI, Tsagarakis KP, Vatalis KI, Nikolaou IE (2021) The influence of environmental regulations on business innovation, intellectual capital, environmental and economic performance. Environ Syst Decis 41:163–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tri NM, Hoang PD (2022) The impact of industrial revolution 4.0 and innovation adoption on Vietnamese intelligentsia success: mediating effects of intelligentsia motivation. Social Space 22(3):50–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng M-L, Bui T-D, Lim MK, Fujii M, Mishra U (2022) Assessing data-driven sustainable supply chain management indicators for the textile industry under industrial disruption and ambidexterity. Int J Prod Econ 245:108401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoa N, Van Hien P, Tiep NC, Huong NTX, Mai TTH, Phuong PTL (2022) The role of financial inclusion, green investment and green credit on sustainable economic development: evidence from Vietnam. Cuadernos de Economía 45(127):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • De Villiers R (2006) Sources of sustainable competitive advantage for businesses operating in a global marketplace. University of Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Vu TL, Paramaiah C, Tufail B, Nawaz MA, Xuyen NTM, Huy PQ (2023a) Effect of financial inclusion, eco-innovation, globalization, and sustainable economic growth on ecological footprint. Eng Econ 34(1):46–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vu TL, Phan TTH, Sadiq M, Xuyen NTM, Ngo TQ (2023b) Nexus of natural resources, urbanization and economic recovery in Asia: the moderating role of innovation. Res Pol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103328

  • Whitener EM, Brodt SE, Korsgaard MA, Werner JM (1998) Managers as initiators of trust: an exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Acad Manag Rev 23(3):513–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong CY, Wong CWY, Boon-itt S (2020) Effects of green supply chain integration and green innovation on environmental and cost performance. Int J Prod Res 58(15):4589–4609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zameer H, Wang Y, Yasmeen H, Mubarak S (2022) Green innovation as a mediator in the impact of business analytics and environmental orientation on green competitive advantage. Manag Decis 60(2):488–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Zhu L (2019) Enhancing corporate sustainable development: stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation. Bus Strateg Environ 28(6):1012–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Li L, Sadiq M, Chien F (2023a) The impact of non-renewable energy production and energy usage on carbon emissions: evidence from China. Energy Environ. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221150432

  • Zhang Y, Li L, Sadiq M, Chien FS (2023b) Impact of a sharing economy on sustainable development and energy efficiency: evidence from the top ten Asian economies. J Innov Knowl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100320

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business City University of Macau, Room 418, 4th Floor, Luso Chinese Building, Avenida Padre Tomas Pereira, Taipa, Macau

    Ka Yin Chau

  2. Department of Business Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan

    Chen-Hsien Lin

  3. Business School, CITI University, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

    Purevdulam Altantsetseg

  4. Iqra University, Karachi, Pakistan

    Bushra Tufail

  5. Faculty of Finance and Banking, Van Lang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Thi Ha An Pham & Tran Thai Ha Nguyen

Authors
  1. Ka Yin Chau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chen-Hsien Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Purevdulam Altantsetseg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bushra Tufail
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thi Ha An Pham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tran Thai Ha Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Ka Yin Chau: conceptualization and writing—original draft. Chen-Hsien Lin: writing—literature review. Purevdulam Altantsetseg: software, visualization, and methodology. Thi Ha An Pham: supervision and data. Bushra Tufail, Tran Thai Ha Nguyen: editing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thi Ha An Pham.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent to participate

It can be declared that there are no human participants, human data, or human tissues.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 9

Table 9
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chau, K.Y., Lin, CH., Altantsetseg, P. et al. Green supply chain, green leadership, consumer preferences, sustainability attitudes, and sustainable business advantage: a case of Vietnamese textile industry. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 115003–115020 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30082-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30082-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation