Abstract
This research investigates the factors influencing carbon emission intensity in 94 countries during 2018 using two qualitative methods: necessary condition analysis (NCA) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). The study covers variables related to economics, human geography, energy, and institutions, showing significant variations among them. The NCA model identifies economic complexity and fossil energy consumption as necessary conditions for high-carbon emission intensity. On the other hand, the fsQCA model reveals sufficient conditions for both high- and low-carbon emission intensity, presenting different causal combinations of variables. For high-carbon emission intensity, nine causal solutions are identified, emphasizing the roles of economic growth, urbanization, fossil energy consumption, and institutional quality. Reducing carbon emission intensity requires addressing economic complexity and reducing reliance on fossil energy consumption. Policymakers should focus on sustainable economic development, environmentally friendly urbanization, and transitioning to renewable energy sources. This research’s originality lies in its qualitative approach, going beyond traditional regression methods to explore necessary and sufficient conditions for carbon emission intensity. It offers valuable insights into the complex interplay of variables, providing multiple causal configurations for both high- and low-carbon emission intensity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The corresponding authors can provide the data used in the study on appropriate requests.
References
Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA, Yared P (2012) Income and democracy. Am Econ J Macroecon 4(3):217–245. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.4.3.217
Ali HS, Zeqiraj V, Lin WL, Law SH, Yusop Z, Bare UAA, Chin L (2019) Does quality institutions promote environmental quality? Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:10446–10456
Ali J, Akram V, Burhan M (2022a) Does economic complexity lead to global carbon emissions convergence? Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(30):45646–45655
Ali U, Guo Q, Kartal MT, Nurgazina Z, Khan ZA, Sharif A (2022b) The impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on carbon emission intensity in China: fresh evidence from novel dynamic ARDL simulations. J Environ Manage 320:115782
Ali U, Guo Q, Nurgazina Z, Sharif A, Kartal MT, Depren SK, Khan A (2023) Heterogeneous impact of industrialization, foreign direct investments, and technological innovation on carbon emissions intensity: evidence from Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Appl Energy 336:120804
Alonso-Dos-Santos M, Llanos-Contreras O (2019) Family business performance in a post-disaster scenario: the influence of socioemotional wealth importance and entrepreneurial orientation. J Bus Res 101:492–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.057
Amin N, Shabbir MS, Song H, Farrukh MU, Iqbal S, Abbass K (2023) A step towards environmental mitigation: do green technological innovation and institutional quality make a difference? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 190:122413
Ang BW (2007) Monitoring changes in economy-wide energy efficiency: from energy–GDP ratio to composite efficiency index. Energy Policy 35(4):2544–2551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.003
Awodumi OB, Adewuyi AO (2020) The role of non-renewable energy consumption in economic growth and carbon emission: evidence from oil producing economies in Africa. Energ Strat Rev 27:100434
Azam M, Liu L, Ahmad N (2021) Impact of institutional quality on environment and energy consumption: evidence from developing world. Environ Dev Sustain 23:1646–1667
Bakhsh S, Yin H, Shabir M (2021) Foreign investment and CO2 emissions: do technological innovation and institutional quality matter? Evidence from system GMM approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(15):19424–19438
Boleti E, Garas A, Kyriakou A, Lapatinas A (2021) Economic complexity and environmental performance: evidence from a world sample. Environ Model Assess 26:251–270
Burke PJ, von Haldenwang C, Birkmann J (2009) Conflict and natural disasters: exploring the links between poverty and disaster vulnerability in Honduras. Disasters 33(4):559–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01110.x
Creutzig F, Goldschmidt JC, Lehmann P, Schmid E, von Blücher F (2015) The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change. Nat Energy 1:16140. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.140
Ding H (2022) What kinds of countries have better innovation performance?–A country-level fsQCA and NCA study. J Innov Knowl 7(4):100215
Doğan B, Driha OM, Balsalobre Lorente D, Shahzad U (2021) The mitigating effects of economic complexity and renewable energy on carbon emissions in developed countries. Sustain Dev 29(1):1–12
Dong F, Yu B, Hadachin T, Dai Y, Wang Y, Zhang S, Long R (2018) Drivers of carbon emission intensity change in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 129:187–201
Dul J (2016) Necessary condition analysis (NCA): logic and methodology of “necessary but not sufficient” causality. Organ Res Methods 19(1):10–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115584005
Dul J, van der Laan E, Kuik R (2020) A statistical significance test for necessary condition analysis. Organ Res Methods 23(2):385–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118795272
Elahi E, Khalid Z, Zhang Z (2022) Understanding farmers’ intention and willingness to install renewable energy technology: a solution to reduce the environmental emissions of agriculture. Applied Energy 309:118459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118459
