Abstract
The increasing drift of urbanization and its impact on urban human settlements are of major concern for China cities. Therefore, demystifying the spatial–temporal patterns, regional types, and affecting factors of urban livability in China is beneficial to urban planning and policy making regarding the construction of livable cities. In accordance with its connotation and denotation, this study develops a systematic evaluation and analysis framework for urban livability. Drawing on the panel data of 40 major cities in China from 2005 to 2019, an empirical research was further conducted. The results show that urban livability in China has exhibited a rising trend during the period, but this differs across dimensions. The levels of urban security and environmental health are lower than those of the three other dimensions. Spatially, cities with higher livability are mainly distributed in the first quadrant divided by the Hu Line and Bole-Taipei Line. Cities in the third quadrant are equipped with the lowest livability. In addition, the 40 major cities can be divided into five categories, and obvious differences exist in terms of the geographical distribution, overall livability level, and sub-dimensional characteristics of the different types. Furthermore, the results of the System GMM estimator indicate that the overall economic development exerts an inhibiting effect on the improvement of urban livability in present-day China, but this logical effect exhibits obvious heterogeneity in different time periods and diverse city scales. Finally, there are also differences in the influencing direction and degree of specific economic determinants.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Notes
The website is: https://info.ceicdata.com/ceic-database-demo-request-social-media-cn.
The website is: http://cdc.cma.gov.cn.
Due to space limitations, the specific process of clustering is omitted, and those who are interested can obtain it from the author.
References
Badland H, Whitzman C, Lowe M (2014) Urban livability: emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health. Soc Sci Med 111:64–73
Biresselioglu ME, Kilinc D, Onater-Isberkb E, Yelkenci T (2016) Estimating the political, economic and environmental factors’ impact on the installed wind capacity development: a system GMM approach. Renew Energy 96(10):636–644
Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 87(1):115–143
Buys L, Miller E (2012) Residential satisfaction in inner urban higher-density Brisbane, Australia: role of dwelling design, neighborhood and neighbors. J Environ Planning Manage 55(3):319–338
Cao YQ, Li F, Xi XS, Corné van Bilsen DJ, Xu LY (2021) Urban livability: agent-based simulation, assessment, and interpretation for the case of Futian District. Shenzhen. J Clean Prod 320:128662
Chatterjee K, Chng S, Clark B, Davis A, De Vos J, Ettema D, Reardon L (2020) Commuting and wellbeing: a critical overview of the literature with implications for policy and future research. Transp Rev 40(1):5–34
Chen D S, Zhang Y T, Yao Y, Hong Y, Guan Q F, Tu W (2019) Exploring the spatial differentiation of urbanization on two sides of the Hu Huanyong Line-based on nighttime light data and cellular automata. Applied Geography 112:202081
Chen LL, Cha LS (2010) Problem in human settlements research in China. Guangzhou Environ Sci 25(1):1–4
Chen L, Zhang WZ, Yang YZ, Yu JH (2013) Disparities in residential environment and satisfaction among urban residents in Dalian, China. Habitat Int 40:100–108
De Vos J, Van Acker V, Witlox F (2016) Urban sprawl: neighborhood dissatisfaction and urban preferences Some Evidence from Flanders. Urban Geogr 37(6):839–862
Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G, Papayannakis L (1995) Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the CRITIC method. Comput Oper Res 22(7):763–770
Doxiadis CA (1968) Ekistics: An Introduction to the Science of Human Settlements. Oxford University Press, London
Ellis P, Roberts M (2016) Leveraging urbanization in south Asia: Managing spatial transformation for prosperity and livability. Working Papers 105(4):137–141
Fang CL (2020) Bole-Taipei Line: the important function and basic conception as a line for regional balanced development. Acta Geographic Sinica 75(2):211–225
Fang K, He JJ, Zhang JQ (2021a) Analysis of the Bole-Taipei Line as the divide for regional coordinated development: evidence from greenhouse gas emissions of Chinese cities. Acta Geographical Sinica 76(12):3090–3102
Fang X, Zou JQ, Wu YF, Zhang YF, Zhao Y, Zhang HF (2021) Evaluation of the sustainable development of an island? Blue economy? A case study of Hainan. China. Sustain Cities Soc 66:102662
Fu B, Yu DL, Zhang YJ (2019) The livable urban landscape: GIS and remote sensing extracted land use assessment for urban livability in Changchun Proper. China. Land Use Policy 87:104048
Fu Y, Zhang X (2017) Planning for sustainable cities? A comparative content analysis of the master plans of eco, low-carbon and conventional new towns in China. Habitat Int 63:55–66
Gao PY, Du C, Liu XH et al (2019) The construction of a modern economic system in the context of high-quality development: a new framework. Econ Res J 4:4–17
Ghasemi K, Hamzenejad M, Meshkini A (2018) The spatial analysis of the livability of 22 districts of Tehran Metropolis using multi-criteria decision-making approaches. Sustain Cities Soc 38:382–404
Goerlich FJ, Reig E (2021) Quality of life ranking of Spanish cities: a non-compensatory approach. Cities 109:102979
Hoeffler AE (2002) The augmented Solow model and the African growth debate. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 64(2):135–158
Howard E (1989) To-morrow: a peaceful path to real reform: garden cities of tomorrow. Faber and Faber, London
Hu QY, Wang C (2020) Quality evaluation and division of regional types of rural human settlements in China. Habitat Int 105:102278
Kaal H (2011) A conceptual history of livability: Dutch scientists, politicians, policy makers & citizens and the quest for a livable city. Cities 15:532–547
Karasan A, Bolturk E, Kahraman C (2019) An integrated methodology using neuromorphic CODAS & fuzzy inference system: assessment of livability index of urban districts. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36(3):5443–5455
Kashef M (2016) Review: urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries. Front Archit Res 5:239–253
Kennedy P (1992) A guide to econometrics. Blackwell, Oxford
Kumar A, Rai AK (2014) Urbanization process, trend, pattern and its consequences in India. Neo Geographia, III(IV): 54–77
Lauster N (2019) What’s livable? Comparing concepts and metrics for housing and livability. In M. Moos (Ed.), A research agenda for housing. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing
Li LP, Zhong SH, Guo FY, Guo XH, Guo XX (2021) Paying for the quality of life: the impacts of urban livability on CEO compensation. Habitat Int 116:102416
Li X, Huang Y, Ma XD (2021) Evaluation of the accessible urban public green space at the community-scale with the consideration of temporal accessibility and quality. Ecol Indic 131:108231
Li XF, Yang H, Jia J, Sheng Y, Liu JQ (2021) Index system of sustainable rural development based on the concept of ecological livability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 86:106478
Li XM, Jin PY (2012) Characteristics and spatial-temporal differences of urban human settlement environment in China. Scientia Geographic Sinica 32(5):521–529
Li YR, Qiao LY, Wang QY, Karacsonyi D (2020) Towards the evaluation of rural livability in China: theoretical framework and empirical case study. Habitat Int 105:102241
Li Z, Wu F (2013) Residential satisfaction in China’s informal settlements: a case study of Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou. Urban Geogr 34(7):923–949
Liu JJ, Nijkamp P, Huang XX, Lin DR (2017) Urban livability and tourism development in China: analysis of sustainable development by means of spatial panel data. Habitat Int 68:99–107
Liu Y (2016) Revisiting several basic geographical concepts: a social sensing perspective. Acta Geogr Sin 71(4):564–575
Liang L, Deng XZ, Wang P, Wang ZH, Wang LS (2020) Assessment of the impact of climate change on cities livability in China. Sci Total Environ 726(6):138339
Ma RR, Wang TF, Zhang WZ, Yu JH, Wang D, Cheng L et al (2014) Overview and progress of Chinese geographical human settlement research. J Geog Sci 26(8):1159–1175
Mahmoudi M, Ahmad F, Abbasi B (2015) Livable streets: the effects of physical problems on the quality and livability of Kuala Lumpur streets. Cities 43:104–114
De Jesus M, Puleo E, Shelton RC, Emmons KM (2010) Associations between perceived social environment and neighborhood safety: Health implications. Health & Place 16(5):1007–1013
Martínez L, Short J, Ortíz M (2015) Citizen satisfaction with public goods and government services in the global urban south: a case study of Cali, Colombia. Habitat Int 49:84–91
McCann E (2007) Inequality and politics in the creative city-region: questions of livability and state strategy. Int J Urban Reg Res 31:188–196
Mohit MA, Ibrahim M, Rashid YR (2010) Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia Habitat Int 34(1):18–27
Monkkonen P, Andre C, Escamilla M, Alberto J, Guerra E (2018) Urban sprawl and the growing geographic scale of segregation in Mexico, 1990–2010. Habitat Int 73:89–95
Mouratidis K (2019) Compact city, urban sprawl, and subjective well-being. Cities 92:261–272
Mouratidis K (2020) Commute satisfaction, neighborhood satisfaction, and housing satisfaction as predictors of subjective well-being and indicators of urban livability. Travel Behavior and Society 21:265–278
Mouratidis K, Yiannakou A (2022) What makes cities livable? Determinants of neighborhood satisfaction and neighborhood happiness in different contexts. Land Use Policy 112:105855
