Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trends in funding research and international collaboration on greenhouse gas emissions: a bibliometric approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Web of Science Core Collection platform was used to withdraw the papers included in this study. The studied period comprised from inception till 2018. Trends in research, journals of publication, subject areas of research, keywords most frequently used, countries of publication, international collaboration, and trends of funding research were also analyzed. A total of 3902 articles were published, most of them (52.5%) during the five-year period 2014–2018. The area with the highest number of papers was environmental sciences (41%), followed by energy fuels (16.6%) and engineering environmental (15.7%). "Nitrous oxide emissions" was the most frequent word, followed by "Carbon dioxide emissions" and "Methane emissions". Other words that stood out were "Life cycle assessment", "Climate change" and "Environmental impacts". The United States was the country with the highest productivity (27.9%), followed by China (12.8%) and the United Kingdom (9.6%). There was a concentration of research in recent years, as more than 80% of the papers were published in the last 10 years. The journals that published the largest number of publications were devoted mainly to environmental studies (sciences and engineering), sustainable and green science and technology, energy and fuels, economics, and agriculture. Half of the works were published in Europe and the other half between North America and Asia. Two thirds of the works (67%) were financed compared to a third that were not financed. The percentage of funded works has been increasing over the last decade, which is seen as an indication of the importance of GHGE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleixandre-Benavent R, Aleixandre-Tudó JL, Castelló-Cogollos L, Aleixandre JL (2017) Trends in scientific research on climate change in agriculture and forestry subject areas (2005-2014). J Clean Prod 147:406–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleixandre-Tudó JL, Bolaños-Pizarro M, Aleixandre JL, Aleixandre-Benavent R (2019a) Current trends in scientific research on global warming: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Global Warming 17:142–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleixandre-Tudó JL, Castelló-Cogollos L, Aleixandre JL, Aleixandre-Benavent R (2019b) Renewable energies: worldwide trends in research, funding and international collaboration. Renew Energy 139:268–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aznar-Sanchez JA, Belmonte-Urena LJ, Velasco-Munoz JF, Manzano-Agugliaro F (2018) Economic analysis of sustainable water use: a review of worldwide research. J Clean Prod 198:1120–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batagelj V, Mrvar A (2002) Analysis and visualization of large networks. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2265:477e478

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden TA, Marland G, Andres RJ (2017) National CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel burning, cement manufacture, and gas flaring: 1751–2014. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy. https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/00001_V2017

  • Chavarro D, Rafols I, Tang P (2018) To what extent is inclusion in the Web of Science an indicator of journal 'quality'? Res Evaluat 27:106–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung JW, Meltzer DO (2009) Estimate of the carbon footprint of the US Health Care sector. J Am Med Assoc 302:1970–1972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dalpe R (2002) Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology. Scientometrics 55:189e213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer L, Forsyth P, Spurr R, Hoque S (2010) Estimating the carbon footprint of Australian tourism. J Sustain Tour 18:355–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodman D (2009) Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Environ Urban 21:185–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englade AJ, Jin G (2006) Application of biotechnology in waste management for sustainable development: an overview. Manage Environ Qual Int J 17:467–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside PM (2000) Global warming and tropical land-use change: greenhouse gas emissions from biomass burning, decomposition and soils in forest conversion, shifting cultivation and secondary vegetation. Clim Chang 46:115–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa JD, Fout T, Plasynski S, Mellvried H, Srivastava RD (2008) Advances in CO2 capture technology—the US Department of Energy´s Carbon Sequestration Program. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2:9–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gingras Y, Khelfaoui M (2018) Assessing the effect of the United States “citation advantage” on other countries' scientific impact as measured in the Web of Science (WoS) database. Scientometrics 114:517–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goek A, Rigby J, Shapira P (2016) The impact of research funding on scientific outputs: evidence from six smaller European countries. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 67:715–730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hache E, Palle A (2019) Renewable energy source integration into power networks, research trends and policy implications: a bibliometric and research actors survey analysis. Energy Policy 124:23–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haunnschild R, Bornmann L, Marx V (2016) Climate change research in view of bibliometrics. PLoS One 11:1e19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwich EG, Peters GP (2009) Carbon footprint of Nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. Environ Sci Technol 43:6414–6420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Husain S, Mushtaq M (2015) Research assessment of climate change data: a scientometric construct. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries Special Issue 183e194

  • IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectorial aspects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA, pp 1-32

