Abstract
Employees’ green creativity is the basic input to organizational innovation capabilities, the prime focus of practitioners to stay competitive, and a mean to solve the society’s sustainable issues in dynamic markets. Hence, this study aims to evaluate the nexus between authentic leadership, psychological environment, and employees’ green creativity based on the theoretical lenses of social identity and social exchange theories that have rare application in these domains. Data were collected through questionnaires from 367 operational staff members of different technical training centers of renewable energy projects in Rawalpindi and Islamabad regions at Pakistan. The findings reveal that authentic leadership is a significant precursor of employee’s green creativity and self-efficacy. In addition, self-efficacy mediates while the environment of trust and safety has non-mediating role in the relationship between authentic leadership and employee’s green creativity. This work brings attention to the initiatives in technical training centers for renewable energy projects and contributes to the field of employees’ green creativity in the context of authentic leadership and psychological environment based on the philosophy of social identity and social exchange theories.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Green creativity enables employees to develop and implement environment genial practices in organizational settings and promotes the trend of sustainability. Green creativity leads to save production costs, gain competitive advantage, improve environmental efficiency, and add in the UN sustainability agenda 2030 (Zameer et al. 2021a, b; Rehman et al. 2023). In this regard, employees who contribute to creative ideas and innovation strategies can identify the opportunities to optimize resource utilization, reduce energy consumption, improve financial performance, and implement more efficient processes (Zameer et al. 2021a, b), perceived as the asset and key capability of an organization (Zeb et al. 2019; Imam et al. 2020). Due to these reasons, organizations often prefer to invest in the development of their employees to build sustainability-oriented capabilities (Zeb et al. 2019). In this consequence, authentic leadership is vital to influence individuals toward achieving the sustainable development goals (Zeb 2020).
Authentic leadership instigates the capacity to inspire and motivate subordinates, make sound decisions, and effectively manage resources and people, promoting the culture of green creativity (Cheng and Yang 2019; Zhou et al. 2018; Zameer et al. 2021a, b; Prokop et al. 2022), while the “employees’ green creativity is referred to as their potentials and roles to generate and initiate green innovative ideas” in the working environment (Amabile 1988). Authentic leadership encourages subordinates to share information, influence followers, share knowledge, and persuade a positive workplace environment (Ahmad et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2014; Xu et al. 2017) but needs further investigation in the context of employee’s green creativity. Usually, prior studies have focused on servant leadership, visionary leadership, transformational leadership to enhance creativity (Yoshida et al. 2014; Umalihayati et al. 2022; Nguyen et al. 2022; Zhou et al. 2018), but less focused on the role of authentic leadership (Zeb et al. 2019; Arici and Uysal 2022; Chaudhary & Panda 2018), especially in the employees’ green creativity in the perspective of psychological environment (Nasab and Afshari 2019; Sarkar 2019) in emerging economies. Studies are also enforced to determine the role of authentic leadership to explore the basic mechanisms to promote the culture of green creativity among firms (Sarkar 2019; Farrukh et al. 2023; Yasmeen et al. 2020; Zameer and Yasmeen 2022).
Moreover, authentic leadership promotes worker self-efficacy, enhance employee’s creativity and performance, creates flexible work environment, and improve organizational commitment (Meng et al. 2016; Bai et al. 2016; Laschinger et al. 2015). In particular, self-efficacy motivates the employees to engage in more innovative activities to foster green creativity (Yang et al. 2017; Nguyen et al. 2022; Maria et al. 2022), while the environment of trust is the “individual’ perception about workplace safety and the environment of reliance” which affects the creativity ability (Anderson and West 1998). Besides, prior studies (e.g., Semedo et al. 2018; Zeb et al. 2020) have directed to investigate the role of authentic leadership in various theoretical settings such as the mediating roles of self-efficacy and the environment of trust and safety to explore the relationship between authentic leadership and employees’ green creativity.
But till now, there is limited literature of these circumstances to explore employee’s green inventiveness (Ma et al. 2017), especially in growing markets (Zhou et al. 2018; Lee et al. 2019; Ribeiro et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2021a, b). Typically, earlier studies have investigated self-efficacy and the psychological environment in various contexts but never focused to examine the influence of self-efficacy and the environment of trust and safety on the employee’s green creativity in the technical training centers of renewable energy projects. Earlier studies also ignored so far to evaluate the mediating role of self-efficacy and the environment of trust and safety on the relationship between authentic leadership and the employee’s green creativity, exactly, in the technical training centers of renewable energy projects in emerging economies. Therefore, it is necessary to explain how a leader behaves to have an impact on the employees’ green inventiveness in the context of psychological environment. Hence, this study has the following shortcomings:
-
1.
Does authentic leadership empower the environment of trust and safety?
-
2.
Does authentic leadership encourage self-efficacy among employees?
-
3.
What are the effects of the environment of trust and safety and self-efficacy on the employee’s green creativity?
-
4.
Does authentic leadership enrich the employee’s green creativity?
-
5.
Do the environment of trust and safety and self-efficacy among employees mediate between authentic leadership and the employee’s green creativity?
Consequently, to clarify the raised research questions and achieve the objectives, we embarked on a study to explore the relationship among the defined constructs. Hence, this study contributes by adapting the social identity and social exchange theory in the theoretical lens, considered the issues elevated by earlier scholars, and theorized the connection of leadership style by conceptualizing a model of employee’s green creativity. It also contributes by evaluating the mediation of the environment of trust and safety and self-efficacy between authentic leadership and the employee’s green creativity. Moreover, this study adds by investigating the application of authentic leadership in the technical training center of renewable energy projects in emerging economy and responding to the calls for further study on the association between authentic leadership and employees’ green creativity (Zeb et al. 2019). This study contributes by merging the literature of authentic leadership, psychological environment, and the employees’ green creativity based on the theoretical lens of social identity and social exchange theories. This study also contributes by validating the proposed research model based on the findings from emerging economy. However, the first part of this study involves by evaluating the existing literature, followed by the analysis of the connection between authentic leadership, psychological environment, and the employees’ green creativity. The concluding segment summarizes the findings, conclusions, and recommendations for future research.