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2021) China City Statistical Yearbook. China Statistical Press
Newman PWG (1999) Sustainability and cities: extending the metabolism model. Landscape & Urban Planning 44(4):219–226
Niknam T, Amiri B (2010) An efficient hybrid approach based on PSO, ACO and K-means for cluster analysis. Appl Soft Comput 10:183–197
Ogneva-Himmelberger Y, Rakshit R, Pearsall H (2013) Examining the impact of environmental factors on quality of life across Massachusetts. Prof Geogr 65(2):187–204
Okulicz-Kozaryn A (2011) City life: rankings (livability) versus perceptions (satisfaction). Soc Indic Res 110(2):433–451
Ouyang W, Wang BY, Tian L, Niu XY (2017) Spatial deprivation of urban public services in migrant enclaves under the context of a rapidly urbanizing China: an evaluation based on suburban Shanghai. Cities 60:436–445
Pacione M (1990) Urban livability: a review. Urban Geogr 11:1–30
Papachristou IA, Rosas-Casals M (2019) Cities and quality of life. Quantitative modeling of the emergence of the happiness field in urban studies. Cities 88:191–208
Paul A (2020) Developing a methodology for assessing livability potential: an evidence from a metropolitan urban agglomeration (MUA) in Kolkata India. Habitat Int 105:102263
Paul A, Sen J (2018) Livability assessment within a metropolis based on the impact of integrated urban geographic factors (IUGFs) on clustering urban centers of Kolkata. Cities 74:142–150
Rehdanz K, Maddison D (2008) Local environmental quality and life-satisfaction in Germany. Ecol Econ 64(4):787–797
Ren H, Folmer H (2016) Determinants of residential satisfaction in urban China: a multi-group structural equation analysis. Urban Studies 54(6):140–1425
Foundation R (2014) City resilience framework. Ove Arup & Partners International Limited, London
Ruth M, Franklin RS (2014) Livability for all? Conceptual limits and practical implications. Appl Geogr 49:18–23
Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15(3):234–281
Shekhar H, Schmidt AJ, Wehling H-W (2019) Exploring wellbeing in human settlements -a spatial planning perspective. Habitat Internal 87:66–74
Sirgy MJ, Cornwell T (2002) How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Soc Indic Res 59(1):79–114
Sofeska E (2017) Understanding the livability in a city through smart solutions and urban planning toward developing sustainable livable future of the City of Skopje. Procedia Environ Sci 37:442–453
Song J, Li XC (2019) Trends analysis industrial transformation’s impact on employment demand and skill preference. J Quant Tech Econ 36(10):38–57
Stanislav A, Chin JT (2019) Evaluating livability and perceived values of sustainable neighborhood design: new urbanism and original urban suburbs. Sustain Cities Soc 47(1):101517
Tan M, Zhao H, Li G, Qu JF (2020) Assessment of potentially toxic pollutants and urban livability in a typical resource-based city. China Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(15):18640–18649
Tang L, Ruth M, He Q, Mizaee S (2017) Comprehensive evaluation of trends in human settlements quality changes and spatial differentiation characteristics of 35 Chinese major cities. Habitat Int 70:81–90
Tang P, Shi XP, Gao JL, Feng S (2019) Demystifying the key for intoxicating land finance in China: an empirical study through the lens of government expenditure. Land Use Policy 85:302–309
Tao L, Wong FKW, Hui ECM (2014) Residential satisfaction of migrant workers in China: a case study of Shenzhen. Habitat Int 42:193–202
Tolfo G, Doucet B (2021) Livability for whom? Planning for livability and the gentrification of memory in Vancouver. Cities 123:103564
Tonne C, Adair L, Adlakha D, Anguelovski I, Belesova K, Berger M, Adli M (2021) Defining pathways to healthy sustainable urban development. Environ Int 146:106236
Wey WM, Huang JY (2018) Urban sustainable transportation planning strategies for livable City’s quality of life. Habitat Int 82:9–27
Węziak-Białowolska D (2016) Quality of life in cities: empirical evidence in comparative European perspective. Cities 58:87–96
Wang Y, Jin C, Lu MQ, Liu YQ (2017) Assessing the suitability of regional human settlements environment from a different preferences perspective: a case study of Zhejiang Province. China Habitat Int 70:1–12
Wang Y, Zhu YM, Yu MJ, Xu J (2020) Quantitative evaluation and spatial differentiation of eco-environmental livability in Zhejiang Province. China J Mt Sci 17(6):1491–1508
Wu HT, Ren SY, Yan GY, Hao Y (2020) Does China’s outward direct investment improve green total factor productivity in the “Belt and Road” countries? Evidence from dynamic threshold panel model analysis. J Environ Manag 275:111295
Xiao T (2016) Whether the environmental quality is the leading factor of labor mobility? Economic Review 2:3–17. (in Chinese)
