Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The province-managing-county reform and green innovation of enterprises: evidence from the quasi-natural experiment

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Based on the database of green patents of China’s A-share listed enterprises from 2001 to 2018, this paper identifies the impact of the province-managing-county (PMC) fiscal reform on the green innovation performance of enterprises by using staggered DID method. The results show that the PMC fiscal reform significantly promotes enterprises’ green innovation performance, and this impact is not only reflected in the quantity of green patents but also in the quality. The mechanism test finds that the policy effect of PMC fiscal reform comes from the attraction of environmental investment and optimization of human capital structure. The PMC fiscal reform expands the financial autonomy of county governments, facilitating the compensation and allocation mechanism. Moreover, the paper incorporates the county-power-expansion (CPE) reform into the robustness test to exclude the interference of other policies in the same period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

References

  • Abdelmageed K, Chang X, Wang D et al (2019) Evolution of varieties and development of production technology in Egypt wheat: a review[J]. J Integr Agr 18(3):483–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan P (2002) Decentralization of governance and development[J]. J Econ Perspect 16(4):185–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?[J]. Q J Econ 119(1):249–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences[J]. J Polit Econ 111(5):1043–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsatto JMLS, BazaniCL, (2021) Green innovation and environmental regulations: a systematic review of international academic works[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(45):63751–63768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brav A, Jiang W, Ma S et al (2018) How does hedge fund activism reshape corporate innovation?[J]. J Financ Econ 130(2):237–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KW (1997) Urbanization and urban infrastructure services in the PRC[J]. Financing Local Government in the People’s Republic of China 83–125

  • Clarkson PM, Li Y, Richardson GD (2004) The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies[J]. Account Rev 79(2):329–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke P (2010) Regional innovation systems: development opportunities from the ‘green turn’[J]. Tech Anal Strat Manag 22(7):831–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuaresma JC, Lutz W, Sanderson W (2014) Is the demographic dividend an education dividend?[J]. Demography 51(1):299–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dangelico RM, Pujari D (2010) Mainstreaming green product innovation: why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability[J]. J Bus Ethics 95(3):471–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechezleprêtre A, Glachant M, Hascic I et al (2011) Invention and transfer of climate change-mitigation technologies: a global analysis[J]. Rev Environ Econ Policy 5(1):109–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derashid C, Zhang H (2003) Effective tax rates and the “industrial policy” hypothesis: evidence from Malaysia[J]. J Int Account Audit Tax 12(1):45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Z, He Y, Wang H (2019) Dynamic effect retest of R&D subsidies policies of China’s auto industry on directed technological change and environmental quality[J]. J Clean Prod 231:196–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edquist C (2013) Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations[M]. Routledge

  • Fan Y, Wu Y, Wu AM et al (2018) Decentralised governance and empowerment of county governments in China: betting on the weak or the strong?[J]. Local Gov Stud 44(5):670–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry WM, Hubbard RG (2000) Entrepreneurship and household saving[J]

  • Gramkow C, Anger-Kraavi A (2018) Could fiscal policies induce green innovation in developing countries? The case of Brazilian manufacturing sectors[J]. Clim Pol 18(2):246–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall BH, Maffioli A (2008) Evaluating the impact of technology development funds in emerging economies: evidence from Latin America[J]. Eur J Dev Res 20(2):172–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society[J]. Am Econ Rev 35(4):519–530

    Google Scholar 

  • He Q (2015) Fiscal decentralization and environmental pollution: evidence from Chinese panel data[J]. China Econ Rev 36:86–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jia R (2017) Pollution for promotion[J]. 21st Century China Center Research Paper (2017-05)

  • Kelm KM, Narayanan VK, Pinches GE (1995) Shareholder value creation during R&D innovation and commercialization stages[J]. Acad Manag J 38(3):770–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuai P, Yang S, Tao A et al (2019) Environmental effects of Chinese-style fiscal decentralization and the sustainability implications[J]. J Clean Prod 239:118089

  • Li P, Lu Y, Wang J (2016) Does flattening government improve economic performance? Evidence from China[J]. J Dev Econ 123:18–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H, Zeng SX, Ma HY et al (2014) Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China[J]. J Clean Prod 64:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Wang E, Cai D (2019) Green credit policy, property rights and debt financing: quasi-natural experimental evidence from China[J]. Financ Res Lett 29:129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Alm J (2016) “Province-managing-county” fiscal reform, land expansion, and urban growth in China[J]. J Hous Econ 33:82–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Yang L, Fan L (2021) Induced effect of environmental regulation on green innovation: evidence from the increasing-block pricing scheme[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(5):2620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma G, Mao J (2018) Fiscal decentralisation and local economic growth: evidence from a fiscal reform in China[J]. Fisc Stud 39(1):159–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millimet DL (2003) Assessing the empirical impact of environmental federalism[J]. J Reg Sci 43(4):711–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montmartin B, Herrera M (2015) Internal and external effects of R&D subsidies and fiscal incentives: empirical evidence using spatial dynamic panel models[J]. Res Policy 44(5):1065–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsato RJ (2006) Competitive environmental strategies: when does it pay to be green?[J]. Calif Manag Rev 48(2):127–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petroni G, Bigliardi B, Galati F (2019) Rethinking the porter hypothesis: the underappreciated importance of value appropriation and pollution intensity[J]. Rev Policy Res 36(1):121–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Polzin F, von Flotow P, Klerkx L (2016) Addressing barriers to eco-innovation: exploring the finance mobilisation functions of institutional innovation intermediaries[J]. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 103:34–46

  • Porter ME, Van der Linde C (1995) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate[J]. Harv Bus Rev 73(5):120–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi Y, Peng W, Xiong NN (2020) The effects of fiscal and tax incentives on regional innovation capability: text extraction based on python[J]. Mathematics 8(7):1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltari E, Travaglini G (2011) The effects of environmental policies on the abatement investment decisions of a green firm[J]. Resour Energy Econ 33(3):666–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song D, Zhang Q, Yang L (2020) Environmental effect of flattening administrative structure on local water quality: A county-level analysis of China’s County-Power-Expansion reform[J]. J Clean Prod 276:123256

  • Stiglitz JE (2015) Leaders and followers: perspectives on the Nordic model and the economics of innovation[J]. J Public Econ 127:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira AAC, Queirós ASS (2016) Economic growth, human capital and structural change: a dynamic panel data analysis[J]. Res Policy 45(8):1636–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen G, Mohnen P (2017) Revisiting the Porter hypothesis: an empirical analysis of green innovation for the Netherlands[J]. Econ Innov New Technol 26(1–2):63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Zheng X, Zhao Z (2012) Fiscal reform and public education spending: a quasi-natural experiment of fiscal decentralization in China[J]. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 42(2):334–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen H, Lee CC (2020) Impact of fiscal decentralization on firm environmental performance: evidence from a county-level fiscal reform in China[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(29):36147–36159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Deng Y, Huang J et al (2013) Incentives and outcomes: China’s environmental policy[R]. Nat Bureau Econ Res

  • You D, Zhang Y, Yuan B (2019) Environmental regulation and firm eco-innovation: evidence of moderating effects of fiscal decentralization and political competition from listed Chinese industrial companies[J]. J Clean Prod 207:1072–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan B, Xiang Q (2018) Environmental regulation, industrial innovation and green development of Chinese manufacturing: based on an extended CDM model[J]. J Clean Prod 176:895–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Yang L, Song D (2020) Environmental effect of decentralization on water quality near the border of cities: evidence from China’s province-managing-county reform[J]. Sci Total Environ 708:135154

  • Zheng F (2009) Province-managing-county reform cannot solve everything[J]. People’s Tribune 18:5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research work is supported in part by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2019A1515011581).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Studies for the Greater Bay Area, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China

    Sheng Liu

  2. School of Economics and Trade, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China

    Qing Mai

  3. School of Economics and Trade, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou, 510521, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China

    Xiuying Chen

Authors
  1. Sheng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qing Mai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiuying Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: conceptualization, S. L., Q. M., and X. C.; methodology, Q. M. and S. L.; software, Q. M.; formal analysis, S. L., Q. M., and X. C.; investigation, S. L., Q. M., and X. C.; writing—original draft preparation, Q. M. and S.L.; writing—review and editing, S. L., Q. M., and X. C.; visualization, Q. M.; supervision, S. L. and Q. M.; funding acquisition, X. C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiuying Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, S., Mai, Q. & Chen, X. The province-managing-county reform and green innovation of enterprises: evidence from the quasi-natural experiment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 88823–88838 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21834-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21834-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation