Abstract
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spread to more than 200 countries with a current case fatality ratio (CFR) of more than 2% globally. The concentration of air pollutants is considered a critical factor responsible for transmitting coronavirus disease among the masses. The photochemical process and coal combustions create respiratory disorders that lead to coronavirus disease. Based on the crucial fact, the study evaluated the impact of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, coal combustion, and traffic emissions on COVID-19 cases in a panel of 39 most affected countries of the world. These three air pollution factors are considered to form a lethal smog that negatively affects the patient’s respiratory system, leading to increased susceptibility to coronavirus worldwide. The study used the Markov two-step switching regime regression model for obtaining parameter estimates. In contrast, an innovation accounting matrix is used to assess smog factors’ intensity on possibly increasing coronavirus cases over time. The results show that N2O emissions, coal combustion, and traffic emissions increase COVID-19 cases in regime-1. On the other hand, N2O emissions significantly increase coronavirus cases in regime-2. The innovation accounting matrix shows that N2O emissions would likely have a more significant share of increasing coronavirus cases with a variance of 33.902%, followed by coal combustion (i.e., 6.643%) and traffic emissions (i.e., 2.008%) over the time horizon. The study concludes that air quality levels should be maintained through stringent environmental policies, such as carbon pricing, sustainable urban planning, green technology advancement, renewable fuels, and pollution less accessible vehicles. All these measures would likely decrease coronavirus cases worldwide.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The enormous increase in global average temperature puts high pressure on implementing green and clean environmental policies, which need to attain ‘industrial ecology.’ This is the newly emerging concept that allows interactive human actions with growth sustainable opportunities to reduce industrial wastes and encourage closed-loop production (Awan 2020a). The globalized world strives hard to devise sustainable policies to shift from blue to green (Awan et al. 2020). The emerging global issue is the high-level smog cause of negative healthcare sustainability. Smoke and fog combined to form ‘smog’ in the air to cause air pollution. Smog was popularized in the 1911’s Manchester conference that proposed specific smog abatement policies to minimize death tools, which were affected millions of peoples and more than thousands of deaths in Great Britain during the autumn of 1909. The two most recognized types of smog, i.e., sulfurous smog and photochemical smog -coal fires, aggravated a higher concentration of suspended particulate matter that continued to harm human health. Traffic emissions and nitrous oxide emissions are caused to form photochemical smog that inflames breathing passage and lungs’ effect. Thus, respiratory deaths are often higher because of an increased smog concentration level globally (Britannica 2019). In early 1952, lethal smog increased thousands of death tools in London caused by extreme weather conditions and industrial pollution. The Clean Air Act is done to mitigate smog concentration to safeguard health issues in Britain (Martinez 2020).
In many parts of the globalized world, winter smog threatened human life and other living beings to make breathing difficulties, leading to a greater risk of a resurgence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (Sarfraz 2020). The earlier studies mainly worked on different air pollutions and their impact on the resurgence of COVID-19 cases across countries. Numerous air pollutants fill the literature, probably causing an increase in the susceptibility rate of COVID-19 cases worldwide (Travaglio et al. 2021; Persico and Johnson 2021; Isphording and Pestel 2021; Magazzino et al. 2020). These studies show that different air pollutants are causing an increase in COVID-19 cases and death rates via the channel of poor air quality that negatively affects the residents’ healthcare status. In many instances, it is proven that due to adopted strict lockdown measures to contain coronavirus cases, air quality level substantially improved; however, once lockdown lifted, economic activities begin to increase, causing more healthcare damages worldwide (Yu et al. 2021, Bhat et al. 2021). Bashir et al. (2020) examined the relationship between air pollutants and the COVID-19 pandemic in California and found a positive correlation between the stated factors. The result implies that particulate matter, sulfur oxide, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide are mainly responsible for increasing COVID-19 cases in a country. The study concludes that there is a high need to control air pollutants through stringent environmental regulations to avoid infectious diseases, including COVID-19. Aydın et al. (2020) argued that Turkish air quality levels were considered unhealthy for sensitive groups before the pandemic emerges while it improves subsequent adoption of strict COVID-19 measures to contain the virus. Zoran et al. (2020) concluded that COVID-19 daily new cases directly impact different particulate matters and air quality levels in Milan, Italy. The country’s warm weather would not support stopping the virus, while aerosol outdoor airborne might have the ability to diffuse the virus. The need to assess the cost of environmental pollution in terms of virus transmission is crucial for achieving global healthcare sustainability. Travaglio et al. (2021) analyzed the regional and sub-regional air pollution data across the UK. They found that nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and ozone linked with the COVID-19 death tolls at the regional level, while nitrogen oxides found a detrimental factor at the sub-regional level. The particulate matter and nitrogen oxides increased the virus’ infection rates in the UK Biobank. Thus, increased pollution causes the emergence of new cases of the virus that need to be contained through pollution abatement policies countrywide.
