Skip to main content
Log in

A review on water simulation models for the WEF Nexus: development perspective

  • Circular Economy Application in Designing Sustainable Medical Waste Management Systems
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary impediment to adopting the Water, Energy, and Food (WEF) Nexus is a lack of a comprehensive and user-friendly simulation model. According to our search on Google Scholar and the Scopus databank, WEF Nexus studies can be divided into three broad categories: (1) studies about the nexus concept, (2) studies related to nexus modeling and software development, and (3) case studies. Given that the present study’s objective is to review various solutions for WEF Nexus modeling and also to prepare a checklist of available models to find a better model for nexus simulation, we excluded papers and studies which were related to the nexus concept. After that, we split up other papers that talked about nexus and software development into (1) integrated and (2) compiled approaches. Then, it was attempted to identify the shortcomings in each approach. It was shown that the existing integrated WEF Nexus models (such as MUSIASEM, NexSym, CLEW, and ANEMI) had some significant drawbacks compared to compiled alternatives. Several of the major shortcomings of existing integrated models include the following: (1) They did not cover all spatial scales; (2) they included only a limited number of interactions across WEF subsystems; and (3) some of these models were unavailable. Therefore, as a general result of the current study, it was shown that compiled approach is generally preferable compared to available integrated models. In this regard, we tried to find the best water simulation models to implement in the nexus concept. We searched for papers about water simulation models and defined water subsystem requirements in the nexus concept. So, we evaluated each water simulation model based on its ability to cover water subsystem requirements. This work illustrates the capability of a suitable water simulation model to be utilized in the nexus concept and provides a holistic checklist to choose the preferred water simulation model based on the needs of each issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

adapted from Molajou et al. (2021a)

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors declare that the data are not available and can be presented upon the request of the readers.

References

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Elham Soleimanian: conceptualization, original draft, visualization, writing and editing; Abbas Afshar: supervision, conceptualization, review, and editing; Amir Molajou: conceptualization, original draft, and visualization.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Molajou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Marcus Schulz

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soleimanian, E., Afshar, A. & Molajou, A. A review on water simulation models for the WEF Nexus: development perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 79769–79785 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19849-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19849-w

Keywords

Navigation