Abstract
Biosorption has been examined for the treatment of aqueous solutions containing uranium, a radiotoxic pollutant. Nevertheless, the evaluation of the role of process variables by experimental design on the use of hydroxyapatite and bone meal as biosorbents for uranium has not yet been previously addressed. In this study, the effects of adsorbent dosage (M), initial uranium concentrations ([U]0), and solution pH were investigated, using a two-level factorial design and response surface analysis. The experiments were performed in batch, with [U]0 of 100 and 500 mg L−1, pH 3 and 5, and adsorbent/uranium solution ratios of 5 and 15 g L−1. Contact time was fixed at 24 h. Removal rates were higher than 88%, with a maximum of 99% in optimized conditions. [U]0 and M were found to be the most influential variables in U removal in terms of adsorption capacity (q). The experiments revealed that bone meal holds higher adsorption capacity (49.87 mg g−1) and achieved the highest uranium removal (~ 100%) when compared to hydroxyapatite (q = 49.20 mg g−1, removal = 98.5%). The highest value of q for both biomaterials was obtained for [U]0 = 500 mg L−1, pH 3, and M = 5 g L−1. Concerning the removal percentage, bone meal achieved the best performance for [U]0 = 500 mg L−1, pH 3, and M = 15 g L−1. Further experiments were made with real radioactive waste, resulting in a high uranium adsorption capacity for both materials, with 22.11 mg g−1 for hydroxyapatite and 22.08 mg g−1 for bone meal, achieving uranium removal efficiencies higher than 99%.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information.
References
Abbas SH, Ismail IM, Moustafa TM et al (2014) Biosorption of heavy metals: a review. J Chem Sci Technol 3:74–102
Abozaid SM, Shetaia YM, Rabie KA, et al (2021) Recovery of uranium from solutions using Aspergillus nidulans isolated from monazite mineral Int J Environ Anal Chem 1–31https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2021.1939022
Ahmed W, Núñez-Delgado A, Mehmood S, et al (2021) Highly efficient uranium (VI) capture from aqueous solution by means of a hydroxyapatite-biochar nanocomposite: adsorption behavior and mechanism Environ Res 201https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111518
Akkaya R (2012) Thermodynamic parameters of TI+, Ra2+, Bi3+ and Ac3+ adsorption onto polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate-hydroxyapatite composite. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 292:771–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1513-0
Ashry A, Bailey EH, Chenery SRN et al (2016) Kinetic study of time-dependent fixation of UVI on biochar. J Hazard Mater 320:55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.002
Bağda E, Sarı A, Tuzen M (2018) Effective uranium biosorption by macrofungus (Russula sanguinea) from aqueous solution: equilibrium, thermodynamic and kinetic studies. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 317:1387–1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6039-2
Bağda E, Tuzen M, Sarı A (2017) Equilibrium, thermodynamic and kinetic investigations for biosorption of uranium with green algae (Cladophora hutchinsiae). J Environ Radioact 175–176:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.04.004
Bakather OY, Zouli N, Abutaleb A et al (2020) Uranium (VI) ions uptake from liquid wastes by Solanum incanum leaves: Biosorption, desorption and recovery. Alexandria Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.03.013
Baselga-Cervera B, Romero-López J, García-Balboa C et al (2018) Improvement of the uranium sequestration ability of a Chlamydomonas sp. (ChlSP strain) isolated from extreme uranium mine tailings through selection for potential bioremediation application. Front Microbiol 9:523. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00523
Bayoumi TA, Saleh HM (2018) Characterization of biological waste stabilized by cement during immersion in aqueous media to develop disposal strategies for phytomediated radioactive waste. Prog Nucl Energy 107:83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.04.021
Bayoumi TA, Saleh HM, Eskander SB (2013) Solidification of hot real radioactive liquid scintillator waste using cement-clay composite. Monatshefte Fur Chemie 144:1751–1758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-013-1065-9
Chen C, Hu J, Wang J (2020) Biosorption of uranium by immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Environ Radioact 213:106158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106158
Chen S, Hong J, Yang H et al (2013) Adsorption of uranium (VI) from aqueous solution using a novel graphene oxide-activated carbon felt composite. J Environ Radioact 126:253–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.09.002
Cheng Y, Li F, Liu N et al (2021) A novel freeze-dried natural microalga powder for highly efficient removal of uranium from wastewater. Chemosphere 282:131084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131084