Comunian et al. (2020) found that particulate matters stimulate lung inflammation that ultimately increases the exposure of the COVID-19 symptoms in patients in Italy. The country needs to control air pollutants concentration in the atmosphere to reduce virus transmission’s susceptibility. Maggazino et al. (2020) argued that particulate matters predominantly emit from the transport sector cause a high susceptibility rate of spreading coronavirus death rates through respiratory diseases in France. The transportation and logistics sectors should use green energy sources to reduce air pollutants to achieve the healthcare sustainability agenda. Liang et al. (2020) found that nitrogen dioxide increases the risk of coronavirus death tolls due to increasing urban combustion, which leads to significant healthcare issues in the USA. The targeted environmental and healthcare policies for higher emissions regions are needed to contain coronavirus disease, including limiting traffic combustion and urban air pollution, which are likely to cause greater exposure of the virus in a country. Othman and Latif (2021) concluded that a highly dense Malaysian urban population region has a greater risk of non-carcinogenic. In contrast, air pollution concentration is mainly controlled by the country’s ‘movement control order’ containing coronavirus cases. The country needs carbon abatement policies to improve human health to reduce coronavirus death tolls. Ghahremanloo et al. (2021) confirmed that most of the air pollutants significantly decline in COVID-19. Nitrogen dioxide emissions substantially decrease in some East Asian countries during lockdown situations. Thus, the environmental impact of the COVID-19 pandemic found a significant positive on the air quality indicators across countries. Peralta et al. (2021) argued that the Mexican government adopts strict measures to contain coronavirus pandemic that further control primary criterion air pollutants in a country. The country needs to adopt more sustainable healthcare policies to move forward towards green growth agenda in the long run. Table 1 shows the recent strikes of the literature that confirmed the negative environmental externalities exacerbated COVID-19 cases.
Based on the stated literature, the study’s contribution is to assess the incidence of COVID-19 cases by different kinds of air pollution that formed the smog. The more significant amounts of burning coal and SO2 emissions increase smoke and fog in the air, combining them to form smog. Further, the photochemical smog initially found in the early 1950s was considered a new type of air pollution that caused smog. Transport and traffic emissions also contribute to the form of smog. Many other sources formed smog. This study confined our findings to the stated air pollution factors that caused smog, i.e., transport emissions, nitrous oxide emissions, and coal energy production. The study has a unique standing in the earlier work as minimal empirical work has been reported in a large panel of countries that have been covered in this study to collect data of 39 most affected countries of COVID-19 for analysis. The previous studies mostly limited their findings on the following aspects, which includes (i) social and administrative issues regarding the COVID-19 pandemic (Moon 2020; Anser et al. 2020a; Ansell et al. 2020), (ii) increased global poverty risk by spreading infectious diseases (Buheji et al. 2020; Anser et al. 2020b), (iii) COVID-19 measures decrease carbon emissions and increase fertility rate (Anser et al. 2020c; Han et al. 2021), (iv) financial depression in the time of COVID-19 (Thayer and Gildner 2020; Anser et al. 2021a; Ettman et al. 2020), (v) COVID-19 vaccination for cancer patients (Ribas et al. 2021), and (vi) behavioral changes and worries due to coronavirus spread (Barber and Kim 2021). At the same time, few studies show the prevalence of COVID-19 in photochemical smog, for instance, Straka et al. (2021), McClatchey et al. 2021, and Li et al. (2021). These studies are limited to show the few smog factors to assess environmental and health quality across countries. The current study has a broader domain and contributed extensively in the recent literature to monitor the concentration of different smog factors in the air that likely to cause an increasing number of COVID-19 cases in the cross-sectional panel of countries.
Based on the unique study’s contribution, the study formulates the four most inspiring research questions that suggest policy formulations globally. First, to what extent can photochemical smog increase the newly infected coronavirus cases globally? This question determines the concentration of nitrous oxide emissions in the air that is likely to cause newly infected cases across countries. Second, does coal combustion spread coronavirus cases? The higher amount of burning coals formed smog that likely to become a carrier to spread new coronavirus cases globally. Third, does COVID-19 cases increase due to an increase in traffic emissions? This question argued that transportation emissions would also be a factor in producing smog, which is likely to cause an increase in COVID-19 cases due to increased healthcare issues. Finally, will smog exacerbate COVID-19 impact globally? The question is essential to determine the risk of mortality in highly dense urban population areas due to increasing pollution levels across countries.
The discussion comes to an end by examining the following research objectives of the study, which helps to make sustainable global healthcare policies, i.e.,
-
i)
To analyze the impact of smog drivers on newly infected coronavirus cases in a cross-sectional panel of 39 countries.
-
ii)
To determine the relationships between the studied factors in inter-temporal setting over the time horizon, and
-
iii)
To examine the impact assessment between the variables in the different regime-based analysis.
The study empirically found the relationship between the stated factors by using Markov switching regression model and variance decomposition analysis. The nonlinearities often exhibit in the linear regression models that need to assess discrete changes in regimes. Further, variance error shocks are assessed in an inter-temporal setting that determines the impact of different regressors on regressand over time.
Data and methodology
The study used three different smog drivers that likely to an increase in COVID-19 cases, i.e., transport emissions (denoted by SMOG_TE) as a percentage of fossil fuel combustion, nitrous oxide emissions (indicated by SMOG_N2O) in thousand metric tons of equivalent carbon emissions, and energy produced by coal fire (denoted by SMOG_CF) as a percentage of total electricity production. The recently available data of the stated variables on the World Bank (2021) database is used as a reference point. The study’s regressand is COVID-19 cases (denoted by COVID19_CASES), where the data is obtained from Worldometer (2020) on 11th February 2021. The study used cross-sectional data of a panel of 39 countries selected based on the higher COVID-19 cases and greater smog concentrations nationwide. Figure 1 shows the aggregation of N2O emissions in the atmosphere. Simultaneously, the number of COVID-19 registered cases is displayed on a global map with light blue (low concentration and less COVID-19 cases) and dark blue (high concentration and larger COVID cases) panel of 39 countries. The COVID-19 number counts show that the lowest infected patients are 236,333 in Croatia, while the highest infected cases are 27,897,214 in the USA on 11th February 2021. On the other hand, nitrous oxide emissions are lowest in Panama with the value of 1408 thousand metric tons of equivalent carbon emissions while highest in the USA, with 288,878 thousand metric tons of carbon equivalent. The smog traffic emissions and coal combustion are more increased in Sweden and South Africa while less elevated in Ukraine and Pakistan. The trend analysis shows different variations in the smog indicators and COVID-19 cases that vary from country to country in the designated sample of countries, which need critical assessment of the smog data to get any evidence of the exposure COVID-19 cases across countries.
Theoretical underpinning
The study’s purpose is to critically analyze the concentration of different smog indicators into the air, possibly be the cause of the resurgence of coronavirus cases in a cross-sectional panel of 39 countries. The study proposed three main theories closely linked to the stated theme of the analysis, i.e., healthcare signalling theory, social-cost theory, and preventive theory. The first theory is related to the information channels through which the government and healthcare professionals signal the general public to be aware of the particular pandemic and suggest possible measures to avoid the disease. The theory’s main drivers are information and communications channels, patients record, and awareness about the disease. The social-cost approach is related to the societal damages in increasing infected cases, death tolls, and rising healthcare expenditures. The societal cost can be of two types; one is in the form of patient's health sufferings and their out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures. Another is increasing national healthcare bill, insurance premiums, and incidental charges that would rapidly increase in the healthcare crisis. Finally, the preventive theory shows healthcare research and development expenditures’ outcomes to get a solution to minimize the risk of infectious diseases through vaccine supplementation or medication. These theories were most evident in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. The WHO declared the SARS-CoV-2 virus as a pandemic, and government and healthcare professionals inform the general public to safeguard from the coronavirus using different information channels. Thus, positive signalling spread globally, and safety measures have been initiated to minimize the virus’ exposure. The societal costs exacerbated both in healthcare damages and monetary outlay in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The higher spending of healthcare R&D expenditures makes a vaccine contain the coronavirus available to the general public in due time. Figure 2 shows the research framework of the study for ready reference.
Econometric framework
Based on the stated theories, the study disseminates the information about smog’s vulnerability and its negative effect on the patient’s respiratory system to expose coronavirus disease to endorse healthcare signalling theory. On the other hand, the study analyzed social-cost theory to assess the societal damages in infected coronavirus cases by smog concentration. Equation (1) shows a different smog indicator that served as air pollutants and possibly is the cause of an increase in coronavirus cases across countries, i.e.,
Equation (1) shows that smog factors would likely cause exposure of COVDI-19 cases across countries. The following hypotheses need to be tested to assess the link between the stated variables, i.e.,
-
H1: The photochemical smog would likely increase COVID-19 cases across countries.
-
H2: The coal combustion would likely cause an increase in the COVID-19 cases, and
-
H3: The traffic emissions and COVID-19 cases would likely be a direct relationship between them.
The stated hypotheses need to be checked by statistical techniques. The study used the ‘switching regression method’ and ‘variance decomposition analysis (VDA)’ for robust inferences. The Markov two-stage switching regimes method is adopted to find the relationship between the smog factors and COVID-19 cases. On the other hand, the study used forecasting relationships between the stated variables by the VDA method. The switching regression methods have the following advantages over the conventional regression methods, i.e.,
-
i)
Its mathematical computational procedure is relatively simple and tractable, valid in the likelihood functions.
-
ii)
It helps to explore the hidden variables that are not observed primarily in the conventional regression models, and
-
iii)
It is flexible, as one can use different regression functions in their estimation procedure to get other trends in changed regimes.
The VDA method is dynamically used in the VAR setting. The technique allows knowledge about the variability of the regressand explained by their regressors in inter-temporal settings. It understands the VAR model once fitted in a schematic fashion.
Results and discussion
Table 2 shows the descriptive statistics of the interested variables and found that the mean value of COVID-19 cases is 2,462,785 with a standard deviation of 4,747,195 and a high kurtosis value. The coal combustion, nitrous oxide emissions, and traffic emissions have an average value of 27.47% of total electricity production, 39,319.36 thousand metric tons of carbon equivalent, and 27.760% fossil fuel combustion. The nitrous oxide emissions have a higher value of standard deviation, positively skewed distribution, and higher kurtosis value compared to the other smog indicators, which shows a higher dispersion of the matters at a given time.
Table 3 shows the correlation estimates and found that nitrous oxide emissions positively correlate with COVID-19 cases with an estimated value of 0.89, p < 0.00. The coal fire and traffic emissions tend to show a low correlation with the COVID-19 cases. The result implies that photochemical smog produced by nitrous oxide emissions is highly toxic for human health, causing lungs and other respiratory infections, which is likely to increase coronavirus disease across countries. It is highly needed to improve human health by reducing air pollution through stringent environmental healthcare policies (Azam et al. 2019; Majeed and Ozturk 2020).
Table 4 shows the two-step, Markov, and switching regime regression approach and found that in regime-1, smog produced by coal fires, nitrous oxide emissions, and traffic emissions negatively affect human health, leading to an increase in the number counts of COVID-19 cases across countries. On the other hand, in regime-2, only nitrous oxide emissions exhibit a positive relationship with COVID-19 cases. The overall results confirmed that air pollution, in general, negatively impacts human health, which leads to exposing the lungs and other respiratory infections. Thus, it is more likely to reveal the affected peoples to the risk of coronavirus cases worldwide. Wang and Su (2020) argued that the COVID-19 pandemic decreases economic activities and traffic volume that support reducing nitrous oxide emissions and improve air quality level in the short run. However, once the lockdown situation is lifted, the economic process will begin to resume, and air pollution would exacerbate, negatively affecting human health. The carbon control measures should strictly define to reduce death counts globally. Islam et al. (2020) confirmed that a high level of pollution leads to more health sufferings that are likely to increase the death counts associated with COVID-19. Carbon monoxide, particulate matter, and nitrous oxide emissions are highly exposed to human health, leading to lung infection and other respiratory diseases, which may increase complications associated with COVID-19. Ma et al. (2020) emphasized the need to increase the knowledge gap about certain air pollutants that may cause to spread of the SARS_CoV-2 virus. The need to know the impacts of air pollution on COVID-19 cases is vital for understanding worldwide carbon abatement policies.
Table 5 shows the estimates of VDA and found that smog air pollution would play a detrimental effect on human health, leading to an increase in the exposure of coronavirus disease across countries. The smog produced by nitrous oxide emissions would likely increase COVID-19 cases with a proportional variance of 33.90%, followed by the pollution produced by coal fires with a value of 6.64% and traffic emissions with a proportional variance of 2.00% over the time horizon. The smog concentration in the atmosphere is highly toxic that negatively affects the healthcare sustainability agenda. The policies to improve air quality and confine new COVID-19 cases are crucial for long-term sustainable growth.
Based on the stated results, the study highlighted the need to ensure socio-economic and industrial based policies to sustained business activities through artificial intelligence, process innovation, and industrial revolution, which help to achieve healthcare sustainability (Awan et al. 2021a, b). Environmental technology, the role of institutions, stringent environmental policies, and renewable energy demand played a vital role to minimize the cost of carbon emissions worldwide (Ahmed et al. 2020; Ahmed and Bhattacharya 2020). Sustainable innovation also is the viable factor to minimize exogenous shocks and attain a green and clean growth agenda (Awan 2020b; Ahmed and Ozturk 2018). The role of the supply chain process during a pandemic is essential in many aspects, as it ensures the free flow of preventive healthcare equipment to reduce the susceptibility of COVID-19 pandemic worldwide (Anser et al. 2021b). Carbon pricing is another policy option to mitigate carbon pollution (Nassani et al. 2019). The re-corrective measures are highly needed to move forward towards green development (Ahmed and Ahmed 2018; Anser et al. 2020d). Technological embodied supply chain processes would likely become more efficient to minimize adverse environmental shocks (Anser et al. 2020e).
Conclusions and policy implications
The study’s primary purpose is to identify the significant atmospheric pollutants that formed a smog in the air that increase lungs and other respiratory diseases, which cause a transmission channel of sensitive increase coronavirus cases worldwide. The study’s critical contribution is to project three main healthcare theories linked with infectious disease to prepare themselves for the emergence of pandemic plague. Healthcare signalling theory provides a signal to the general public about the outbreak of epidemic disease. In contrast, the social-cost view found the societal damages in healthcare sufferings and out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures. Finally, the prevention theory is designed to get out of the epidemic through make a designated vaccine or medication formulations. This study worked on the first two stated theories, as the emergence of smog causes a severe respiratory disease that may lead to being infected with the SARS_CoV-2 virus. Simultaneously, its societal damage in the concentration of different air pollutants on patients’ health suffering is analyzed through computational methods. The study results confirmed the adverse effects of N2O emissions, coal combustion, and traffic emissions on patients’ health that exposed the coronavirus disease. The forecast relationship confirmed that N2O emissions would likely have a higher variance in increasing COVID-19 cases, followed by coal combustion and traffic emissions. Based on the stated results, the study proposed the three critical policies related to smog control measures that possibly be minimized new COVID-19 cases across countries, i.e.,
-
i)
The photochemical smog concentrations should be reduced by adopting the clean environmental plan, introducing a clean air plan by sustainable fueling, implementing vehicle emissions control measures through electrified vehicles, cutting industrial and power plant emissions by imposing carbon taxes, and reducing marine emissions through compliant fuels. All these measures would be helpful to achieve healthcare sustainability agenda across countries.
-
ii)
The reduction of nitrogen oxide is essential to minimize healthcare issues. The ‘catalytic reduction’ is vital to lowering the nitrogen oxide levels. The industry and vehicles can use this process to filter out oxides into nitrogen and oxygen. The efficient use of LPG and CNG further reduce volatile organic compounds, and
-
iii)
The use of energy-efficient appliances, smart building designs, use of renewable fuels, limiting wood fuels, and sustainable education, all these measures would help to minimize air pollution level that supports to achieve healthcare sustainability agenda globally. The combustion of fossil fuels has a larger share of air pollution that needs to be reduced by smart pollution control technologies (Rehman et al. 2021; Baloch et al. 2021). Introducing clean power sources is also a desirable step to improve air quality.
The toxicity of anthropogenic activities leads to more death tolls from infectious diseases, including COVID-19. The low immune system and high pollution level are directly linked together. The increased need to improve air quality indicators is desirable to prevent contagious diseases. Society needs to take care of its surroundings and minimize the waste that causes increased healthcare costs, leading to increased COVID-19 cases. Moreover, academia and research scientists need to identify the causal factors that likely to cause the spread of COVID-19 cases globally. Environmental policies should frame with regulatory authorities to monitor air quality levels and reduce air pollution levels by adopting cleaner technologies (Ahmed 2020), using renewable fuels (Ahmed et al. 2021), smart building designing (Eini et al. 2021), and the imposition of emissions-cap trading and carbon taxes (Zaman et al. 2021). These measures would reduce smog formation and ultimately improve human health to reduce coronavirus disease incidence globally.
The study is limited to access few environmental factors that likely to cause an increase in COVID-19 cases. Future research would likely extend it by socio-economic, environmental, and healthcare logistics supply factors to assess the COVID-19 vulnerability across different segments of the society.
