Abstract
As the major energy consumers, energy-intensive industries are the key players in achieving carbon emission reduction targets. The paper builds a super slack-based model (SBM) considering this undesirable output and calculates the carbon emission efficiency. Then, the meta-frontier Malmquist–Luenberger productivity index (MF-MLPI) is constructed to dynamically analyze the growth rate changes of the carbon emission efficiency and the regional differences in energy-intensive industries. Furthermore, the carbon emission reduction potential of the energy-intensive industries in various economic regions of China is discussed, and the conclusions are as follows: there is a big difference in the carbon emission technology gap ratios (TGRs) of the energy-intensive industries in different economic regions; the growth rate of the carbon emission efficiency of energy-intensive industries shows a trend of first declining and then slowly recovering, while the carbon reduction potential generally shows a trend of decreasing and then rising; and the carbon emission reduction potential in the eastern region keeps decreasing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data and materials used in the study are available from the corresponding author by request.
References
Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 39:1261–1264. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
Branger F, Quirion P (2015) Reaping the carbon rent: abatement and overallocation profits in the European cement industry, insights from an LMDI decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 47:189–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.11.008
Cai W, Wang C, Chen J, Ke W, Lu X (2008) Comparison of CO2 emission scenarios and mitigation opportunities in China’s five sectors in 2020. Energy Policy 36(3):1181–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.11.030
Chen Z, Zhao W, Zheng H (2021) Potential output gap in China’s regional coal-fired power sector under the constraint of carbon emission reduction. Energy Policy 148:111888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111888
Chung Y, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51(3):229–240. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1997.0146
de la Rue du Can S, Price L (2008) Sectorial trends in global energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy 36(4):1386–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.12.017
Ding L, Yang Y, Wang W, Calin AC (2019) Regional carbon emission efficiency and its dynamic evolution in China: A novel cross efficiency-malmquist productivity index. Journal of Cleaner Production 241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118260
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Pasurka CA (2007) Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy 32(7):1055–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.09.005
Gerres T, Chaves-Ávila JP, Linares P, Gomez T (2019) A review of cross-sector decarbonisation potentials in the European energy intensive industries. J Clean Prod 210:585–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.036
Guo C (2014) Estimation of industrial carbon emission reduction potential in China. Chin Population Resourc Environ 24(9):13–20
Guo P, Qi X, Zhou X, Li W (2018) Total-factor energy efficiency of coal consumption: an empirical analysis of China’s energy intensive industries. J Clean Prod 172:2618–2624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.149
Hayami Y (1969) Sources of agricultural productivity gap among selected countries. Am J Agricult Econ 51(3):564–575. https://doi.org/10.2307/1237909
Hasan A, Tuhin RA, Ullah M, Sakib TH, Thollander P, Trianni A (2021) A comprehensive investigation of energy management practices within energy intensive industries in Bangladesh. Energy 232:120932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120932
Hussain A, Perwez U, Ullah K, Kim C, Asghar N (2021) Long-term scenario pathways to assess the potential of best available technologies and cost reduction of avoided carbon emissions in an existing 100% renewable regional power system: a case study of Gilgit-Baltistan (GB). Pakistan Energy 221:119855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.119855
IEA (2015) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion highlights 2015. Retrieved from IEA,2015: https://www.iea.org/terms
IEA (2017) Tracking clean energy progress 2017-----energy technology perspectives 2017 excerpt informing energy sector transformations. Paris, France: International Energy Agency
IPCC (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories 2006. URL: https://www.ipcc- nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html
Kang JN, Wei YM, Liu L, Han R, Chen H, Li J, Wang JW, Yu Y (2020) The prospects of carbon capture and storage in China’s power sector under the 2◦C target: a component-based learning curve approach. Int J Greenhouse Gas Cont 101:103149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103149
Lee H (2021) Is carbon neutrality feasible for Korean manufacturing firms?: The CO2 emissions performance of the Metafrontier Malmquist-Luenberger index. J Environ Manag 297:113235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113235
Li J, Cheng Z (2020) Study on total-factor carbon emission efficiency of China’s manufacturing industry when considering technology heterogeneity. J Clean Prod 260:121021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121021
Li Z, Dai H, Song J, Sun L, Geng Y, Lu K, Hanaoka T (2019) Assessment of the carbon emissions reduction potential of China’s iron and steel industry based on a simulation analysis. Energy 183:279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.099
Lin B, Tan R (2016) Ecological total-factor energy efficiency of China’s energy intensive industries. Ecol Indicators 70:480–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.026
