Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the mechanism of barriers towards green finance and public spending in small and medium enterprises from developed countries

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to their different abilities to improve financial growth and improve social development, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) have been referred to as the economy’s backbone. Small- and medium-sized enterprises are crucial for both high- and low-income nations’ financial development. Customers grow more conscious of their purchase choices, preferences, and environmental consequences. The financial opportunities for SMEs in the United Arab Emirates to use green innovation methods to address potential obstacles for increasing green goods, processes, and management are examined in this paper; as a result, it is critical to reduce clean technology adoption constraints in small- and medium-sized businesses. To identify significant hurdles, sub-barriers, and ways to overcome impediments to green innovation in the United Arab Emirates, we apply an integrated decision process. Following a detailed literature analysis and the assistance of twelve experts, six primary obstacles, twenty-five sub-obstacles, and strategies to reduce the barriers were identified. Primary and sub-barriers were assessed using the FAHP. The (FTOPSIS) approach was used to rank the strategies. Five SMEs in the United Arab Emirates are putting the suggested integrated decision model to the test. “Financial investment levels 0.646 to 11 percent growth level,” according to the FAHP, are the most significant hurdles to SMEs adopting green practices. This research demonstrated a considerable beneficial association between SMEs and financial development and funding in the United Arab Emirates. According to this study, using research methodologies to provide green innovation in SMEs is the best strategy to overcome green innovation and adoption hurdles in small and medium firms and increasing their economics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • African Development Indicators (1997) Africa region findings & Good practice infobriefs; No. 111. World Bank, Washington, DC. © World Bank

  • Alemzero DA, Iqbal N, Iqbal S, Mohsin M, Chukwuma NJ, Shah BA (2020a) Assessing the perceived impact of exploration and production of hydrocarbons on households perspective of environmental regulation in Ghana. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:5359–5371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10880-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alemzero DA, Sun H, Mohsin M, Iqbal N, Nadeem M, Vo XV (2020b) Assessing energy security in Africa based on multi-dimensional approach of principal composite analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:2158–2171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10554-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen O (1997) Internationalization and market entry mode: A review of theories and conceptual frameworks. MIR: Management International Review, pp 27–42

  • Andersen TF, Madsen M, Jørgensen J, Mellemkjoer L, Olsen JH (1999) The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. Dan Med Bull 46(3):263–268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aloise PG, Macke J (2017) Eco-innovations in developing countries: The case of Manaus Free Trade Zone (Brazil). J Clean Prod 168:30–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Arundel AV, Kemp R (2009) Measuring eco-innovation

  • Ashford NA (1993) Understanding technological responses of industrial firms to environmental problems: implications for government policy (chapter)

  • Awasthi A, Chauhan SS, Goyal SK (2010) A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. Int J Prod Econ 126:370–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Babar M, Arif F (2017) Smart urban planning using Big Data analytics to contend with the interoperability in Internet of Things. Future Gener Comput Syst 77:65–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliesner A, Liedtke C, Rohn H (2014) Resource efficiency and culture—workplace training for small and medium-sized enterprises. Sci Total Environ 481:645–648

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blok V, Long TB, Gaziulusoy AI, Ciliz N, Lozano R, Huisingh D, Csutora M, Boks C (2015) From best practices to bridges for a more sustainable future: advances and challenges in the transition to global sustainable production and consumption: introduction to the ERSCP stream of the Special volume. J Clean Prod 108:19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer S, Hoejmose S, Marchant K (2012) Environmental management in SME s in the UK: practices, pressures and perceived benefits. Bus Strateg Environ 21:423–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter CR, Rogers DS (2008) A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag

  • Cecere G, Corrocher N, Mancusi ML (2018) Financial constraints and public funding of eco-innovation: empirical evidence from European SMEs. Small Bus Econ:1–18

  • Chen Y-S, Lai S-B, Wen C-T (2006) The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. J Bus Ethics 67:331–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien F, Wang CN, Nguyen VT, Nguyen VT, Chau KY (2020) An evaluation model of quantitative and qualitative fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for hydroelectric plant location selection. Energies. 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112783

  • Chien F, Anwar A, Hsu CC, Sharif A, Razzaq A, Sinha A (2021a) The role of information and communication technology in encountering environmental degradation: proposing an SDG framework for the BRICS countries. Technol Soc 65:101587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien F, Chau KY, Ady SU, Zhang YQ, Tran QH, Aldeehani TM (2021b) Does the combining effects of energy and consideration of financial development lead to environmental burden: social perspective of energy finance? Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13423-6

