Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Do foreign direct investment inflows affect environmental degradation in BRICS nations?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The acceleration in environmental degradation in the past few decades due to a spur in the emissions of greenhouse gases, massive deforestation and a loss of biodiversity has become a major concern of environmentalists, policy makers and researchers. Against this backdrop, the current paper empirically explores the impact of foreign direct investment inflows on environmental degradation. To do so, we have drawn a sample of BRICS nations because of its immense contribution to global environmental challenge. We collected the data since 1992 through 2014 and employed the panel cointegration techniques, and FMOLS and DOLS models. Our results confirm the significant role of foreign direct investment and gross domestic product in reducing the CO2 emissions in these nations. Our results do not support the theory of environmental Kuznets curve and the pollution haven hypothesis valid for these nations. Our findings recommend the use of cleaner technology, and promotion of FDI that ensures environmental awareness. Furthermore, appropriate policies on climate change and effective delegation of environmental protocols will be able to reduce the environmental degradation in BRICS nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See BRIC Economies Attract 35% More FDI Than G7 Nations | Financial Tribune

References

  • Ahmad M, Jabeen G, Wu Y (2021) Heterogeneity of pollution haven/halo hypothesis and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across development levels of Chinese provinces. Journal of Cleaner Production 285:124898

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Albornoz F, Cole MA, Elliott RJ, Ercolani MG (2009) In search of environmental spillovers. World Economy 32(1):136–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2016) The investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the advanced economies: the role of energy prices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 54:1622–1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsalobre-Lorente D, Gokmenoglu KK, Taspinar N, Cantos-Cantos JM (2019) An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26(22):23010–23026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee PK, Rahman M (2012) Some determinants of carbon dioxide emissions in Bangladesh. International Journal of Green Economics 6(2):205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubellouta B, Kusch-Brandt S (2020) Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for E-waste in the EU28+ 2 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 277:123371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung J (2000) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: Baltagi B (ed) Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15. JAI Press, Amsterdam, pp 161–178

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bulus, G.C. and Koc, S., 2021. The effects of FDI and government expenditures on environmental pollution in Korea: the pollution haven hypothesis revisited. Environ Sci Pollut Res, pp.1-16.

  • Chang SC (2015) Threshold effect of foreign direct investment on environmental degradation. Portuguese Economic Journal 14(1):75–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin MY, Puah CH, Teo CL, Joseph J (2018) The determinants of CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a new aspect. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 8(1):190–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill SA, Inekwe J, Ivanovski K, Smyth R (2018) The environmental Kuznets curve in the OECD: 1870–2014. Energy Economics 75:389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill SA, Inekwe J, Ivanovski K, Smyth R (2020) The environmental Kuznets curve across Australian states and territories. Energy economics 90:104869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA, Elliott RJ (2005) FDI and the capital intensity of “dirty” sectors: a missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle. Review of Development Economics 9(4):530–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1994) North-South trade and the environment. The quarterly journal of Economics 109(3):755–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, D’Agostino RB Jr (1990) A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. American Statistician 44:316–321

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mello LR (1999) Foreign direct investment-led growth: evidence from time series and panel data. Oxford Economic Papers 51(1):133–151 mello

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demena BA, Afesorgbor SK (2020) The effect of FDI on environmental emissions: evidence from a meta-analysis. Energy Policy 138:111192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA, Okumus I (2019) Does pollution haven hypothesis hold in newly industrialized countries? Evidence from ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26(23):23689–23695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Inglesi-Lotz R (2020) The impact of economic structure to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: evidence from European countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27(11):12717–12724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doytch N, Uctum M (2016) Globalization and the environmental impact of sectoral FDI. Economic Systems 40(4):582–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson PG, Svensson J (2003) Political instability, corruption and policy formation: the case of environmental policy. Journal of public economics 87(7-8):1383–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganda F (2019) Carbon emissions, diverse energy usage and economic growth in South Africa: investigating existence of the environmental kuznets curve (EKC). Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 38(1):30–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Görg H, Strobl, E. (2005) Foreign direct investment and local economic development: beyond productivity spillovers. Does foreign direct investment promote development, pp.137-55

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110:353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzel AE, Okumus İ (2020) Revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis in ASEAN-5 countries: new insights from panel data analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27(15):18157–18167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hameed, S., Wei, W., Farrukh, U. and Mushtaq, K., 2019. Switching to Hydropower renewable energy to mitigate the effects of the carbon emissions in South and East Asian economies.