Literature review
Based on the philosophical background of social identity and social exchange theories, this study examines the association among authentic leadership, self-efficacy, the environment of trust and safety, and employees’ green creativity (Tajfel 1982). Social identity theory focuses to maintain the sense of positive distinctiveness among the group members (Tajfel and Turner 1986) while social exchange theory presumes that a social behavior occurs due to exchange process (Jonason and Middleton 2015). However, creativity is viewed as a cognitive and social process as well as a personality trait, rather than just a product of individual talents and traits (Amabile and Pillemer 2012). The study operationalized social categorization by explaining the nexus between authentic leadership and green creativity based on the environment of trust and safety, as well as self-efficacy of employees. Authentic leadership braces a person’s positive attitude and actions as well as strives for open and honest relationships with followers along with several favorable outcomes (Ogunyemi and Ogunyemi 2020; Gardner et al. 2021). Therefore, the social identity and social exchange theories are applied to evaluate the role of positive senses and social behavior of leaders in influencing the employee’s green creativity and their psychological mindset.
Theory and hypothesis development
Authentic leadership is considered as a multifaceted construct that includes internal moral perspective, relational transparency, balanced processing, and leader self-awareness. It refers to the degree to which the leader is conscious of exhibiting a pattern of openness and clarity and is consistent in disclosing and acting upon personal principles, sentiments, and intentions (Walumbwa et al. 2008). According to Semedo et al. (2016), firms can put more emphasis on hiring leaders and supervisors who have value transparency and self-awareness in their interactions with employees. The study demonstrated that the leaders and supervisors can process internal moral and balance processing information to produce the desired outcomes both at the organizational and individual levels. Semedo et al. (2018) discovered that authentic leadership affects individual’s affective commitment and their inventiveness. The study emphasized that authenticity boosts creativity and worker’s capacity to deal with changing obstacles at workplace. Likewise, George (2003) stressed that authentic leadership improves the relationship between leaders and their teams and enhances ecological efficiency, which in turn leads toward positive attitudes and behaviors, that can result in highly green creativity (Rod and Ashill 2009; Regoet al. 2012; Walumbwa et al. 2011; Karman et al. 2023). Based on the assumption that effective association between employees and managers may improve employees’ views toward overall workplace initiatives, this study takes a similar approach to the leader-member interaction. As a result, we put forward the following hypothesis:
-
H1. Authentic leadership enhances employee’s green creativity.
The environment of trust is related to how the group members perceive these two aspects: how trust-related issues are handled and whether or not an employee’s behavior is consistent with the characteristics of trust (Costigan et al. 1998). According to Luthans and Avolio (2003), authentic leadership helps to foster a healthy atmosphere that is centered on trust, compassion, and a culture that values and encourages ethical behavior. By establishing cooperative relationship networks and environment of justice and encouraging people to share their independent views, authentic leaders can quickly gain the respect and trust of their workforce (Zeb et al. 2021; Batmomolin et al. 2022). Furthermore, Fransen et al. (2011) emphasized that achieving a reliable mode of activity within the team environment requires member’s participation that engenders a strong perception of mutual trust among employees by using the behavioral approach of authentic leaders. Avolio et al. (2004) praised that authentic leaders are transparent in their interpersonal ties with subordinates/members and share their true beliefs, values, and feelings. Authentic leadership behavior is characterized by a highly developed organizational context as well as positive emotional abilities. These capabilities promote constructive conduct both in the leaders and subordinates which furthers improve their personal growth. According to Gonçalves and Brandão (2017), the psychological capital and safety of the group are predicated by the leader humility. However, prior studies have evaluated the association of authentic leadership with various factors in organizational settings but less focused to examine the role of authentic leadership with the environment of trust and safety. Therefore, we proposed the following hypothesis:
-
H2. Authentic leadership enhances the environment of trust and safety.
Self-efficacy of the employees is a motivational tool which stimulates their risk-taking propensity in difficult situations, taking decisions, and participating in different work activities (Sharif and Raza 2017; Khalil and Siddiqui 2019; Rehman et al. 2018). The level of self-efficacy is differing among individual and is affected by many factors. However, authentic leaders are not only aware of their own strengths and limitations but also aware of their subordinates. It is their confidence, which emphasizes the employee’s strength and empowers them to overcome their deficiencies that enable the employees to acquire a high-level self-efficacy. Therefore, leaders can maintain an open and honest relationship with their staff to motivate them and increase their self-efficacy to optimize the level of creativity. One of the dimensions of psychological capital is self-efficacy, and it may be argued that authentic leadership affects self-efficacy (Avolio and Luthans 2006). Hence, we proposed the following hypothesis.
-
H3. Authentic leadership enhances self-efficacy among employees.
Bock et al. (2005) stated that mutual trust among group members is a helpful mechanism for organization to handle tasks outside the scope of their formal duty. Group members also share mutual opinions regarding problems from various angles of knowledge. Amabile (1988), Chaudhry et al. (2023), and Zeb et al. (2019) argued that a trustful environment encourages employees’ creativity and safety. These studies further pointed out that the mutual trust and support among group members can enhance the confidence in their conducts and lead them to apply new tactics in their job. Zhou and George (2003) noted that the trust can improve interactions and cooperation among members, thereby instigating creativity and innovation. However, it is compulsory that supervisors should help in making creative ideas and devising an environment of trust to improve individual creativity (Tsai et al. 2015). Hsu et al. (2007) and Zameer et al. (2021a, b) also opined that importance of a strong atmosphere of mutual trust among group members could not be underestimated because it leads to creativity. Moreover, safety is also a significant predictor of employees’ creativity. Baer and Frese (2003) focused on safety practices, employees’ creativity, and performance. The study observed that in safe and protected environment, employees feel less interpersonal pressure and used their full strength for creativity. This leads to the following hypothesis:
-
H4. Environment of trust and safety enhances employees’ green creativity.
“Self-efficacy is an individual’s belief that can organize and complete specific tasks” (Bandura 1994). Tierney and Farmer (2002) also presumed that “self-efficacy refers to employee belief in their own ability to be creative in their job roles.” Job self-efficacy, job tenure, job complexity, and leader role contribute to the strength of creative efficacy beliefs. Tierney and Farmer (2002, 2011), Kim et al. (2019), and Han and Bai (2020) claimed that self-efficacy predicts creative performance beyond the predictive effects of job self-efficacy. Several theoretical and empirical studies supported the evidence that self-efficacy improves employees’ creativity. Based on this discussion, we propose the following hypothesis:
-
H5. Self-efficacy enhances employee’s green creativity.
Based on the contingency approach, psychological environment of trust and safety was used as a mediating concept. Zeb et al. (2019) proved that authentic leadership develops a positive environment of trust and safety through the authenticity to stimulate innovative skills. The same was concluded by Meng et al. (2016) where trust and safety mediated the links between authentic leadership and employee’s creativity. A similar study in Taiwanese firms also found that authentic leadership and employees’ creativity are mediated through leader-member exchange and a safe psychological environment (Xu et al. 2017). Xu et al. (2017) used leader-member exchange (LMX) approach between authentic leadership and creativity and found that employee’s perception toward authentic leadership enhanced the psychological trust and safety through LMX relationships, which further influence the level of creativity. Therefore, the current study looked at how safety and trust act as linking factors in the relationship between authentic leadership and employees’ green creativity. Based on the contingency approach, authentic leadership is the antecedent concept and deliberates the mediating effect of psychological environment of trust and safety and employees’ creativity. Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:
-
H6. Environment of trust and safety mediates the link between authentic leadership and employees’ green creativity.
Literature on the topic highlighted that leader role has an important effect on the employee’s creativity and proposed a notion that self-efficacy mediates the relationship between leader role and creativity. Evidently, Jaiswal and Dhar (2015), Santoso et al. (2019), and Azim et al. (2019) revealed a positive relationship between transformational leadership, self-efficacy, and creativity. The study of Yang et al. (2017) also found that self-efficacy mediates the link between servant leadership and employee’s creativity. The study further concluded that servant leadership predicted self-efficacy, which in turn promotes the employees’ creativity. Zeb et al. (2019) opined on intrinsic motivation principle of creativity and confirmed that authentic leadership stimulates creative beliefs promoting employees’ creativity. However, prior studies have evaluated the mediating role of self-efficacy in various context, but less focused to examine the mediating role of self-efficacy on the relationship between authentic leadership and the employee’s green creativity in the technical training centers of renewable energy projects. Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:
-
H7. Self-efficacy mediates the link between authentic leadership and employees’ green creativity.
Conceptual framework
This study revolves around the idea of green creativity, which refers to the ability of employees to develop and implement environment friendly practices and initiatives within organizations. Green creativity is seen as a key capability for organizations to stay competitive in today’s dynamic environment around the world. However, this study integrates the concept of authentic leadership, psychological environment, and the employee’s green creativity to visualize the conceptual framework for the operationalization of study as shown in (Fig. 1).
Method
Sample and procedures
Operational staff members of different technical training centers of renewable energy projects at Rawalpindi and Islamabad regions were the population of this research study. First, we got an approval from the CEO/concerned officers about data collections from the operational staff members of the technical training centers of renewable energy projects. The technical training center of renewable energy projects was the subject of the study because of its actual and potential contributions to public sector. These technical training centers for renewable energy projects decrease the ratio of unemployment, handle the energy issues, and focus on the UN sustainability agenda 2030.
A non-probability, convenience sampling technique was applied followed by the recommendations of Zeb et al. (2021) . This type of sampling technique allows to quickly and easily gather data as they can select participants who are readily available and accessible. This is a useful approach when there is limitation of resources and time and suitable in industrial settings (Baxter et al. 2015; Zeb et al. 2019; Rasool et al. 2023). Therefore, this study preferred to collect data through convenience sampling techniques due to the limitation of resources and time and unstructured industrial settings.
In primary research, usually the questionnaire-based survey is applied to obtain the views of respondents to predict the relationship among construct (Zameer et al. 2021a, b). However, on the defined scale in this study, all the responses were recorded through five-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree = 1 to strongly agree = 5. Before the distribution of the survey forms, respondents were guided regarding the aims of the study and questionnaires. A total of 450 survey forms were distributed, but only 367 (81.56% response rate) questionnaires were received in complete form. The data is being truly used for the first time, presenting the current dynamics of authentic leadership, psychological environment of trust and safety, and the employees’ green creativity of the technical training centers of renewable energy projects in Rawalpindi and Islamabad regions.
Demographic profile
The results of the respondents (please refer to Table 1) indicated that 345 (94.01%) were male among the respondents and 22 (5.99%) were female and 101 (27.53%) were < 20–29 years old, 118 (32.16%) were 30–39 years old, and 148 (40.33%) were 40–49 years old. The results of the respondents’ education indicated that 103 (28.07%) have SSC level of education, 144 (39.23%) have HSC level of education, 75 (20.44%) have BA level of education, and 45 (12.27%) have master and MS level of education. The results of the respondent’s experience indicated that 159 (43.33%) have < 10–19 years of experience, 146 (39.79%) have 20–29 years of experience, and 62 (16.90%) have 30–39 years of experience, respectively.
Measures
Authentic leadership was measured by a six-item scale, e.g., one sample items “my immediate leader is able to improve his/her interactions with others by soliciting feedback.” The scale was taken from the study of Walumbwa et al. (2008) that have a valid Cronbach’s alpha value 0.827. Environment of trust and safety was measured by a six-item scale, e.g., two sample items “I trust my co-workers” and “I am confident that I can handle the physical demands at work.” The scale was taken from the study of Kahn (1990) and May et al. (2004) having valid Cronbach’s alpha values 0.827 and 0.910. Self-efficacy was measured with a six-item scale, e.g., one sample item “I will be able to achieve most of the goals that I have set for myself.” The scale was taken from the studies of Igbaria and Guimaraes (1993) and Rehman et al. (2021a, b) having a valid alpha value 0.86. Employee’s creativity was also measured by a six-item scale, e.g., one sample items “suggests new ways to achieve goals or objectives.” The scale was taken from the study of Zhou and George (2003) having valid Cronbach’s alpha values 0.877.
Technique of analysis
The study analyzed the collected data by using the technique of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). PLS-SEM is preferable to analyze the complex models (where there are no issues of small sample size), test the conjectures, and measure the validity of theory; is highly recommended in formative style of theoretical consideration; and is preferable in predictive studies (Raza et al. 2021; Rehman et al. 2022; Raza and Khan 2022). The collected data were examined by employing a bootstrapping procedure with the sample that consists of 5000 subsamples (Hair et al. 2012; Raza et al. 2020). PLS-SEM justifies the association in an organized way and displays the results in a single click (Rehman et al. 2021a, b). Hence, PLS-SEM was the more suitable option to establish association among the defined constructs.
