Abstract
In recent decades, the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and carbon emissions has garnered the extensive attention by researchers and governments across the globe. Also, for most part, empirical studies on this nexus have assumed a symmetric relationship through the imposition of linear specifications. However, such relationships do not account for asymmetries in the impact of FDI on carbon emissions. In the case of sub-Saharan Africa, such relationships are crucial and need more careful analysis given the important role FDI plays in the development of the sub-region. Thus, this paper examines the asymmetric effect of FDI on carbon emissions in 41 selected sub-Saharan African countries spanning from 1996 to 2018. In order to decompose FDI into positive and negative partial sum and examine possible asymmetric effects of the variables on carbon emissions, we used the panel nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) approach. This method accounts for cross-sectional variances. Our results show that in the long run, a positive shock in FDI increases carbon emissions while a negative shock lowers them. Our results also show that carbon emissions respond asymmetrically to changes in FDI. It is recommended that comprehensive investment policies aimed at encouraging clean technology and environmentally friendly investments be implemented to ensure environmental sustainability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data sources are outlined above in Table 1 and will be made available on demand.
References
Adejumo AV, Asongu SA (2020) Foreign direct investment, domestic investment and green growth in Nigeria: any spillovers? In International Business, Trade and Institutional Sustainability. Springer, Cham, pp 839–861
Ansari MA, Khan NA, Ganaie AA (2019) Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in Asian countries? A panel data analysis. OPEC Energy Review 43(2):109–135
Apergis N, Jebli MB, Youssef SB (2018) Does renewable energy consumption and health expenditures decrease carbon dioxide emissions? Evidence for sub-Saharan Africa countries. Renew Energy 127:1011–1016
Ashraf S, Umar Z (2022) The asymmetric relationship between foreign direct investment, oil prices and carbon emissions: evidence from Gulf Cooperative Council economies. Cogent Econ Finance 10(1):2080316
Asongu SA, Iheonu CO, Odo KO (2019) The conditional relationship between renewable energy and environmental quality in sub-Saharan Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:36993–37000
Bakhsh K, Rose S, Ali MF, Ahmad N, Shahbaz M (2017) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, renewable waste and FDI relation in Pakistan: new evidences from 3SLS. J Environ Manage 196:627–632
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Gokmenoglu KK, Taspinar N, Cantos- Cantos JM (2019) An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(22):23010–23026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x
Banerjee S, Murshed M (2020) Do emissions implied in net export validate the pollution haven conjecture? Analysis of G7 and BRICS countries. Int J Sustain Econ 12(3):297–319. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2020.10033008
Bhujabal P, Sethi N, Padhan PC (2021) ICT, foreign direct investment and environmental pollution in major Asia Pacific countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(31):42649–42669
Blackburne EF III, Frank MW (2007) Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels. Stand Genomic Sci 7:197–208
Bokpin GA (2017) Foreign direct investment and environmental sustainability in Africa: the role of institutions and governance. Res Int Bus Financ 39:239–247
Breitung J, Pesaran MH (2008) Unit roots and cointegration in panels. In Theeconometrics of panel data (pp. 279–322). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Chang SC (2015) Threshold effect of foreign direct investment on environmental degradation. Port Econ J 14(1):75–102
Cheng C, Ren X, Wang Z (2019) The impact of renewable energy and innovation on carbonemission: an empirical analysis for OECD countries. Energy Procedia 158:3506–3512
Demena BA, Afesorgbor SK (2020) The effect of FDI on environmental emissions: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Energy Policy 138:111192
Demena BA, van Bergeijk PA (2019) Observing FDI spillover transmission channels: evidencefrom firms in Uganda. Third World Quarterly 40(9):1708–1729
Duodu E, Kwarteng E, Oteng-Abayie EF, Frimpong PB (2021) Foreign direct investments and environmental quality in sub-Saharan Africa: the merits of policy and institutions for environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:66101–66120
Faheem M, Hussain S, Safdar N, Anwer MA (2022) Does foreign direct investment asymmetrically affect the mitigation of environmental degradation in Malaysia? Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:7393–7405
Gao X, Li X, Chishti MZ, Ullah S, Sohail S (2022) Decomposing the asymmetric effects of terrorism and FDI on carbon emission: evidence from fragile economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(27):41125–41139
Gujarati DN (1995) Basic econometric. The McGraw-Hill companies Inc, New York
Guoyan S, Khaskheli A, Raza SA, Shah N (2022) Analyzing the association between the foreign direct investment and carbon emissions in MENA countries: a pathway to sustainable development. Environ Dev Sustain 24(3):4226–4243
Hanif I (2018) Impact of economic growth, nonrenewable and renewable energy consumption, and urbanization on carbon emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(15):15057–15067
Haug AA, Ucal M (2019) The role of trade and FDI for CO2 emissions in Turkey: nonlinearrelationships. Energy Econ 81:297–307
Hille E, Shahbaz M, Moosa I (2019) The impact of FDI on regional air pollution in the Republic of Korea: a way ahead to achieve the green growth strategy? Energy Econ 81:308–326
Hou L, Li K, Li Q, Ouyang M (2021) Revisiting the location of FDI in China: a panel data approach with heterogeneous shocks. J Econom 221(2):483–509
Huang X, Liu W, Cao Z (2022) Environmental courts and foreign direct investments: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(21):31400–31412
IEA (2019) Africa Energy Outlook 2019. IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/africa-energy-outlook-2019
Jakada AH, Mahmood S (2020) An asymmetric effect of economic growth, foreign direct investment and financial development on the quality of environment in Nigeria. J Manag Theory Pract (JMTP) 5–13
Jarrett MB (2017) Lights out: poor governance and Africa’s energy crisis. The Africa Report. Available at: http://www.theafricareport.com/News-Analysis/lights-out-africas.html. Sccessed 1 Dec 2018
Jebli MB, Youssef SB, Apergis N (2019) The dynamic linkage between renewable energy, tourism, CO2 emissions, economic growth, foreign direct investment, and trade. Latin Am Econ Rev 28(1):1–19
Koçak E, Şarkgüneşi A (2018) The impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Turkey: new evidence from cointegration and bootstrap causality analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(1):790–804
Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103
Kwakwa PA, Alhassan H, Adu G (2019) Effect of natural resources extraction on energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission in Ghana. Int J Energy Sect Manage 14(1):20–39
Lau L-S, Choong C-K, Eng Y-K (2014) Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energy Policy 68:490–497
Lee JW (2013) The contribution of foreign direct investment to clean energy use, carbon emissions and economic growth. Energy Policy 55:483–489
Liu Q, Wang S, Zhang W, Zhan D, Li J (2018) Does foreign direct investment affect environmental pollution in China’s cities? A spatial econometric perspective. Sci Total Environ 613:521–529
Mahadevan R, Sun Y (2020) Effects of foreign direct investment on carbon emissions: evidence from China and its Belt and Road countries. J Environ Manage 276:111321
Mert M, Bölük G (2016) Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO2 emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:21669–21681
Mert M, Caglar AE (2020) Testing pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses for Turkey: a new perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:32933–32943
Minh NN (2020) Foreign direct investment and carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from capital of Vietnam. Int J Energy Econ Policy 10(3):76–83
Muhammad B, Khan MK (2021) Foreign direct investment inflow, economic growth, energy consumption, globalization, and carbon dioxide emission around the world. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:55643–55654
Musah M, Mensah IA, Alfred M, Mahmood H, Murshed M, Omari-Sasu AY, ... Coffie CPK (2022) Reinvestigating the pollution haven hypothesis: the nexus between foreign direct investments and environmental quality in G-20 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(21):31330–31347
Ochoa-Moreno WS, Quito BA, Moreno-Hurtado CA (2021) Foreign direct investment and environmental quality: revisiting the EKC in Latin American Countries. Sustainability 13(22):12651
Odhiambo NM (2012) Economic growth and carbon emissions in South Africa: an empirical investigation. J Appl Bus Res (JABR) 28:37–46
Odhiambo NM (2020) Financial development, income inequality and carbon emissions in Sub-Saharan African countries: a panel data analysis. Energy Explor Exploit 38(5):1914–1931
Odugbesan JA, Adebayo TS (2020) The symmetrical and asymmetrical effects of foreign direct investment and financial development on carbon emission: evidence from Nigeria. SN Appl Sci 2:1–15
Ojewumi SJ, Akinlo AE (2017) Foreign direct investment, economic growth and environmental quality in sub-Saharan Africa: a dynamic model analysis. African J Econ Rev 5:48–68
Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240). Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22:265–312
Ren YS, Apergis N, Ma C, Baltas K, Jiang Y, Liu JL (2021) FDI, economic growth, and carbon emissions of the Chinese steel industry: new evidence from a 3SLS model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(37):52547–52564
Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I, Sohag K (2018) The effects of electricity consumption, economic growth, financial development and foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Kuwait. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:2002–2010
Salisu AA, Isah KO (2017) Revisiting the oil price and stock market nexus: a nonlinear Panel ARDL approach. Econ Model 66:258–271
Schröder E, Storm S (2020) Economic growth and carbon emissions: the road to “hothouse earth” is paved with good intentions. Int J Polit Econ 49(2):153–173
Shahbaz M, Nasir MA, Roubaud D (2018) Environmental degradation in France: the effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Econ 74:843–857
Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Abbas F, Anis O (2015) Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? Energy Econ 51:275–287
Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer, New York, NY, pp 281–314
Shinwari R, Wang Y, Maghyereh A, Awartani B (2022) Does Chinese foreign direct investment harm CO2 emissions in the Belt and Road Economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(26):39528–39544
Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Musah I, Ozturk I (2017) Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy 124:706–719
Tang CF, Tan BW (2015) The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy 79:447–454
Teng JZ, Khan MK, Khan MI, Chishti MZ, Khan MO (2021) Effect of foreign direct investment on CO2 emission with the role of globalization, institutional quality with pooled mean group panel ARDL. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(5):5271–5282
World Bank (2021) World development indicators. http://www.worldbank.org/data/onlinedatabases.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2022
Xie Q, Wang X, Cong X (2020) How does foreign direct investment affect CO2 emissions in emerging countries? New findings from a nonlinear panel analysis. J Clean Prod 249:119422
Yilanci V, Ozgur O, Gorus MS (2019) The asymmetric effects of foreign direct investment on clean energy consumption in BRICS countries: a recently introduced hidden cointegration test. J Clean Prod 237:117786
Yuping L, Ramzan M, Xincheng L, Murshed M, Awosusi AA, Bah SI, Adebayo TS (2021) Determinants of carbon emissions in Argentina: the roles of renewable energy consumption and globalization. Energy Rep 7:4747–4760
Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR, Mirza FM, Hou F, Kirmani SAA (2019) The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Resources Policy 63:101428
Zameer H, Yasmeen H, Zafar MW, Waheed A, Sinha A (2020) Analyzing the association between innovation, economic growth, and environment: divulging the importance of FDI and trade openness in India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(23):29539–29553
Zarsky L (1999) Havens, halos and spaghetti: untangling the evidence about foreign direct investment and the environment. Foreign Direct Invest Environ 13(8):47–74
Zhang C, Zhou X (2016) Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:943–951
Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y, Yu K (2016) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ Model 58:237–248
Zhou Y, Fu J, Kong Y, Wu R (2018) How foreign direct investment influences carbon emissions, based on the empirical analysis of Chinese urban data. Sustainability 10:2163
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Abdallah Abdul-Mumuni contributed to the study conception, data collection, estimations, and analysis. John Kwaku Amoh wrote the introduction section of the manuscript, while Barbara Deladem Mensah reviewed related literature on foreign direct investment-carbon emissions nexus. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
We, the authors, are giving our ethical approval and consent for this paper to be published in ESPR if found publishable.
Consent to participate
We, the authors, are giving our consent for participation in this paper to be published in ESPR if found publishable.
Consent for publication
We, the authors, are giving our consent for this paper to be published in ESPR if found publishable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1 List of countries
Appendix 1 List of countries
Benin | Kenya | Sierra Leone | Burundi |
---|---|---|---|
Burkina Faso | Madagascar | Seychelles | Central Africa Rep |
Botswana | Mali | Togo | Congo DR |
Cote d’Ivoire | Mozambique | Tanzania | Comoros |
Cameroon | Mauritius | Uganda | Mauritania |
Congo, Republic | Namibia | South Africa | Equatorial Guinea |
Cabo Verde | Niger | Malawi | Chad |
Gabon | Nigeria | Ethiopia | Zambia |
Ghana | Rwanda | Lesotho | |
Guinea-Bissau | Sudan | Guinea | |
The Gambia | Senegal | Angola |
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Abdul-Mumuni, A., Amoh, J.K. & Mensah, B.D. Does foreign direct investment asymmetrically influence carbon emissions in sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from nonlinear panel ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 11861–11872 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22909-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22909-w