  • Hashmi R, Alam K (2019) Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, innovation, CO2 emissions, population, and economic growth in OECD countries: a panel investigation. Journal of cleaner production 231:1100–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassaballa H (2014) The effect of lax environmental laws on foreign direct investment inflows in developing countries. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences 5(3):305–315

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2019) Global Energy & CO2 Status Report. In: The Latest Trends, in Energy and Emissions in 2018. IEA Publications, France Retrieved 07 05, 2019, from. https://webstore.iea.org/download/direct/2461?fileName=Global_Energy_and_CO2_Status_Report_2018.pdf

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115(1):53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarque CM, Bera AK (1987) A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, pp.163-172

  • Jiang Y (2015) Foreign direct investment, pollution, and the environmental quality: a model with empirical evidence from the Chinese regions. The International Trade Journal 29(3):212–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahia M, Jebli MB, Belloumi M (2019) Analysis of the impact of renewable energy consumption and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions in 12 MENA countries. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 21(4):871–885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of econometrics 90(1):1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostakis I, Lolos S, Sardianou E (2017) Foreign direct investment and environmental degradation: further evidence from Brazil and Singapore. J Environ Manag Tour 8(1 (17)):45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, C.R., Nayak, C. and Pradhan, A.K., 2020 What determines crop diversification in North-East zone of India?. J Public Affairs, p.e2450

  • Lean HH, Smyth R (2010) CO2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. Applied Energy 87(6):1858–1864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson A (1996) Environmental regulations and manufacturers' location choices: evidence from the Census of Manufactures. Journal of public Economics 62(1-2):5–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mert M, Bölük G (2016) Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO 2 emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23(21):21669–21681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mert M, Caglar AE (2020) Testing pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses for Turkey: a new perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27(26):32933–32943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millimet DL, Roy J (2016) Empirical tests of the pollution haven hypothesis when environmental regulation is endogenous. Journal of Applied Econometrics 31(4):652–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan PK, Narayan S (2010) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy policy 38(1):661–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu S, Ding Y, Niu Y, Li Y, Luo G (2011) Economic growth, energy conservation and emissions reduction: a comparative analysis based on panel data for 8 Asian-Pacific countries. Energy policy 39(4):2121–2131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Onafowora OA, Owoye O (2014) Bounds testing approach to analysis of the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis. Energy Economics 44:47–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'neill, J., 2001. Building better global economic BRICs. Building_Better_Global_Economic_Brics.pdf (elcorreo.eu.org)

  • Öztürk Z, Öz D (2016) The relationship between energy consumption, income, foreign direct investment, and CO2 emissions: the case of Turkey. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi 6(2):269–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Pao HT, Tsai CM (2011) Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy 36(1):685–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P., 2004. Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric theory, pp.597-625

  • Pesaran, M. H. 2004. General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22(2):265–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phong LH (2019) Globalization, financial development, and environmental degradation in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from ASEAN-5 countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 9(2):40–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan AK, Hiremath GS (2020) The capital flight from India: a case of missing woods for trees? The Singapore Economic Review 65(02):365–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana R, Sharma M (2019) Dynamic causality testing for EKC hypothesis, pollution haven hypothesis and international trade in India. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 28(3):348–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royston, P. (1991) sg3.5: comment on sg3.4 and an improved D’Agostino test. Stata Technical Bulletin 3: 23–24. Reprinted in Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, vol. 1, pp. 110–112. College Station, TX: Stata Press

