Abstract
South Asian region is extremely vulnerable to climate change which hampers its attainment of the sustainable development goals (SDGs). This study explores how sustainable development of South Asian nations is affected by the clean or renewable energy consumption, globalization, population growth and deliberative democracy. To tackle the effects of shocks within the cross-sectional units as well as to account for endogeneity, this study utilizes Common Correlated Effects Mean Group-Generalized Method of Moments (CCE-GMM) estimation technique proposed by Neal (2015). Common Correlated Effects Mean Group (CCE-MG) of Pesaran 2006 and Augmented Mean Group (AMG) by Eberhardt and Teal (2010) and Eberhardt and Bond (2009) techniques are also utilized as robustness checks. The empirical results reveal that the consumption of renewable or clean energy can significantly and positively affect sustainable development, implying that deploying clean energy technologies is helpful to achieve SDG agenda in South Asia. Population growth is found to be hampering sustainable development while deliberative democracy ensures this development. The impact of globalization on sustainable development was found to be negative yet insignificant. Bidirectional causal relationship was discovered between sustainable development and renewable energy, between population and sustainable development, between deliberative democracy and sustainable development and between deliberative democracy and globalization. Finally, the study provides policy directions to achieve sustainable development in South Asia via enhanced integration of renewable energy in the region’s energy mix.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Available upon request from the corresponding author.
References
Acheampong AO, Opoku EEO, Dzator J (2022) Does democracy really improve environmental quality? Empirical contribution to the environmental politics debate. Energy Econ 109:105942
Adeleye BN (2021) Investigating growth-energy-emissions trilemma in South Asia. Int J Energy Econ Policy
Ahmed Z, Ahmad M, Rjoub H, Kalugina OA, Hussain N (2022) Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development. Sustain Dev 30(4):595–605
Alam S, Fatima A, Butt MS (2007) Sustainable development in Pakistan in the context of energy consumption demand and environmental degradation. J Asian Econ 18(5):825–837
Al-Mulali U, Solarin SA, Sheau-Ting L, Ozturk I (2016) Does moving towards renewable energy cause water and land inefficiency? An empirical investigation. Energy Policy 93:303–314
Alola AA, Bekun FV, Sarkodie SA (2019) Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Sci Total Environ 685:702–709
Amna Intisar R, Yaseen MR, Kousar R, Usman M, Makhdum MSA (2020) Impact of trade openness and human capital on economic growth: a comparative investigation of Asian countries. Sustainability 12(7):2930
Anser MK, Shabbir MS, Tabash MI, Shah SHA, Ahmad M, Peng MYP, Lopez LB (2021) Do renewable energy sources improve clean environmental-economic growth? Empirical investigation from South Asian economies. Energy Explor Exploit 39(5):1491–1514
Azam M, Hunjra AI, Bouri E, Tan Y, Al-Faryan MAS (2021) Impact of institutional quality on sustainable development: Evidence from developing countries. J Environ Manag 298:113465
Barlas A (2019) Democracy, nationalism, and communalism: The colonial legacy in South Asia. Routledge
Batool Z, Raza SMF, Ali S, Abidin SZU (2022) ICT, renewable energy, financial development, and CO2 emissions in developing countries of East and South Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(23):35025–35035
Cheema, A.R. (2022). South Asian Countries’ Progress on Sustainable Development Goals. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/southasia/2022/03/14/south-asian-countries-progress-on-sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed on 28 April, 2023
Chen Y, Lee CC, Chen M (2022) Ecological footprint, human capital, and urbanization. Energy Environ 33(3):487–510
Cheng C, Ren X, Wang Z (2019) The impact of renewable energy and innovation on carbon emission: an empirical analysis for OECD countries. Energy Proc 158:3506–3512
Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econ 188(2):393–420
De Soysa I, Bailey J, Neumayer E (2012) Free to squander?: democracy and sustainable development. Global Environ Change Human Sec 261:1975–2000
Destek MA, Sinha A (2020) Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod 242:118537
Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1074–1085
Dogan E, Majeed MT, Luni T (2022) Revisiting the nexus of ecological footprint, unemployment, and renewable and non-renewable energy for South Asian economies: Evidence from novel research methods. Renew Energy 194:1060–1070
Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29(4):1450–1460
