Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of deep learning and transform domain feature extraction techniques for land cover classification: balancing through augmentation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The identification of features that can improve classification accuracy is a major concern in land cover classification research. This paper compares deep learning and transform domain feature extraction techniques for land cover classification of SAR data on balanced and imbalanced training sets. Convolutional autoencoders (CAE), variational autoencoders (VAE), and Haar wavelet transforms (HWT) are used and evaluated for feature generation capability. Variations in features of CAE and HWT help gather more information about the image patch. The fusion of CAE and HWT features provides a combination of high- and low-frequency coefficients, respectively, which improves classification accuracy for various land covers. To assess features generated through fusion of features, RISAT-1 C-band and AIRSAR L-band datasets are used. Furthermore, agricultural/grass land has similar features with open forest which leads to misclassification of forest in agricultural/grass land. Increasing the number of samples in each class using the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) increases training samples. Hierarchical classification of the above-mentioned features, where agricultural/grass land and forest classes are discriminated, improves classification results. This paper evaluates all the three types of features and fused features and provides a guidance for land cover classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All relevant data and material are presented in the main paper.

References

  • Anand R, Veni S, Aravinth J (2021) Robust classification technique for hyperspectral images based on 3D-discrete wavelet transform. Remote Sens 13(7):1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhuvan. (n.d.). Online Map Bhuvan-Thematic Services, LULC-50K map/NRC, NRSC/ISRO - India. Retrieved December 26, 2020, from https://bhuvan-noeda.nrsc.gov.in/theme/thematic/theme.php

  • Bloice MD, Stocker C, Holzinger A (2017) Augmentor: an image augmentation library for machine learning. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1708.04680

  • Buslaev A, Iglovikov VI, Khvedchenya E, Parinov A, Druzhinin M, Kalinin AA (2020) Albumentations: fast and flexible image augmentations. Information 11(2):125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao R, Tu W, Yang C, Li Q, Liu J, Zhu J et al (2020) Deep learning-based remote and social sensing data fusion for urban region function recognition. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 163:82–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP (2002) SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res 16:321–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhajer P, Shah M, Kshirsagar A (2022) The applications of artificial neural networks, support vector machines, and long–short term memory for stock market prediction. Decision Anal J 2:100015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chollet F, others (2015) Keras. GitHub

  • De S, Bruzzone L, Bhattacharya A, Bovolo F, Chaudhuri S (2017) A novel technique based on deep learning and a synthetic target database for classification of urban areas in PolSAR data. IEEE J Select Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 11(1):154–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diederik PK, Welling M, others (2014) Auto-encoding variational Bayes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (Vol. 1)

  • Dong G, Liao G, Liu H, Kuang G (2018) A review of the autoencoder and its variants: a comparative perspective from target recognition in synthetic-aperture radar images. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Magazine 6(3):44–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Y, Song W, He Q, Huang D, Liotta A, Su C (2019) Deep learning with multi-scale feature fusion in remote sensing for automatic oceanic eddy detection. Information Fusion 49:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan Y, Liu F, Jiao L, Zhao P, Zhang L (2017) SAR Image segmentation based on convolutional-wavelet neural network and Markov random field. Pattern Recogn 64:255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earth online: Esa earth observation data [online] (Accessed on: January 2019) from

  • Feng X, Zhang W, Su X, Xu Z (2021) Optical remote sensing image denoising and super-resolution reconstructing using optimized generative network in wavelet transform domain. Remote Sens 13(9):1858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garza-Ulloa J (2018) Chapter 6 - Application of mathematical models in biomechatronics: artificial intelligence and time-frequency analysis. In: Garza-Ulloa J (ed) Applied Biomechatronics using Mathematical Models. Academic Press, pp 373–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812594-6.00006-8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gong J, Liu C, Huang X (2020) Advances in urban information extraction from high-resolution remote sensing imagery. Sci China Earth Sci 63(4):463–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow, I. J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., … Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial networks. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1406.2661.

  • Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. MIT Press

  • Graps A (1995) An introduction to wavelets. IEEE Comput Sci Eng 2(2):50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haut JM, Fernandez-Beltran R, Paoletti ME, Plaza J, Plaza A (2019) Remote sensing image superresolution using deep residual channel attention. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 57(11):9277–9289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooda R, Joshi V, Shah M (2022) A comprehensive review of approaches to detect fatigue using machine learning techniques. Chron Diseas Trans Med 8(1):26–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou B, Kou H, Jiao L (2016) Classification of Polarimetric SAR Images using multilayer autoencoders and superpixels. IEEE J Select Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 9(7):3072–3081. https://earth.esa.int/web/polsarpro/data-sources/sample-datasets

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JS (1980) Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics. IEEE Transac Patt Anal Mach Intell n.d. (2):165–168

  • Lee JS (2009) Polarimetric radar imaging: from basics to applications. Jong-Sen Lee, Eric Pottier. Optical science and engineering, vol 143. CRC. London: Taylor & Francis [distributor], Boca Raton, Fla

  • Lee T-HH (2017) Wavelet analysis for image processing. Institute of Communication Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Li W, Liu H, Wang Y, Li Z, Jia Y, Gui G (2019) Deep learning-based classification methods for remote sensing images in urban built-up areas. IEEE Access 7:36274–36284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Liu Y, Zhang X, Ye Y, Yin G, Johnson BA (2019) Deep learning in remote sensing applications: a meta-analysis and review. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 152:166–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao D, Wang Z, Du B, Li L, Tian Y, Jia M et al (2020) National wetland mapping in China: a new product resulting from object-based and hierarchical classification of Landsat 8 OLI images. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 164:11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masci J, Meier U, Cirecsan D, Schmidhuber J (2011) Stacked convolutional auto-encoders for hierarchical feature extraction. In International conference on artificial neural networks (pp. 52–59)

  • Memon N, Parikh H, Patel SB, Patel D, Patel VD (2021) Automatic land cover classification of multi-resolution dualpol data using convolutional neural network (CNN). Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ 22:100491

    Google Scholar 

  • Modi Y, Teli R, Mehta A et al (2022) A comprehensive review on intelligent traffic management using machine learning algorithms. Innov Infrastruct Solut 7:128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00718-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijhawan R, Das J, Raman B (2019) A hybrid of deep learning and hand-crafted features based approach for snow cover mapping. Int J Remote Sens 40(2):759–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parikh HI, Patel SB, Patel VD (2019) Land cover classification using ensemble techniques. In International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence (pp. 340–349)

  • Patel D, Patel S, Patel P et al (2022) Solar radiation and solar energy estimation using ANN and Fuzzy logic concept: A comprehensive and systematic study. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19185-z

  • Petrovska B, Zdravevski E, Lameski P, Corizzo R, Štajduhar I, Lerga J (2020) Deep learning for feature extraction in remote sensing: a case-study of aerial scene classification. Sensors 20(14):3906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raney RK (2006) Dual-polarized SAR and stokes parameters. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 3(3):317–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raney RK, Cahill JTS, Patterson GW, Bussey DBJ (2012) The m-chi decomposition of hybrid dual-polarimetric radar data with application to lunar craters. J Geophys Res Planets, 117(E12)

  • Rezende DJ, Mohamed S, Wierstra D (2014) Stochastic backpropagation and approximate inference in deep generative models. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1401.4082

  • Romero A, Gatta C, Camps-Valls G (2015) Unsupervised deep feature extraction for remote sensing image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 54(3):1349–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah A, Gor M, Sagar M et al (2022a) A stock market trading framework based on deep learning architectures. Multimed Tools Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12328-x

  • Shah K, Mehta A, Shah M (2022b) Prediction of geothermal wells location and hot water temperature using machine learning. Petrol Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptlrs.2022.02.002

