Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A spatial-temporal decomposition of carbon emission intensity: a sectoral level analysis in Pakistan

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the relative performance of the industry, services, and agriculture sectors in energy conservation and reduction in CO2 emissions in Pakistan using the “spatial-temporal decomposition” method by taken data from 2006 to 2016. An efficient way to achieve low-carbon economy targets is to decompose different factors contributing to CO2 emissions, including structure effect, intensity effect, GDP gap effect, energy use efficiency effect, and economic efficiency. We classify economic sectors into three groups based on performance, i.e., sectors performing below, average, and above-average performing. Our results indicate that the economic efficiency and energy use efficiency effects in the industry sector have remained above average. In contrast, the GDP gap effect has remained below average. In the case of structure effect and intensity effect, the agriculture sector has performed on average. In contrast, the service sector has shown mixed results in all factors. The government should pay special attention to energy use structure and innovation to improve desirable output technical efficiency to achieve the target carbon emission level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data and replication files are available on request from the corresponding author.

Notes

  1. https://knoema.com/atlas/Pakistan/CO2-emissions-per-capita

  2. The DEA is a nonparametric method in investigating productivity and carrying out economic efficiency measurements. For further details on DEA method, see Charnes et al. (1978), Färe et al. (1994), Coelli et al. (2005), and Cooper et al. (2006)

References

  • Álvarez IC, Barbero J, Zofío JL (2016) A spatial autoregressive panel model to analyze road network spillovers on production. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 93:83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang BW, Xu XY, Su B (2015) Multi-country comparisons of energy performance: the index decomposition analysis approach. Energy Econ 47:68–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang BW, Su B, Wang H (2016) A spatial–temporal decomposition approach to performance assessment in energy and emissions. Energy Econ 60:112–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (2013) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Auffhammer M, Carson RT (2008) Forecasting the path of China’s CO2 emissions using province-level information. J Environ Econ Manag 55:229–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Awan HS, Samad G, Faraz N (2019) Electricity subsidies and welfare analysis in Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoletto S, Rubio MM (2008) Energy transition and CO2 emissions in Southern Europe: Italy and Spain (1861-2000). Glob Environ 1:46–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Duan Q (2016) Decomposition analysis of factors driving CO 2 emissions in Chinese provinces based on production-theoretical decomposition analysis. Nat Hazards 84:267–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Haynes KE (2015a) Spatial impact of transportation infrastructure: a spatial econometric CGE approach. In: Regional Science Matters. Springer, pp 163–186

  • Chen Z, Haynes KE (2015b) Multilevel assessment of public transportation infrastructure: a spatial econometric computable general equilibrium approach. Ann Reg Sci 54:663–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Yang Z (2015) A spatio-temporal decomposition analysis of energy-related CO2 emission growth in China. J Clean Prod 103:49–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51:229–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2006) Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: with DEA-solver software and references. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Du K, Xie C, Ouyang X (2017) A comparison of carbon dioxide (CO2) emission trends among provinces in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 73:19–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein D, Künzel V, Schäfer L, Winges M (2019) Global climate risk index 2020. Bonn

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK, Pasurka C (1989) Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. Rev Econ Stat:90–98

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84:66–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng Y, Zhao H, Liu Z et al (2013) Exploring driving factors of energy-related CO2 emissions in Chinese provinces: a case of Liaoning. Energy Policy 60:820–826

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich S, Kušková P, Steinberger JK (2011) Long-term changes in CO2 emissions in Austria and Czechoslovakia—identifying the drivers of environmental pressures. Energy Policy 39:535–543

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC IP on CC (2019) Global warming of 1.5 °C: an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change. Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change

  • Iqbal N, Nawaz S (2020) Cash transfers and residential demand for electricity: insights from BISP, Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res

  • Iqbal N, Khan SJI, Irfan M (2008) Democracy autocracy and macroeconomic performance in Pakistan. Kashmir Econ Rev 17:61–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim T, Dall’erba S (2014) Spatio-temporal association of fossil fuel CO2 emissions from crop production across US counties. Agric Ecosyst Environ 183:69–77

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Kim Y (2012) International comparison of industrial CO2 emission trends and the energy efficiency paradox utilizing production-based decomposition. Energy Econ 34:1724–1741

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon DS, Cho JH, Sohn SY (2017) Comparison of technology efficiency for CO2 emissions reduction among European countries based on DEA with decomposed factors. J Clean Prod 151:109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le Sage JP (2014) What regional scientists need to know about spatial econometrics. Rev Reg Stud 44:13–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Sage JP, Pace RK (2010) Spatial econometric models. In: Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer, pp 355–376

  • Lin B, Du K (2015) Energy and CO2 emissions performance in China’s regional economies: do market-oriented reforms matter? Energy Policy 78:113–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Li Y, Hou R, Wang H (2019) Assessing the drivers of China’s CO2 emissions based on PDA. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1598369

