Abstract
China has pledged to peak its carbon dioxide emissions (CEM) before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060. The energy consumption related to land urbanization (LURB) and internet penetration (INT) may have a significant impact on CEM. It is critical for China to obtain a better understanding of the interaction among them in order to tackle challenges of climate change in the digital era. Initially, the multivariate panel bootstrap Granger causality test is conducted to estimate the causal effects of LURB and INT on CEM in China. The results reveal that the interaction patterns among them varied across different provinces, and particularly LURB and INT are two determinants of CEM mainly in Eastern China, which is consistent with the stochastic differential model. Then, CEM is not a Granger-cause of LURB and INT in the majority of Chinese provinces, as LURB and INT largely depend on government policies and industrial development. In addition, there are no significant interactions between LURB and CEM in over two-thirds of the provinces and there are also none between INT and CEM in over half of the Chinese provinces. Therefore, Chinese policymakers should further adopt differentiated and efficient policies targeting the weak links and achieve environmental sustainability through low carbon transition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ahmad M, Rehman A, Shah SAA, Solangi YA, Chandio AA, Jabeen G (2021) Stylized heterogeneous dynamic links among healthcare expenditures, land urbanization, and CO2 emissions across economic development levels. Sci Total Environ 753:142228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142228
Ahmed Z, Le HP (2021) Linking information communication technology, trade globalization index, and CO 2 emissions: evidence from advanced panel techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:8770–8781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102064
Ahmed Z, Zafar MW, Ali S, Danish (2020) Linking urbanization, human capital, and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: an empirical analysis. Sustain Cities Soc 55:102064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102064
Akande A, Cabral P, Casteleyn S (2019) Assessing the gap between technology and the environmental sustainability of European cities. Inf Syst Front 21:581–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09903-3
Ali R, Bakhsh K, Yasin MA (2019) Impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economy: evidence from Pakistan. Sustain Cities Soc 48:101553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101553
Altinoz B, Vasbieva D, Kalugina O (2020) The effect of information and communication technologies and total factor productivity on CO2 emissions in top 10 emerging market economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11630-1
Amri F, Ben Zaied Y, Ben Lahouel B (2019) ICT, total factor productivity, and carbon dioxide emissions in Tunisia. Technol Forecast Soc Change 146:212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.028
Asongu SA, Le Roux S, Biekpe N (2018) Enhancing ICT for environmental sustainability in sub-Saharan Africa. Technol Forecast Soc Change 127:209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.022
Bao C, Xu MT (2019) Cause and effect of renewable energy consumption on urbanization and economic growth in China’s provinces and regions. J Clean Prod 231:483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.191
Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47:239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
Chen XH, Gong XM, Li DY, Zhang JP (2019) Can information and communication technology reduce CO2 emission? A quantile regression analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:32977–32992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06380-8
Chen ZF, Liu XQ, Lu Z, Li YR (2021) The expansion mechanism of rural residential land and implications for sustainable regional development: evidence from the Baota district in China’s loess plateau. Land 10:172. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020172
Chuai XW, Huang XJ, Wang WJ, Zhao RQ, Zhang M, Wu CY (2015) Land use, total carbon emission’s change and low carbon land management in Coastal Jiangsu, China. J Clean Prod 103:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.046
Danish (2019) Effects of information and communication technology and real income on CO2 emissions: the experience of countries along Belt and Road. Telematics Inform 45:101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101300
Dietz T, Rosa EA (1997) Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94:175–179. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.1.175
Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5323-8
Dong F, Wang Y, Su B, Hua YF, Zhang YQ (2019) The process of peak CO2 emissions in developed economies: a perspective of industrialization and urbanization. Resour Conserv Recycl 141:61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.010
Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171:1212–1217
Faisal F, Azizullah TT, Pervaiz R (2020) Does ICT lessen CO2 emissions for fast-emerging economies? An application of the heterogeneous panel estimations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:10778–10789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07582-w
Fan Y, Liu LC, Wu G, Wei YM (2006) Analyzing impact factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model. Environ Impact Assess Rev 26:377–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2005.11.007
Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2012) The internet and local wages: a puzzle. Am Econ Rev 102:556–575. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.556
Gao J, Zhang L (2021) Does biomass energy consumption mitigate CO2 emissions? The role of economic growth and urbanization: evidence from developing Asia. J Asia Pac Econ 26:96–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2020.1717902
Godil DI, Sharif A, Agha H, Jermsittiparsert K (2020) The dynamic nonlinear influence of ICT, financial development, and institutional quality on CO2 emission in Pakistan: new insights from QARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:24190–24200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08619-1
Higon DA, Gholami R, Shirazi F (2017) ICT and environmental sustainability: a global perspective. Telematics Inform 34:85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.001
Jiang S, Li Y, Lu Q, Hong Y, Guan D, Xiong Y, Wang S (2021) Policy assessments for the carbon emission flows and sustainability of bitcoin blockchain operation in China. Nat Commun 12:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22256-3
Khan K, Su CW (2021) Urbanization and carbon emissions: a panel threshold analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12443-6
Khan FN, Sana A, Arif U (2020a) Information and communication technology (ICT) and environmental sustainability: a panel data analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:36718–36731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09704-1
Khan K, Su CW, Tao R, Hao LN (2020b) Urbanization and carbon emission: causality evidence from the new industrialized economies. Environ Dev Sustain 22:7193–7213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00479-1
Konya L (2006) Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Econ Model 23:978–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2006.04.008
Lee JW, Brahmasrene T (2014) ICT, CO2 emissions and economic growth: evidence from a panel of ASEAN. Glob Econ Rev 43:93–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508x.2014.917803
