Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The electric power supply chain network design and emission reduction policy: a comprehensive review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrical energy is unique because it must sustain a consistent production and consumption balance. This guarantees that the “generation-transmission-distribution-consumption-storage” electric power supply chain (EPSC) continues to be connected and inseparable through the power system’s complete operation. This paper is a type of secondary study. According to the nature of the article which is qualitative, the grounded theory (GT) method for reviewing the literature has been used. A systematic review of existing literature is carried out over 12 years (2010–2022) by classifying it based on several dimensions such as phase sources of production, the total fixed cost of the real variable, and criteria of decision-making and emissions. The literature is further divided into categories based on the year of publication and the journals in which it was published. The study shows a direction for future studies in the electric power domain of the supply chain while utilizing an operations strategy approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Agnew S, Dargusch P (2015) Effect of residential solar and storage on centralized electricity supply systems. Nat Clim Chang 5(4):315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alinaghian M, Goli A (2017) Location, allocation and routing of temporary health centers in rural areas in crisis, solved by improved harmony search algorithm. Int J Comput Intell Syst 10(1):894–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgul O, Mac Dowell N, Papageorgiou LG, Shah N (2014) A mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) supply chain optimisation framework for carbon negative electricity generation using biomass to energy with CCS (BECCS) in the UK. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 28:189–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arefifar SA, Yasser A-RM, El-Fouly THM (2013) Optimum microgrid design for enhancing reliability and supply-security. IEEE Transact Smart Grid 4(3):1567–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arent D, Pless J, Mai T, Wiser R, Hand M, Baldwin S, et al. (2014) Implications of high renewable electricity penetration in the US for water use, greenhouse gas emissions, land-use, and materials supply. Appl Energy 123:368–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babazadeh R, Ghaderi H, Pishvaee MS (2019) A benders-local branching algorithm for second-generation biodiesel supply chain network design under epistemic uncertainty. Comput Chem Eng 124:364–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Babazadeh R, Razmi J, Pishvaee MS, Rabbani M (2017a) A sustainable second-generation biodiesel supply chain network design problem under risk. Omega 66:258–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babazadeh R, Razmi J, Rabbani M, Pishvaee MS (2017b) An integrated data envelopment analysis–mathematical programming approach to strategic biodiesel supply chain network design problem. J Clean Prod 147:694–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bairamzadeh S, Saidi-Mehrabad M, Pishvaee MS (2018) Modelling different types of uncertainty in biofuel supply network design and planning: a robust optimization approach. Renew Energy 116:500–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu M, Bentahar O (2021) Digitalization of the healthcare supply chain: a roadmap to generate benefits and effectively support healthcare delivery. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 167:120717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banbury JG (1975) Distribution the final link in the electricity-supply chain. Electron Power 21(13):773–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bas E (2013) The integrated framework for analysis of electricity supply chain using an integrated SWOT-fuzzy TOPSIS methodology combined with AHP: the case of Turkey. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 44(1):897–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentahar O, Benzidia S, Bourlakis M (2022) Critical factors for a proactive approach include a green supply chain taxonomy in healthcare. Int J Logist Manag (ahead of print)

  • Brinker J, Haasis HD (2022) Power in the context of SCM and supply chain digitalization: an overview from a literature review. Logistics 6(2):25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boston A (2013) Delivering a secure electricity supply on a low carbon pathway. Energy Policy 52:55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Change IC, et al. (2014) Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1454

  • Chen G, Chen B, Zhou H, Dai P (2013) Life cycle carbon emission flow analysis for electricity supply system: a case study of China. Energy Policy 61:1276–1284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin JM, Strauss A (1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 13(1):3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcelli F, Ripa M, Leccisi E, Cigolotti V, Fiandra V, Graditi G, …, Ulgiati S (2018) Sustainable urban electricity supply chain–indicators of material recovery and energy savings from crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels end-of-life. Ecol Ind 94:37–51

  • Devine-Wright P, Devine-Wright H, Sherry-Brennan F (2010) Visible technologies, invisible organisations: an empirical study of public beliefs about electricity supply networks. Energy Policy 38(8):4127–4134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding N, Liu J, Yang J, Yang D (2017) Comparative life cycle assessment of regional electricity supplies in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 119:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossati JP, Galarza A, Martín-Villate A, Fontan L (2015) A method for optimal sizing energy storage systems for microgrids. Renew Energy 77:539–549

  • Frankowska M, Mańkowska M, Rabe M, Rzeczycki A, Szaruga E (2022) Structural model of power grid stabilization in the green hydrogen supply chain system—conceptual assumptions. Energies 15(2):664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R, Stucki M (2010) Scope-dependent modelling of electricity supply in life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(8):806–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0200-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang F, Du Y, Hu D, Zhang B (2021) Sustainable performance analysis of power supply chain system from the perspective of technology and management. Sustainability 13(11):5972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghelichi Z, Saidi-Mehrabad M, Pishvaee MS (2018) A stochastic programming approach toward optimal design and planning of an integrated green biodiesel supply chain network under uncertainty: a case study. Energy 156:661–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldkuhl G, Cronholm S (2010) Adding theoretical grounding to grounded theory: toward multi-grounded theory. Int J Qual Methods 9(2):187–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonela V (2018) Stochastic optimization of hybrid electricity supply chain considering carbon emission schemes. Sustain Product Consumpt 14:136–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouveia JP, Dias L, Martins I, Seixas J (2014) Effects of renewables penetration on the security of Portuguese electricity supply. Appl Energy 123:438–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu X, Zhou L, Huang H, Shi X, Ieromonachou P (2021) Electric vehicle battery secondary use under government subsidy: a closed-loop supply chain perspective. Int J Prod Econ 234:108035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabbarzadeh A, Fahimnia B, Rastegar S (2017) Green and resilient design of electricity supply chain networks: a multiobjective robust optimization approach. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 99:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil F, Iqbal N, Ahmad S, Kim D (2021) Peer-to-peer energy trading mechanism based on blockchain and machine learning for sustainable electrical power supply in smart grid. IEEE Access 9:39193–39217

  • Jelti F, Allouhi A, Büker MS, Saadani R, Jamil A (2021) Renewable power generation: a supply chain perspective. Sustainability 13(3):1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahti JP, Helo P, Shamsuzzoha A (2012) Information flows and ICT-system interconnections in electricity supply chain wind power modelled. Tenth Int Confer ICT Knowledge Eng 2012:175–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahti JP, Helo P, Shamsuzzoha A, Phusavat K (2017) IoT in electricity supply chain: review and evaluation. 2017 15th International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering (ICT&KE), 1–6

  • Lai CS, Locatelli G, Pimm A, Wu X, Lai LL (2021) A review on longterm electrical power system modeling with energy storage. J Clean Prod 280:124298

  • Lee C, Chen P, Ma H (2012) Direct and indirect lead-containing waste discharge in the electrical and electronic supply chain. Resour Conserv Recycl 68:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Zhao R, Wu K-J, Huang T, Chiu A, Cai C (2018) A hybrid of multi-objective optimization and system dynamics simulation for straw-to-electricity supply chain management under the belt and road initiatives. Sustainability 10(3):868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukić J, Radenković M, Despotović-Zrakić M, Labus A, Bogdanović Z (2017) Supply chain intelligence for electricity markets: a smart grid perspective. Inf Syst Front 19(1):91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund H, Mathiesen BV, Christensen P, Schmidt JH (2010a) Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(3):260–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lund H, Mathiesen BV, Christensen P, Schmidt JH (2010b) Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(3):260–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Messagie M, Mertens J, Oliveira L, Rangaraju S, Sanfelix J, Coosemans T, …, Macharis C (2014) The hourly life cycle carbon footprint of electricity generation in Belgium, bringing a temporal resolution in life cycle assessment. Appl Energy 134:469–476

