Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental quality and the asymmetrical nonlinear consequences of energy consumption, trade openness and economic development: prospects for environmental management and carbon neutrality

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economic expansion gives rise to modern and energy-efficient technologies and, thus, contributes to a decline in energy usage. Developing countries, including Pakistan, require tremendous efforts to sustain economic growth. However, to attain economic growth, these countries have to cope with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and other environmental problems. This research focuses primarily on the asymmetric impacts of energy consumption and economic growth on Pakistan’s environmental quality. Accordingly, secondary data spanning from 1971 to 2018 was used, and carbon dioxide emission (CO2) was considered a target variable (a proxy for environmental quality), whereas energy consumption (E) and gross domestic product (GDP) as a proxy for economic growth, and trade accessibility (TR) and foreign direct investment (FDI) as control variables. The nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) approach is used to verify the asymmetric co-integration between the variables selected. Moreover, to examine data stationarity and nonlinearity, we used the Zivot–Andrews structural break unit root and BDS tests, respectively. The findings confirmed the asymmetric and symmetric co-integrations among the considered variables. In addition, the causality analysis reveals that only negative shocks to TR have an effect on CO2 emissions. Similarly, negative shocks to FDI asymmetrically cause CO2 emissions. Meanwhile, GDP symmetrically affects CO2 emissions. Finally, a neutral causal response was observed between E and CO2 emissions. These findings have policy implications in terms of environmental management and carbon neutrality, and they serve as a baseline for future research.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

N/A

References

  • Afridi MA, Kehelwalatenna S, Naseem I, Tahir M (2019) Per capita income, trade openness, urbanization, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: an empirical study on the SAARC Region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:29978–29990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad A, Yasin NM, Derek C, Lim J (2011) Microalgae as a sustainable energy source for biodiesel production: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:584–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad N, Du L, Tian X-L, Wang J (2019) Chinese growth and dilemmas: modelling energy consumption, CO 2 emissions and growth in China. Qual Quant 53:315–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajmi AN, Hammoudeh S, Nguyen DK, Sato JR (2015) On the relationships between CO2 emissions, energy consumption and income: the importance of time variation. Energy Econ 49:629–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akbostancı E, Türüt-Aşık S, Tunç Gİ (2009) The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy 37:861–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari MA, Haider S, Khan NA (2020) Does trade openness affects global carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from the top CO2 emitters. Manag Environ Qual 31:32–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indic 52:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arouri MEH, Youssef AB, M'henni H, Rault C (2012) Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Middle East and North African countries. Energy Policy 45:342–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baz K, Xu D, Ampofo GMK, Ali I, Khan I, Cheng J, Ali H (2019) Energy consumption and economic growth nexus: new evidence from Pakistan using asymmetric analysis. Energy 189:116254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baz K, Xu D, Ali H, Ali I, Khan I, Khan MM, Cheng J (2020) Asymmetric impact of energy consumption and economic growth on ecological footprint: using asymmetric and nonlinear approach. Sci Total Environ 718:137364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BP plc (2019) BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2019.https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html

  • Bradford DF, Schlieckert R, Shore S (2000) The environmental Kuznets curve: exploring a fresh specification

  • Coondoo D, Dinda S (2008) Carbon dioxide emission and income: a temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns. Ecol Econ 65:375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crippa M, Oreggioni G, Guizzardi D, Muntean M, Schaaf E, Lo Vullo E, Solazzo E, Monforti-Ferrario F, Olivier J, Vignati E (2019) Fossil CO2 and GHG emissions of all world countries. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui H (2016) China’s economic growth and energy consumption. Int J Energy Econ Policy 6:349–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74:427–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhani S, Ozturk I (2015) Causal relationship between CO 2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:15663–15676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedl B, Getzner M (2003) Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecol Econ 45:133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1993) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement1. Garber P. (éd.), The US-Mexico Free Trade Agreement, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1655177

  • Hatemi-j A (2003) A new method to choose optimal lag order in stable and unstable VAR models. Appl Econ Lett 10:135–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatemi-J A (2008) Forecasting properties of a new method to determine optimal lag order in stable and unstable VAR models. Appl Econ Lett 15:239–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatemi-j A (2012) Asymmetric causality tests with an application. Empir Econ 43:447–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hongdou L, Shiping L, Hao L (2018) Existing agricultural ecosystem in China leads to environmental pollution: an econometric approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:24488–24499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC CC (2007) Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC CC (2011) IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation

  • Jamel L, Maktouf S (2017) The nexus between economic growth, financial development, trade openness, and CO2 emissions in European countries. Cogent Econ Finance 5

  • Javid M, Sharif F (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve and financial development in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:406–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jebli MB, Youssef SB, Ozturk I (2016) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol Indic 60:824–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan I, Zhao M (2019) Water resource management and public preferences for water ecosystem services: a choice experiment approach for inland river basin management. Sci Total Environ 646:821–831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan I, Zhao M, Khan SU (2018) Ecological degradation of an inland river basin and an evaluation of the spatial and distance effect on willingness to pay for its improvement. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:31474–31485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan I, Javed T, Khan A, Lei H, Muhammad I, Ali I, Huo X (2019) Impact assessment of land use change on surface temperature and agricultural productivity in Peshawar-Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:33076–33085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan I, Rehman FU, Pypłacz P, Khan MA, Wiśniewska A, Liczmańska-Kopcewicz K (2021) A dynamic linkage between financial development, energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from an asymmetric and nonlinear ARDL model. Energies 14:5006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim D, Perron P (2009) Unit root tests allowing for a break in the trend function at an unknown time under both the null and alternative hypotheses. J Econ 148:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luqman M, Ahmad N, Bakhsh K (2019) Nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in Pakistan: Evidence from non-linear autoregressive distributed lag model. Renew Energy 139:1299–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv Z, Xu T (2019) Trade openness, urbanization and CO2 emissions: dynamic panel data analysis of middle-income countries. J Int Trade Econ Dev 28:317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mai LTT, Kimtaegi, Anh LH (2019) The effects of trade openness on CO2 emissions in Vietnam. J Int Trade Commer 15:153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir M, Rehman FU (2011) Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Pakistan: an empirical investigation. Energy Policy 39:1857–1864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011) OECD MRL calculator: spreadsheet for single data set and spreadsheet for multiple data set, 2 March 2011

  • Oh K-Y, Bhuyan MI (2018) Trade openness and CO 2 emissions: evidence of Bangladesh. Asian J Atmos Environ (AJAE) 12:30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I (2010) A literature survey on energy–growth nexus. Energy Policy 38:340–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:3220–3225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2013) The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ 36:262–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Aslan A, Kalyoncu H (2010) Energy consumption and economic growth relationship: evidence from panel data for low and middle income countries. Energy Policy 38:4422–4428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pao H-T, Fu H-C, Tseng C-L(2012) Forecasting of CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China using an improved grey model. Energy 40:400–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 57:1361–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PC, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saboori B, Sulaiman J (2013) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries: a cointegration approach. Energy 55:813–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saidi K, Hammami S (2015) The impact of CO2 emissions and economic growth on energy consumption in 58 countries. Energy Rep 1:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Lean HH, Shabbir MS (2012) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:2947–2953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Hye QMA, Tiwari AK, Leitão NC (2013a) Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Tiwari AK, Nasir M (2013b) The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy 61:1452–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Hoang THV, Mahalik MK, Roubaud D (2017) Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: new evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis ☆. Energy Econ 66:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in an ARDL framework. In: Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer Science and Business Media, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Toda HY, Yamamoto T (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econ 66(1–2):225–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8

  • Tugcu CT, Topcu M (2018) Total, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth: revisiting the issue with an asymmetric point of view. Energy 152:64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah A, Khan D, Khan I, Zheng S (2018) Does agricultural ecosystem cause environmental pollution in Pakistan? Promise and menace. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:13938–13955

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vasichenko K, Khan I, Wang Z (2020) Symmetric and asymmetric effect of energy consumption and CO2 intensity on environmental quality: using nonlinear and asymmetric approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27:32809–32819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waheed R, Chang D, Sarwar S, Chen W (2018) Forest, agriculture, renewable energy, and CO2 emission. J Clean Prod 172:4231–4238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Li Q, Fang C, Zhou C (2016) The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO 2 emissions: empirical evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 542:360–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Li G, Fang C (2018) Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2144–2159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2019) World development indicators 2019. Accessed at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator?tab=all

  • Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR, Mirza FM, Hou F, Kirmani SAA (2019) The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Res Policy 63:101428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zivot E, Andrews DWK (2002) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 20:25–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IK and HL conceived and designed the research. IK, HL and AAS analyzed the data and wrote the paper. IK, MAK, KB and AAH proofread, edited and revised the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Imran Khan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent of participate

N/A

Consent for publication

N/A

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, I., Lei, H., Shah, A.A. et al. Environmental quality and the asymmetrical nonlinear consequences of energy consumption, trade openness and economic development: prospects for environmental management and carbon neutrality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 14654–14664 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16612-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16612-5

Keywords

Navigation