  • Sarkodie SA, Ozturk I (2020) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Kenya: a multivariate analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 117:109481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2019) Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Science of the Total Environment 646:862–871

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharda, J., 2016. The new development bank: its role in achieving BRICS renewable energy targets. Available at: New-Development-Bank-and-Role-in-BRICS-Renewable-Energy-Targets-October-2016.pdf (ieefa.org)

  • Sharif A, Raza SA, Ozturk I, Afshan S (2019) The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: a global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations. Renewable Energy 133:685–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Wang S, Liu W, Chu J (2019) Does migration of pollution-intensive industries impact environmental efficiency? Evidence supporting “Pollution Haven Hypothesis”. Journal of environmental management 242:142–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhania M, Saini N (2021) Demystifying pollution haven hypothesis: role of FDI. Journal of Business Research 123:516–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Musah I, Ozturk I (2017) Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy 124:706–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy policy 37(1):246–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CF, Tan BW (2015) The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy 79:447–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • To AH, Ha DTT, Nguyen HM, Vo DH (2019) The impact of foreign direct investment on environment degradation: evidence from emerging markets in Asia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(9):1636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ur Rahman Z, Chongbo W, Ahmad M (2019) An (a) symmetric analysis of the pollution haven hypothesis in the context of Pakistan: a non-linear approach. Carbon Management 10(3):227–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Hong G, Qin T, Fan WR, Yuan XC (2019) Factors governing the willingness to pay for air pollution treatment: a case study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Journal of cleaner production 235:1304–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics 69(6):709–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing Y, Kolstad CD (2002) Do lax environmental regulations attract foreign investment? Environmental and Resource Economics 21(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Zhao W, Zhang M, Cheng B (2021) Pollution haven or halo? The role of the energy transition in the impact of FDI on SO2 emissions. Science of the Total Environment 763:143002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Guo H, Liu B, Shi R, Zhang B, Ye W (2018) Environmental regulation and the pollution haven hypothesis: do environmental regulation measures matter? Journal of Cleaner Production 202:993–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarsky L (1999) Havens, halo and spaghetti: untangling the evidence about foreign direct investment and the environment. Foreign direct Investment and the Environment 13(8):47–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Zhou X (2016) Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 58:943–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Zhu K, Hewings GJ (2017) A multi-regional input–output analysis of the pollution haven hypothesis from the perspective of global production fragmentation. Energy Economics 64:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Chen X, Wu Y, Shuai C, Shen L (2019) The environmental Kuznets curve of CO2 emissions in the manufacturing and construction industries: a global empirical analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 79:106303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng D, Shi M (2017) Multiple environmental policies and pollution haven hypothesis: evidence from China's polluting industries. Journal of Cleaner Production 141:295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y, Yu K (2016) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Economic Modelling 58:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zubair AO, Samad ARA, Dankumo AM (2020) Does gross domestic income, trade integration, FDI inflows, GDP, and capital reduces CO2 emissions? An empirical evidence from Nigeria. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability 2:100009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. Any errors from the paper are our own.

Availability of data and material

Will be made available on request.

Funding

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

    Ashis Kumar Pradhan, Anshita Sachan, Udit Kumar Sahu & Vinita Mohindra

Authors
  1. Ashis Kumar Pradhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anshita Sachan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Udit Kumar Sahu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vinita Mohindra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed towards the conceptual design and structure of the study. The manuscript was written jointly by Anshita Sachan, Udit Kumar Sahu and Vinita Mohindra. The data collection and empirical analysis of the study was performed by Ashis Kumar Pradhan. All authors proofread and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashis Kumar Pradhan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical declaration

The authors warrant that the article is the authors’ original work.

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent to publish

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pradhan, A.K., Sachan, A., Sahu, U.K. et al. Do foreign direct investment inflows affect environmental degradation in BRICS nations?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 690–701 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15678-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15678-5

Keywords

JEL classification

Search

Navigation