  • Mezouar H, El Afia A (2016) A process simulation model for a proposed Moroccan supply chain of electricity. Int Renew Sustain Energy Confer (IRSEC) 2016:647–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirhashemi MS, Mohseni S, Hasanzadeh M, Pishvaee MS (2018) Moringa oleifera biomass-to-biodiesel supply chain design: an opportunity to combat desertification in Iran. J Clean Prod 203:313–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitridati L, Pinson P (2018) A Bayesian inference approach to unveil supply curves in electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 33(3):2610–2620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohseni S, Pishvaee MS (2016) A robust programming approach towards design and optimization of microalgae-based biofuel supply chain. Comput Ind Eng 100:58–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohseni S, Pishvaee MS (2020) Data-driven robust optimization for wastewater sludge-to-biodiesel supply chain design. Comput Ind Eng 139:105944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohseni S, Pishvaee MS, Sahebi H (2016) Robust design and planning of microalgae biomass-to-biodiesel supply chain: a case study in Iran. Energy 111:736–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Konno N (1998) The concept of “Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. Calif Manage Rev 40(3):40–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira FS, Ruiz C, Conejo AJ (2013) Contract design and supply chain coordination in the electricity industry. Eur J Oper Res 227(3):527–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osisiogu UA, Okafor PN (2018) On electric power supply chain model for three different tariff customers in South East Nigeria

  • Osmani A, Zhang J (2014) Optimal grid design and logistic planning for wind and biomass based renewable electricity supply chains under uncertainties. Energy 70:514–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paatero JV, Lund PD (2006) A model for generating household electricity load profiles. Int J Energy Res 30(5):273–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palander T (2011) Modelling renewable supply chain for electricity generation with forest, fossil, and wood-waste fuels. Energy 36(10):5984–5993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandit NR (1996) The creation of theory: a recent application of the grounded theory method. Qual Rep 2(4):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasjidin R, Kumar A, Alam F, Abosuliman S (2012) A system dynamics conceptual model on retail electricity supply and demand system to minimize retailer’s cost in eastern Australia. Procedia Eng 49:330–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi T, Babazadeh R, Doniavi A (2021) Designing and planning the animal waste-to-energy supply chains: a case study. Renew Energy Focus 39:37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter A, van der Laan E, Ketter W, Valogianni K (2012) Transitioning from the traditional to the smart grid: lessons learned from closed-loop supply chains. 2012 International Conference on Smart Grid Technology, Economics and Policies (SG-TEP), 1–7

  • Röder M, Whittaker C, Thornley P (2015) How certain are greenhouse gas reductions from bioenergy? Life cycle assessment and uncertainty analysis of wood pellet-to-electricity supply chains from forest residues. Biomass Bioenerg 79:50–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rafique R, Jat M, Chudhery MAZ (2021) Bioenergy supply chain optimization for addressing energy deficiency: a dynamic model for large-scale network designs. J Clean Prod 318:128495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C et al. (2020) Techno-economic and environmental assessment of power supply chain by using waste biomass gasification in Iceland. BioPhys Econ Sustain 5(7)

  • Sarkar B, Tayyab M, Choi S-B (2019) Product channeling in an O2O supply chain management as power transmission in electric power distribution systems. Mathematics 7(1):4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabani N, Sowlati T (2016) A hybrid multi-stage stochastic programming-robust optimization model for maximizing the supply chain of a forest-based biomass power plant considering uncertainties. J Clean Prod 112:3285–3293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafie SM, Masjuki HH, Mahlia TMI (2014) Rice straw supply chain for electricity generation in Malaysia: economical and environmental assessment. Appl Energy 135:299–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbazbegian V, Hosseini-Motlagh S-M, Haeri A (2020) Integrated forward/reverse logistics thin-film photovoltaic power plant supply chain network design with uncertain data. Appl Energy 277:115538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoes S, Huppes G, Seixas J (2015) A tangled web: assessing overlaps between energy and environmental policy instruments along the electricity supply chain. Environ Policy Gov 25(6):439–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Xu S, Li G (2020a) Analyzing sustainable power supply chain performance. J Enterprise Inform Manag

  • Sun J, Xu S, Li G (2020b) Does China’s power supply chain systems perform well? A data-based path-index meta-frontier analysis. Industr Manag Data Syst

  • Tirkolaee EB, Goli A, Ghasemi P, Goodarzian F (2022) Designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic: Pareto-based algorithms. J Clean Prod 333:130056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng ML, Ha HM, Wu KJ, Xue B (2021) Healthcare industry circular supply chain collaboration in Vietnam: vision and learning influences on connection in a circular supply chain and circularity business model. Int J Logistics Res Appl 1–26

  • (US) EIA, Office GP (2016) International Energy Outlook 2016, with Projections to 2040. Government Printing Office

  • Wang C, Zhang L, Chang Y, Pang M (2015) Biomass direct-fired power generation system in China: an integrated energy, GHG emissions, and economic evaluation for Salix. Energy Policy 84:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Zhang L, Zhou P, Chang Y, Zhou D, Pang M, Yin H (2019) Assessing the environmental externalities for biomass-and coal-fired electricity generation in China: a supply chain perspective. J Environ Manage 246:758–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X-H, Cong R-G (2012) Electric power supply chain management addressing climate change. Procedia Eng 29:749–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangsa ID, Wee HM (2019) The economical modelling of a distribution system for electricity supply chain. Energy Syst 10(2):415–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangsa I, Yang T, Wee H (2018) The effect of price-dependent demand on the sustainable electrical energy supply chain. Energies 11(7):1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar B, Tayyab M, Choi SB (2018) Product channeling in an O2O supply chain management as power transmission in electric power distribution systems. Mathematics 7(1):4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisser D (2007) A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies. Energy 32(9):1543–1559

  • Xingang Z, Jieyu W, Xiaomeng L, Pingkuo L (2012) China’s wind, biomass and solar power generation: what the situation tells us? Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(8):6173–6182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Chung CY, Wong KP (2012) Optimal fuel, power and load-based emissions trades for electric power supply chain equilibrium. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27(3):1147–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi H, Hajiesmaili MH, Zhang Y, Chen M, Lin X (2018) Impact of the uncertainty of distributed renewable generation on deregulated electricity supply chain. IEEE Transact Smart Grid 9(6):6183–6193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare K, Mehri-Tekmeh J, Karimi S (2015) A SWOT framework for analyzing the electricity supply chain using an integrated AHP methodology combined with fuzzy-TOPSIS. Int Strat Manag Rev 3(1–2):66–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žarković SD, Hilber P, Shayesteh E (2018) On the security of electricity supply in power distribution systems. IEEE Int Confer Probabilistic Methods Appl Power Syst (PMAPS) 2018:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Samsatli NJ, Hawkes AD, Brett DJL, Shah N, Papageorgiou LG (2013) Fair electricity transfer price and unit capacity selection for microgrids. Energy Econ 36:581–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou K, Wei S, Yang S (2019) Time-of-use pricing model based on power supply chain for user-side microgrid. Appl Energy 248:35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Huang G, Liu L, Li K (2022) Development of a stochastic multistage lifecycle programming model for electric power system planning–a case study for the Province of Saskatchewan Canada. Renew Sust Energ Rev 158:112044

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Mahdi Yousefi Nejad Attari, Ali Ala, and Zohreh Khalilpour Shiraz performed material preparation, data collection, and analysis. Mahdi Yousefi Nejad Attari wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and Ali Ala did the conceptualization, validation, visualization, and Zohreh Khalilpour Shiraz read and checked the final review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Ala.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Attari, M.Y.N., Ala, A. & Khalilpourshiraz, Z. The electric power supply chain network design and emission reduction policy: a comprehensive review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 55541–55567 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21373-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21373-w

Keywords

Navigation