Abstract
Anthropogenic and natural factors lead to substantial environmental degradation. This shift is aligned with the country's overall development, resulting in high demand for energy resources and a dramatic shift in human activities that contribute to haze pollution. Some of the countries in the South Asian region are ranked between one and twenty on the list of countries with the highest levels of PM2.5 pollution. The member countries have taken many steps to tackle global warming, but concern about haze pollution was found limited. Moreover, very little research was conducted on haze pollution, which led us to conduct this research in this region. This study used the panel data from 1998 to 2018 and a set of econometric models like long-term cointegrating relationship, fully modified ordinary least squares, and vector error-correction model Granger causality tests to examine the major drivers like anthropogenic and natural factors that might elevate haze pollution. Furthermore, our empirical results depict that (1) there is a long-term cointegrating relation between haze and the factors studied. (2) Energy consumption, urbanisation, and economic growth are the primary drivers of environmental degradation. (3) Rainfall has the most substantial influence on reducing haze pollution. The study concluded that (a) if the countries continue to develop at the same pace, all factors studied will continue to drive haze pollution to rise. (b) A decrease in PM2.5 pollution requires improvements in regional rainfall through vegetation, reducing reliance on fossil fuel-based energy sources, and increasing environmental education. (c) Slowing down the drive for urbanisation would not be cost-effective in reducing haze pollution in the region in the short run. Thus, reducing haze by adjusting the factors studied would not be easy in the short run and require the careful adoption of long-term policies.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The [monthly average temperature, total monthly rainfall] data that support the findings of this study are available at [WorldClim database], [https://www.worldclim.org/data/monthlywth.html]; the [yearly average PM2.5 concentration] data that support the findings of this study are availed from [Atmospheric Composition Analysis Group (ACA)], [http://fizz.phys.dal.ca/~atmos/martin/?page_ id = 140]; the other variable [economic growth, energy consumption, urbanisation, and education] data are available at [World Development Indicators], [https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators].
References
Ahmed K, Rehman MU, Ozturk I (2017) What drives carbon dioxide emissions in the long-run? Evidence from selected South Asian Countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 70:1142–1153
Akhmat G, Zaman K, Shukui T, Irfan D, Khan MM (2014) Does energy consumption contribute to environmental pollutants? Evidence from SAARC countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:5940–5951
Anwar A, Malik S (2021) Cogitating the role of technological innovation and institutional quality on environmental degradation in G-7 countries. Int J Green Econ 15:213–232
Anwar A, Sharif A, Fatima S, Ahmad P, Sinha A, Rehman Khan SA, Jermsittiparsert K (2021a) The asymmetric effect of public private partnership investment on transport CO2 emission in China: evidence from quantile ARDL approach. J Clean Prod 288:125282
Anwar A, Siddique M, Eyup D, Sharif A (2021b) The moderating role of renewable and non-renewable energy in environment-income nexus for ASEAN countries: evidence from method of moments quantile regression. Renew Energy 164:956–967
Anwar A, Sinha A, Sharif A, Siddique M, Irshad S, Anwar W, Malik S (2022a) The nexus between urbanisation, renewable energy consumption, financial development, and CO2 emissions: evidence from selected Asian countries. Environ Dev Sustain 24:6556–6576
Anwar A, Malik S, Ahmad P (2022b) Cogitating the role of technological innovation and institutional quality in formulating the sustainable development goal policies for E7 countries: evidence from quantile regression. 0, 09721509211072657
Ardon-Dryer K, Huang YW, Cziczo DJ (2015) Laboratory studies of collection efficiency of sub-micrometer aerosol particles by cloud droplets on a single-droplet basis. Atmos Chem Phys 15:9159–9171
Bai L, Jiang L, Yang D-y, Liu Y-b (2019) Quantifying the spatial heterogeneity influences of natural and socioeconomic factors and their interactions on air pollution using the geographical detector method: a case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. J Clean Prod 232:692–704
Brauer M (2017) The Global Burden of Disease Study
Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47:239–253
Canning D, Pedroni P (2008) Infrastructure, long-run economic growth and causality tests for cointegrated panels. The Manchester School Special Issue 76, pp. 504-527
Centre SE 2018: SAARC energy outlook 2030, CRISIL Limited, Mumbai, India
Chen J, Zhou C, Wang S, Li S (2018) Impacts of energy consumption structure, energy intensity, economic growth, urbanisation on PM2.5 concentrations in countries globally. Appl Energ 230:94–105