Mert M, Bölük G, Çağlar AE (2019) Interrelationships among foreign direct investments, renewable energy, and CO2 emissions for different European country groups: a panel ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:21495–21510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05415-4
Muhammad S, Long XL, Salman M, Dauda L (2020) Effect of urbanization and international trade on CO2 emissions across 65 belt and road initiative countries. Energy 196:117102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117102
Munir K, Riaz N (2019) Energy consumption and environmental quality in South Asia: evidence from panel non-linear ARDL. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:29307–29315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06116-8
Munoz P, Zwick S, Mirzabaev A (2020) The impact of urbanization on Austria’s carbon footprint. J Clean Prod 263:121326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121326
N’dri LM, Islam M, Kakinaka M (2021) ICT and environmental sustainability: any differences in developing countries? J Clean Prod 297:126642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126642
Peng HF, Tan XY, Li YL, Hu LQ (2016) Economic growth, foreign direct investment and CO2 emissions in China: a panel granger causality analysis. Sustainability 8:233. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030233
Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empir Econ 60:13–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econ 142:50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Pesaran MH, Ullah A, Yamagata T (2008) A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. Econ J 11:105–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x
Poumanyvong P, Kaneko S (2010) Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecol Econ 70:434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.029
Qiu L, Zhong S, Sun B, Song Y, Chen X (2021) Is internet penetration narrowing the rural–urban income inequality? A cross-regional study of China Qual Quant:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01081-8
Raheem ID, Tiwari AK, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2020) The role of ICT and financial development in CO2 emissions and economic growth. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:1912–1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06590-0
Rahman MM, Vu XB (2020) The nexus between renewable energy, economic growth, trade, urbanisation and environmental quality: a comparative study for Australia and Canada. Renew Energy 155:617–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.135
Sadorsky P (2014) The effect of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economies. Energy Econ 41:147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.11.007
Sahoo M, Gupta M, Srivastava P (2021) Does information and communication technology and financial development lead to environmental sustainability in India? An empirical insight. Telematics Inform 60:101598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101598
Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I (2016) The effects of Internet usage and economic growth on CO2 emissions in OECD countries: a panel investigation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 62:1226–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.018
Shahnazi R, Shabani ZD (2019) The effects of spatial spillover information and communications technology on carbon dioxide emissions in Iran. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:24198–24212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05636-7
Su CW, Liu TY, Chang HL, Jiang XZ (2015) Is urbanization narrowing the urban-rural income gap? A cross-regional study of China. Habitat Int 48:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.002
Su CW, Song Y, Ma YT, Tao R (2019) Is financial development narrowing the urban-rural income gap? A cross-regional study of China. Pap Reg Sci 98:1779–1800. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12428
Su CW, Qin M, Tao R, Umar M (2020) Financial implications of fourth industrial revolution: can bitcoin improve prospects of energy investment? Technol Forecast Soc Change 158:120178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120178
Swamy PA (1970) Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica 38:311–323. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913012
Ulucak R, Danish KSUD (2020) Does information and communication technology affect CO2 mitigation under the pathway of sustainable development during the mode of globalization? Sustain Dev 28:857–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2041
Wang WZ, Liu LC, Liao H, Wei YM (2021) Impacts of urbanization on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis from OECD countries. Energy Policy 151:112171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112171
Wu TP, Wu HC (2019) Tourism and economic growth in Asia: a bootstrap multivariate panel Granger causality. Int J Tour Policy 21:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2243
Xu HZ, Zhang WJ (2016) The causal relationship between carbon emissions and land urbanization quality: a panel data analysis for Chinese provinces. J Clean Prod 137:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.076
Yazdi SK, Shakouri B (2018) The effect of renewable energy and urbanization on CO2 emissions: a panel data. Energ Source Part B 13:121–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2017.1400607
Yu Y, Zhang N (2021) Low-carbon city pilot and carbon emission efficiency: quasi-experimental evidence from China. Energy Econ 96:105125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105125
Yu X, Shen M, Shen W, Zhang X (2020) Effects of land urbanization on smog pollution in China: estimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models. Land 9:337. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090337
Zhang CG, Liu C (2015) The impact of ICT industry on CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 44:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.011
Zhang WJ, Xu HZ (2017) Exploring the causal relationship between carbon emissions and land urbanization quality in China using a panel data analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 19:1445–1462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9813-8
Zhang X, Geng Y, Shao S, Wilson J, Song XQ, You W (2020) China’s non-fossil energy development and its 2030 CO2 reduction targets: the role of urbanization. Appl Energy 261:114353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114353
Zhou Y, Liu YS, Wu WX, Li YR (2015) Effects of rural-urban development transformation on energy consumption and CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:863–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.158
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the editors and the anonymous reviews for their valuable comments and suggestions on this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Shunbin Zhong, Huafu Shen, and Xiaohua Chen; methodology: Shunbin Zhong, Chongchong Xin, Huafu Shen; formal analysis and investigation: Shunbin Zhong, Xiaohua Chen; writing—original draft preparation: Shunbin Zhong, Huafu Shen; writing—review and editing: Chongchong Xin, Xiaohua Chen; supervision: Chongchong Xin. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1
This paper uses the traditional measure of urbanization (URB) as a robustness test, and the findings are nearly the same with the measure of land urbanization (LURB). It indicates that the development patterns of land-centered urbanization and population-centered urbanization are coordinated on the whole in spite of some differences. Therefore, it makes this article’s estimation results convincing.