Results
Measurement model
This exploratory study aims to establish relationship among the defined constructs; therefore, PLS-SEM was selected to analyze the research model. The PLS-SEM procedure usually comprises two sub-models: the measurement model and the structural model (Rehman and Zeb 2022; Rehman et al. 2021a, b). Before assessing the path relationships of the model, the validity and reliability of various constructs of the measurement model were examined to gauge whether the study’s constructs are valid and reliable or not. To ensure this, the first step was to examine the construct reliability and content validity. As content validity concerns with the reliability of the constructs, according to Hulland (1999), content validity and reliability are assessed by examining the loadings of respective items on their respective latent construct. A study recommended that the standardized loading estimates should be equal to or greater than 0.5, and the ideal range is 0.7 or higher (Rehman 2023). The alpha values of all constructs were greater than 0.7, which signifies that all constructs were reliable (Rehman and Prokop 2023). All constructs of outer loadings ranging from 0.566 to 0.843 were considered acceptable as they are above the proposed criteria of 0.55 (Raza et al. 2020; Raza and Khan 2022). The composite reliability values of all constructs ranging from 0.861 to 0883 were greater than 0.7, as per the recommended criteria (Hair et al. 2012) that it should be greater than 0.7. The AVE values of all constructs ranging from 0.511 to 0.575 were greater than 0.5 thresholds. However, the measurement model values signified high level of internal consistencies. The results of the measurement model are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 2, respectively.
Discriminant validity
The outcome of the measurement model shows that there are no issues of multicollinearity (please refer to Table 3) as per the procedure of prior studies (Rehman 2023), because the square root of AVE for each construct is greater than the correlation of other latent constructs, which implies adequate discriminant validity (Fornell and Larcker 1981).
R 2coefficient of determination
The path coefficient value R2 shows that only 19.1% of the total variance was explained by authentic leadership, environment of trust and safety, and self-efficacy. Furthermore, R2 shows that 1.2% and 4.5% of the total variance in environment of trust and safety and self-efficacy were explained by authentic leadership. Further, the VIF values, 1.056, 1.000, and 1.000, were less than 5 which is an acceptable range (please refer to Table 4) as per the criteria of the previous studies (Rehman et al. 2023).
Structural path analysis
The detailed description of results of the structure model was presented (please refer to Table 5). Authentic leadership has significant impacts on the employee’s green creativity (β = 0.126, t = 2.958, p = 0.000) and supports H1. On the other side, authentic leadership has insignificant impacts on the environment of trust and safety (β = 0.111, t = 0.456, p = 0.146) and rejects H2. Authentic leadership has also significant impacts on self-efficacy (β = 0.211, t = 3.809, p = 0.000) and supports H3. Moreover, the environment of trust and safety has also significant impacts on the employee’s green creativity (β = 0.180, t = 2.373, p = 0.018) and supports H4. Furthermore, self-efficacy has also significant impacts on the employees’ green creativity and supports H5. The indirect structural path values (β = 0.020, t = 1.160, p = 0.247) show that the environment of trust and safety did not mediate the link between authentic leadership and the employee’s green creativity and rejects H6, while the indirect structural path values (β = 0.070, t = 3.069, p = 0.002) show that self-efficacy significantly mediates the link between authentic leadership and the employee’s green creativity and supports H7.
Discussion
The first pathway of this study illuminates the direct effect of authentic leadership on the employees’ green creativity, while the second pathway delineates the mediating effect of the environment of trust and safety and self-efficacy between authentic leadership and employee’s green creativity. The result of the first pathway articulates that authentic leadership positively enhanced employees’ green creativity. However, the findings of the first pathway are consistent with the prior research studies of Cerne et al. (2013), Liqun et al. (2017), Semedo et al. (2018), Zeb et al. (2019), and Imam et al. (2020). In the second pathway, self-efficacy partially mediated the relationship while environment of trust and safety did not mediate the relationships between authentic leadership and the employees’ green creativity. The results supported that higher authenticity of the leaders can engage employees in green creative activities. When employees feel that our leader is authentic and able to provide a creative environment, then they will habitually reciprocate green creativity in the workplace. The findings of our study are partially supported by the previous research of the following authors: Amabile et al. (1994), Zeb et al. (2019), and Phuong and Takahashi (2021). The studies stated that authentic leadership developed truthful relationships with the subordinates, enhancing motivation and promoting innovative work environments and fostering employee’s creativity. Our findings are also contrary to the study of Malodia and Goyal (2023) who found the sequential mediation effect of workplace inclusion and employee engagement in the relationship between authentic leadership and employee’s creativity in the IT sector. Our study contributed to the body of knowledge by using the psychological environment of trust and safety and self-efficacy as mediating mechanism between the authentic leadership and employee’s green creativity in the technical training sector of renewable energy projects.
The results confirm that authentic leadership has a strong association with the employees’ green creativity in the technical training centers of renewable energy projects at Rawalpindi and Islamabad regions. Amabile et al. (1994) supported the view that perceived leadership support has a positive influence on the employee’s green creativity. Phuong and Takahashi (2021) support the results of this study and presumed that the perceived leadership support has positive impacts on the employee’s creativity. The study further stated that authentic leadership acts as a role model to inspire employees. The direct effect of authentic leadership on self-efficacy and employees’ creativity is also confirmed by the previous research studies of Lee et al. (2019), Lei et al. (2021), Niswaty et al. (2021), and Javed et al. (2021).
A study that has been conducted by Sumanth et al. (2023) stated that authentic leadership and LMX approach foster employees’ proactive orientation and creativity with the theoretical lens of social identity and social exchange theories at Central Europe and the USA. We provide a theoretical lens of both theories to assess a multilevel model of creativity and authentic leadership theory. We also concluded from the results that authentic leadership style promotes green creativity of the employees.
Furthermore, this study also clarified that the environment of trust and safety did not mediate the relationship while self-efficacy mediated the relationship between authentic leadership and the employees’ green creativity. These findings contribute to the study of Yang et al. (2017) who called for additional research to check the effect of leaders on creativity on a multi-mediation level. Fewer studies by Yang et al. (2017), Wang et al. (2021a, b), and Ma et al. (2021) explored the impact of authentic leadership on the environment of trust and safety and self-efficacy and employee’s creativity. Yoshida et al. (2014), Yang et al. (2017), and Xu et al. (2017) called for further research to collect data from different organizations and to examine the effect of leaders at multi-mediation levels. The responses collected from technical training center employees of renewable energy projects at Rawalpindi and Islamabad regions clarified that authentic leadership instigates employees’ self-efficacy as well as the environment of trust and safety, which boost green creative ideas in the workplace.
Conclusion
In conclusion, results of the study indicated that authentic leadership positively influences employees’ green creativity and supports previous research findings. The analysis also revealed that self-efficacy partially mediated the relationship between authentic leadership and green creativity, while trust and safety in the environment have non-mediating effect. These findings suggest that when leaders demonstrate authenticity and create a supportive and creative environment, then employees are more likely to engage in green creative activities. The results also align with the prior research and emphasized on the importance of authentic leadership relationships in fostering employee’s creativity (Malodia and Goyal 2023). Additionally, the study contributes to the theoretical lens of social identity and social exchange theories in assessing the relationship between authentic leadership and employee’s green creativity. Overall, this research provides valuable insights into the role of authentic leadership in promoting employees’ green creativity and highlights the need for further investigation into the multi-mediation effects of leaders on creativity.
Theoretical implication
The study contributes to the existing theoretical knowledge by highlighting the role of authentic leadership in influencing employees’ green creativity in the light of social identity and social exchange theories. It supports the notion that authentic leadership plays a significant role in fostering green creativity among employees in the context of renewable energy projects. The study builds upon prior empirical studies that have already established a linkage between authentic leadership and creativity. By reinforcing these findings in the specific context of a technical training center for renewable energy projects in Rawalpindi and Islamabad regions at Pakistan, the study strengthens the theoretical understanding of the relationship between authentic leadership and green creativity among employees in the light of self-efficacy and the environment of trust and safety in emerging markets.
Managerial implication
The study suggests that the management or leadership of the technical training center of renewable energy projects in Rawalpindi and Islamabad regions, Pakistan, should create a counter-productive environment that encourages green creativity among employees. This managerial insight emphasizes the importance of providing an atmosphere that fosters green creativity and supports employees’ efforts in contributing toward green initiatives. The study highlights the role of authentic leaders in improving employees’ output and moral levels. It suggests that leaders should act as the role models and set the norms and standards for employees to be followed. By recognizing the significance of authentic leadership in influencing employees’ counter-productive green behavior, the study provides guidance for managerial practices that can enhance organizational outcomes. The study emphasizes on the importance to create a psychologically safe and trusted environment within the organization. It suggests that the management or leadership should foster the atmosphere where employees feel free of fear and risks, enabling them to actively share their knowledge within organization and contribute toward green creativity. This managerial recommendation promotes collaboration, building trust, and promotes knowledge sharing culture among employees.
Limitations and further research
This research was the first such type of empirical attempt to assess the links between authentic leadership, environment of trust and safety, self-efficacy, and the employee’s green creativity in the context of technical training centers of renewable energy projects at Rawalpindi and Islamabad regions of Pakistan. This study provides the potential directions for future research due to some major limitations. Firstly, one of the limitations is the sample data, which is only concern with technical training centers at Rawalpindi and Islamabad regions. Hence, the results of this study are limited to technical training centers of renewable energy projects. Therefore, the results of this study posses’ generalizability challenges. Secondly, this study has collected data from the technical training center industry employees and assessed authentic leaderships and employee’s green creativity. Future studies can explore the employee’s green creativity by collecting data from other broad level of organizations in another managerial context. Thirdly, in this study, we used a multidimensional mediation of self-efficacy and the environment of trust and safety between authentic leadership and employee’s green creativity, while future studies can examine the role of gender, education, and age in the capacity of control variables to further enrich the relevant knowledge area. Hughes et al. (2018) argued that the future research may assess identification of different mechanisms and concept that may offer supplementary concepts in understanding the relationship between leader and subordinates’ relationships. Fourthly, this study used a cross-sectional research approach. Future studies can use longitudinal research approach to assess the association between authentic leadership and the employee’s green creativity.
Data availability
Data will be provided on the request to the corresponding author.
References
Ahmad I, Zafar MA, Shahzad K (2015) Authentic leadership style and academia’s creativity in higher education institutions: intrinsic motivation and mood as mediators. Transylvanian Rev Adm Sci 46:5–19
Ali M, Lei S, Jie ZS, Rahman MA (2018) Empowering leadership and employee performance: a mediating role of thriving at work. Int J Asian Bus Inf Manag 9(2):1–14
Ali M, Lei S, Freeman S, Khan MM (2019) Implemented and perceived high-performance work system and its effect on branch performance: a 2-1-2 mediational multilevel approach. Empl Relat 41(4):793–810
Arici HE, Uysal M (2022) Leadership, green innovation, and green creativity: A systematic review. The Service Industries Journal 42(5–6):280–320
Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res Organ Behav 10(1):123–167
Amabile TM, Pillemer J (2012) Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. J Creat Behav 46(1):3–15
Amabile TM, Hill KG, Hennessey BA, Tighe EM (1994) The work preference inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. J Pers Soc Psychol 66(5):1994
Anderson NR, West MA (1998) Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. J Organ Behav 19(3):235–258
Avolio BJ, Gardner WL (2005) Authentic leadership development: getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadersh Quart 16(3):315–338
Avolio BJ, Luthans F (2006) The high impact leader: moments matter for accelerating authentic leadership development. McGraw-Hill Education, New York
Avolio BJ, GardnerWL WFO, Luthans F, May DR (2004) Unlocking the mask: a look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadersh Quart 15(6):801–823
Azim MT, Fan L, Uddin MA, Jilani Abdul Kader, M. M., & Begum, S. (2019) Linking transformational leadership with employees’ engagement in the creative process. Management Research Review 42(7):837–858
Baer M, Frese M (2003) Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J Organ Behav 24(1):45–68
Bai Y, Lin L, Li PP (2016) How to enable employee creativity in a team context: a cross-level mediating process of transformational leadership. J Bus Res Elsevier 69(9):3240–3250
Bandura A (1994) Self-efficacy, in Ramachaudran VS (Ed.). Encyclopedia of human behavior, Vol. 4, Academic Press, New York, pp. 71–81, (Reprinted in Friedman H (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mental Health, Academic Press, San Diego)
Batmomolin A, Sadikin M, Hadi JS, Sadana S (2022) Effect of diversity management on organizational trust, employee innovative behavior, and employee engagement: evidence from Indonesia. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics & Administration 30(2)
Baxter K, Courage C, Caine K (2015) Choosing a user experience research activity. Understanding your Users, 96–112
Bock GW, Zmud RW, Kim YG, Lee JN (2005) Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological factors, and organizational. MIS Q 29(1):87–111
Cerne M, Jakli CM, Skerlavaj M (2013) Authentic leadership, creativity, and innovation: a multilevel perspective. Leadership 9(1):63–85
Chaudhary R, Panda C (2018) Authentic leadership and creativity: the intervening role of psychological meaningfulness, safety and work engagement. Int J Product Perform Manag 67(9):2071–2088
Chaudhry NI, Rasool SF, Raza M, Mhelska H, Rehman FU (2023) Exploring the linkage between workplace precaution measures, covid-19 fear and job performance: the moderating effect of academic competence. Curr Psychol 1–20
Chen XP, Yao X (2011) From autonomy to creativity: a multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. J Appl Psychol 96(2):294–309
Cheng C, Yang M (2019) Creative process engagement and new product performance: the role of new product development speed and leadership encouragement of creativity. J Bus Res 99:215–225
Chow WS, Chan LS (2008) Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Inf Manag 45(7):458–465
Costigan RD, Ilter SS, Berman JJ (1998) A multi-dimensional study of trust in organizations. J Manag Issues 10(3):303–317
Doronin D, Shen L, Ali M (2020) Parallel mediating effect of knowledge sharing quality on team innovativeness. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 32(12):1449–1461
Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q 44(2):350–383
Fransen J, Kirschner PA, Erkens G (2011) Mediating team effectiveness in the context of collaborative learning: the importance of team and task awareness. Comput Hum Behav 27(3):1103–1113
Farrukh M, Raza A, Mansoor A, Khan MS, Lee JWC (2023) Trends and patterns in pro-environmental behaviour research: a bibliometric review and research agenda. Benchmarking: An International Journal 30(3):681–696
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research 18:382–388
Gardner WL, Karam EP, Alvesson M, Einola K (2021) Authentic leadership theory: the case for and against. Leadersh Q 32(6):101495
George B (2003) Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering the Secrets to Creating Lasting Value. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
Zhou J, George JM (2003) Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence. The leadership quarterly 14(4–5):545–568
Gonçalves L, Brandão F (2017) The relation between leader’s humility and team creativity: the mediating effect of psychological safety and psychological capital. Int J Organ Anal 25(4):687–702
Gumusluoglu L, Ilsev A (2009) Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. J Bus Res 62(4):461–473
Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the academy of marketing science 40:414–433
Hahm SW (2017) Information sharing and creativity in a virtual team: roles of authentic leadership, sharing team climate and psychological empowerment. KSII Trans Internet Inf Syst 11(8):4105–4119
Han GH, Bai Y (2020) Leaders can facilitate creativity: the moderating roles of leader dialectical thinking and LMX on employee creative self-efficacy and creativity. J Manag Psychol
Hsu MH, Ju TL, Yen CH, Chang CM (2007) Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: the relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. Int J Hum Comput Stud 65(2):153–169
Hughes DJ, Lee A, Tian AW, Newman A, Legood A (2018) Leadership, creativity, and innovation: a critical review and practical recommendations. Leadersh Quart 29(5):549–569
Hulland J (1999) Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic management journal 20(2):195–204
Igbaria M, Guimaraes T (1993) Antecedents and consequences of job satisfaction among information center employees. J Manag Inf Syst 9(4):145–174
Ilies R, Morgeson FP, Nahrgang JD (2005) Authentic leadership and eudaemonic wellbeing: understanding leader-follower outcomes. Leadersh Quart 16(3):373–394
Imam H, Naqvi MB, Naqvi SA, Chambel MJ (2020) Authentic leadership: unleashing employee creativity through empowerment and commitment to the supervisor. Leadersh Org Dev J 41(6):847–864
Jaiswal NK, Dhar RL (2015) Transformational leadership, innovation climate, creative self-efficacy and employee creativity: a multilevel study. Int J Hosp Manag 51:30–41
Javaid M, Abdullah NH, Zeb A, Hussain K (2018) The impact of authentic leadership on knowledge sharing behavior with the moderating role of Islamic work ethics. J Phys: Conf Ser 1049(1):012007)
Javed T, Mahmood S, Khan S, Ullah H (2021) The mediating role of affective commitment between creative self-efficacy, authentic leadership and innovative behaviour among academic employees of higher education sector of Punjab, Pakistan. Irasd J Manag 3(3):429–447
Je KIM (2019) The impact of creative role identity and creative self-efficacy on employee creativity in the hotel business. J Asian Financ Econ Bus 6(2):123–133
Jonason P K, Middleton JP (2015) Dark Triad: The “dark side” of human personality. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25051-4
Kahn WA (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad Manag J 33:692–724
Karman, A., Prokop, V., Giglio, C., & Rehman, F. U. (2023). Has the Covid‐19 pandemic jeopardized firms’ environmental behavior? Bridging green initiatives and firm value through the triple bottom line approach. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 1–21
Khalil SA, Siddiqui DA (2019) Authentic leadership and work engagement: the mediatory role of employees’ trust and occupational self-efficacy. Int J Organ Leadersh 8:17–42
Kim BJ, Park S, Kim TH (2019) The effect of transformational leadership on team creativity: sequential mediating effect of employee’s psychological safety and creativity. Asian J Technol Innov 27(1):90–107
Laschinger HKS, Borgogni L, Consiglio C, Read E (2015) The effects of authentic leadership, six areas of worklife, and occupational coping self-efficacy on new graduate nurses’ burnout and mental health: a cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud 52(6):1080–1089
Lee HS, Hong SA (2014) Factors affecting hospital employees’ knowledge sharing intention and behavior, and innovation behavior. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 5(3):148–155
Lee J, Yun S, Lee S, Lee J (2019) The curvilinear relationship between self-efficacy and creativity: the moderating role of supervisor close monitoring. J Bus Psychol 34(3):377–388
Lei S, Qin C, Ali M, Freeman S, Shi-Jie Z (2021) The impact of authentic leadership on individual and team creativity: a multilevel perspective. Leadersh Org Dev J 42(4):644–662
Liqun W, Zhou M, Lu Q (2017) The influence of leader’s creativity on employees’ and team creativity: role of identification with leader. Nankai Bus Rev Int 8(1):22–38
Luthans F, Avolio BJ (2003) Authentic leadership development. Positive Organizational Scholarship 241:258
Ma Z, Long L, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Lam CK (2017) Why do high-performance human resource practices matter for team creativity? The mediating role of collective efficacy and knowledge sharing. Asia Pac J Manag 34(3):565–586
Ma Z, Gong Y, Long L, Zhang Y (2021) Team-level high-performance work systems, self-efficacy and creativity: differential moderating roles of person–job fit and goal difficulty. Int J Human Resour Manag 32(2):478–511
Malodia L, Goyal I (2023) Psychological Process that Links Authentic Leadership with Followers’ Creative Behaviour. Metamorphosis 22(1):28–37
Maria AD, Yulianto H, Palupiningtyas D, Usodo H (2022) Relationship between transformational leadership, proactive personality, creative self-efficacy and employee creativity at food processing SMEs in Indonesia. In Evidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship. Emerald Publishing Limited
May D, Gilson R, Harter L (2004) The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. J Occup Organ Psychol 77:11–37
Meng H, Cheng ZC, Guo TC (2016) Positive team atmosphere mediates the impact of authentic leadership on subordinate creativity. Soc Behav Pers 44(3):355–368
Nasab AH, Afshari L (2019) Authentic leadership and employee performance: mediating role of organizational commitment. Leadersh Organ Dev J 40(5):548–560
Nguyen TPL, Nguyen TT, Duong CD, Doan XH (2022) The effects of transformational leadership on employee creativity in Vietnam telecommunications enterprises. Manag Decis
Niswaty R, Wirawan H, Akib H, Saggaf MS, Daraba D (2021) Investigating the effect of authentic leadership and employees’ psychological capital on work engagement: evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon 7(5):e06992
Ogunyemi O, Ogunyemi K (2020) Authentic leadership: leading with purpose, meaning and core values. In New Horizons in Positive Leadership and Change (pp. 369–380). Springer, Cham
Phuong TH, Takahashi K (2021) The impact of authentic leadership on employee creativity in Vietnam: a mediating effect of psychological contract and moderating effects of subcultures. Asia Pac Bus Rev 27(1):77–100
Prokop V, Gerstlberger W, Zapletal D, Striteska MK (2022) The double-edged role of firm environmental behaviour in the creation of product innovation in Central and Eastern European countries. J Clean Prod 331:129989
Rasool SF, Samma M, Mohelska H, Rehman FU (2023) Investigating the nexus between information technology capabilities, knowledge management, and green product innovation: evidence from SME industry. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(19):56174–56187
Raza SA, Khan KA (2022) Impact of green human resource practices on hotel environmental performance: the moderating effect of environmental knowledge and individual green values. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 34(6):2154–2175
Raza SA, Qazi W, Umer B, Khan KA (2020) Influence of social networking sites on life satisfaction among university students: a mediating role of social benefit and social overload. Health Educ 120(2):141–164
Raza SA, Khan KA, Salam J (2021) Impact of environmental triggers on students’ behavior to use ride-sharing services: the moderating role of perceived risk. Curr Psychol 1–15
Rego A, Sousa F, Marques C, Cunha MP (2012) Authentic leadership promoting employees’ psychological capital and creativity. J Bus Res 65(3):429–437
Rehman FU (2023) Mapping the two-way relationship between management practices and firm innovation: the mediating role of business environment, degree of competition, and energy policies. In Press, European Business Review
Rehman FU, Prokop V (2023) Interplay in management practices, innovation, business environment, degree of competition and environmental policies: a comparative study. Bus Process Manag J 29(3):858–892
Rehman FU, Ismail H, Al Ghazali BM, Asad MM, Shahbaz MS, Zeb A (2021a) Knowledge management process, knowledge based innovation: does academic researcher’s productivity mediate during the pandemic of covid-19? PLoS ONE 16(12):e0261573
Rehman F, Javed F, Shiekh SE, Asad MM (2021b) Translating the impacts of self-efficacy on the ethical behavior of sales force: the moderating role of gender. J Bus Soc Rev Emerg Econ 7(1):139–147
Rehman FU, Al-Ghazali BM, Farook MRM (2022) Interplay in circular economy innovation, business model innovation, SDGs, and government incentives: a comparative analysis of Pakistani, Malaysian, and Chinese SMEs. Sustainability 14(23):15586
Rehman FU, Zeb A (2022) Translating the impacts of social advertising on Muslim consumers buying behavior: the moderating role of brand image. Journal of Islamic Marketing. In Press
Rehman F, Yusoff RBM, Zabri SBM, Ismail FB (2018) Impacts of psychological capital on the ethical behavior of teachers: a case of educational sector in Pakistan. In MATEC Web of Conferences150: 05032. EDP Sciences
Rehman FU, Sein YY, Dmytrenko D (2023) Translating the impact of internal and external factors in achieving the sustainable market competitiveness: the mediating role of management practices. J Compet (1)
Rhoades L, Eisenberger R, Armeli S (2001) Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol 86(5):825–836
Ribeiro N, Semedo AS, Coelho A (2017)Authentic leadership and creativity: the mediating role of happiness. Int J Organ Anal 25(3)
Richter AW, Hirst G, van Knippenberg D, Baer M (2012) Creative self-efficacy and individual creativity in team contexts: cross-level interactions with team informational resources. J Appl Psychol 97(6):1282–1290
Rod M, Ashill NJ (2009) Symptoms of burnout and service recovery performance: the influence of job resourcefulness. Manag Serv Qual: Int J 19(1):60–84
Santoso H, Elidjen E, Abdinagoro S, Arief M (2019) The role of creative self-efficacy, transformational leadership, and digital literacy in supporting performance through innovative work behavior: evidence from telecommunications industry. Manag Sci Lett 9(13):2305–2314
