Abstract
Ratoon rice (RR) is regarded as a labor-saving and efficient approach to rice cultivation; however, sub-optimal production techniques (fertilization, irrigation, harvesting) may lead to serious environmental problems and unsustainable agriculture. In this study, emergy analysis was combined with indicators of soil fertility, global warming potential (GWP), and profitability to comprehensively assess the sustainability performance of three cultivation modes: (i) traditional farm practice (TRA), (ii) optimized mode (OPT), and (iii) OPT plus green manure planting (OPTM). Over 2 years, compared with the TRA mode, OPT and OPTM modes increased total rice yield by 10% and 19% on average and improved profit by 233.7 and 456.5 Yuan ha−1, respectively. Single emergy analysis results showed that, compared with the TRA mode, OPT and OPTM (2-year average value) modes increased production efficiency by 10% and 8%, reduced renewable fraction and emergy sustainability index by 14–19% and 18–23%, respectively, and increased environmental loading ratio by 31% and 22%. Multiple EMA analysis results showed that, compared with the TRA mode, OPT and OPTM (2-year average value) modes reduced UEVNmin by 23% and 21% and increased UEVGWP 32% and 51%, respectively. The UEVTotal revenue and UEVBenefit of OPT and OPTM increased by 8–29% and 4–37%, respectively, compared with TRA mode. The comprehensive assessment indicated that, despite OPT and OPTM modes have a range of improvements and dis-improvements versus the TRA mode, OPTM was the more sustainable mode of RR production overall. However, some sustainability indicators remained poor, and there remains scope for further optimization via, e.g., precision application of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers, application of a straw-decomposing inoculant to improve soil fertility, and use of new improved rice varieties with high regenerative ability to improve the yield of ratoon crops.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).
References
AghaAlikhani M, Kazemi-Poshtmasari H, Habibzadeh F (2013) Energy use pattern in rice production: a case study from Mazandaran province. Iran Energ Convers Manage 69:157–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.01.034
Brown MT, Ulgiati S (1997) Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation. Ecol Eng 9:51–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(97)00033-5
Brown MT, Ulgiati S (2004) Energy quality, emergy, and transformity: H.T. Odum’s contributions to quantifying and understanding systems. Ecol Model. 178(1):201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.03.002
Brown MT, Campbell DE, De Vilbiss C, Ulgiati S (2016) The geobiosphere emergy baseline: a synthesis. Ecol Model 339:92–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.03.018
Cao YX, Zhu JQ, Hou J (2020) Yield gap of ratoon rice and their influence factors in China. Sci Agric Sin 53:707–719. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.04.004 (in Chinese)
Cheng H, Chen CD, Wu SJ, Mirza ZA, Liu ZM (2017) Emergy evaluation of cropping, poultry rearing, and fish raising systems in the drawdown zone of Three Gorges Reservoir of China. J Clean Prod 144:559–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.053
Deng QJ, Cao ZG, Li CF (2019) Effects of different ratooning cultivation modes on greenhouse gas emissions and grain yields in paddy fields. J Agro-Environ Sci 38(06):1373–1380. https://doi.org/10.11654/jaes.2018-1400 (in Chinese)
Deng, Q.J., 2019b. Effects of cultivation modes on soil fertility, greenhouse gases emission and yield in ratoon rice fields. Huazhong Agricultural University (in Chinese).
Ding ZJ, Xu Z, Tian YB, Liu KW, Zhang DY, Zhu JQ, Hou J (2021) Reducing gas emissions from ratooning rice field using controlled nitrogen fertilization and alternate wetting-drying irrigation. J Irrig Drain 40(7):51–58. https://doi.org/10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2020288 (in Chinese)
FAO (2019) Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook, Rome, pp 2011–2030
He XQ, Qiao YH, Liang L, Knudsen MT, Martin F (2018) Environmental life cycle assessment of long-term organic rice production in subtropical China. J Clean Prod 176:880–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.045
Hou, J., Wang, X.L., Xu, Q., Cao, Y.X., Zhang, D.Y., Zhu, J.Q., 2021. Rice-crayfish systems are not a panacea for sustaining cleaner food production. Environ Sci Pollut R. 1–14https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-12345-7
Lan SF, Qin P, Lu HF (2002) Energy assessment of eco-ecological systems. Press, Chemical Industry, Beijing, China (in Chinese)
Li YX, Zhang WF, Ma L, Wu L, Shen JB, Davies WJ, Oenema O, Zhang FS, Dou ZX (2014) An analysis of China’s grain production: looking back and looking forward. Food Energy Secur 3:19–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.41
Li TY, Zhang WF, Yin J, David C, David N, Lu YL, Liu XJ, Chen XP, Zhang FS, David P, Dou ZX (2018) Enhanced-efficiency fertilizers are not a panacea for resolving the nitrogen problem. Global Change Biol 24(2):511–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13918
Lou B, Qiu Y, Ulgiati S (2015) Emergy-based indicators of regional environmental sustainability: a case study in Shanwei, Guangdong. China Ecol Indic 57:514–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.017
Lu HF, Tan YW, Zhang WS, Qiao YC, Campbell DE, Zhong L, Ren H (2017) Integrated emergy and economic evaluation of lotus-root production systems on reclaimed wetlands surrounding the Pearl River Estuary. China J Clean Prod 158:367–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.016
Lu HF, Bai Y, Ren H, Campbell DE (2010) Integrated emergy, energy and economic evaluation of rice and vegetable production systems in alluvial paddy fields: implications for agricultural policy in China. J Environ Manage 91:2727–2735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.025
Luo K (2016) The development status and strategy of ratooning rice industry in Hubei Province. Hubei Agric Sci. 55(12):3001–3002. https://doi.org/10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2016.12.003 (in Chinese)
Lyu ZF, Gao ZZ, Liu ZY, Jin T (2020) Effects of cover plant in winter on soil CH4 and N2O emission under the ratoon rice system. Hubei Agric Sci. 59(15):60–65. https://doi.org/10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2020.15.011 (in Chinese)
Odum HT (1986) Emergy in ecosystems. In: Polunin N (ed) Ecosystem theory and application. John Wiley and Sons, New York
Odum HT (1996) Environmental accounting: emergy and environmental decision making. Wiley, New York
Petroudi Rahimi E, Ghorban Noormohammadi, MirhadiJavad M, Hadani Madani, Mobasser Reza H (2011) Effects of nitrogen fertilization and rice harvest height on agronomic yield indices of ratoon rice-berseem clover intercropping system. Aust J Crop Sci 5:566–574. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2089
Raghuvanshi RS, Dutta A, Tewari G, Suri S (2017) Qualitative characteristics of red rice and white rice procured from local market of Uttarakhand: a comparative study. J Rice Res 10(1):49–53
Su, S., 2018. Effects of the paddy multiple cropping pattern on the greenhouse gas emission and soil organic carbon. Hunan Agricultural University (in Chinese).