Data availability
The data is freely available at Worldometer (2021) at https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ and World Development Indicators published by World Bank (2021) at https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.
References
Aabed K, Lashin MM (2021) An analytical study of the factors that influence COVID-19 spread. Saudi J Biol Sci 28(2):1177–1195
Ahmed K (2020) Environmental policy stringency, related technological change and emissions inventory in 20 OECD countries. J Environ Manag 274:111209
Ahmed K, Ahmed S (2018) A predictive analysis of CO 2 emissions, environmental policy stringency, and economic growth in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(16):16091–16100
Ahmed, K., Bhattacharya, M. (2020) Towards a sustainable development: the role of energy and institutions in combating CO 2 emissions for the ASEAN-8. In Moving from the Millennium to the Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 199-225). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Ahmed K, Ozturk I (2018) What new technology means for the energy demand in China? A sustainable development perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(29):29766–29771
Ahmed S, Ahmed K, Ismail M (2020) Predictive analysis of CO 2 emissions and the role of environmental technology, energy use and economic output: evidence from emerging economies. Air Qual Atmos Health 13(9):1035–1044
Ahmed K, Apergis N, Bhattacharya M, Paramati SR (2021) Electricity consumption in Australia: the role of clean energy in reducing CO2 emissions. Appl Econ:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1925080
Ansell C, Sørensen E, Torfing J (2020) The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Manag Rev 23:949–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272
Anser MK, Yousaf Z, Khan MA, Nassani AA, Abro MMQ, Vo XH, Zaman K (2020a) Social and administrative issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Pakistan: better late than never. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(27):34567–34573
Anser MK, Yousaf Z, Khan MA, Nassani AA, Alotaibi SM, Abro MMQ et al (2020b) Does communicable diseases (including COVID-19) may increase global poverty risk? A cloud on the horizon. Environ Res 187:109668
Anser MK, Yousaf Z, Khan MA, Voo XH, Nassani AA, Alotaibi SM, Abro MMQ, Zaman K (2020c) The impacts of COVID-19 measures on global environment and fertility rate: double coincidence. Air Qual Atmos Health 13(9):1083–1092
Anser MK, Yousaf Z, Awan U, Nassani AA, Qazi Abro MM, Zaman K (2020d) Identifying the carbon emissions damage to international tourism: turn a blind eye. Sustainability 12(5):1937. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051937
Anser MK, Khan MA, Awan U, Batool R, Zaman K, Imran M, Sasmoko, Indrianti Y, Khan A, Bakar ZA (2020e) The role of technological innovation in a dynamic model of the environmental supply chain curve: evidence from a panel of 102 countries. Processes 8(9):1033
Anser MK, Khan MA, Zaman K, Nassani AA, Askar SE, Abro MMQ, Kabbani A (2021a) Financial development during COVID-19 pandemic: the role of coronavirus testing and functional labs. Financial Innov 7(1):1–13
Anser MK, Khan MA, Nassani AA, Abro MMQ, Zaman K, Kabbani A (2021b) Does COVID-19 pandemic disrupt sustainable supply chain process? Covering some new global facts. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14817-2
Awan U (2020a) Industrial Ecology in Support of Sustainable Development Goals. In: Leal Filho W, Azul AM, Brandli L, Özuyar PG, Wall T (eds) Responsible Consumption and Production. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95726-5_18
Awan, U. (2020b). Steering for sustainable development goals: a typology of sustainable innovation. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Wall, T. (eds) Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71059-4_64-1
Awan U, Kraslawski A, Huiskonen J (2020) Progress from blue to the green world: multilevel governance for pollution prevention planning and sustainability. In: Hussain C (ed) Handbook of Environmental Materials Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58538-3_177-1
Awan, U., Kanwal, N., Alawi, S., Huiskonen, J., & Dahanayake, A. (2021a). Artificial intelligence for supply chain success in the era of data analytics. The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Implementation of Artificial Intelligence for Growing Business Success, edited by Allam Hamdan, Aboul Ella Hassanien, Anjum Razzaque, Bahaaeddin Alareeni, pp. 3-21. Springer International Publishing, Online available at: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030627959 (accessed on 26th June 2021)
Awan U, Arnold MG, Gölgeci I (2021b) Enhancing green product and process innovation: towards an integrative framework of knowledge acquisition and environmental investment. Bus Strateg Environ 30(2):1283–1295