Coelho E, Reis TA, Cotrim M et al (2020) Bioremediation of water contaminated with uranium using Penicillium piscarium. Biotechnol Prog. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.3032
Coutelot FM, Seaman JC, Baker M (2018) Uranium (VI) adsorption and surface complexation modeling onto vadose sediments from the Savannah River Site. Environ Earth Sci 77:148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7316-7
Curtis GP, Fox P, Kohler M et al (2004) Comparison of in situ uranium KD values with a laboratory determined surface complexation model. Appl Geochemistry 19:1643–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.03.004
Das N (2010) Recovery of precious metals through biosorption - a review. Hydrometallurgy 103:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.03.016
Das N (2012) Remediation of radionuclide pollutants through biosorption - an overview. Clean - Soil, Air, Water 40:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201000522
Davis JA, Meece DE, Kohler M et al (2004) Approaches to surface complexation modeling of Uranium (VI) adsorption on aquifer sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68:3621–3641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2004.03.003
Dong L, Yang J, Mou Y et al (2017) Effect of various environmental factors on the adsorption of U (VI) onto biochar derived from rice straw. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 314:377–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-017-5414-8
Dunn K (2021) pid: Process Improvement using Data. R package version 0.50. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pid. Accessed 08 October 2021
Ferreira EGA, Alves E, Ferreira RVP et al (2015) Biosorption of thorium by bone meal. WM Symposia, Phoenix, USA
Ferreira EGA, Ferreira RVP, Araujo LG, et al (2013) Chemical analysis of radioactive mixed liquid wastes by chemical analysis of radioactive mixed liquid wastes by alpha/gamma spectrometry, ICP-OES and Arsenazo III.
Ferreira RVP, Araujo LG, Canevesi RLS et al (2020) The use of rice and coffee husks for biosorption of U (total), 241Am, and 137Cs in radioactive liquid organic waste. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09727-8
Ferreira RVP, Silva EA, Canevesi RLS et al (2018) Application of the coconut fiber in radioactive liquid waste treatment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 15:1629–1640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1541-6
Foster RI, Amphlett JTM, Kim KW et al (2020) SOHIO process legacy waste treatment: Uranium recovery using ion exchange. J Ind Eng Chem 81:144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2019.09.001
Gök C, Aytas S, Sezer H (2017) Modeling uranium biosorption by Cystoseira sp. and application studies. Sep Sci Technol 52:792–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2016.1267212
Guilhen SN, Coleti J, Tenório JAS et al (2019) Influence of adsorption parameters on uranium adsorption capability by biochar derived from macauba coconut residue. Braz J Radiat Sci 07(2A):01–14. https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v7i2A.590
Guilhen SN, Rovani S, Araujo LG et al (2021) Uranium removal from aqueous solution using macauba endocarp-derived biochar: Effect of physical activation. Environ Pollut 272:116022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116022
Hadjittofi L, Pashalidis I (2014) Uranium sorption from aqueous solutions by activated biochar fibres investigated by FTIR spectroscopy and batch experiments. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 304:897–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3868-5
Hariani PL, Muryati M, Said MS (2019) Kinetic and thermodynamic adsorption of nickel (II) onto hydroxyapatite prepared from Snakehead (Channastriata) fish bone. Mediterr J Chem 9:85–94. https://doi.org/10.13171/mjc92190906825plh
Hashemi N, Dabbagh R, Noroozi M, Baradaran S (2020) Optimization of uranium biosorption in solutions by Sargassum boveanum using RSM method. 9:65–84. https://doi.org/10.12989/aer.2020.9.1.065
Hassan Khani M, Reza Keshtkar A, Meysami B, FirouzZarea M, Jalali R (2006) Biosorption of uranium from aqueous solutions by nonliving biomass of marine algae Cystoseira indica Electron J Biotechnol 9. https://doi.org/10.2225/vol9-issue2-fulltext-8
I. Puigdomenech, HYDRA (hydrochemical Equilibrium Constant Database) and MEDUSA (make Equilibrium Diagrams Using Sophisticated Algorithms) Programs, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden. (2006). http://www.kemi.kth.se/medusa/. Accessed 06 October 2021
Kahouli S (2011) Re-examining uranium supply and demand: new insights. Energy Policy 39:358–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.007
Kim H, Um W, Kim WS et al (2017) Synthesis of tributyl phosphate-coated hydroxyapatite for selective uranium removal. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:3399–3406. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04491
