Skip to main content
Log in

Joint effects of phenol, chlorophenol pesticide, phthalate, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon on bone mineral density: comparison of four statistical models

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exposure to phenols, phthalates, pesticides, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) can harm the skeleton. However, data about the joint effects of these chemicals’ mixture on bone health are limited. The final analysis involved 6766 participants aged over 20 years recruited from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Generalized linear regression, weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression, Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR), and quantile g-computation (qgcomp) were performed to investigate the association of the urinary levels of chemicals (three phenols, two chlorophenol pesticides, nine phthalates, and six polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon [PAH] metabolites) with bone mineral density (BMD) measurements and osteoporosis (OP) risk. Generalized linear regression identified that benzophenone-3, 2,4-dichlorophenol, mono-n-butyl phthalate, 1-napthol, 3-fluorene, 2-fluorene, and 1-phenanthrene were significantly associated with lower BMD and increased OP risk. The WQS index was negatively associated with total femur, femoral neck, and lumbar spine vertebra 1 (L1) BMD among all the participants, with corresponding β (95% confidence interval) values of −0.028 g/cm2 (−0.040, −0.017), −0.015 g/cm2 (−0.025, −0.004), and −0.018 g/cm2 (−0.033, −0.003). In the BKMR analysis, the overall effect of the mixture was significantly associated with femoral neck BMD among males and OP risk among females. The qgcomp model found a significant association between co-exposure and L1 BMD among all the participants and among males. Our study presents compelling epidemiological evidence that co-exposure to phenols, chlorophenol pesticides, phthalates, and PAHs is associated with reduced BMD and elevated OP risk. It provides epidemiologic evidence for the detrimental effects of these chemicals on bone health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All raw data is available and will be provided as per requirement.

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 82273711, 72061137006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dong-sheng Di: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing; Ru-yi Zhang: investigation, methodology, validation, review & editing; Hao-long Zhou: investigation, methodology, validation; Mu-hong Wei: investigation, methodology, validation; Yuan Cui: investigation, methodology, validation; Jian-li Zhang: investigation, methodology; Ting-ting Yuan: investigation, methodology; Qian Liu: investigation, methodology; Ting-ting Zhou: investigation, methodology; Qi Wang: conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The NHANES agreement has been reviewed and approved by the NCHS Research Ethics Committee. All participants provided written informed consent before participating.

Consent to participate

Not applicable here.

Consent for publication

The manuscript is approved by all authors for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Lotfi Aleya

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 19149 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di, D., Zhang, R., Zhou, H. et al. Joint effects of phenol, chlorophenol pesticide, phthalate, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon on bone mineral density: comparison of four statistical models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 80001–80013 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28065-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28065-z

Keywords

Navigation