Chien F, Anwar A, Hsu C-C, Sharif A, Razzaq A, Sinha A (2021) The role of information and communication technology in encountering environmental degradation: proposing an SDG framework for the BRICS countries. Technol Soc 65:101587
Chu J (2015) Can rain clean the atmosphere? Study explains how rain droplets attract aerosols out of the atmosphere., Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Chudik A, Pesaran H (2013) Large panel data models with cross-sectional dependence: a survey. SSRN Electronic Journal
Dong K, Sun R, Dong C, Li H, Zeng X, Ni G (2018) Environmental Kuznets curve for PM2.5 emissions in Beijing, China: what role can natural gas consumption play? Ecol Ind 93:591–601
Gan T, Liang W, Yang HC, Liao XC (2020) The effect of Economic Development on haze pollution (PM 25) based on a spatial perspective: urbanisation as a mediating variable. J Clean Prod 266:14
Giner J (2021) Orthant-based variance decomposition in investment portfolios. Eur J Oper Res 291:497–511
Hadjichambis AC, Paraskeva-Hadjichambi D (2020) Education for environmental citizenship: the pedagogical approach. In: Hadjichambis AC et al (eds) Conceptualizing environmental citizenship for 21st century education. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 237–261
Hammer MS, van Donkelaar A, Li C, Lyapustin A, Sayer AM, Hsu NC, Levy RC, Garay MJ, Kalashnikova OV, Kahn RA, Brauer M, Apte JS, Henze DK, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Ford B, Pierce JR, Martin RV (2020) Global estimates and long-term trends of fine particulate matter concentrations (1998–2018). Environ Sci Technol 54:7879–7890
Hashem Pesaran M, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econom 142:50–93
Hirabayashi S, Nowak DJ (2016) Comprehensive national database of tree effects on air quality and human health in the United States. Environ Pollut 215:48–57
Le HP, Ozturk I (2020) The impacts of globalisation, financial development, government expenditures, and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:22680–22697
Li G, Fang C, Wang S, Sun S (2016) The effect of economic growth, urbanization, and industrialization on fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations in China. Environ Sci Technol 50:11452–11459
Li K, Fang L, He L (2018) How urbanisation affects China’s energy efficiency: a spatial econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 200:1130–1141
Liang W, Yang M (2019) Urbanisation, economic growth and environmental pollution: evidence from China. Sustain Comput Infor Syst 21:1–9
Liu H, Fang C, Zhang X, Wang Z, Bao C, Li F (2017a) The effect of natural and anthropogenic factors on haze pollution in Chinese cities: a spatial econometrics approach. J Clean Prod 165:323–333
Liu Y, Xiao H, Lv Y, Zhang N (2017b) The effect of new-type urbanisation on energy consumption in China: a spatial econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 163:S299–S305
Liu Y, Cao G, Zhao N, Mulligan K, Ye X (2018) Improve ground-level PM2.5 concentration mapping using a random forests-based geostatistical approach. Environ Pollut 235:272–282
Liu X, Sun T, Feng Q (2020) Dynamic spatial spillover effect of urbanisation on environmental pollution in China considering the inertia characteristics of environmental pollution. Sustain Cities Soc 53:101903
Liu L, Anwar A, Irmak E, Pelit I (2022) Asymmetric linkages between public-private partnership, environmental innovation, and transport emissions. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1–22
Lu F, Xu D, Cheng Y, Dong S, Guo C, Jiang X, Zheng X (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the adverse health effects of ambient PM2.5 and PM10 pollution in the Chinese population. Environ Res 136:196–204
Lütkepohl H (2005) New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 764
Muhammad S, Long X, Salman M, Dauda L (2020) Effect of urbanisation and international trade on CO2 emissions across 65 belt and road initiative countries. Energy 196:117102
Odhiambo NM (2021) Trade openness and energy consumption in sub-Saharan African countries: a multivariate panel Granger causality test. Energy Rep 7:7082–7089
Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics and Politics, p 39
Sun Y, Anwar A, Razzaq A, Liang X, Siddique M (2022) Asymmetric role of renewable energy, green innovation, and globalization in deriving environmental sustainability: evidence from top-10 polluted countries. Renew Energy 185:280–290
Tuncer G (2011) Managing air pollution: how does education help? In: Khallaf MK (Editor), The impact of air pollution on health, economy, environment and agricultural sources. InTech
Uddin MGS, Bidisha SH, Ozturk I (2016) Carbon emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth relationship in Sri Lanka. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 11, 282-287
Van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Brauer M, Kahn R, Levy R, Verduzco C, Villeneuve PJ (2010) Global estimates of ambient fine particulate matter concentrations from satellite-based aerosol optical depth: development and application. Environ Health Perspect 118:847–855