Šaparnienė D, Reinholde I, Rinkevičienė S (2021) Relationship between citizens’ trust in local government and participation in local governance. Scientific papers of the University of Pardubice. Ser D: Faculty Econ Admin 29(2):1–13
Sarkar A (2019) Authentic leadership: the influence of work and non-work domain contextual factors. Leadersh Org Dev J 40(4):520–531
Semedo AS, Coelho A, Ribeiro N (2016) Authentic leadership and creativity: the mediating role of happiness. Int J Organ Anal 25(3):395–512
Semedo AS, Coelho A, Ribeiro N (2018) The relationship between authentic leaders and employees’ creativity: what are the roles of affective commitment and job resourcefulness? Int J Workplace Health Manag 11(2):58–73
Sharif A, Raza SA (2017) The influence of hedonic motivation, self-efficacy, trust and habit on adoption of internet banking: a case of developing country. Int J Electron Cust Relationsh Manag 11(1):1–22
Sumanth JJ, Černe M, Hannah ST, Škerlavaj M (2023) Fueling the Creative Spark: How Authentic Leadership and LMX Foster Employees’ Proactive Orientation and Creativity. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518231180064
Tajfel H (1982) Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annu Rev Psychol 33(1):1–39
Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin WG (eds) Psychology of Intergroup Relation. Hall Publishers, Chicago, pp 7–24
Tierney P, Farmer SM (2002) Creative self-efficacy: its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Acad Manag J 45(6):1137–1148
Tierney P, Farmer SM (2004) The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. J Manag 30(3):413–432
Tierney P, Farmer SM (2011) Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. J Appl Psychol 96(2):277–293
Tsai CY, Horng JS, Liu CH, Hu DC (2015) Work environment and atmosphere: the role of organizational support in the creativity performance of tourism and hospitality organizations. Int J Hosp Manag 46:26–35
Umalihayati U, Hardhienata S, Wulandari D (2022) How Does Innovative Behavior Mediating The Effect of Visionary Leadership, Learning Organization and Creativity On Lecturers’ Performance? Multicultural Education 8(4):21–36
Walumbwa FO, Avolio BJ, Gardner WL, Wernsing TS, Peterson SJ (2008) Authentic leadership: development and validation of a theory-based measure. J Manag 34(1):89–126
Walumbwa FO, Mayer DM, Wang P, Wang H, Workman K, Christensen AL (2011) Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: the roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 115(2):204–213
Wang Y, Wang Z, Zameer H (2021a) Structural characteristics and evolution of the “international trade-carbon emissions” network in equipment manufacturing industry: international evidence in the perspective of global value chains. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:25886–25905
Wang D, Kan W, Qin S, Zhao C, Sun Y, Mao W, Hu Y (2021b) How authentic leadership impacts on job insecurity: the multiple mediating role of psychological empowerment and psychological capital. Stress Health 37(1):60–71
Wang H, Sui Y, Luthans F, Wang D, Wu Y (2014) Impact of authentic leadership on performance: role of followers’ positive psychological capital and relational processes. J Organ Behav 35(1):5–2186–106
Xu BD, Zhao SK, Li CR, Lin CJ (2017) Authentic leadership and employee creativity: testing the multilevel mediation model. Leadersh Org Dev J 38(3):82–498
Yang J, Liu H, Gu J (2017) A multi-level study of servant leadership on creativity: the roles of self-efficacy and power distance. Leadersh Org Dev J 38(5):610–629
Yasmeen H, Tan Q, Zameer H, Tan J, Nawaz K (2020) Exploring the impact of technological innovation, environmental regulations and urbanization on ecological efficiency of China in the context of COP21. J Environ Manage 274:111210
Yoshida DT, Sendjaya S, Hirst G, Cooper B (2014) Does servant leadership foster creativity and innovation? A multi-level mediation study of identification and prototypicality. J Bus Res 67(7):1395–1404
Zameer H, Yasmeen H (2022) Green innovation and environmental awareness driven green purchase intentions. Mark Intell Plan 40(5):624–638
Zameer H, Yasmeen H, Wang R, Tao J, Malik MN (2020) An empirical investigation of the coordinated development of natural resources, financial development and ecological efficiency in China. Resour Policy 65:101580
Zameer H, Wang Y, Vasbieva DG, Abbas Q (2021a) Exploring a pathway to carbon neutrality via reinforcing environmental performance through green process innovation, environmental orientation and green competitive advantage. J Environ Manage 296:113383
Zameer H, Wang Y, Saeed MR (2021b) Net-zero emission targets and the role of managerial environmental awareness, customer pressure, and regulatory control toward environmental performance. Bus Strateg Environ 30(8):4223–4236
Zeb A, Abdullah NH, Hussain A, Safi A (2019) Authentic leadership, knowledge sharing, and employees’ creativity. Manag Res Rev 43(6):669–690
Zeb A, Rehman FU, Imran M, Ali M, Almansoori RG (2020) Authentic leadership traits, high-performance human resource practices and job performance in Pakistan. Int J Public Leadersh 16(3):299–317
Zeb A. (2020). Relationship between organizational factors and job performance (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia).
Zeb A, Goh GGG, Javaid M, Khan MN, Khan AT, Gul S (2022) The interplay between supervisor supports and job performance: implications of social exchange and social learning theories. J Appl Res Higher Educ. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2021-0143
Zeb A, Rehman FU, Arsalan Y, Usman Khan M (2021) Does organizational justice enhance job performance through high-performance human resource practices? WPOM-Work Pap Oper Manag 12(2):16–40
Zhou J (2003) When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. J Appl Psychol 88(3):413–422
Zhou YQ, Gardner DG, Chen HG (2018) Relationships between work team climate, individual motivation, and creativity. Journal of Management 44(5):2094–2115
Funding
Open access publishing supported by the National Technical Library in Prague.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Fazal Ur Rehman, Ali Zeb. Methodology: Fazal Ur Rehman. Software: Ali Zeb. Validation: Ali Zeb, Fazal Ur Rehman. Formal analysis: Ali Zeb. Investigation: Ali Zeb, Fazal Ur Rehman. Resources: Fazal Ur Rehman. Data curation: Fazal Ur Rehman. Writing—original draft: Ali Zeb, Fazal Ur Rehman. Writing—review and editing: Fazal Ur Rehman. Supervision: Fazal Ur Rehman, Ali Zeb. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rehman, F.U., Zeb, A. Investigating the nexus between authentic leadership, employees’ green creativity, and psychological environment: evidence from emerging economy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 107746–107758 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29928-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29928-1