  • Iribarren D, Vázquez-Rowe I, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo T (2010) Estimation of the carbon footprint of the Galician fishing activity (NW Spain). Sci Total Environ 408:5284–5294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob BA, Lefgren L (2011) The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. J Public Econ 95(9-10):1168–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacis AA, Schmidt GA, Rind D, Ruedy RA (2010) Atmospheric CO2: principal control knob governing earth´s temperature. Science 330:356–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KH (2011) Integrating carbon footprint into supply chain management: the case of Hunday Motor Company in the automobile industry. J Clean Prod 19:1216–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff L, Wagner C, Bornmann L (2014) The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: competition and collaborations. J Inf Secur 8:606–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Martin A, Orduna-Malea E, Lopez-Cozar E (2018) Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison. Scientometrics 116:2175–2188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA, Washington WM, Collins WD, Arblaster JM, Hu A, Buja LE, Strand WG, Teng H (2005) How much more global warming and sea level rise? Science 307:1769–1772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKain K, Wofsy SC, Nehrkorn T, Eluszkiewicz J, Ehleringer JR, Stephen BB (2012) Assessment of ground-based atmospheric observations for verification of greenhouse gas emissions from an urban region. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:8423–8428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meinshausen M, Meinshausen N, Hare W, Raper SCB, Frieler K, Knutti R, Frame DJ, Allen MR (2009) Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 degrees C. Nature 458(7242):1158–1162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A (2016) The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics 106:213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosier A, Kroeze C, Nevison C, Oenema O, Seitzinger S, van Cleemput O (1998) Closing the global N(2)O budget: nitrous oxide emissions through the agricultural nitrogen cycle—OECD/IPCC/IEA phase II development of IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventory methodology. Nut Cycling Agroeco 52:225–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penela AC, García-Negro MC, Quesada JLD (2009) A methodological proposal for corporate carbon footprint and its application to a wine-producing company in Galicia. Sustainability 1:302–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paris Agreement (2015) Adopted at the XXI international conference on climate change (COP21) in December 2015

  • Parsons D (2009) The environmental impact of engineering education in Australia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul-Hus A, Desrochers N, Costas R (2016) Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in Web of Science. Scientometrics 108:167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patz JA, Grabow ML, Limaye VS (2014) When it rains, it pours: future climate extremes and health. Ann Global Health 80:332–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raper S, Braithwaite RJ (2006) Low sea level rise projections from mountain glaciers and icecaps under global warming. Nature 439:311–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riahi K, Rao S, Krey V, Cho CH, Chirkov V, Fischer G, Kindermann G, Nakicenovic N, Rafaj P (2011) RCP 8.5-A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Clim Chang 109:33–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu TH (2008) Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from and-use change. Science 319(5867):1238–1240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder CS, Bruulsema TW, Jensen TL, Fixen PE (2009) Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agric Ecosyst Environ 133:247–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samaras C, Meisterling K (2008) Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. Environ Sci Technol 42:3170–3176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shine KP, Fuglestvedt JS, Hailemariam K, Stuber N (2005) Alternatives to the global warming potential for comparing climate impacts of emissions of greenhouse gases. Clim Chang 68:281–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Zhao TZ (2013) A bibliometric analysis of global forest ecology research during 2002–2011. Springerplus 2:204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (2019) Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data. Accessed 11/07/2019. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data#Country.

  • van Vuuren DP, Hoogwijk M, Barker T, Riahi K, Boeters S, Chateau J, Scrieciu S, van Vliet J, Masui T, Blok K, Blomen E, Kram T (2009) Comparison of top-down and bottom-up estimates of sectoral and regional greenhouse gas emissions reduction potentials. Energy Policy 37(12):5125–5139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock J, Edwards P, Tonne C, Armstrong BG, Ashiru O, Banister D, Beevers S, Chalabi Z, Chowdhury Z, Cohen A, Franco OH, Haines A, Hickman R, Lindsay G, Mittal I, Mohan D, Tiwari G, Woodward A, Roberts I (2009) Health and Climate Change 2 Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport. Lancet 374(9705):1930–1943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan E, Wu C, Song M (2018) The funding factor: a cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact. Scientometrics 115:369–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Chen Z, Xiong Z, Liu Y, Ying X (2015) Comparison study of landfill gas emissions from subtropical landfill with various phases: a case study in Wuhan, China. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 65:980–986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Chen Z, Liu T, Gong Z, Yu Y, Wang J (2013) Global trends of solid waste research from 1997 to 2011 by using bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 96:133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Smith KR, Ma Y, Ye S, Jiang F, Qi W, Liu P, Khalil MAK, Rasmussen RA, Thorneloe SA (2000) Greenhouse gases and other airborne pollutants from household stoves in China: a database for emission factors. Atmos Environ 34:4537–4549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JLAT was the project leader. LCC was responsible of the statistical treatment. JLA searched and reviewed the literature. RAB wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Luis Aleixandre.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aleixandre-Tudó, J.L., Castelló-Cogollos, L., Aleixandre, J.L. et al. Trends in funding research and international collaboration on greenhouse gas emissions: a bibliometric approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 32330–32346 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12776-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12776-2

Keywords

Navigation