Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance enhancement of a solar still using a V-groove solar air collector—experimental study with energy, exergy, enviroeconomic, and exergoeconomic analysis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 09 June 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

This paper intended to evaluate the performance of a new design of solar still integrated with a V-groove solar air collector. In this system, an air channel was placed under the basin to simultaneously raise the water temperature and the temperature difference between evaporation and condensation zones. The performance of this modified solar still was compared with a conventional one in terms of their productivity, cost of water production, energy, exergy, energy payback time, enviroeconomic, and exergoeconomic analysis. All the experiments were performed in the climatic conditions of Zanjan, Iran. Findings revealed that the freshwater produced in the modified system was 170% more than the traditional one. Moreover, the annual output energy and exergy of the modified still was 170% and 257% higher than the conventional one, respectively. The results also showed that integrating the solar air collector with solar still improved the energy and exergy parameters, energy payback time, and energy production factor 26, 67, 17, and 21% more than traditional solar still, respectively. Additionally, the modified solar still was found to be 40.6% more efficient than the conventional type in the Co2 mitigation. Furthermore, based on the experimental results, three characteristic equations were presented to predict the daily water production, efficiency, and Co2 mitigation of the conventional and modified solar stills based on the solar intensity and ambient temperature. Finally, a characteristic equation for instantaneous efficiency of the active still, which depends on climatic conditions and system performance parameters, was obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure. 5.
Figure. 6.
Figure. 7.
Figure. 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 10.
Figure 11.
Figure 12.
Figure 13.
Figure 14.
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17.
Figure 18.
Fig. 19.
Figure. 20.
Figure. 21.
Figure. 22.
Figure. 23.
Figure. 24.
Figure. 25.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data can be made available on request.

Change history

Notes

  1. Phase change materials

  2. Photovoltaic-thermal

  3. Photovoltaic

  4. Phase change materials

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Parisa Azari: Conceptualization, resources, performing experiments, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing original draft, and editing.

Arash Mirabdolah Lavasani: Conceptualization, writing-review and editing, supervision, and project administration.

Nader Rahbar: Conceptualization, writing-review and editing, supervision, and project administration.

Mohammad Eftekhari Yazdi: Supervision and project administration.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arash Mirabdolah Lavasani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

1. Freshwater production enhanced by integrating a V-groove solar air collector into solar still.

2. The proficiency of the active solar still was experimentally compared with the passive one.

3. An improvement of 170% in distilled water was achieved for the active solar still.

4. The CPL value for the active solar still was 33% lower than passive one.

5. The exergoeconomic parameters based on energy and exergy for active solar still has been found to be 7.8 and 0.79kWh/$, respectively, at 20% rate of interest.

6. The active solar still mitigated Co2 emission more than the passive one.

7. Characteristic equations of the active solar still were extracted to predict the daily yield, efficiency, andCo2 mitigation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azari, P., Mirabdolah Lavasani, A., Rahbar, N. et al. Performance enhancement of a solar still using a V-groove solar air collector—experimental study with energy, exergy, enviroeconomic, and exergoeconomic analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 65525–65548 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15290-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15290-7

Keywords

Navigation