  • Shang R, Wang G, Okoth A, M., & Jiao, L. (2019) Complex-valued convolutional autoencoder and spatial pixel-squares refinement for polarimetric SAR image classification. Remote Sens 11(5):522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao Z, Tang P, Wang Z, Saleem N, Yam S, Sommai C (2020) BRRNet: A fully convolutional neural network for automatic building extraction from high-resolution remote sensing images. Remote Sens 12(6):1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silla CN, Freitas AA (2011) A survey of hierarchical classification across different application domains. Data Min Knowl Disc 22(1):31–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha S, Santra A, Mitra SS (2020) Semi-automated impervious feature extraction using built-up indices developed from space-borne optical and SAR remotely sensed sensors. Adv Space Res 66(6):1372–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanković RS, Falkowski BJ (2003) The Haar wavelet transform: its status and achievements. Comput Electr Eng 29(1):25–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7906(01)00011-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Story M, Congalton RG (1986) Accuracy assessment: a user’s perspective. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 52(3):397–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushra T, Iyengar N, Shah M et al (2022) Judging a book by its cover: significance of UX design in gamification and computing systems. Iran J Comput Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42044-021-00096-0

  • Tammireddy PR, Tammu R (2014) Image Reconstruction using wavelet transform with extended fractional fourier Transform

  • Thacker M, Shah L, Shah M (2022) Society sync–digitalize society management systems with artificial intelligence technologies. Intell Syst Appl 14:200069

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakkar S, Joshi MV (2017) Classification of human actions using 3-d convolutional neural networks: a hierarchical approach. In National Conference on Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition, Image Processing, and Graphics (pp. 14–23)

  • Turkar V, De S, Ponnurangam GG, Deo R, Rao YS, Das A (2013) Classification of RISAT-1 hybrid polarimetric data for various land features. In Conference Proceedings of 2013 Asia-Pacific Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar (APSAR) (pp. 494-497). IEEE

  • Walker JS (2008) A primer on wavelets and their scientific applications. CRC press

  • Wang H, Wu X, Huang Z, Xing EP (2020) High-frequency component helps explain the generalization of convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 8684–8694)

  • Wang L, Song W, Liu P (2016) Link the remote sensing big data to the image features via wavelet transformation. Clust Comput 19(2):793–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Wang Y, Liu H, Zuo Q, He J (2017) Feature-fused SAR target discrimination using multiple convolutional neural networks. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 14(10):1695–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Z, Sun J, Xu C, Wang H (2021) Unknown SAR target identification method based on feature extraction network and KLD--RPA Joint Discrimination. Remote Sens 13(15):2901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A, Yang X, Fang S, Ai J (2020) Region level SAR image classification using deep features and spatial constraints. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 163:36–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Li W, Li Y (2019) SAR Image Despeckling Using Multiconnection Network Incorporating Wavelet Features. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett

  • Zhang Z, Wang H, Xu F, Jin YQ (2017) Complex-valued convolutional neural network and its application in polarimetric SAR image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55(12):7177–7188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu XX, Tuia D, Mou L, Xia G-S, Zhang L, Xu F, Fraundorfer F (2017) Deep learning in remote sensing: a comprehensive review and list of resources. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Magazine 5(4):8–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to SAC, ISRO Ahmedabad, for providing RISAT-1 data and are thankful to European Space Agency for providing Flevoland dataset used in this paper. The authors are also thankful to SAC/ISRO for providing MIDAS software. The authors have used land use/land cover information from the Natural Resources Census Project of National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC), ISRO, Hyderabad, and Google Earth imagery as reference.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors make a substantial contribution to this manuscript. HP, SP, and VP participated in drafting the manuscript. HP, SP, and VP wrote the main manuscript; all the authors discussed the results and implication on the manuscript at all stages.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samir Patel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parikh, H., Patel, S. & Patel, V. Evaluation of deep learning and transform domain feature extraction techniques for land cover classification: balancing through augmentation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 14464–14483 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23105-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23105-6

Keywords

Navigation