  • Malik S, Qasim M, Saeed H et al (2020) Energy security in Pakistan: perspectives and policy implications from a quantitative analysis. Energy Policy 144:111552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz S, Iqbal N (2020a) The impact of unconditional cash transfer on fuel choices among ultra-poor in Pakistan: quasi-experimental evidence from the Benazir Income Support Program. Energy Policy 142:111535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz S, Iqbal N (2020b) How cash transfers program affects environmental poverty among ultra-poor? Insights from the BISP in Pakistan. Energy Policy 148:111978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz S, Mangla IU (2018) The economic geography of infrastructure in Asia: the role of institutions and regional integration. In: 34th AGM & Conference on the “Pakistan’s Economy: The Way Forward.” Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE), 12th - 14th December, 2018, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp 1–35

  • Nawaz S, Iqbal N, Anwar S (2013) Electricity demand in Pakistan: a nonlinear estimation. Pak Dev Rev 52:479–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz S, Iqbal N, Anwar S (2014) Modelling electricity demand using the STAR (Smooth Transition Auto-Regressive) model in Pakistan. Energy 78:535–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasurka C (2006) Decomposing electric power plant emissions within a joint production framework. Energy Econ 28:26–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper L, Cordeiro M, Ng W-S (2007) Measuring the carbon dioxide impacts of urban transport projects in developing countries. In: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board Conference. Washington

  • Su B, Ang BW (2012) Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: some methodological developments. Energy Econ 34:177–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Su B, Ang BW (2014) Input–output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: a multi-region model for China. Appl Energy 114:377–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Su B, Ang BW (2017) Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of aggregate embodied energy and emission intensities. Energy Econ 65:137–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Su B, Ang BW, Li Y (2019) Structural path and decomposition analysis of aggregate embodied energy and emission intensities. Energy Econ 83:345–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun J (1998) Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: a complete decomposition model. Energy Econ 20:85–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun JW, Ang BW (2000) Some properties of an exact energy decomposition model. Energy 25:1177–1188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian X, Chang M, Tanikawa H et al (2013) Structural decomposition analysis of the carbonization process in Beijing: a regional explanation of rapid increasing carbon dioxide emission in China. Energy Policy 53:279–286

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tong T, T-HE Y, Cho S-H et al (2013) Evaluating the spatial spillover effects of transportation infrastructure on agricultural output across the United States. J Transp Geogr 30:47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Zhao T (2015) Impacts of energy-related CO2 emissions: evidence from under developed, developing and highly developed regions in China. Ecol Indic 50:186–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Zhou P (2018) Multi-country comparisons of CO2 emission intensity: the production-theoretical decomposition analysis approach. Energy Econ 74:310–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Chiu Y-H, Chiu C-R (2015) Driving factors behind carbon dioxide emissions in China: a modified production-theoretical decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 51:252–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Zhang C, Lu A et al (2017) A disaggregated analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve for industrial CO2 emissions in China. Appl Energy 190:172–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Hang Y, Su B, Zhou P (2018) Contributions to sector-level carbon intensity change: an integrated decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 70:12–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Zhou P, Xie B-C, Zhang N (2019) Assessing drivers of CO2 emissions in China’s electricity sector: a metafrontier production-theoretical decomposition analysis. Eur J Oper Res 275:1096–1107

    Google Scholar 

  • You W, Lv Z (2018) Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: a spatial panel approach. Energy Econ 73:248–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Mu H, Ning Y (2009) Accounting for energy-related CO2 emission in China, 1991–2006. Energy Policy 37:767–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Liu X, Wang W, Zhou M (2013) Decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions from electricity generation in China. Energy Policy 52:159–165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou P, Ang BW (2008a) Decomposition of aggregate CO2 emissions: a production-theoretical approach. Energy Econ 30:1054–1067

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou P, Ang BW (2008b) Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance. Energy Policy 36:2911–2916

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to anonymous referees for their valuable inputs to improve the quality of the article. The view presented in the article is those of the authors. The authors are responsible for any errors.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work:

• Muhammad Azam contributed to the article by contextualizing the idea and developing an initial draft.

• Saima Nawaz contributed to the article by conceptualization study and doing a literature review.

• Zubair Rafiq collected the data for empirical analysis, solves the mathematical model, and performs analysis.

• Nasir Iqbal finalized the article and explains the results and policy implications with the conclusion.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nasir Iqbal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 6
figure 6

Procedure to select reference region

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azam, M., Nawaz, S., Rafiq, Z. et al. A spatial-temporal decomposition of carbon emission intensity: a sectoral level analysis in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 21381–21395 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12088-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12088-x

Keywords

Navigation