Abstract
To promote county economic prosperity and social development, China enacted a fiscal reform known as “province governing county” (PGC) in the early 2000s. Using the difference-in-differences (DID) method and a massive sample of enterprises from 2003 to 2011, this study investigates the effect of PGC reform on firm environmental performance. The results show that enterprises in reformed counties have significantly decreased their pollution intensity since the fiscal reform. Our research reveals that the environmental effects of fiscal decentralization are related to changes in the political assessment metrics of local officials. It also shows that PGC fiscal reform has a significant positive effect on the environmental performance of large, small, and micro enterprises. Furthermore, it suggests that PGC fiscal reform benefits the environmental performance due to the informational advantages of county governments. In terms of environmental governance, although local governments have an information advantage in the allocation of green fiscal funds, well-designed mechanisms are needed to strengthen their motivation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam A, Delis MD, Kammas P (2014) Fiscal decentralization and public sector efficiency: evidence from OECD countries. Econ Gov 15(1):17–49
Almeida CM, Sevegnani F, Agostinho F, Liu G, Yang Z, Coscieme L, Giannetti BF (2018) Accounting for the benefits of technology change: replacing a zinc-coating process by a water-based organo-metallic coating process. J Clean Prod 174:170–176
Becker RA, Pasurka CA, Shadbegian RJ (2013) Do environmental regulations disproportionately affect small businesses? Evidence from the pollution abatement costs and expenditures survey. J Environ Econ Manag 66(3):523–538
Brock GJ, Jin Y, Zeng T (2015) Fiscal decentralization and China’s regional infant mortality. J Policy Model 37(2):175–188
Cai X, Lu Y, Wu M, Yu L (2016) Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. J Dev Econ 123(123):73–85
Chen Y, Lee CC (2020) Does technological innovation reduce CO2 emissions? Cross-country evidence. J Clean Prod 263:121550
Cheng S, Fan W, Chen J, Meng F, Liu G, Song M, Yang Z (2020) The impact of fiscal decentralization on CO2 emissions in China. Energy 192:116685
Clarkson PM, Overell M, Chapple LL (2011) Environmental reporting and its relation to corporate environmental performance. Abacus 47(1):27–60
Du W, Li M (2020) Assessing the impact of environmental regulation on pollution abatement and collaborative emissions reduction: micro-evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises. Environ Impact Assess Rev 82:106382
Fredriksson PG, Millimet DL (2002) Strategic interaction and the determination of environmental policy across U.S. states. J Urban Econ 51(1):101–122
Hao Y, Chen Y, Liao H, Wei Y (2020) China’s fiscal decentralization and environmental quality: theory and an empirical study. Environ Dev Econ 25(2):159–181
He C, Pan F, Yan Y (2012) Is economic transition harmful to China’s urban environment? Evidence from industrial air pollution in Chinese cities. Urban Stud 49(8):1767–1790
He Q (2015) Fiscal decentralization and environmental pollution: evidence from Chinese panel data. China Econ Rev 36:86–100
Hu D, Feng C, Liang L, Wu P, Du Y (2019) Environmental performance of Chinese listing manufacturing enterprise: from an investment perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(7):6625–6635
Huang B, Gao M, Xu C, Zhu Y (2017) The impact of province-managing-county fiscal reform on primary education in China. China Econ Rev 45(C):45–61
Kuai P, Yang S, Tao A, Zhang S, Khan ZD (2019) Environmental effects of Chinese-style fiscal decentralization and the sustainability implications. J Clean Prod 239:118089
Li H, Zhou L (2005) Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China. J Public Econ 89(9):1743–1762
Liu Y, Alm J (2016) “Province-managing-county” fiscal reform, land expansion, and urban growth in China. J Hous Econ 33:82–100
Liu L, Li L (2019) Effects of fiscal decentralisation on the environment: new evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(36):36878–36886
Ma G, Mao J (2018) Fiscal decentralisation and local economic growth: evidence from a fiscal reform in China. Fisc Stud 39(1):159–187
Millimet DL (2003) Assessing the empirical impact of environmental federalism. J Reg Sci 43(4):711–733
Oates WE (1972) Fiscal federalism. Books
Que W, Zhang Y, Liu S, Yang C (2018) The spatial effect of fiscal decentralization and factor market segmentation on environmental pollution. J Clean Prod 184:402–413
Saltari E, Travaglini G (2011) The effects of environmental policies on the abatement investment decisions of a green firm. Resour Energy Econ 33(3):666–685
Shi X, Xu Z (2018) Environmental regulation and firm exports: evidence from the eleventh Five-Year Plan in China. J Environ Econ Manag 89:187–200
Tiebout CM (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ 64(5):416–424
Van Fan Y, Varbanov PS, Klemes JJ, Nemet A (2018) Process efficiency optimisation and integration for cleaner production. J Clean Prod 174:177–183
Wang C, Wu J, Zhang B (2018) Environmental regulation, emissions and productivity: evidence from Chinese COD-emitting manufacturers. J Environ Econ Manag 92:54–73
Wang S (1997) China’s 1994 fiscal reform: an initial assessment. Asian Surv 37(9):801–817
Wen H, Lee C (2020) Impact of environmental labeling certification on firm performance: empirical evidence from China. J Clean Prod 255:120201
You D, Zhang Y, Yuan B (2019) Environmental regulation and firm eco-innovation: evidence of moderating effects of fiscal decentralization and political competition from listed Chinese industrial companies. J Clean Prod 207:1072–1083
Zhang K, Zhang Z, Liang Q (2017) An empirical analysis of the green paradox in China: from the perspective of fiscal decentralization. Energy Policy 103:203–211
Zhang Q, Yang L, Song D (2020) Environmental effect of decentralization on water quality near the border of cities: evidence from China’s province-managing-county reform. Sci Total Environ 708:135154
Zhang T, Zou H (1998) Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China. J Public Econ 67(2):221–240
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Editor and the anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. These authors contributed equally to this study and share first authorship.
Funding
The authors received financial support from the National Statistical Science Research Fund of China (Grant No. 2019LZ36) and the Jiangxi Humanities and Social Sciences Key Research Base Project of University (JD18016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wen, H., Lee, CC. Impact of fiscal decentralization on firm environmental performance: evidence from a county-level fiscal reform in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 36147–36159 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09663-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09663-7