Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can anti-corruption improve the quality of environmental information disclosure?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 30 August 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

This study takes the anti-corruption campaign of the 18th CPC National Congress in China as an exogenous impact build a double difference (DID) model, proving that anti-corruption can increase the quality of enterprise environmental information disclosure significantly. After a series of tests such as parallel trend test and placebo test, the results are still robust. The intermediary effect model results indicate that the anti-corruption increases the violation cost of enterprises and encourages enterprises to carry out innovation activities, and ultimately increase the quality of enterprise environmental information disclosure. Heterogeneity analysis finds that non-state-owned enterprises, large enterprises, and regions with more substantial environmental supervision will improve the quality of enterprise environmental information disclosure to a greater extent. The findings of this paper can help provide policy inspiration for improving the mandatory environmental information disclosure system and strengthening the enforcement of environmental regulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Aerts W, Cormier D (2009) Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Acc Organ Soc 34:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Tuwaijri SA, Christensen TE, Hughes KE (2004) The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Acc Organ Soc 29(5-6):447–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz D, Lin C, Ma Y (2015) Do property rights matter? Evidence from a property law enactment. J Financ Econ 116(3):583–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer S, Pavelin S (2006) Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies [J]. J Bus Financ Acc 33(7-8):1168–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai H, Fang H, Xu LC (2011) Eat, drink, firms, government: an investigation of corruption from the entertainment and travel costs of Chinese firms. J Law Econ 54(1):55–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campante FR, Do QA (2014) Isolated capital cities, accountability and corruption: evidence from us states. Soc Sci Electron Publ 104(4):2456–2481

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles HC, Roberts PRW (2006) Corporate political strategy: an examination of the relation between political expenditures, environmental performance, and environmental disclosure. J Bus Ethics 67(2):139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Z, Wang F, Keung C, Bai Y (2017) Will corporate political connection influence the environmental information disclosure level: based on the panel data of a-shares from listed companies in shanghai stock market. J Bus Ethics 143(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson PM, Li Y, Richardson GD, Vasvari FP (2008) Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical analysis. Acc Organ Soc 33(4/5):303–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA (2007) Corruption, income and the environment: an empirical analysis. Ecol Econ 62(3):637–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cull R, Xu LC (2005) Institutions, ownership, and finance: the determinants of profit reinvestment among Chinese firms. J Financ Econ 77(1):117–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Qin H, Zhang Y, Jin T (2012) Accuracy assessment of single and double difference models for the single epoch GPS compass. Advances in Space Research 49(4):725–738

  • Dang L, Yang R, Yang J (2015) Anti-corruption and firms’ innovations: an explanation from political connections. China Indu Econ 7:146–160 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrell W, Schwartz BN (1997) Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure. J Account Public Policy 16(2):125–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Ozturk I (2017) The influence of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real income on co2 emissions in the USA: evidence from structural break tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(11):10846–10854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Seker F (2016) Determinants of co2 emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energy 94(8):429–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Jian W, Zeng Q, Du Y (2013) Corporate environmental responsibility in polluting industries: does religion matter. J Bus Ethics 124(3):485–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan JP, Wong TJ, Zhang T (2007) Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. J Financ Econ 84(2):330–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisman R, Svensson J (2007) Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth: firm level evidence. J Dev Econ 83(1):63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser EL, Saks RE (2006) Corruption in America. J Public Econ 90(6):1053–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jizi MI, Salama A, Dixon R, Stratling R (2014) Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from the US banking sector. J Bus Ethics 125(4):601–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong D, Tao Y, Wang Y (2020) China’s anti-corruption campaign and firm productivity: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. China Econ Rev 63:101535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis BW, Walls JL, Dowell GWS (2014) Difference in degrees: CEO characteristics and firm environmental disclosure. Strateg Manag J 35(5):712–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XB, Anbumozhi V (2009) Determinant factors of corporate environmental information disclosure: an empirical study of Chinese listed companies. J Clean Prod 17(6):593–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Lu Y, Wang J (2015) Does flattening government improve economic performance: evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics 123(11):18–37

  • Olken BA (2007) Monitoring corruption: evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. J Polit Econ 115:200–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten DM (2002) Media Exposure, Public policy pressure, and environmental disclosure: an examination of the impact of tri data availability. Account Forum 6(2):152–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paunov C (2016) Corruption’s asymmetric impacts on firm innovation. J Dev Econ 100(118):216–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren S, Hu Y, Zheng J, Wang J (2020) Emissions trading and firm innovation: evidence from a natural experiment in China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 155:119989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said R, Omar N, Abdullah W (2013) Empirical investigations on boards, business characteristics, human capital and environmental reporting. Soc Responsib J 9(4):534–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng J, Zhou W, Zhang S (2019) The role of the intensity of environmental regulation and corruption in the employment of manufacturing enterprises: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 219(10):244–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JZ, Gao MH (2017) Anti-corruption, entrepreneurial competencies and enterprise innovation. J Manag 39(06):36–52 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Sun X (2018) The global system-ranking efficiency model and calculating examples with consideration of thenon-homogeneity of decision-making units. Expert Syst 37(9):12272

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Fan G, Yu J (2017a) Marketization index of China’s provinces: NERI report 2016. Social Sciences Academic Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman J (1982) An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Acc Organ Soc 7(10):553–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu G, Yano G (2017) How does anti-corruption affect corporate innovation: evidence from recent anti-Corruption efforts in China. J Comp Econ 45(3):498–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng SX, Xu XD, Dong ZY, Tam WY (2010) Towards corporate environmental information disclosure: an empirical study in China. J Clean Prod 18(12):1142–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Yu Z, Dongmin K (2019) The real effect of legal institutions: environmental courts and firm environmental protection expenditure. J Environ Econ Manag 98:102254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu JF, Xue HF (2009) Empirical research on factors influencing level of environmental protection information disclosure in annual reports by listed companies. Chin J Populat Resources Environ 7(1):15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of data and materials

The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article and its additional files.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 72003097), the Humanities and Social Sciences Research of Ministry of Education of China (grant number: 18YJC790041), the National Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant number: BK20190775), and the NUIST Students’ Platform for Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (grant number: 202110300096Y)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ye Wei: data curation, analyzed data, and writing-original draft preparation.

Wenjian He: conceptualization, methodology, analyzed, and writing-original draft preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenjian He.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised due to a retrospective Open Access cancellation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, Y., He, W. Can anti-corruption improve the quality of environmental information disclosure?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 5345–5359 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15932-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15932-w

Keywords

Navigation