Abstract
As a region rich in natural resources and biodiversity, Latin America is particularly vulnerable to environmental crises. The ecological footprint (EF) of Latin America and the variables that affect it in the long run are examined through a panel data approach and causality, using a sample of 12 countries in the region over the period 1990 to 2014. The study uses human development instead of human capital, because the former considers health and standard of living in addition to schooling. Applying a recent methodology that contains tests and estimators for various specification problems including cross-sectional dependence, the study finds that economic growth and imports damage environmental quality while human development, renewable energy consumption and exports tend to mitigate the ecological footprint. Human development and imports have a unidirectional effect on the EF while there is feedback between economic growth, renewable energy consumption and the EF. Urbanization and financial development do not play a significant role, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve theory is not validated for the region. Policies are proposed for EF management to ensure sustainable development in Latin America.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All the data was downloaded and is available from: a) URL:https://data.world/footprint/nfa-2019-edition b) URL:https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators c) URL:https://databank.worldbank.org/source/global-financial-development d) URL:https://globaldatalab.org/
Notes
International Energy Agency, Climate Impacts on Latin American Hydropower, July 2021. https://www.iea.org/reports/climate-impacts-on-latin-american-hydropower
References
Ahmed Z, Zafar MW, Ali S (2020) Linking urbanization, human capital, and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: an empirical analysis. Sustain Cities Soc 55:102064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102064
Ahmed Z, Nathaniel SP, Shahbaz M (2021) The criticality of information and communication technology and human capital in environmental sustainability: evidence from Latin American and Caribbean countries. J Clean Prod 286:125529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cleprod.2020.125529
Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2015) The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA (M,iddle East and North African) region. Energy 84:382–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.004
Al-Mulali U, Tang CF, Ozturk I (2015) Estimating the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis: evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 50:918–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.017
Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2016) The investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the advanced economies: the role of energy prices. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:1622–1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.131
Alola AA, Bekun FV, Sarkodie SA (2019) Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Sci Total Environ 685:702–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139
Altıntaş H, Kassouri Y (2020) Is the environmental Kuznets curve in Europe related to the per-capita ecological footprint or CO2 emissions? Ecol Indic 113:106187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106187
Alvarado R, Tillaguango B, Dagar V, Ahmad M, Isik C, Mendez P, Toledo E (2021) Ecological footprint, economic complexity and natural resources rents in Latin America: empirical evidence using quantile regressions. J Clean Prod 318:128585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128585
Ansari MA, Haider S, Masood T (2020) Do renewable energy and globalization enhance ecological footprint: an analysis of top renewable energy countries? Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(6):6719–6732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10786-0
Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Filis G (2017) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: an ethical dilemma. Renew Sust Energ Rev 68:808–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.105
Apergis N, Payne JE (2009) CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy 37 (8):3282–3286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.048
Baloch MA, Zhang J, Iqbal K, Iqbal Z (2019) The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(6):6199–6208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9
Baloch MA, Ozturk I, Bekun FV, Kahn D (2021) Modeling the hynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: does globalization matter? Bus Strateg Environ 30(1):176–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2615
Baltagi BH, Feng Q, Kao C (2012) A Lagrange multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. J Econ 170(1):164–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2012.04.004
Bibi F, Jamil M (2021) Testing environment Kuzents curve (EKC) hypothesis in different regions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(11):13581–13594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11515-2
Bilgili F, Nathaniel SP, Kuskaya S, Kasssouri Y (2021) Environmental pollution and energy research and development: An Environmental Kuznets Curve model through quantile simulation approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(38):53712–53727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14506-0
Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47(1):239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
Caviglia-Harris JL, Chambers D, Kahn JR (2009) Taking the u out of Kuznets: a comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation. Ecol Econ 68(4):1149–1159. https://doi.org/10.1006/j.ecolecon.2008.08.006
Chankrajang T, Muttarak R (2017) Green returns to education: does schooling contribute to pro-environmental behaviours? Evidence from Thailand. Ecol Econ 131:434–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.015
Charfeddine L, Mrabet Z (2017) The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: a panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 76:138–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.031
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1994) North-South trade and the environment. Q J Econ 109 (3):755–787. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118421
Danish U, Khan R, U-D S (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996
Destek MA, Ulucak R, Dogan E (2018) Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(29):29387–29396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4
Destek MA, Sinha A (2020) Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. J Clean Prod 242:118537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537
Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1074–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.006
Dogan E, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu KK (2019) Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy Environ 30(6):1065–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x19834279
Dreher A (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Appl Econ 38(10):1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/0036840500392078
Driscoll JC, Kraay AC (1998) Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev Econ Stat 80(4):549–560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29(4):1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (2021) Press release: ESCAZU agreement enters into force in latin america and the caribbean on international mother earth day. https://www.cepal.org/en/pressreleases/escazu-agreement-enters-force-latin-america-and-caribbean-international-motherearth/