Elahi E, Khalid Z, Tauni MZ, Zhang H, Lirong X (2022) Extreme weather events risk to crop-production and the adaptation of innovative management strategies to mitigate the risk: a retrospective survey of rural Punjab, Pakistan. Technovation 117:102255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102255
Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2023) Non-renewable energy consumption (million tone oil equivalent). Available online: https://www.eia.gov/international/data/world/
Fan G, Zhu A, Xu H (2023) Analysis of the impact of industrial structure upgrading and energy structure optimization on carbon emission reduction. Sustainability 15(4):3489. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043489
Fischer C, Newell RG (2008) Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. J Environ Econ Manag 55(2):142–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2007.08.005
Fiss PC (2011) Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad Manag J 54(2):393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
Fragile States Index (FSI) (2023) Available online: https://fragilestatesindex.org/excel/
Godil DI, Sharif A, Agha H, Jermsittiparsert K (2020) The dynamic nonlinear influence of ICT, financial development, and institutional quality on CO2 emission in Pakistan: new insights from QARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:24190–24200
Haldar A, Sethi N (2021) Effect of institutional quality and renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions− an empirical investigation for developing countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(12):15485–15503
Huang Y, Zhu H, Zhang Z (2020) The heterogeneous effect of driving factors on carbon emission intensity in the Chinese transport sector: evidence from dynamic panel quantile regression. Sci Total Environ 727:138578
Huang Y, Li S, Xiang X, Bu Y, Guo Y (2022) How can the combination of entrepreneurship policies activate regional innovation capability? A comparative study of Chinese provinces based on fsQCA. J Innov Knowl 7(3):100227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100227
Jiao B (2019) Research of environmental assessment model based on fragile state index. In IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 493(1):012038 (IOP Publishing)
Kazemzadeh E, Fuinhas JA, Salehnia N, Koengkan M, Shirazi M, Osmani F (2022) Factors driving CO2 emissions: the role of energy transition and brain drain. Environ Dev Sustain pp 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02780-y
Kazemzadeh E, Fuinhas JA, Salehnia N, Koengkan M, Silva N (2023) Assessing influential factors for ecological footprints: a complex solution approach. J Clean Prod 414:137574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137574
Khezri M, Heshmati A, Khodaei M (2022) Environmental implications of economic complexity and its role in determining how renewable energies affect CO2 emissions. Appl Energy 306:117948
Koengkan M, Silva N, Fuinhas JA (2023) Assessing energy performance certificates for buildings: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) of Portuguese municipalities. Energies 2023(16):3240. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073240
Kraus S, Ribeiro-Soriano D, Schussler M (2018) Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research−the rise of a method. Int Entrep Manag J 14(1):15–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0461-8
Kumpel E, Albert J, Peletz R, de Waal D, Hirn M, Danilenko A, ..., Khush R (2016) Urban water services in fragile states: an analysis of drinking water sources and quality in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, and Monrovia, Liberia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 95(1):229
Li W, Fan Y (2023) Influence of green finance on carbon emission intensity: empirical evidence from China based on spatial metrology. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(8):20310–20326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23523-6
Li X, Ou X, Zhang X, Zhang Q, Zhang X (2013) Life-cycle fossil energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission intensity of dominant secondary energy pathways of China in 2010. Energy 50:15–23
Li HS, Geng YC, Shinwari R, Yangjie W, Rjoub H (2021) Does renewable energy electricity and economic complexity index help to achieve carbon neutrality target of top exporting countries? J Environ Manage 299:113386
Liu C, Zhao G (2021) Can global value chain participation affect embodied carbon emission intensity? J Clean Prod 287:125069
Maino R, Emrullahu D (2022) Climate change in Sub-Saharan Africa fragile states: evidence from panel estimations. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2022/03/18/Climate-Change-in-Sub-Saharan-Africa-Fragile-States-Evidence-from-Panel-Estimations-515159
Mendel JM, Korjani MM (2012) Charles Ragin’s fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) used for linguistic summarizations. Inf Sci 202:1–23
Misangyi VF, Greckhamer T, Furnari S, Fiss PC, Crilly D, Aguilera R (2017) Embracing causal complexity: the emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. J Manag 43(1):255–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679252
Newman P, Beatley T, Boyer H (2012) Resilient cities: responding to peak oil and climate change. Island Press
Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC) (2023) Economic complexity index. Available online: https://oec.world/en/rankings/eci/hs6/hs96
Our World in Data (OWD) (2023) Carbon emission intensity of economies. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co2-intensity
Pan X, Uddin MK, Ai B, Pan X, Saima U (2019) Influential factors of carbon emissions intensity in OECD countries: evidence from symbolic regression. J Clean Prod 220:1194–1201
