Abstract
We examine the relative performance of the industry, services, and agriculture sectors in energy conservation and reduction in CO2 emissions in Pakistan using the “spatial-temporal decomposition” method by taken data from 2006 to 2016. An efficient way to achieve low-carbon economy targets is to decompose different factors contributing to CO2 emissions, including structure effect, intensity effect, GDP gap effect, energy use efficiency effect, and economic efficiency. We classify economic sectors into three groups based on performance, i.e., sectors performing below, average, and above-average performing. Our results indicate that the economic efficiency and energy use efficiency effects in the industry sector have remained above average. In contrast, the GDP gap effect has remained below average. In the case of structure effect and intensity effect, the agriculture sector has performed on average. In contrast, the service sector has shown mixed results in all factors. The government should pay special attention to energy use structure and innovation to improve desirable output technical efficiency to achieve the target carbon emission level.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data and replication files are available on request from the corresponding author.
Notes
References
Álvarez IC, Barbero J, Zofío JL (2016) A spatial autoregressive panel model to analyze road network spillovers on production. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 93:83–92
Ang BW, Xu XY, Su B (2015) Multi-country comparisons of energy performance: the index decomposition analysis approach. Energy Econ 47:68–76
Ang BW, Su B, Wang H (2016) A spatial–temporal decomposition approach to performance assessment in energy and emissions. Energy Econ 60:112–121
Anselin L (2013) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Springer Science & Business Media
Auffhammer M, Carson RT (2008) Forecasting the path of China’s CO2 emissions using province-level information. J Environ Econ Manag 55:229–247
Awan HS, Samad G, Faraz N (2019) Electricity subsidies and welfare analysis in Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan
Bartoletto S, Rubio MM (2008) Energy transition and CO2 emissions in Southern Europe: Italy and Spain (1861-2000). Glob Environ 1:46–81
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444
Chen L, Duan Q (2016) Decomposition analysis of factors driving CO 2 emissions in Chinese provinces based on production-theoretical decomposition analysis. Nat Hazards 84:267–277
Chen Z, Haynes KE (2015a) Spatial impact of transportation infrastructure: a spatial econometric CGE approach. In: Regional Science Matters. Springer, pp 163–186
Chen Z, Haynes KE (2015b) Multilevel assessment of public transportation infrastructure: a spatial econometric computable general equilibrium approach. Ann Reg Sci 54:663–685
Chen L, Yang Z (2015) A spatio-temporal decomposition analysis of energy-related CO2 emission growth in China. J Clean Prod 103:49–60
Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51:229–240
Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer Science & Business Media
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2006) Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: with DEA-solver software and references. Springer Science & Business Media
Du K, Xie C, Ouyang X (2017) A comparison of carbon dioxide (CO2) emission trends among provinces in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 73:19–25
Eckstein D, Künzel V, Schäfer L, Winges M (2019) Global climate risk index 2020. Bonn
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK, Pasurka C (1989) Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. Rev Econ Stat:90–98
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84:66–83
Geng Y, Zhao H, Liu Z et al (2013) Exploring driving factors of energy-related CO2 emissions in Chinese provinces: a case of Liaoning. Energy Policy 60:820–826
Gingrich S, Kušková P, Steinberger JK (2011) Long-term changes in CO2 emissions in Austria and Czechoslovakia—identifying the drivers of environmental pressures. Energy Policy 39:535–543
IPCC IP on CC (2019) Global warming of 1.5 °C: an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change. Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change
Iqbal N, Nawaz S (2020) Cash transfers and residential demand for electricity: insights from BISP, Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res
Iqbal N, Khan SJI, Irfan M (2008) Democracy autocracy and macroeconomic performance in Pakistan. Kashmir Econ Rev 17:61–88
Kim T, Dall’erba S (2014) Spatio-temporal association of fossil fuel CO2 emissions from crop production across US counties. Agric Ecosyst Environ 183:69–77
Kim K, Kim Y (2012) International comparison of industrial CO2 emission trends and the energy efficiency paradox utilizing production-based decomposition. Energy Econ 34:1724–1741
Kwon DS, Cho JH, Sohn SY (2017) Comparison of technology efficiency for CO2 emissions reduction among European countries based on DEA with decomposed factors. J Clean Prod 151:109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.065
Le Sage JP (2014) What regional scientists need to know about spatial econometrics. Rev Reg Stud 44:13–32
Le Sage JP, Pace RK (2010) Spatial econometric models. In: Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer, pp 355–376
Lin B, Du K (2015) Energy and CO2 emissions performance in China’s regional economies: do market-oriented reforms matter? Energy Policy 78:113–124
Liu B, Li Y, Hou R, Wang H (2019) Assessing the drivers of China’s CO2 emissions based on PDA. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1598369