Lin B, Tan R (2017) Sustainable development of China’s energy intensive industries: from the aspect of carbon dioxide emissions reduction. Renewab Sustainab Energy Rev 77:386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.042
Liu D, Cheng R, Li X, Zhao M (2021a) On the driving factors of China’s provincial carbon emission from the view of periods and groups. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:51971–51988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14268-9
Liu H, Fan J, Zhou D, Zhang H (2019a) The evolution of spatial distribution and its influencing factors of high-energy intensive industry in China since 2000. Econ Geogr 39(5):110–118
Liu H, Fan J, Zeng Y, Guo R (2019b) Spatiotemporal differences in carbon intensity in high-energy-intensive industry and its influence factors in China. Acta Ecol Sin 39(22):8357–8369
Liu S, Xu R, Chen, X (2021) Does green credit affect the green innovation performance of high-polluting and energy-intensive enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15217-2 Accessed 6 July 2021
Liu X (2017) Dynamic analysis of the factors influencing the growth of carbon emissions in China’s industrial sector. Seeker 7:86–90
Ngo TQ (2021) How do environmental regulations affect carbon emission and energy efficiency patterns? A provincial-level analysis of Chinese energy-intensive industries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15843-w Accessed 13 August 2021
Oh D, Lee J (2010) A meta-frontier approach for measuring Malmquist productivity index. Empirical Economics 38:47–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0255-0
Özer B, Görgün E, İncecik S (2012) The scenario analysis on CO2 emission mitigation potential in the Turkish electricity sector: 2006–2030. Energy 49:395–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.10.059
Qi X, Guo P, Guo Y, Liu X, Zhou X (2020) Understanding energy efficiency and its drivers: an empirical analysis of China’s 14 coal intensive industries. Energy 190:116354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116354
Rootze J, Johnsson F (2015) CO2 emissions abatement in the Nordic carbon-intensive industry––an end game in sight? Energy 80:715–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.029
Saygin D, van den Broek M, Ramírez A, Pate MKR, Worrell E (2013) Modelling the future CO2 abatement potentials of energy efficiency and CCS: the case of the Dutch industry. Int J Greenhouse Gas Cont 18:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.05.032
Shan H (2008) Re-estimating the capital stock of China: 1952–2006. J Quant Technical Econ 10:17–31
Shao W, Li F (2018) Driving forces analysis of growth of energy-intensive industries in China under the background of overcapacity. Soft Sci 32(1):41–46
Song C, Oh W (2015) Determinants of innovation in energy intensive industry and implications for energy policy. Energy Policy 81:122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.022
Sueyoshi T, Qu J, Li A, Xie C (2020) Understanding the efficiency evolution for the Chinese provincial power industry: a new approach for combining data envelopment analysis-discriminant analysis with an efficiency shift across periods. J Clean Prod 277: 122371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122371
Tan R, Lin B (2020) The influence of carbon tax on the ecological efficiency of China’s energy intensive industries—a inter-fuel and inter-factor substitution perspective. J Environ Manag 261:110252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110252
Tang W, Wu L, Qian H (2016) From pollution-heaven to green-growth–––impact of carbon-market relocation of energy-intensive-sector. Econ Res J 6:58–70
Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Operation Res 143(1):32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.12.007
Tone K (2004) Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: a slacks-based measure (SBM) approach. North American Productivity Workshop 2004, Toronto, 23–25 June 2014: 44–45
Wei C, Löschel A, Liu B (2013) An empirical analysis of the CO2 shadow price in Chinese thermal power enterprises. Energy Economics 40:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.05.018
Wei W, Mushtaq Z, Sharif M, Zeng X, Zhang W, Qaisrani M A (2020) Evaluating the coal rebound effect in energy intensive industries of China. Energy 207:118247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118247
Wen Z (2015) Carbon emission reduction potential and development strategy of the industrial sector. Chin Nat Conditions Strength 12:14–16
Yang M, Lu X, Duan H (2018) Analysis on the determinants and peaking paths of CO2 emissions on China’s high energy-consuming industries. Syst Eng-Theory Pract 38(10):2501–2511
Yu S, Agbemabiese L, Zhang J (2016) Estimating the carbon abatement potential of economic sectors in China. Appl Energy 165:107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.064
Funding
The funding for this research was provided by Jiangsu Provincial Social Science Fund (Grant No:19EYB012) and the Jiangsu University Philosophy and Social Science Project (Grant No:2019SJA0187) in China. Furthermore, we are grateful to the professors that gave us a lot of advice on the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yao Chen, writing—original draft, methodology, formal analysis, conceptualization, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition. Jing Wu, investigation, data curation, and formal analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All studies did not involve human or animal ethics.
Consent for publication
This manuscript hasn’t contained any individual person’s data in any form.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Roula Inglesi-Lotz
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Y., Wu, J. Changes in carbon emission performance of energy-intensive industries in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 43913–43927 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18354-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18354-w