Aydın S, Nakiyingi BA, Esmen C, Güneysu S, Ejjada M (2020) Environmental impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) from Turkish perceptive. Environ Dev Sustain 23:7573–7580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00933-5
Azam M, Khan AQ, Ozturk I (2019) The effects of energy on investment, human health, environment and economic growth: empirical evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(11):10816–10825
Baloch MA, Ozturk I, Bekun FV, Khan D (2021) Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: does globalization matter? Bus Strateg Environ 30(1):176–184
Barber SJ, Kim H (2021) COVID-19 worries and behavior changes in older and younger men and women. J Gerontol: Series B 76(2):e17–e23
Bashir MF, Jiang B, Komal B, Bashir MA, Farooq TH, Iqbal N, Bashir M (2020) Correlation between environmental pollution indicators and COVID-19 pandemic: a brief study in Californian context. Environ Res 187:109652
Bhat SA, Bashir O, Bilal M, Ishaq A, Dar MUD, Kumar R et al (2021) Impact of COVID-related lockdowns on environmental and climate change scenarios. Environ Res 195:110839
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopedia (2019, December 17). Smog. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/smog (accessed on 13th February 2021)
Buheji, M., da Costa Cunha, K., Beka, G., Mavric, B., De Souza, Y. L., da Costa Silva, S. S., ... & Yein, T. C. (2020). The extent of covid-19 pandemic socio-economic impact on global poverty. a global integrative multidisciplinary review. Am J Econ 10(4):213-224
Comunian S, Dongo D, Milani C, Palestini P (2020) Air pollution and Covid-19: the role of particulate matter in the spread and increase of Covid-19's morbidity and mortality. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(12):4487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124487
De Angelis E, Renzetti S, Volta M, Donato F, Calza S, Placidi D et al (2021) COVID-19 incidence and mortality in Lombardy, Italy: an ecological study on the role of air pollution, meteorological factors, demographic and socioeconomic variables. Environ Res 195:110777
Eini R, Linkous L, Zohrabi N, Abdelwahed S (2021) Smart building management system: performance specifications and design requirements. J Build Eng 39:102222
Ettman, C. K., Abdalla, S. M., Cohen, G. H., Sampson, L., Vivier, P. M., & Galea, S. (2020) Low assets and financial stressors associated with higher depression during COVID-19 in a nationally representative sample of US adults. J Epidemiol Commun Health
Ghahremanloo M, Lops Y, Choi Y, Mousavinezhad S (2021) Impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on air pollution levels in East Asia. Sci Total Environ 754:142226
Han P, Cai Q, Oda T, Zeng N, Shan Y, Lin X, Liu D (2021) Assessing the recent impact of COVID-19 on carbon emissions from China using domestic economic data. Sci Total Environ 750:141688
Islam H, Shakoori IS, Aslam F, Ashraf G, Akram H (2020) Examination of air pollution’s relationship with COVID-19, Physical and Mental Health. J Interdiscip Med 5(4):137–140
Isphording IE, Pestel N (2021) Pandemic meets pollution: poor air quality increases deaths by COVID-19. J Environ Econ Manag 108:102448
Konstantinoudis G, Padellini T, Bennett J, Davies B, Ezzati M, Blangiardo M (2021) Long-term exposure to air-pollution and COVID-19 mortality in England: a hierarchical spatial analysis. Environ Int 146:106316
Li M, Wang T, Xie M, Li S, Zhuang B, Fu Q, Zhao M, Wu H, Liu J, Saikawa E, Liao K (2021) Drivers for the poor air quality conditions in North China Plain during the COVID-19 outbreak. Atmos Environ 246:118103
Liang D, Shi L, Zhao J, Liu P, Sarnat JA, Gao S, Schwartz J, Liu Y, Ebelt ST, Scovronick N, Chang HH (2020) Urban air pollution may enhance COVID-19 case-fatality and mortality rates in the United States. Innovation 1(3):100047
Ma Q, Qi Y, Shan Q, Liu S, He H (2020) Understanding the knowledge gaps between air pollution controls and health impacts including pathogen epidemic. Environ Res 189:109949
Magazzino C, Mele M, Schneider N (2020) The relationship between air pollution and COVID-19-related deaths: an application to three French cities. Appl Energy 279:115835
Majeed MT, Ozturk I (2020) Environmental degradation and population health outcomes: a global panel data analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(13):15901–15911
Marquès M, Rovira J, Nadal M, Domingo JL (2021) Effects of air pollution on the potential transmission and mortality of COVID-19: a preliminary case-study in Tarragona Province (Catalonia, Spain). Environ Res 192:110315
Martinez, J. (2020) Great Smog of London. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Great-Smog-of-London (accessed on 13th February 2021)
McClatchey K, Jackson T, Delaney B, Morgan N, Pinnock H, Chan AHY (2021) COVID-19 information for people living with asthma: a rapid review of publicly available information. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 9:2070–2072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2021.01.003
Moon MJ (2020) Fighting COVID-19 with agility, transparency, and participation: wicked policy problems and new governance challenges. Public Adm Rev 80(4):651–656
Nassani AA, Awan U, Zaman K, Hyder S, Aldakhil AM, Abro MMQ (2019) Management of natural resources and material pricing: Global evidence. Res Policy 64:101500
Othman M, Latif MT (2021) Air pollution impacts from COVID-19 pandemic control strategies in Malaysia. J Clean Prod 291:125992
Peralta O, Ortínez-Alvarez A, Torres-Jardón R, Suárez-Lastra M, Castro T, Ruíz-Suárez LG (2021) Ozone over Mexico City during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Total Environ 761:143183
Persico CL, Johnson KR (2021) The effects of increased pollution on COVID-19 cases and deaths. J Environ Econ Manag 107:102431
Rehman A, Ma H, Chishti MZ, Ozturk I, Irfan M, Ahmad M (2021) Asymmetric investigation to track the effect of urbanization, energy utilization, fossil fuel energy and CO 2 emission on economic efficiency in China: another outlook. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(14):17319–17330
Ribas A, Sengupta R, Locke T, Zaidi SK, Campbell KM, Carethers JM et al (2021) Priority COVID-19 vaccination for patients with cancer while vaccine supply is limited. Cancer Discov 11(2):233–236
Sarfraz Z (2020) The social and economic burden of smog in Pakistan. Pakistan J Surg Med 1(1):5–7
Straka W, Kondragunta S, Wei Z, Zhang H, Miller SD, Watts A (2021) Examining the economic and environmental impacts of COVID-19 using Earth Observation Data. Remote Sens 13(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13010005
Thayer ZM, Gildner TE (2020) COVID-19-related financial stress associated with higher likelihood of depression among pregnant women living in the United States. Am J Hum Biol 33:e23508. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23508
Travaglio M, Yu Y, Popovic R, Selley L, Leal NS, Martins LM (2021) Links between air pollution and COVID-19 in England. Environ Pollut 268:115859
Tung NT, Cheng PC, Chi KH, Hsiao TC, Jones T, BéruBé K, Ho KF, Chuang HC (2021) Particulate matter and SARS-CoV-2: a possible model of COVID-19 transmission. Sci Total Environ 750:141532
Vasquez-Apestegui BV, Parras-Garrido E, Tapia V, Paz-Aparicio VM, Rojas JP, Sanchez-Ccoyllo OR, Gonzales GF (2021) Association between air pollution in Lima and the high incidence of COVID-19: findings from a post hoc analysis. BMC Public Health 21(1):1–13
Wang Q, Su M (2020) A preliminary assessment of the impact of COVID-19 on environment—a case study of China. Sci Total Environ 728:138915
World Bank (2021) World development indicators. World Bank, Washington D.C
Worldometer (2021)COVID-19: Coronavirus pandemic. Online available at: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ (accessed on 11th February, 2021)
Zaman K, Aziz ARA, Sriyanto S, Indrianti Y, Jambari H (2021) The role of solar energy demand in the relationship between carbon pricing and environmental degradation: a blessing in disguise. J Public Aff:e2702. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2702
Zhang X, Tang M, Guo F, Wei F, Yu Z, Gao K, Jin M, Wang J, Chen K (2021) Associations between air pollution and COVID-19 epidemic during quarantine period in China. Environ Pollut 268:115897
Zoran MA, Savastru RS, Savastru DM, Tautan MN (2020) Assessing the relationship between surface levels of PM2. 5 and PM10 particulate matter impact on COVID-19 in Milan, Italy. Sci Total Environ 738:139825
Funding
Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/87), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MKA: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing-Reviewing and Editing. DIG: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal Analysis. MAK: Methodology, Formal Analysis. AAN: Supervision, Resources, Software. KZ. Software, Formal Analysis, Resources. MMQA: Resources, visualization, Formal Analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
The authors equally participated in the study.
Consent for publication
The authors allow the publication of the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anser, .K., Godil, D.I., Khan, M.A. et al. The impact of coal combustion, nitrous oxide emissions, and traffic emissions on COVID-19 cases: a Markov-switching approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 64882–64891 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15494-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15494-x