Malik S, Qasim M, Saeed H et al (2020) Energy security in Pakistan: perspectives and policy implications from a quantitative analysis. Energy Policy 144:111552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111552
Nawaz S, Iqbal N (2020a) The impact of unconditional cash transfer on fuel choices among ultra-poor in Pakistan: quasi-experimental evidence from the Benazir Income Support Program. Energy Policy 142:111535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111535
Nawaz S, Iqbal N (2020b) How cash transfers program affects environmental poverty among ultra-poor? Insights from the BISP in Pakistan. Energy Policy 148:111978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111978
Nawaz S, Mangla IU (2018) The economic geography of infrastructure in Asia: the role of institutions and regional integration. In: 34th AGM & Conference on the “Pakistan’s Economy: The Way Forward.” Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE), 12th - 14th December, 2018, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp 1–35
Nawaz S, Iqbal N, Anwar S (2013) Electricity demand in Pakistan: a nonlinear estimation. Pak Dev Rev 52:479–492
Nawaz S, Iqbal N, Anwar S (2014) Modelling electricity demand using the STAR (Smooth Transition Auto-Regressive) model in Pakistan. Energy 78:535–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.040
Pasurka C (2006) Decomposing electric power plant emissions within a joint production framework. Energy Econ 28:26–43
Schipper L, Cordeiro M, Ng W-S (2007) Measuring the carbon dioxide impacts of urban transport projects in developing countries. In: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board Conference. Washington
Su B, Ang BW (2012) Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: some methodological developments. Energy Econ 34:177–188
Su B, Ang BW (2014) Input–output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: a multi-region model for China. Appl Energy 114:377–384
Su B, Ang BW (2017) Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of aggregate embodied energy and emission intensities. Energy Econ 65:137–147
Su B, Ang BW, Li Y (2019) Structural path and decomposition analysis of aggregate embodied energy and emission intensities. Energy Econ 83:345–360
Sun J (1998) Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: a complete decomposition model. Energy Econ 20:85–100
Sun JW, Ang BW (2000) Some properties of an exact energy decomposition model. Energy 25:1177–1188
Tian X, Chang M, Tanikawa H et al (2013) Structural decomposition analysis of the carbonization process in Beijing: a regional explanation of rapid increasing carbon dioxide emission in China. Energy Policy 53:279–286
Tong T, T-HE Y, Cho S-H et al (2013) Evaluating the spatial spillover effects of transportation infrastructure on agricultural output across the United States. J Transp Geogr 30:47–55
Wang Y, Zhao T (2015) Impacts of energy-related CO2 emissions: evidence from under developed, developing and highly developed regions in China. Ecol Indic 50:186–195
Wang H, Zhou P (2018) Multi-country comparisons of CO2 emission intensity: the production-theoretical decomposition analysis approach. Energy Econ 74:310–320
Wang Q, Chiu Y-H, Chiu C-R (2015) Driving factors behind carbon dioxide emissions in China: a modified production-theoretical decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 51:252–260
Wang Y, Zhang C, Lu A et al (2017) A disaggregated analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve for industrial CO2 emissions in China. Appl Energy 190:172–180
Wang Q, Hang Y, Su B, Zhou P (2018) Contributions to sector-level carbon intensity change: an integrated decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 70:12–25
Wang H, Zhou P, Xie B-C, Zhang N (2019) Assessing drivers of CO2 emissions in China’s electricity sector: a metafrontier production-theoretical decomposition analysis. Eur J Oper Res 275:1096–1107
You W, Lv Z (2018) Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: a spatial panel approach. Energy Econ 73:248–257
Zhang M, Mu H, Ning Y (2009) Accounting for energy-related CO2 emission in China, 1991–2006. Energy Policy 37:767–773
Zhang M, Liu X, Wang W, Zhou M (2013) Decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions from electricity generation in China. Energy Policy 52:159–165
Zhou P, Ang BW (2008a) Decomposition of aggregate CO2 emissions: a production-theoretical approach. Energy Econ 30:1054–1067
Zhou P, Ang BW (2008b) Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance. Energy Policy 36:2911–2916
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to anonymous referees for their valuable inputs to improve the quality of the article. The view presented in the article is those of the authors. The authors are responsible for any errors.
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to this work:
• Muhammad Azam contributed to the article by contextualizing the idea and developing an initial draft.
• Saima Nawaz contributed to the article by conceptualization study and doing a literature review.
• Zubair Rafiq collected the data for empirical analysis, solves the mathematical model, and performs analysis.
• Nasir Iqbal finalized the article and explains the results and policy implications with the conclusion.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Azam, M., Nawaz, S., Rafiq, Z. et al. A spatial-temporal decomposition of carbon emission intensity: a sectoral level analysis in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 21381–21395 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12088-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12088-x