Fuinhas JA, Marques AC, Koengkan M (2017) Are renewable energy policies upsetting carbon dioxide emissions? The case of Latin America countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(17):15044–15054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9109-z
Global Data Lab (GDL) (2020) Subnational human development index (SHDI) version 4.0. Institute for Management Research, Radbound University https://globaldatalab.org/
Global Footprint Network (GFN) (2019) National footprint and biocapacity accounts data set https://data.world/footprint/nfa-2019-edition
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110 (2):353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
Hervieux MS, Darné O (2015) Environmental Kuznets Curve and ecological footprint: a time series analysis. Econ Bull 35(1):814–826
Ike GN, Usman O, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA (2020) Environmental quality effects of income, energy prices and trade: the role of renewable energy consumption in g-7 countries. Sci Total Environ 721:137813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137813
International Monetary Fund (2020) Financial development index database https://data.imf.org/?sk=F8032E80-B36C-43B1-AC26-493C5B1CD33BsId=1480712464593
Kassouri Y, Altıntaş H (2020) Human well-being versus ecological footprint in MENA countries: a trade-off? J Environ Manag 263:110405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110405
Koengkan M, Fuinhas JA, Santiago R (2020) Asymmetric impacts of globalisation on co2 emissions of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Environmental Systems and Decisions 40(1):135–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-09752-0
Koengkan M, Fuinhas JA (2020) Exploring the effect of the renewable energy transition on co2 emissions of Latin American & Caribbean countries. Int J Sustain Energy 39 (6):515–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2020.1731511
Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Amer Econ Rev 45(1):1–28. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1811581
Levin A, Lin C-F, Chu C-SJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econ 108(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00098-7
Lopez L, Weber S (2017) Testing for Granger causality in panel data. The Stata Journal: promoting communications on statistics and Stata 17(4):972–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1701700412
Menegaki AN (2019) The ARDL method in the energy-growth nexus field best implementation strategies. Economies 7(4):105. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies7040105
Nathaniel S, Anyanwu O, Shah M (2020) Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(13):14601–14613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08017-7
Nathaniel SP, Nwulu N, Bekun F (2021) Natural resource, globalization, human capital and environmental degradation in Latin American and Caribbean countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(5):6207–6221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10850-9
Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61(s1):653–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.14
Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No 0435. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.5113
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econom 22(2):265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Rees WE (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban 4(2):121–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789200400212
Roodman D (2009) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 71 (1):135–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x
Sapkota P, Bastola U (2017) Foreign direct investment, income, and enviromental pollution in developing countries: panel data analysis of Latin America. Energy Econ 64:206–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.001
Selden TM, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J Environ Econ Manag 27(2):147–162. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1031
Shujah-ur-Rahman, Chen S, Saud S, Saleem N, Bari MW (2019) Nexus between financial development, energy consumption, income level, and ecological footprint in CEE countries: do human capital and biocapacity matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(31):31856–31872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06343-z
The Nature Conservancy (2019) Latin America’s natural resources and climate change. https://www.nature.org/en-us/what-we-do/our-insights/perspectives/latin-america-natural-resources-climate-change/
Tugcu CT (2018) Panel data analysis in the energy-growth nexus (EGN). In: The Economics and Econometrics of the Energy-Growth Nexus. Elsevier, pp 255–271
Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191
United Nations Development Programme (2021) Human Development Index (HDI). http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi
United Nations (UN) (2015) Sustainable development goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
University of Groningen (2021) Human capital in PWT 9.0. https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/docs/human_capital_in_pwt_90.pdf
Usman M, Kousar R, Yaseen MR, Makhdum MSA (2020) An empirical nexus between economic growth, energy utilization, trade policy, and ecological footprint: a continent-wise comparison in upper-middle-income countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(31):38995–39018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09772-3
Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1997) Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ecol Econ 20(1):3–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.006
Wang J, Dong K (2019) What drives environmental degradation? evidence from 14 sub-Saharan African countries. Sci Total Environ 656:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.354
Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
World Bank (2019) Global financial development. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/global-financial-development
World Bank (2021) World development indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
Funding
We acknowledge financial support from the National Agency for Research and Development (ANID) Chile FONDECYT - 1200555.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Christopher Castro: conceptualization, methodology, software, data curation, writing original draft preparation, formal analysis, validation. Werner Kristjanpoller: methodology, supervision, writing—reviewing and editing, formal analysis, validation. Josephine Olson: writing—reviewing and editing, formal analysis, validation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consent to participate
The study does not involve human participants. The study does not involve animals.
Consent to publish
The authors agreed with the content and gave explicit consent to submit the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castro, C., Kristjanpoller, W. & Olson, J.E. Long-run economic and social determinants of the ecological footprint of latin america: a panel causality approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 88908–88924 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21602-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21602-2