Pappas IO, Woodside AG (2021) Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing. Int J Inf Manag 58:102310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310
Ragin CC (1987) The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Univ, California Press
Ragin CC (2008) Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Rehman A, Ma H, Ozturk I (2021) Do industrialization, energy importations, and economic progress influence carbon emission in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:45840–45852
Rihoux B, Ragin CC (2009) Configurational comparative methods: qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques, vol 51. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Romero JP, Gramkow C (2021) Economic complexity and greenhouse gas emissions. World Dev 139:105317
Salman M, Long X, Dauda L, Mensah CN (2019) The impact of institutional quality on economic growth and carbon emissions: evidence from Indonesia, South Korea and Thailand. J Clean Prod 241:118331
Schneider CQ, Wagemann C (2012) Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: a guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schneider MR, Schulze-Bentrop C, Paunescu M (2010) Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: a fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. J Int Bus Stud 41(2):246–266
Sugiura A, Nagata D, Fujikura R, Nakata T (2020) The causal relationships between energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in the ASEAN-5 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(11):12260–12273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07874-8
Taghvaee VM, Nodehi M, Saboori B (2022) Economic complexity and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: sector-wise Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(53):80860–80870
Tao M, Sheng MS, Wen L (2023) How does financial development influence carbon emission intensity in the OECD countries: some insights from the information and communication technology perspective. J Environ Manag 335:117553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117553
Woodside AG (2013) Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. J Bus Res 64(4):463–472
Woodside AG, Zhang M (2013) Cultural diversity and marketing transactions: are market integration, large community size, and world religions necessary for fairness in ephemeral exchanges? Psychol Mark 30(3):263–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20603
World Bank Open Data (WBD) (2023a) GDP (constant 2015 US$). Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD. Accessed 7 Jan 2023
World Bank Open Data (WBD) (2023b) Urban population (% of total population). Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS. Accessed 7 Jan 2023
World Bank Open Data (WBD) (2023c) Industry (including construction), value added (% GDP). Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.IND.TOTL.ZS. Accessed 7 Jan 2023
World Bank Open Data (WBD) (2023d) Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI). Available online: https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/. Accessed 7 Jan 2023
Xiao H, Ma Z, Zhang P, Liu M (2019) Study of the impact of energy consumption structure on carbon emission intensity in China from the perspective of spatial effects. Nat Hazards 99:1365–1380
Xiong Q, Sun D (2022) Influence analysis of green finance development impact on carbon emissions: an exploratory study based on fsQCA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(22):61369–61380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18351-z
Xue LM, Meng S, Wang JX, Liu L, Zheng ZX (2020) Influential factors regarding carbon emission intensity in China: a spatial econometric analysis from a provincial perspective. Sustainability 12(19):8097
Zhang YJ, Liu Z, Zhang H, Tan TD (2014) The impact of economic growth, industrial structure and urbanization on carbon emission intensity in China. Nat Hazards 73:579–595
Zhang F, Deng X, Phillips F, Fang C, Wang C (2020) Impacts of industrial structure and technical progress on carbon emission intensity: evidence from 281 cities in China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 154:119949
Zhou G, Zhu J, Luo S, Wu Z, Jiang Y (2020) An evaluation method of Fragile States Index based on climate shock: a case of Bangladesh. J Environ Manage 275:111142
Funding
The research is supported by the postdoctoral project grant of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), Economics Department (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences). The research is supported by the CeBER, R&D unit, funded by national funds through FCT–Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., project UIDB/05037/2020. UCILeR is an R&D Unit accredited and funded by the FCT–Portugal National Agency within the scope of its strategic project: UIDB/04643/2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.K.: writing-original draft and editing, validation, data curation, and project administration, conceptualization, formal analysis, and visualization; J.A.F.: introduction and editing; N.S.: supervision and editing; M.K.: discussion and editing; N.M.S.: data and methodology and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The authors attested that this paper has not been published elsewhere, the work has not been submitted simultaneously for publication elsewhere, and the results presented in this work are true and not manipulated.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kazemzadeh, E., Fuinhas, J.A., Salehnia, N. et al. Exploring necessary and sufficient conditions for carbon emission intensity: a comparative analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 97319–97338 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29260-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29260-8