Xiao Y, Chai JX, Wang R, Huang H (2022) Assessment and key factors of urban livability in underdeveloped regions: a case study of the Loess Plateau China. Sustain Cities and Soc 79:103674
Yassin HH (2019) Livable city: an approach to pedestrianization through tactical urbanism. Alex Eng J 58(1):251–259
Yu C, Wang FZ (2014) Quantitative analysis about coordinating development of livability and economy in Xinyang. China Popul Resour Environ 24(5):426–429
Yu J, Wen J (2016) Multi-criteria satisfaction assessment of the spatial distribution of urban emergency shelters based on high-precision population estimation. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 7(4):413–429
Zanella A, Camanho AS, Dias TG (2014) The assessment of cities’ livability integrating human wellbeing and environmental impact. Ann Oper Res 226(1):695–726
Zhan DS, Kwan MP, Zhang WZ, Fan J, Yu JH, Dang YX (2018) Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China. Cities 79:92–101
Zhang WZ (2016) The core framework of the livable city construction. Geogr Res 35(2):205–213
Zhang WZ, Cao J, He J, Chen L (2021) City health examination in China: a methodology and empirical study. Chin Geogra Sci 31(6):951–965
Zhou L, Zhou CH, Yang F, Che L, Wang B, Sun DQ (2019) Spatio-temporal evolution and the influencing factors of PM2.5 in China between 2000 and 2015. J Geogr Sci 29(2):253–270
Zhang WZ, Chen L, Dang YX, Zhan DS (2016) Theory and practice of harmonious and livable city construction. Science Press, Beijing
Zheng L (2014) What city amenities matter in attracting smart people? Pap Reg Sci 95(2):309–327
Funding
The study is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41901205) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20190482).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yi Wang: conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, and supervision. Zhuanying Miao: data curation, writing—reviewing, and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This research project has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanjing University of Science and Technology.
Consent to participate
Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all the authors.
Consent for publication
The author confirms that the article described has not been published before; not considering publishing elsewhere; its publication has been approved by all the co-authors; Its publication has been approved (acquiesced or publicly approved) by the responsible authority of the institution where it works. The author agrees to publish in the following journals, and agrees to publish articles in the corresponding English journals of Environmental Science and Pollution Research. If the article is accepted for publication, the copyright of English articles will be transferred to Environmental Science and Pollution Research. The author declares that his contribution is original and that he has full rights to receive this grant. The author requests and assumes responsibility for publishing this material on behalf of any and all the co-authors. Copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to copy and distribute articles, including printed matter, translation, photo reproduction, microform, electronic form (offline, online), or any other reproduction of similar nature.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
This is the derivation for the calculation formula of the combined weight method. In Sect. 3.2, we have obtained the objective weight (w1j) and the subjective weight (w2j) of each indicator. Now, we need to calculate the combined weight (wj) based on the w1j and w2j.
First, according to the relative entropy formula:
The total relative entropy can be expressed as follows:
Then, according to the principle of minimum relative entropy, when the total relative entropy is minimum, wj is the closest to w1j and w2j. Next, the minimum value of F can be calculated:
Assuming \(\varphi \left({w}_{1},{w}_{1},\dots {w}_{n}\right)= {\sum }_{j=1}^{n}{w}_{j}-1=0\), we can construct a Lagrangian function:
Subsequently, according to the Lagrange Multiplier Method, we can get:
Arranging the first equation, we can get:
Substituting Eq. (18) into Eq. (17), we can get:
Therefore:
Substituting Eq. (20) into Eq. (18), we can know that F can obtain an extreme value when \({w}_{j}=\frac{\sqrt{{w}_{1j}\times {w}_{2j}}}{\sum_{j=1}^{n}\sqrt{{w}_{1j}\times {w}_{2j}}}\). Combined with the actual situation, this extreme value should be the minimum value.
In this way, we can get the final combined weight (wj) of each indicator.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Miao, Z. Towards the analysis of urban livability in China: spatial–temporal changes, regional types, and influencing factors. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 60153–60172 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20092-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20092-6