Ulgiati S, Brown MT (1998) Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems. Ecol Model 108:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(98)00016-7
Wang XL, Li ZJ, Long P, Yan LL, Gao WS, Chen YQ, Sui P (2017) Sustainability evaluation of recycling in agricultural systems by emergy accounting. Resour Conserv Recy 117:114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.009
Win KT, Nonaka R, Win AT, Sasada Y, Toyota K, Motobayashi T (2015) Effects of water saving irrigation and rice variety on greenhouse gas emissions and water use efficiency in a paddy field fertilized with anaerobically digested pig slurry. Paddy Water Environ 13(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-013-0406-y
Xu FX, Xiong H, Zhang L, Zhu YC, Jiang P, Guo XY, Liu M (2015) Progress in research of yield formation of ratooning rice and its high-yielding key regulation technologies. Sci Agric Sin. 48:1702–1717. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.09.04 (in Chinese)
Xu Q, Wang XL, Xiao B, Hu KL (2019) Rice-crab coculture to sustain cleaner food production in Liaohe River Basin, China: an economic and environmental assessment. J Clean Prod 208:188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.092
Yao YL, Zhang M, Tian YH, Zhao M, Zhang B, Zhao M, Zeng K, Yin B (2018) Urea deep placement for minimizing NH3 loss in an intensive rice cropping system. Field Crop Res 218:254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.03.013
Yu S, Cui YL, Wang L, Zhao SJ, Xu YQ, Shi H (2016) Effects of intermittent irrigation on rice paddy soil fertility. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University. 49(01):46–53. https://doi.org/10.14188/j.1671-8844.2016-01-008 (in Chinese)
Yuan S, Cassman KG, Huang JL, Peng SB, Grassini P (2019) Can ratoon cropping improve resource use efficiencies and profitability of rice in central China? Field Crop Res 234:66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.004
Yuan S, Peng SB (2017) Input-output energy analysis of rice production in different crop management practices in central China. Energy 141:1124–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.007
Zhang GZ, Zhang YX, Huang JL, Zhai KY, Zhou Y, Huang HD, Fan QZ (2016) Designing and performance testing a novel head spike harvester of ratoon rice. J Huazhong Agricu Univ 35(01):131–136. https://doi.org/10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2016.01.021 (in Chinese)
Zhang LX, Ulgiati S, Yang ZF, Chen B (2011) Emergy evaluation and economic analysis of three wetland fish farming systems in Nansi Lake area. China J Environ Manag 92:683–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.005
Zhang SY, Jin MC, Ma C, Chai RS, Gao SF, Gao HJ (2018) Effect of straw returning with decomposing inoculants on grain yield and potassium fertilizer utilization efficiency of rice. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China. 01:49–55. https://doi.org/10.11838/sfsc.20180109 (in Chinese)
Zhang L, Xu QH, Li LL, Chen YW, Zheng HB, Tang QY, Tang JW (2019) Comparative study on CH4 emission from ratoon rice and double-cropping rice fields. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 52(12):2101–2113. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.12.008 (in Chinese)
Zhang Q, Chen J, Tu JM, Jin HM, Cao ZG, Peng SB, Huang JL, Cheng JP, Fang XW, Qian TP (2019) Comparative test results and evaluation of 23 rice varieties as ratooning rice. Sci Agric Sin. 58(24):12–15. https://doi.org/10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2019.24.003 (in Chinese)
Zhao ZH, Dai L, Huang JL, Pan XH, You AQ, Zhao QZ, Chen GH, Zhou Z, Hu WB, Ji L (2019) Status, problems and solutions in rice industry development in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Chin J Rice Sci. 33(6):553–564. https://doi.org/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2019.9061 (in Chinese)
Acknowledgements
Thanks to C.F Li for data collection.
Funding
This work is supported by the Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wetland, Ministry of Education (KF202109), and Hubei special fund for agricultural science and technology innovation (2018skjcx01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization and methodology: J.H. Investigation and data collection were performed by Z.D. and R.H. Analysis and review were performed by Z.D. and D.S. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Z.D., and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ding, Z., Hu, R., Styles, D. et al. Optimized ratoon rice system to sustain cleaner food production in Jianghan Plain, China: a comprehensive emergy assessment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 24639–24650 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17747-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17747-1