Van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Brauer M, Boys BL (2015) Use of satellite observations for long-term exposure assessment of global concentrations of fine particulate matter. Environ Health Perspect 123:135–143
Van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Brauer M, Hsu NC, Kahn RA, Levy RC, Lyapustin A, Sayer AM, Winker DM (2016) Global estimates of fine particulate matter using a combined geophysical-statistical method with information from satellites, models, and monitors. Environ Sci Technol 50:3762–3772
Wang S, Zhou C, Wang Z, Feng K, Hubacek K (2017) The characteristics and drivers of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) distribution in China. J Clean Prod 142:1800–1809
Wang Q, Kwan M-P, Zhou K, Fan J, Wang Y, Zhan D (2019) The impacts of urbanisation on fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations: empirical evidence from 135 countries worldwide. Environ Pollut 247:989–998
Wang X, Cai D, Chen S, Lou J, Liu F, Jiao L, Cheng H, Zhang C, Hua T, Che H (2021) Spatio-temporal trends of dust emissions triggered by desertification in China. CATENA 200:105160
World Bank (2019) World development indicators, The World Bank., Washington, D.C
World Bank (2021) Data on South Aisa. World Bank Group
WorldClim (2020): Global climate and weather data
Wu W, Zhang M, Ding Y (2020) Exploring the effect of economic and environment factors on PM2.5 concentration: a case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. J Environ Manage 268:110703
Xie L, Yan H, Zhang S, Wei C (2020) Does urbanisation increase residential energy use? Evidence from the Chinese residential energy consumption survey 2012. China Econ Rev 59:101374
Xu B, Luo L, Lin B (2016) A dynamic analysis of air pollution emissions in China: evidence from nonparametric additive regression models. Ecol Ind 63:346–358
Yan D, Kong Y, Jiang P, Huang R, Ye B (2021) How do socioeconomic factors influence urban PM2.5 pollution in China? Empirical analysis from the perspective of spatiotemporal disequilibrium. Sci Total Environ 761:143266
Yang D, Wang X, Xu J, Xu C, Lu D, Ye C, Wang Z, Bai L (2018) Quantifying the influence of natural and socioeconomic factors and their interactive impact on PM2.5 pollution in China. Environ Pollut 241:475–483
Yi L, Kang Z-r, Yang L, Musa M, Wang F (2022) Do driving restriction policies effectively alleviate smog pollution in China? Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:11405–11417
Zafar MW, Sinha A, Ahmed Z, Qin Q, Zaidi SAH (2021) Effects of biomass energy consumption on environmental quality: the role of education and technology in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 142:110868
Zhan D, Kwan M-P, Zhang W, Yu X, Meng B, Liu Q (2018) The driving factors of air quality index in China. J Clean Prod 197:1342–1351
Zhang YL, Cao F (2015) Fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) in China at a city level. Sci Rep 5:14884
Zhao Z-Y, Gao L, Zuo J (2019) How national policies facilitate low carbon city development: a China study. J Clean Prod 234:743–754
Zhuang J, Li F, Liu X, Cai H, Feng L, Li X (2021) An experiment-based impulse response method to characterise airborne pollutant sources in a scaled multi-zone building. Atmos Environ 251:118272
Funding
This study is supported by the Chinese Ministry of Education’s Humanities and Social Sciences program entitled “Research on the synergistic effect of carbon market mechanism design on carbon emission reduction and smog control.” [Grant No. 20YJA790082]; the National Social Science Foundation of China’s flagship program “Research on the maturity of China’s carbon market and environmental regulation policy” [grant number 14AZD051]; the National Natural Science Foundation of China “Modelling Carbon Price Drivers with Optimised Smart Methods” [grant number 71101133]; the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University “Carbon finance innovation Research on the price formation mechanism of international carbon market” [grant number NCET-11–0725].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MM: conceptualisation, methodology, software, data curation, writing—original draft, formal analysis visualisation. LY: supervision, guidance, writing—review and editing, project administration, resources, funding acquisition. PR: literature, data curation, and visualisation. MASA: review, editing and visualisation. LY: methodology, software and validation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This is an observational study, and we confirmed that no ethical approval is required.
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Table 7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Musa, M., Yi, L., Rahman, P. et al. Do anthropogenic and natural factors elevate the haze pollution in the South Asian countries? Evidence from long-term cointegration and VECM causality estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 87361–87379 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21759-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21759-w