  • Chien F, Pantamee AA, Hussain MS et al (2021c) Nexus between financial innovation and bankruptcy: evidence from information, communication and technology (ict) sector. Singap Econ Rev:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590821500181

  • Chien FS, Kamran HW, Albashar G, Iqbal W (2021d) Dynamic planning, conversion, and management strategy of different renewable energy sources: a sustainable solution for severe energy crises in emerging economies. Int J Hydrog Energy 46:7745–7758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chien FS, Sadiq M, Kamran HW, Nawaz MA, Hussain MS, Raza M (2021e) Co-movement of energy prices and stock market return: environmental wavelet nexus of COVID-19 pandemic from the USA, Europe, and China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12938-2

  • Christopoulos DK, Tsionas EG (2004) Financial development and economic growth: evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. J Dev Econ 73:55–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins E, Lawrence S, Pavlovich K, Ryan C (2007) Business networks and the uptake of sustainability practices: the case of New Zealand. J Clean Prod 15:729–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook P, Nixson F (2000) Finance and small and medium-sized enterprise development. Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Corral Á (2003) Local distributions and rate fluctuations in a unified scaling law for earthquakes. Phys Rev E 68(3)

  • Dangelico RM (2016) Green product innovation: where we are and where we are going. Bus Strateg Environ 25:560–576

    Google Scholar 

  • De Medeiros JF, Ribeiro JLD, Cortimiglia MN (2014) Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: a systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 65:76–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Río P, Carrillo-Hermosilla J, Könnölä T (2010) Policy strategies to promote eco-innovation: an integrated framework. J Ind Ecol 14:541–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhull S, Narwal M (2016) Drivers and barriers in green supply chain management adaptation: a state-of-art review. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag 4:61–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu KK (2018) Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy Environ 30(6):1065–1086

    Google Scholar 

  • Eltayeb TK, Zailani S, Ramayah T (2011) Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: investigating the outcomes. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:495–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney LS, Riding AL (1997) Business owners’ fundamental tradeoff: Finance and the vicious circle of growth and control. Canadian Business Owner, November

  • Govindan K, Kaliyan M, Kannan D, Haq AN (2014) Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 147:555–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan K, Muduli K, Devika K, Barve A (2016) Investigation of the influential strength of factors on adoption of green supply chain management practices: an Indian mining scenario. Resour Conserv Recycl 107:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta H, Barua MK (2017) Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. J Clean Prod 152:242–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta H, Barua MK (2018a) A framework to overcome barriers to green innovation in SMEs using BWM and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Sci Total Environ 633:122–139

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta H, Barua MK (2018b) A grey DEMATEL-based approach for modeling enablers of green innovation in manufacturing organizations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:9556–9578

    Google Scholar 

  • Han H, Trimi S (2018) A fuzzy TOPSIS method for performance evaluation of reverse logistics in social commerce platforms. Expert Syst Appl 103:133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanim Mohamad Zailani S, Eltayeb TK, Hsu C-C, Choon Tan K (2012) The impact of external institutional drivers and internal strategy on environmental performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 32:721–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan A, Paray BA, Hussain A, Qadir FA, Attar F, Aziz FM et al (2020) A review on the cleavage priming of the spike protein on coronavirus by angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 and furin. J Biomol Struct Dyn:1–9

  • Hillary R (2004) Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. J Clean Prod 12:561–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Horbach J, Rammer C, Rennings K (2012) Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact—the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecol Econ 78:112–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang SZ, Chau KY, Chien F, Shen H (2020) The impact of startups’ dual learning on their green innovation capability: the effects of business executives’ environmental awareness and environmental regulations. Sustain. 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166526

  • Jabbour CJC, Jugend D, de Sousa Jabbour ABL et al (2015) Green product development and performance of Brazilian firms: measuring the role of human and technical aspects. J Clean Prod 87:442–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinzhou W (2011) Discussion on the relationship between green technological innovation and system innovation. Energy Procedia 5:2352–2357

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone N, Hascic I (2008) Preliminary indicators of eco-innovation in selected environmental areas. ENV/EPOC/WPNEP (2008) 7, OECD, Paris