Eberhardt M (2012) Estimating panel time-series models with heterogeneous slopes. Stata J 12(1):61–71
Eberhardt, M., & Bond, S. (2009). Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: a novel estimator
Eberhardt M, Teal F (2010) Productivity analysis in global manufacturing production. Eco-nomics series. Working papers: 515. University of Oxford Department of Economics
Figge L, Oebels K, Offermans A (2017) The effects of globalization on Ecological Footprints: an empirical analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 19(3):863–876
Godil DI, Sharif A, Rafique S, Jermsittiparsert K (2020) The asymmetric effect of tourism, financial development, and globalization on ecological footprint in Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(32):40109–40120
Guo Q, Shah MI, Kumar S, AbdulKareem HK, Inuwa N (2023a) The roles of organic farming, renewable energy, and corruption on biodiversity crisis: a European perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(11):31696–31710
Guo Q, Shah MI, Kumar S, AbdulKareem HK, Inuwa N (2023b) The roles of organic farming, renewable energy, and corruption on biodiversity crisis: a European perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(11):31696–31710
Gutmann A, Thompson D (2016) What deliberative democracy means. Democracy: A reader. Columbia University Press, p 415
Haseeb M, Azam M (2021) Dynamic nexus among tourism, corruption, democracy and environmental degradation: a panel data investigation. Environment, development and sustainability 23(4):5557–5575
Henry J (2001) Creativity and perception in management. Walton Hall Publication
Heo U, Hahm SD (2015) Democracy, institutional maturity, and economic development. Soc Sci Q 96(4):1041–1058
Hickel J (2020) The sustainable development index: Measuring the ecological efficiency of human development in the anthropocene. Ecol Econ 167:106331
Irfan M, Mahapatra B, Ojha RK (2021) Examining the effectiveness of low-carbon strategies in South Asian countries: the case of energy efficiency and renewable energy. Environ Dev Sustain 23:11936–11952
Kassouri Y, Altıntaş H (2020) Human well-being versus ecological footprint in MENA countries: a trade-off? J Environ Manag 263:110405
Kirikkaleli D, Adebayo TS, Khan Z, Ali S (2021) Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(11):14009–14017
Li Q, Cherian J, Shabbir MS, Sial MS, Li J, Mester I, Badulescu A (2021) Exploring the relationship between renewable energy sources and economic growth the case of SAARC countries. Energies 14(3):520
Mendenhall M et al (1995) Global management. Blackwell Publishers, USA, Massachusetts
Murshed M (2021) Can regional trade integration facilitate renewable energy transition to ensure energy sustainability in South Asia? Energy Rep 7:808–821
Murshed M, Ahmed R, Kumpamool C, Bassim M, Elheddad M (2021) The effects of regional trade integration and renewable energy transition on environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian neighbors. Bus Strateg Environ 30(8):4154–4170
Murshed M, Haseeb M, Alam MS (2022) The environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for carbon and ecological footprints in South Asia: the role of renewable energy. Geo J 87(3):2345–2372
Neal T (2015) Estimating heterogeneous coefficients in panel data models with endogenous regressors and common factors. Workblacking paper 2009:1–29
Norouzi N, Ataei E (2021) Globalization and sustainable development. Int J Innov Res Human 1(2):66–74
Pandey A, Asif M (2022) Assessment of energy and environmental sustainability in South Asia in the perspective of the Sustainable Development Goals. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2022:112492
Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74(4):967–1012
Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econ 142(1):50–93
Phillips PC, Sul D (2003) Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence. Econ J 6(1):217–259
Rahman MM, Alam K (2021) Clean energy, population density, urbanization and environmental pollution nexus: Evidence from Bangladesh. Renew Energy 172:1063–1072
Rahman MM, Velayutham E (2020) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-economic growth nexus: new evidence from South Asia. Renew Energy 147:399–408
Rahman MM, Saidi K, Mbarek MB (2020) Economic growth in South Asia: the role of CO2 emissions, population density and trade openness. Heliyon 6(5):e03903
Rehman A (2019) The nexus of electricity access, population growth, economic growth in Pakistan and projection through 2040: An ARDL to co-integration approach. Int J Energy Sect Manag 13(3):747
Sabir S, Gorus MS (2019) The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(32):33387–33398
Sachs J, Kroll C, Lafortune G, Fuller G, Woelm F (2021) Sustainable development report 2021. Cambridge University Press
Safdar S, Khan A, Andlib Z (2022) Impact of good governance and natural resource rent on economic and environmental sustainability: an empirical analysis for South Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(55):82948–82965
Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A (2020) The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. J Clean Prod 250:119518
Shah MI, AbdulKareem HK, Ishola BD, Abbas S (2022b) The roles of energy, natural resources, agriculture and regional integration on CO2 emissions in selected countries of ASEAN: does political constraint matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–15
Seth, S. (2023). South Asian Countries: The New Face of Emerging Economies
Shah MI, AbdulKareem HK, Abbas S (2022a) Examining the agriculture induced Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in BRICS economies: The role of renewable energy as a moderator. Renew Energy 198:343–351
Sharma GD, Shah MI, Shahzad U, Jain M, Chopra R (2021) Exploring the nexus between agriculture and greenhouse gas emissions in BIMSTEC region: The role of renewable energy and human capital as moderators. J Environ Manag 297:113316
Shukla AK, Sudhakar K, Baredar P (2017) Renewable energy resources in South Asian countries: Challenges, policy and recommendations. Resour -Efficient Technol 3(3):342–346
Tekbaş M (2021) The Impact of Economic, Social and Political Globalization on Economic Growth: Evidence from BRICS-T Countries. Gaziantep Univ J Soc Sci 20(1):57–71
Umar M, Ji X, Kirikkaleli D, Shahbaz M, Zhou X (2020) Environmental cost of natural resources utilization and economic growth: can China shift some burden through globalization for sustainable development? Sustain Dev 28(6):1678–1688
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific . (2017). Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in South Asia: Key Policy Priorities and Implementation Challenges. UN
Usman M, Hammar N (2021) Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(12):15519–15536
Usman M, Radulescu M (2022) Examining the role of nuclear and renewable energy in reducing carbon footprint: does the role of technological innovation really create some difference? Sci Total Environ 841:156662
Usman O, Iorember PT, Olanipekun IO (2019) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in India. In: The effects of energy consumption and democracy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:13390–13400
Uzar, U. (2021) The relationship between institutional quality and ecological footprint: Is there a connection? In Natural Resources Forum 45(4), 380-396. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wang J, Dong K (2019) What drives environmental degradation? Evidence from 14 Sub-Saharan African countries. Sci Total Environ 656:165–173
Wang Q, Li L (2021) The effects of population aging, life expectancy, unemployment rate, population density, per capita GDP, urbanization on per capita carbon emissions. Sustain Prod Consump 28:760–774
Wang J, You S, Agyekum EB, Matasane C, Uhunamure SE (2022) Exploring the Impacts of Renewable Energy, Environmental Regulations, and Democracy on Ecological Footprints in the Next Eleven Nations. Sustainability 14(19):11909
Westerlund J (2007) Error correction based panel cointegration tests. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69:709–748
Willis R, Curato N, Smith G (2022) Deliberative democracy and the climate crisis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 13(2):e759
World Bank (2016) South Asia Economic Focus Spring 2016: Fading Tailwinds. The World Bank
Xue L, Haseeb M, Mahmood H, Alkhateeb TTY, Murshed M (2021) Renewable energy use and ecological footprints mitigation: evidence from selected South Asian economies. Sustainability 13(4):1613
Yang X, Li N, Mu H, Zhang M, Pang J, Ahmad M (2021) Study on the long-term and short-term effects of globalization and population aging on ecological footprint in OECD countries. Ecol Complex 47:100946
Funding
The research funding from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Ural Federal University Program of Development within the Priority-2030 Program) is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.Z: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing - Original Draft, Supervision; Z.K.: Resources, Writing - Original Draft, Formal analysis; S.A.: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - review & editing; H.A.: Resources; Writing - Original Draft
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
All authors have given explicit consent to submit and publish this work.
Competing interests
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, ., Khan, Z., Abbas, S. et al. The roles of renewable energy, globalization, population expansion and deliberative democracy on Sustainable Development in South Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 88775–88788 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28690-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28690-8