The results differ in several ways. First, we do not find evidences of one-way Granger causality from URB to CEM in Shandong, Tianjin, and Shanxi. The possible reason is that there are still some restrictions on population moving from rural to urban areas in these provinces. As a result, people do not possess enough income to consume and invest. Thus, restrictions such as Hukou policies in these provinces should be further lifted. And the remaining provinces show that there may be other factors determining the CEM. Moreover, we find significant evidences of causality from URB to CEM in Hubei, which may be subject to the implementation of many attracting talent policies. For instance, in January 2017, Wuhan in Hubei province has proposed a graduate program aiming to keep one million college students in the city after they graduate. Population growth and migration induce URB, and higher population increases energy consumption, which resulted in an increase in CEM. Finally, we do not find evidences of one-way Granger causality from CEM to URB in Inner Mongolia and Shaanxi, as these two provinces are in the Western region with a small population and little internal migration.
Appendix 2
To further illustrate the long run effects of LURB and INT on CEM, this paper employs the panel autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model to test their association. The panel ARDL approach takes advantage of a single equation that makes it simple to perform, and it can be used when the studied factors are combination of I (0) and I (1) (Mert et al. 2019). There are two stages in the panel ARDL model when testing the long-term relationship among the variables. In the first step, the t statistics is calculated by the error correction model to determine whether the investigated variables have a long-term cointegration association. In the second step, the long-run and short-run coefficients can be obtained if the variables are cointegrated. Thus, referring to the studies by Mert et al. (2019), Munir and Riaz (2019), and N’dri et al. (2021), the panel ARDL model for the study is constructed as follows:
where i is the province, t is the time, μi is the cross-section effects,\( {\lambda}_i^{\hbox{'}} \) is the long-term coefficients, π and ω are the short-term coefficients, p and q are the optimal lags, and X includes LURB, INT, and ECG.
Initially, we perform panel unit root tests for the series in Table 8, the results show that the first differenced series of CEM, LURB, and ECG are stationary, and the INT series is stationary. Secondly, we perform the Pedroni panel cointegration test for the series after getting the integration orders in Table 9, and it confirms the cointegrating relationship among the variables. Therefore, we proceed with ARDL model to estimate the long-run and short-run coefficients along with the error correction coefficient, which are reported in Table 10.
From an overall perspective, the long-run and short-run estimated results are presented in Table 10. The finding reveals that both urbanization and internet development have a significant positive impact on carbon emissions in the short run and a significant negative impact in the long run. The results further indicate that a 1% increase in LURB and INT could result in the reduction of CEM by 0.447% and 3.694%, respectively, in the long run. It corroborated that of Ali et al. (2019) in Pakistan and Shahnazi and Shabani (2019) in Iran, while it contradicted that of Dogan and Turkekul (2016) in USA and Altinoz et al. (2020) in top 10 emerging counties. The likely reason might be the local institutional and policy environment. For example, developed counties are known for their government strict energy regulations and measure taken for reducing energy consumption in the pursuit of environmental sustainability. However, developing counties are still accelerating economic development for their primary goals. China has now paid more attention to environmental sustainability after the achievement of rapid urbanization and digitization. The coefficient value of the error correction term (ECM) clarifies that the determinants of CEM from the long-run equilibrium will be corrected and converged to the equilibrium level at 35.1% annually.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhong, S., Xin, C., Shen, H. et al. Effects of land urbanization and internet penetration on environmental sustainability: a cross-regional study of China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 66751–66771 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15226-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15226-1