Kim J, Sambudi NS, Cho K (2019) Removal of Sr2+ using high-surface-area hydroxyapatite synthesized by non-additive in-situ precipitation. J Environ Manage 231:788–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.100
Kolhe N, Zinjarde S, Acharya C (2020) Removal of uranium by immobilized biomass of a tropical marine yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. J Environ Radioact 223–224:106419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106419
Kong L, Ruan Y, Zheng Q et al (2020) Uranium extraction using hydroxyapatite recovered from phosphorus containing wastewater. J Hazard Mater 382:120784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120784
Lee KY, Kim KW, Baek YJ, Chung DY, Lee EH, Lee SY, Moon JK (2014) Biosorption of uranium (VI) from aqueous solution by biomass of brown algae Laminaria japonica. Water Sci Technol 70:136–143. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2014.205
Liu J, Zhao C, Zhang Z et al (2016) Fluorine effects on U(VI) sorption by hydroxyapatite. Chem Eng J 288:505–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.045
Mishra V, Sureshkumar MK, Gupta N et al (2017) Study on sorption characteristics of uranium onto biochar derived from eucalyptus wood. Water Air Soil Pollut 228:309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3480-8
Mohammed AAER (2020) Potentiality of quercetin-sodium hydroxide modified Spirulina Platensis in uranium biosorption from waste effluent. Int J Environ Stud 77:48–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2019.1688988
Naeem H, Bhatti HN, Sadaf S et al (2017) Uranium remediation using modified Vigna radiata waste biomass. Appl Radiat Isot 123:94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.02.027
Namdarian N, Tajer Mohammad Ghazvini P, TabatabaeeBafroee AS (2021) Bio-removal of uranium by the treated biosorbent from aqueous solutions as an efficient strategy in uranium bioremediation. Appl Biol 34:163–177. https://doi.org/10.22051/JAB.2020.33051.1378
Nuhanović M, Grebo M, Draganović S et al (2019) Uranium(VI) biosorption by sugar beet pulp: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 322:2065–2078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06877-z
Nuhanović M, Smječanin N, Mulahusić N et al (2021) Pomegranate peel waste biomass modified with H3PO4 as a promising sorbent for uranium(VI) removal. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 328:617–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07664-5
Ouassel S, Chegrouche S, Nibou D et al (2021) Application of response surface methodology for uranium (VI) adsorption using hydroxyapatite prepared from eggshells waste material: Study of influencing factors and mechanism. Water Sci Technol 83:1198–1216. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2021.022
Pang C, Liu YH, Cao XH et al (2011) Biosorption of uranium (VI) from aqueous solution by dead fungal biomass of Penicillium citrinum. Chem Eng J 170:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.10.068
Paterlini V, Bettinelli M, Rizzi R et al (2020) Characterization and luminescence of Eu3+ - and Gd3+ - Doped hydroxyapatite Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2. Curr Comput-Aided Drug Des 10:806. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10090806
Pratas J, Paulo C, Favas PJC et al (2014) Potential of aquatic plants for phytofiltration of uranium-contaminated waters in laboratory conditions. Ecol Eng 69:170–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.046
R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 23 July 2021
Rosenberg E, Pinson G, Tsosie R et al (2016) Uranium remediation by ion exchange and sorption methods: a critical review. Johnson Matthey Technol Rev 60:59–77. https://doi.org/10.1595/205651316X690178
Šabanović E, Muhić-Šarac T, Nuhanović M et al (2019) Biosorption of uranium (VI) from aqueous solution by Citrus limon peels: kinetics, equlibrium and batch studies. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 319:425–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6358-3
Saleh HM, Moussa HR, El-Saied FA et al (2020) Mechanical and physicochemical evaluation of solidified dried submerged plants subjected to extreme climatic conditions to achieve an optimum waste containment. Prog Nucl Energy 122:103285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103285
Sar P, D’Souza SF (2001) Biosorptive uranium uptake by a Pseudomonas strain: characterization and equilibrium studies. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 76:1286–1294. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.517
Satir IT, Ozdemir N, Donmez Gungunes CD (2021) Bone meal and chitosan biocomposite: a new biosorbent for the removal of Victoria Blue R from wastewater Chem Eng Commun 1–15https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2021.1957850
Sprynskyy M, Kowalkowski T, Tutu H et al (2011) Adsorption performance of talc for uranium removal from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 171:1185–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.022
Vieira LC, Araujo LG, Ferreira RVP et al (2019) Uranium biosorption by Lemna sp. and Pistia stratiotes. J Environ Radioact 203:179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.03.019
Wang J, Chen C (2006) Biosorption of heavy metals by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A review. Biotechnol Adv 24:427–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.03.001
Wang J, Chen C (2009) Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future. Biotechnol Adv 27:195–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.11.002
Wang JS, Hu XJ, Liu YG et al (2010) Biosorption of uranium (VI) by immobilized Aspergillus fumigatus beads. J Environ Radioact 101:504–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.03.002
Wang J, Zhuang S (2019) Extraction and adsorption of U (VI) from aqueous solution using affinity ligand-based technologies: an overview. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 18:437–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-019-09507-y
Wang S, Guo W, Gao F et al (2018) Lead and uranium sorptive removal from aqueous solution using magnetic and nonmagnetic fast pyrolysis rice husk biochars. RSC Adv 8:13205–13217. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra13540h
Xiong T, Li Q, Liao J, Zhang Y, Zhu W (2021) Highly enhanced adsorption performance to uranium (VI) by facile synthesized hydroxyapatite aerogel. J Hazard Mater 423B:127184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127184
Yakout SME, Abdeltawab AA, Elhindi K et al (2018) Uranium dynamic adsorption breakthrough curve onto rice straw based activated carbon using bed depth service time model. BioResources 13:9143–9157. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.4.9143-9157
Yang J, Volesky B (1999) Biosorption of uranium on Sargassum biomass. Water Res 33:3357–3363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00043-3
Yi ZJ, Yao J, Chen HL et al (2016) Uranium biosorption from aqueous solution onto Eichhornia crassipes. J Environ Radioact 154:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.01.012
Yi ZJ, Yao J, Zhu MJ et al (2017) Biosorption characteristics of Ceratophyllum demersum biomass for removal of uranium (VI) from an aqueous solution. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 313:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-017-5269-z
Younes AA, Masoud AM, Taha MH (2018) Uranium sorption from aqueous solutions using polyacrylamide-based chelating sorbents. Sep Sci Technol 53:2573–2586. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2018.1467450
Yuan Y, Liu N, Dai Y et al (2020) Effective biosorption of uranium from aqueous solution by cyanobacterium Anabaena flos-aquae. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:44306–44313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10364-4
Zhang J, Chen X, Zhou J et al (2020) Uranium biosorption mechanism model of protonated Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Hazard Mater 385:121588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121588
Zhang XT, Jiang DM, Xiao YQ, Chen JC, Xia LS (2019) Adsorption of uranium (VI) from aqueous solution by modified rice stem. J Chem. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6409504
Zhao C, Liu J, Yuan G et al (2018) A novel activated sludge-graphene oxide composites for the removal of uranium (VI) from aqueous solutions. J Mol Liq 271:786–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.09.069
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the fellowship awarded by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development to TW. We also thank the support given by the Center for Lasers and Applications’ Multiuser Facility at IPEN-CNEN/SP in the SEM/EDS analysis, and Dr. Flavia R.O. Silva and Dr. Rafael V.P. Ferreira for supplying the hydroxyapatite and the bone meal, respectively.
Funding
This project was supported by the Nuclear and Energy Research Institute, the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, and the Brazilian National Nuclear Energy Commission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TW: data curation, investigation, resources, visualization, writing—original draft. SNG: formal analysis, resources, writing—review and editing. JTM: conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, writing—review and editing. RPS: investigation. LGA: conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, resources, visualization, writing—review and editing.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Tito Roberto Cadaval Jr.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watanabe, T., Guilhen, S.N., Marumo, J.T. et al. Uranium biosorption by hydroxyapatite and bone meal: evaluation of process variables through experimental design. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 79816–79829 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17551-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17551-x