  • Jones P, Hillier D, Comfort D (2011) Shopping for tomorrow: promoting sustainable consumption within food stores. Br Food J 113:935–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan D, de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Jabbour CJC (2014) Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. Eur J Oper Res 233:432–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss B, Manchón CG, Neij L (2013) The role of policy instruments in supporting the development of mineral wool insulation in Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom. J Clean Prod 48:187–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar VCS, Mukherjee S, Harne PS, Subedi A, Ganapathy MK, Patthipati VS, Sapkota B (2020) Novelty in the gut: a systematic review and metaanalysis of the gastrointestinal manifestations of COVID-19. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 7(1):e000417

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusumawardani RP, Agintiara M (2015) Application of fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method for decision making in human resource manager selection process. Procedia Comput Sci 72:638–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai SB, Wen CT, Chen YS (2003) The exploration of the relationship between the environmental pressure and the corporate competitive advantage. In: Proceedings of the CSMOT Academic Conference, National Chiao Tung University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan

  • Lee V-H, Ooi K-B, Chong AY-L, Seow C (2014) Creating technological innovation via green supply chain management: an empirical analysis. Expert Syst Appl 41:6983–6994

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Hu Z, Shi V, Wang Q (2021a) Manufacturer’s encroachment strategy with substitutable green products. Int J Prod Econ 235:108102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Chien F, Hsu CC, Zhang YQ, Nawaz MA, Iqbal S, Mohsin M (2021b) Nexus between energy poverty and energy efficiency: estimating the long-run dynamics. Res Policy 72:102063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Chien F, Kamran HW, Aldeehani TM, Sadiq M, Nguyen VC, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2021c) The nexus between COVID-19 fear and stock market volatility. Econ Res Istraživanja:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2021.1914125

  • Li Y, Wang S, Xu T, Li J, Zhang Y, Xu T, Yang J (2021d) Novel designs for the reliability and safety of supercritical water oxidation process for sludge treatment. Process Saf Environ Prot 149:385–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.10.049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C-Y, Ho Y-H (2008) An empirical study on logistics service providers’ intention to adopt green innovations. J Technol Manag Innov 3:17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CP, Xian J, Li B, Huang H (2020) Transformational leadership and employees’ thriving at work: the mediating roles of challenge-hindrance stressors. Front Psychol 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01400

  • Longoni A, Golini R, Cagliano R (2014) The role of new forms of work organization in developing sustainability strategies in operations. Int J Prod Econ 147:147–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthra S, Mangla SK (2018) Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies. Process Saf Environ Prot 117:168–179

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lv X, Liu Y, Xu S, Li Q (2021) Welcoming host, cozy house? The impact of service attitude on sensory experience. Int J Hosp Manag 95:102949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madrid-Guijarro A, Garcia D, Van Auken H (2009) Barriers to innovation among Spanish manufacturing SMEs. J Small Bus Manag 47:465–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangla SK, Govindan K, Luthra S (2017) Prioritizing the barriers to achieve sustainable consumption and production trends in supply chains using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. J Clean Prod 151:509–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew D, Giles JR, Baxter AE, Oldridge DA, Greenplate AR, Wu JE et al (2020) Deep immune profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals distinct immunotypes with therapeutic implications. Science 369(6508)

  • Mathiyazhagan K, Govindan K, NoorulHaq A, Geng Y (2013) An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 47:283–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiyazhagan K, Govindan K, Noorul Haq A (2014) Pressure analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Res 52:188–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Matus KJM, Xiao X, Zimmerman JB (2012) Green chemistry and green engineering in China: drivers, policies and barriers to innovation. J Clean Prod 32:193–203

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mudgal RK, Shankar R, Talib P, Raj T (2010) Modelling the barriers of green supply chain practices: an Indian perspective. Int J Logist Syst Manag 7:81–107

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD Economic Studies (1997) https://doi.org/10.1787/16097491

  • OECD (2013) Economic Surveys 2013. https://doi.org/10.1787/19990820

  • OECD (2018) Economic Surveys 2018. https://doi.org/10.1787/19990820

  • Organization WH (2015) Trends in maternal mortality: 1990-2015: estimates from WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. World Health Organization

  • Perron GM (2005) Barriers to environmental performance improvements in Canadian SMEs. Dalhousie Univ Canada

  • Pinget A, Bocquet R, Mothe C (2015) Barriers to environmental innovation in SMEs: Empirical evidence from French firms. M@ n@ gement 18(2):132–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao P, Holt D (2005) Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? Int J Oper Prod Manag 25:898–916

    Google Scholar 

  • Revell A, Rutherfoord R (2003) UK environmental policy and the small firm: broadening the focus. Bus Strateg Environ 12:26–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Runhaar H, Tigchelaar C, Vermeulen WJV (2008) Environmental leaders: making a difference. A typology of environmental leaders and recommendations for a differentiated policy approach. Bus Strateg Environ 17:160–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel T (2017) Greener purchasing: opportunities and innovations. Routledge

  • Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1980) Hierarchical analysis of behavior in competition: Prediction in chess. Behav Sci 25(3):180–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2001) The decision by the US congress on China’s trade status: a multicriteria analysis. In: Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 305–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J, Zhu Q, Lai KH (2011) An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int J Prod Econ 130(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva MJ, Leitao J, Raposo M (2008) Barriers to innovation faced by manufacturing firms in Portugal: how to overcome it for fostering business excellence? Int J Bus Excell 1:92–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson M, Taylor N, Barker K (2004) Environmental responsibility in SMEs: does it deliver competitive advantage? Bus Strateg Environ 13:156–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Solazzo R, Donati M, Tomasi L, Arfini F (2016) How effective is greening policy in reducing GHG emissions from agriculture? Evidence from Italy. Sci Total Environ 573:1115–1124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Somsuk N, Laosirihongthong T (2017) Prioritization of applicable drivers for green supply chain management implementation toward sustainability in Thailand. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 24:175–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Pofoura AK, Adjei Mensah I, Li L, Mohsin M (2020) The role of environmental entrepreneurship for sustainable development: evidence from 35 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Sci Total Environ 741:140132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiep NC, Wang M, Mohsin M, Kamran HW, Yazdi FA (2021) An assessment of power sector reforms and utility performance to strengthen consumer self-confidence towards private investment. Econ Anal Policy 69:676–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourism and economy (2017). https://doi.org/https://u.ae/en/information-and-services/visiting-and-exploring-the-uae/travel-and-tourism

  • Turner TJ, Pearce LB, Goldin SM (1989) A superfusion system designed to measure release of radiolabeled neurotransmitters on a subsecond time scale. Anal Biochem 178(1):8–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Urban B, Naidoo R (2012) Business sustainability: empirical evidence on operational skills in SMEs in South Africa. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 19:146–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker H, Di Sisto L, McBain D (2008) Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: lessons from the public and private sectors. J Purch Supply Manag 14:69–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolman T, Veshagh A (2006) Designing support for manufacturing SMEs approaching ecodesign and cleaner production—learning from UK survey results. In: 13th CIRP conference on life cycle engineering, Leuven

  • World Bank (1998) https://doi.org/worldbank.org/handle/10986/9896

  • World Bank (2000) World Development Report 2000/2001. https://doi.org/http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11856

  • Xiong Z, Xiao N, Xu F, Zhang X, Xu Q, Zhang K, Ye C (2021) An Equivalent exchange based data forwarding incentive scheme for socially aware networks. J Signal Process Syst 93:249–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-020-01610-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan H, Wang Z, Shi Y, Hao J (2021) A dissipative structure theory-based investigation of a construction and demolition waste minimization system in China. J Environ Plan Manag:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1889484

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K (2012a) Green supply chain management innovation diffusion and its relationship to organizational improvement: an ecological modernization perspective. J Eng Technol Manag 29:168–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y, Wittmann X, Peng MW (2012b) Institution-based barriers to innovation in SMEs in China. Asia Pac J Manag 29:1131–1142

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available on request.

Funding

This research is partly funded by University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Finance and Accounting, Fuzhou University of International Studies and Trade, Fujian, 350202, China

    Fengsheng Chien & Ching-Chi Hsu

  2. Faculty of Business, City University of Macau, Macau, China

    Fengsheng Chien

  3. School of Government, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Quang-Thanh Ngo

  4. Faculty of International Tourism and Management, City University of Macau, Macau, China

    Ka Yin Chau

  5. Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China

    Robina Iram

Authors
  1. Fengsheng Chien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Quang-Thanh Ngo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ching-Chi Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ka Yin Chau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Robina Iram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Fengsheng Chien: conceptualization, data curation, methodology, writing—original draft. Quang-Thanh, Ngo: data curation, visualization. Ching-Chi Hsu: visualization, supervision, editing. Ka Yin Chau: review and editing. Robina Iram: writing—review and editing—and software. Fengsheng Chien: editing and reviewing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ching-Chi Hsu or Robina Iram.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

N/A

Consent for publication

We do not have any individual person’s data in any form.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chien, F., Ngo, QT., Hsu, CC. et al. Assessing the mechanism of barriers towards green finance and public spending in small and medium enterprises from developed countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 60495–60510 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14907-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14907-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation